Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of the Pacific | OTHER |
| American Physical Therapy Association | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to determine changes in the brain associated with improvement in ankle range of motion following ankle manual therapy procedures in individuals with post-acute ankle sprains
Physical therapists use many ways to treat joints that do not move well. One way takes 1-2 seconds. Another way may take up to 1 minute. Both stretches seem to work, but we do not know how. Certain changes in the brain and spinal cord may cause joints to become more flexible after these kinds of stretches. Right now, we do not have very much information about how these might work in people who have injured their ankle. This study will find out if changes in the brain cause better flexibility in the ankle joint after different kinds of stretches. In this study, subjects with a certain kind of ankle sprains and limited ankle joint flexibility will be assigned to 1 out of 3 groups. Subjects will not get to choose their groups. The first group will have an ankle stretch that lasts 1-2 seconds. The second group will have a stretch that last 1 minute. The third group will have their foot held without any stretching. We will use a machine to stimulate the brain and spinal cord to find out how these stretches affect the brain and spinal cord. The machine sends a magnetic signal to the brain, and we will measure how much signal gets through to the leg muscles using electrodes on the skin. We also will use 3 flexibility tests to find out how well each stretch worked. One test is with the subject lying on their stomach, and the others are with the subject standing up. To start the study, subjects will get their brain stimulated. They will then get their brain stimulated again one hour later. After the second stimulation, subjects will have their flexibility tested and then get 1 of the 3 treatments. After the treatment, subjects will get a last brain stimulation test and flexibility tests. We think subjects that get a fast stretch will have better brain function and flexibility than subjects that get the slow stretch or no stretch. To test our idea, we will compare how each group did with the brain stimulation and flexibility tests. We will also look at the relationship between brain function and flexibility.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| High velocity, low amplitude stretch | Experimental | With the subject in a seated position on a treatment table and the lower extremity of interest stabilized to the table with a belt, a single standardized treating investigator will grasp the foot of interested with the thenar eminences on the foot's plantar surface. A thrust will be delivered parallel to the long axis of the subject's lower leg after the treating therapist induces passive ankle dorsiflexion to end range. |
|
| Slow, mobilization stretch | Active Comparator | With the subject in a seated position on a treatment table and the lower extremity of interest stabilized to the table with a belt, a single standardized treating investigator will grasp the foot of interested with the thenar eminences on the foot's plantar surface. Traction will be delivered to the talocrural joint at the treating therapist's second perception of tissue resistance in 3 bouts of 30-second holds, separated by 10 seconds of rest. |
|
| Passive positioning | Sham Comparator | With the subject in a seated position on a treatment table and the lower extremity of interest stabilized to the table with a belt, a single standardized treating investigator will grasp the foot of interested with the thenar eminences on the foot's plantar surface, which is similar to the positioning used for the active comparator groups. The treating investigator will maintain passive positioning of the ankle for the duration of 1 deep inhalation and exhalation by the subject rather than induce an iatrogenic force. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High velocity, low amplitude stretch | Other | This group (n=9) will receive talocrural traction manipulation. With the subject in a seated position on a treatment table and the lower extremity of interest stabilized to the table with a belt, a single standardized treating investigator will grasp the foot of interested with the thenar eminences on the foot's plantar surface. A thrust will be delivered parallel to the long axis of the subject's lower leg after the treating therapist induces passive ankle dorsiflexion to end range. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Corticospinal motor excitability (transcranial magnetic stimulation variables) | Pre-intervention measurement, 1 additional repeated pre-intervention measurement, post-intervention measurement |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Single leg squat reach test | Pre-intervention measurement, 1 additional repeated pre-intervention measurement, post-intervention measurement | |
| Ankle flexibility test (laying on stomach) | Pre-intervention measurement, 1 additional repeated pre-intervention measurement, post-intervention measurement |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Beth E Fisher, PhD, PT | University of Southern California | Principal Investigator |
| Todd E Davenport, DPT, OCS | University of the Pacific | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Southern California | Los Angeles | California | 90089 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27266885 | Derived | Fisher BE, Piraino A, Lee YY, Smith JA, Johnson S, Davenport TE, Kulig K. The Effect of Velocity of Joint Mobilization on Corticospinal Excitability in Individuals With a History of Ankle Sprain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Jul;46(7):562-70. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6602. Epub 2016 Jun 6. | |
| 19460169 | Derived |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016512 | Ankle Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007869 | Leg Injuries |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014143 | Traction |
| D016059 | Range of Motion, Articular |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019637 | Orthopedic Procedures |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D010808 | Physical Examination |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Slow, mobilization stretch | Other | This group (n=9) will receive talocrural traction mobilization. With the subject in a seated position on a treatment table and the lower extremity of interest stabilized to the table with a belt, a single standardized treating investigator will grasp the foot of interested with the thenar eminences on the foot's plantar surface. Traction will be delivered to the talocrural joint at the treating investigator's second perception of tissue resistance in 3 bouts of 30-second holds, separated by 10 seconds of rest. |
|
|
| Passive Positioning | Other | This group (n=9) will receive the manual therapy control intervention. This will consist of the same patient and clinician preparation for the mobilization/manipulation techniques. However, a single standardized treating investigator will simply maintain passive ankle positioning for the duration of 1 deep inhalation and exhalation by the subject rather than induce an iatrogenic force characteristic of the intervention received by the other 2 comparison groups. |
|
|
| Ankle flexibility test (standing against wall) | Pre-intervention measurement, 1 additional repeated pre-intervention measurement, post-intervention measurement |
| Fisher BE, Davenport TE, Kulig K, Wu AD. Identification of potential neuromotor mechanisms of manual therapy in patients with musculoskeletal disablement: rationale and description of a clinical trial. BMC Neurol. 2009 May 21;9:20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-9-20. |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
| D009142 | Musculoskeletal Physiological Phenomena |
| D055687 | Musculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena |