Modified Constrained - Induced Movement Therapy Compared to Intensive Bimanual Training for Subacute Stroke Patients. A Randomized Controlled Trial
Modified Constrained - Induced Movement Therapy Compared to Intensive Bimanual Training for Subacute Stroke Patients. A Randomized Controlled Trial
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the benefit of two different treatment approaches for the hemiplegic arm, modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and task-related bimanual training.
Detailed description:
Constrained-Induced Movement Therapy seems to be an efficacious treatment approach for a certain subgroup of patients with moderate to mild hemiparesis after stroke. Still it remains unclear whether the training intensity or restriction of the better arm plays the bigger role. CIMT or mCIMT is usually compared to standard care of lower intensity with no constraint of the better arm, or other treatments that do not focus on functional (task-specific) training for the hemiplegic arm. Bimanual training, implying training of activities requiring use of both arms, may however, be even more effective than mCIMT, provided that the training is of similar intensity. The purposes of this study are:
Patients in both groups will participate in a 4 week training program, either mCIMT or bimanual. In both groups cognitive techniques will be used to increase adherence. The patients will be examined when screening, before and after the intervention, and 3 months after completed intervention.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: