Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| UK REC Ref: 08/H0724/24 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The randomised controlled trial will be carried out on patients that require a total hip replacement (THR) to reduce pain and restore their function. One way of fixing the hip joint to the bone is by coating the implant to encourage the body to grow bone onto the replacement hip. This study is aiming to find out whether the new (Bonemaster) coating allows increased bony growth onto the cup when compared to the usual (plasma-sprayed) coating. This may reduce the incidence of early failures due to poor bony attachment, which is a well known complication for early failure of total hip replacements.
The study will compare two different types of coating (BoneMaster and Plasma-sprayed) on the cup of the replacement hip. Density of the bone immediately surrounding the cup will be observed to see if there are differences between the two groups. The density of bone will be measured using standard x-ray assessment and in a smaller sample of 14 patients, using a special scan called Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA Scan). Functional comparisons will be assessed through clinical scores.
The patients will be identified by the orthopaedic surgeon in the orthopaedic clinic and deemed suitable for the study if all inclusion and exclusion criteria are met. 210 patients will be recruited to the study and each patient will be randomised into either of the groups allowing 105 patients into each group. Patients will be followed up at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after the surgery. All patients will have radiographic assessments at these follow-up intervals, as well as Harris Hip, Oxford Hip and Womac scores. This will allow comparison of the two groups.
The BoneMaster coating has been extensively tested in cell and animal studies and has been evaluated in one previous clinical study and showed favorable results. Further investigation is required to ensure the new coating may enhance bony growth allowing better fixation of the hips in the early period after the operation and also over a longer period of time. The growth needs to be measured using a more sensitive scan than radiographic assessment alone, called DEXA which was also used in the previous study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plasma-sprayed shell | Active Comparator | Exceed ABT plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coated acetabular cup. |
|
| BoneMaster coated shell | Experimental | Exceed ABT BoneMaster hydroxyapatite coated acetabular cup. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BoneMaster coated acetabular shell. | Device | Bonemaster coated Exceed Acetabular Shell |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Record and Measure Bone Density Using DEXA Scans at 24 Months. | DEXA scan cohort - DEXA scan was used to measure bone density. Below is the calculated net average bone mineral density (BMD) percentage change from baseline at 2 years. | 2 years. |
| Radiography to Determine Radiolucency in All Three DeLee & Charnley Zones of the Acetabulum. | 34 patient cases without duplicated data were the basis for the radiographic analysis that was conducted: Bonemaster group, n = 12; Plasma-Sprayed group, n = 22. The degree of osseous-fixation was determined by grading: 1-2 mm radiolucencies, classed as not fixated; >2mm radiolucencies, classed as unstable. | 2 years. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Secondary Outcomes Are Functional Assessment Using Harris Hip Score | Modified Harris Hip Score, total score 0-100. A score of <70 is poor, 70-79 is fair, 80-89 is good, 90-100 is excellent. | 2 years |
| Secondary Outcomes Are Clinical Assessment Using Oxford Hip Score |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Helmut ZAHN | William Harvey Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William Harvey Hospital | Ashford | Kent | TN24 0LZ | United Kingdom |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Plasma-sprayed Shell | Exceed ABT plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coated acetabular cup. Plasma Coated Acetabular Shell: Plasma HA coated Exceed Acetabular Shell |
| FG001 | BoneMaster Coated Shell | Exceed ABT BoneMaster hydroxyapatite coated acetabular cup. BoneMaster coated acetabular shell.: Bonemaster coated Exceed Acetabular Shell |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Plasma-sprayed Shell | Exceed ABT plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coated acetabular cup. Plasma Coated Acetabular Shell: Plasma HA coated Exceed Acetabular Shell |
