Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this randomized control study is to evaluate the use of electric powered wheelchairs and powered seating function patterns of Veterans to determine how usage patterns relate to activity, participation, and seating discomfort. In addition, it will be determined if a training program or a training program with a virtual coach will improve compliance of clinical practice guidelines for pressure relief, upper limb preservation, and discomfort management. The virtual coach is a portable, programmable intelligent reminder designed to enhance a person's use of their power wheelchair and power seat functions.
This is a randomized control trial evaluating power seat function usage among 3 groups: 1) standard of care- verbal instruction 2) verbal and written instruction and 3) same as #2 with addition of virtual coach. This study will be conducted in two phases. Phase I data will be collected for 8 weeks, during the time period that the subject is awaiting for delivery of their personal electric powered wheelchair (EPW) with powered seat functions. Phase II data will be collected for a total of 4 weeks, after the subject receives their personal wheelchair. During Phase I, Visit I, subjects will be fitted for a study EPW with powered seat functions. All subjects will be provided with the "standard of care" training on driving of the wheelchair and usage of the power seating functions. Subjects will be instructed to go about their daily activities as they normally would, while the instrumented wheelchair will track their usage of the wheelchair and seating habits. Phase I, Visit II-IV, subjects will be randomized into one of three study groups: Control Group; Instruction Group; and Instruction & Virtual Coach Group. Subjects assigned to the Control Group will receive 'standard of care.' Subjects assigned to the Intervention Group will receive the "standard of care" and additional written instructional materials and feedback regarding activity and wheelchair usage. Subjects assigned to the Instruction & Virtual Coach Group will receive the same training and instructional materials as the Intervention Group. This group will also be instructed in use of the virtual coach system, which will be active during the in-home usage periods to provide personalized feedback. Phase II will involve mounting a wheelchair and seat function usage datalogger to the subject's personal wheelchair over a period of 4 weeks.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control Group | No Intervention | Control Group | |
| Instruction Group | Experimental | Instruction Group |
|
| Instruction and Virtual Coach Group | Experimental | Instruction and Virtual Coach Group |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction Group: Power seat function usage instruction- verbal and written instruction | Other | Subjects assigned to the Intervention Group will be assigned to an Intervention Group Clinician. The Intervention Group Clinicians will provide the same training as the Control Group Clinicians, with the addition of discussing the Veteran's activity and seating function usage data, reviewing and providing a study pamphlet and compact disk as a reference guide on use of power seat functions. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance Rate | Compliance rate is a measure of compliance with the recommendation of using powered seating functions (moderate or maximum range of tilt, at least once every hour, for 2 minutes). The participant had to follow the recommended position, duration, and frequency to be considered as compliant and performed successful repositioning exercise. The compliance rate of a participant was the number of successful repositioning exercise divided by the sum of the number of successful repositioning exercise and missed repositioning exercise. The result of the difference between the baseline and week 7-8 (last 2 weeks) was shown here. | Every 2 weeks for 8 weeks following acquisition of wheelchair |
| Frequency of Power Seat Function Usage | Frequency of power seat function usage was measured by the number of times of changing tilt and recline angles averaged by the duration that the participant occupied the wheelchair per day. The results of the difference between the baseline and week 7-8 (last 2 weeks) were shown here. | Every 2 weeks for 8 weeks following acquisition of wheelchair |
| Power Wheelchair Usage | Power wheelchair usage was measured by the sum of distances that the power wheelchair traveled (km) divided by the duration of the wheelchair being occupied a day (hr). The result of the difference between the baseline and week 7-8 (last 2 weeks) was shown here. | Every 2 weeks for 8 weeks following acquisition of wheelchair |
| Wheelchair Occupancy | Wheelchair occupancy was measured by the sum of duration that the seat of the wheelchair was occupied. The results of the difference between the baseline and week 7-8 (last 2 weeks) were shown here. | Every 2 weeks for 8 weeks following acquisition of wheelchair |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Questionnaire Responses: Tool for Assessing Wheelchair Discomfort (TAWC) | General Discomfort Assessment (GD) and Discomfort Intensity Rating (DI) are two sub-scales of TAWC. Higher scores indicate greater discomfort. GD consists of 8 discomfort statements and 5 comfort statements. The statements are rated on a seven point Likert scale, from strongly disagree to strongly agree of points from 1-7 (total score: 13-91). DI includes seven body areas (back, neck, buttocks, legs, arms, feet, and hands) and overall discomfort level, rated for a degree of discomfort intensity on a scale of 0 (no discomfort) to 10 (severe discomfort). Space is also included for the user to list additional body areas. DI scores may range from 0 to more than 80, depending on whether the participant reported additional areas of discomfort. Although GD and DI were measured daily, the data were average for each two-week period. The average GD and DI of the difference between the baseline and week 7-8 (last 2 weeks) were shown here. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Rory A. Cooper, PhD | Director, Center of Excellence for Wheelchairs and Related Technology | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VA Pittsburgh Health Care System | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15240 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Control Group | Control Group |
| FG001 | Instruction Group | Instruction Group Instruction Group: Power seat function usage instruction- verbal and written instruction: Subjects assigned to the Intervention Group will be assigned to an Intervention Group Clinician. The Intervention Group Clinicians will provide the same training as the Control Group Clinicians, with the addition of discussing the veteran's activity and seating function usage data, reviewing and providing a study pamphlet and compact disk as a reference guide on use of power seat functions. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Instruction and Virtual Coach Group: Power seat function usage instruction- verbal, written, and virtual coach | Other | Subjects assigned to the Instruction & Virtual Coach Group will be assigned to an Intervention Group Clinician and will receive the same training and instructional materials as the Instruction Group. Subjects will also be instructed in use of the virtual coach system, which will be active during the in-home usage periods to provide personalized feedback. As the Virtual Coach is a dynamic intelligent system, it will adjust its coaching to the needs of the individual. For example, if the person is compliant, the Virtual Coach will give positive feedback and then gradually transition to operating quietly in the background. If a person is not fully compliant, it will alter feedback modes (e.g., verbal cues, auditory tones, visual cues) and timing to attempt to increase compliance. |
|
| Every 2 weeks for 8 weeks following acquisition of wheelchair |
| Questionnaire Responses: Psychological Impacts of Assistive Devices Scale | This tool is to measure perceived psychological impact of using an assistive device. It consists of three subscales, Competence (12 items), Adaptability (6 items), and Self-esteem (8 items). Each item is scored on a likert scale from -3 (decreases) to + 3 (increases). The total score is the sum of all 26 items, ranging from -78 to 78. A higher positive score indicates more positive impact. A negative score indicates negative impact. The differences between the measurements taken at the end of 2nd week (end of baseline) and the end of 8th week (end of intervention period) are reported here to show the intervention effect. | At the end of every two weeks |
| Questionnaire Responses: Independence in Community | This outcome was measured in three aspects: Physical Independence, Cognitive Independence, and Mobility, using the three of the subscales of Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique Scale. The scores of each subscale has to be calculated with specific formula and weight based on the manual. The range of each subscale score are: Physical Independence: 28-100; Cognitive Independence: 15-100; and Mobility: 16-100. A higher score indicates greater independence. The analyzed results of the difference between the measurements at the end of 2nd week and 8th week were shown here. | At the end of 2nd (end of baseline) week and 8th week (end of intervention period) following acquisition of wheelchair |
| FG002 | Instruction and Virtual Coach Group | Instruction and Virtual Coach Group Instruction and Virtual Coach Group: Power seat function usage instruction- verbal, written, and virtual coach: Subjects assigned to the Instruction & Virtual Coach Group will be assigned to an Intervention Group Clinician and will receive the same training and instructional materials as the Instruction Group. Subjects will also be instructed in use of the virtual coach system, which will be active during the in-home usage periods to provide personalized feedback. As the Virtual Coach is a dynamic intelligent system, it will adjust its coaching to the needs of the individual. For example, if the person is compliant, the Virtual Coach will give positive feedback and then gradually transition to operating quietly in the background. If a person is not fully compliant, it will alter feedback modes (e.g., verbal cues, auditory tones, visual cues) and timing to attempt to increase compliance. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
The average age of the participants was 53.2 years old (+/- 14.0 years old). Twelve out of 28 were female (42.9%). Two of the participants were veterans, and one of them was recruited from VA Wheelchair Seating clinic.