| BG001 | BoneMaster Coated Shell |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Record and Measure Bone Density Using DEXA Scans at 24 Months. | DEXA scan cohort - DEXA scan was used to measure bone density. Below is the calculated net average bone mineral density (BMD) percentage change from baseline at 2 years. | DEXA scan cohort: Bonemaster group, n = 7; Plasma-Sprayed group, n = 7 | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Net average BMD %change from baseline | 2 years. |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Plasma-sprayed Shell | Exceed ABT plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coated acetabular cup. Plasma Coated Acetabular Shell: Plasma HA coated Exceed Acetabular Shell |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Death | General disorders | Patient Deaths that were reported over the course of the study; considered SAE |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardiovascular - stroke | Cardiac disorders |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical Project Lead | Zimmer Biomet | Maggie.Shen@zimmerbiomet.com |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Plasma Coated Acetabular Shell | Device | Plasma HA coated Exceed Acetabular Shell |
|
|
Oxford Hip Score, scored 12-60. The Oxford hip score - this score was based on the original publication where each answer gives a score of 1-5. A score of 1 for each question, represented best outcome/least symptoms. Therefore a total score of 12 was the best overall outcome. |
| 2 years. |
| Secondary Outcomes Are Clinical Assessment Using WOMAC Hip Score | Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Hip Score, Each question is scored on a scale of 0 (best health state) to 4 (worst health state); total WOMAC hip score, 0 being the best and 96 being the worst. | 2 years |
Exceed ABT BoneMaster hydroxyapatite coated acetabular cup.
BoneMaster coated acetabular shell.: Bonemaster coated Exceed Acetabular Shell
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Secondary Outcomes Are Functional Assessment Using Harris Hip Score | Modified Harris Hip Score, total score 0-100. A score of <70 is poor, 70-79 is fair, 80-89 is good, 90-100 is excellent. | 2 years post-op | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | 2 years |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Secondary Outcomes Are Clinical Assessment Using Oxford Hip Score | Oxford Hip Score, scored 12-60. The Oxford hip score - this score was based on the original publication where each answer gives a score of 1-5. A score of 1 for each question, represented best outcome/least symptoms. Therefore a total score of 12 was the best overall outcome. | 2 years post-op | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | 2 years. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Secondary Outcomes Are Clinical Assessment Using WOMAC Hip Score | Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Hip Score, Each question is scored on a scale of 0 (best health state) to 4 (worst health state); total WOMAC hip score, 0 being the best and 96 being the worst. | 2 years post-op | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a Scale | 2 years |
|
|
|
| Primary | Radiography to Determine Radiolucency in All Three DeLee & Charnley Zones of the Acetabulum. | 34 patient cases without duplicated data were the basis for the radiographic analysis that was conducted: Bonemaster group, n = 12; Plasma-Sprayed group, n = 22. The degree of osseous-fixation was determined by grading: 1-2 mm radiolucencies, classed as not fixated; >2mm radiolucencies, classed as unstable. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 2 years. |
|
|
|
| 1 |
| 82 |
| 5 |
| 82 |
| EG001 | BoneMaster Coated Shell | Exceed ABT BoneMaster hydroxyapatite coated acetabular cup. BoneMaster coated acetabular shell.: Bonemaster coated Exceed Acetabular Shell | 2 | 85 | 10 | 85 |
| Dislocation | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders |
|
| Fractured pelvis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders |
|
| Fall - patient confused | General disorders |
|
| Urogenital adverse event with diarrhoea | Renal and urinary disorders |
|
| Urogenital | Renal and urinary disorders |
|
| Stomach cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) |
|
| Respiratory problems post-op; has COPD | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders |
|
| Antibiotics given imm post-op | General disorders | Unknown if this was related to infection or other condition. No further information available. |
|
| 2 units of blood given post-op | Blood and lymphatic system disorders |
|
| Pulmonary | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders |
|
| Fall - soft tissue injury | General disorders |
|
| Hernia | General disorders |
|
| Non-traumatic bruising | General disorders |
|
| Needs scar revised | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders |
|
Not provided
Not provided