Arm 1 (control group) was removed from the study through IRB modification because of difficulties in recruiting participants.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Control Group | Control Group |
| BG001 | Instruction Group | Instruction Group Instruction Group: Power seat function usage instruction- verbal and written instruction: Subjects assigned to the Intervention Group will be assigned to an Intervention Group Clinician. The Intervention Group Clinicians will provide the same training as the Control Group Clinicians, with the addition of discussing the veteran's activity and seating function usage data, reviewing and providing a study pamphlet and compact disk as a reference guide on use of power seat functions. |
| BG002 | Instruction and Virtual Coach Group | Instruction and Virtual Coach Group Instruction and Virtual Coach Group: Power seat function usage instruction- verbal, written, and virtual coach: Subjects assigned to the Instruction & Virtual Coach Group will be assigned to an Intervention Group Clinician and will receive the same training and instructional materials as the Instruction Group. Subjects will also be instructed in use of the virtual coach system, which will be active during the in-home usage periods to provide personalized feedback. As the Virtual Coach is a dynamic intelligent system, it will adjust its coaching to the needs of the individual. For example, if the person is compliant, the Virtual Coach will give positive feedback and then gradually transition to operating quietly in the background. If a person is not fully compliant, it will alter feedback modes (e.g., verbal cues, auditory tones, visual cues) and timing to attempt to increase compliance. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years of age |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Compliance Rate | Compliance rate is a measure of compliance with the recommendation of using powered seating functions (moderate or maximum range of tilt, at least once every hour, for 2 minutes). The participant had to follow the recommended position, duration, and frequency to be considered as compliant and performed successful repositioning exercise. The compliance rate of a participant was the number of successful repositioning exercise divided by the sum of the number of successful repositioning exercise and missed repositioning exercise. The result of the difference between the baseline and week 7-8 (last 2 weeks) was shown here. | Only the data of the participants who completed the study protocol and use the wheelchair were included in the data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percentage of participants' compliance | Every 2 weeks for 8 weeks following acquisition of wheelchair |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Questionnaire Responses: Tool for Assessing Wheelchair Discomfort (TAWC) | General Discomfort Assessment (GD) and Discomfort Intensity Rating (DI) are two sub-scales of TAWC. Higher scores indicate greater discomfort. GD consists of 8 discomfort statements and 5 comfort statements. The statements are rated on a seven point Likert scale, from strongly disagree to strongly agree of points from 1-7 (total score: 13-91). DI includes seven body areas (back, neck, buttocks, legs, arms, feet, and hands) and overall discomfort level, rated for a degree of discomfort intensity on a scale of 0 (no discomfort) to 10 (severe discomfort). Space is also included for the user to list additional body areas. DI scores may range from 0 to more than 80, depending on whether the participant reported additional areas of discomfort. Although GD and DI were measured daily, the data were average for each two-week period. The average GD and DI of the difference between the baseline and week 7-8 (last 2 weeks) were shown here. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Every 2 weeks for 8 weeks following acquisition of wheelchair |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Questionnaire Responses: Psychological Impacts of Assistive Devices Scale | This tool is to measure perceived psychological impact of using an assistive device. It consists of three subscales, Competence (12 items), Adaptability (6 items), and Self-esteem (8 items). Each item is scored on a likert scale from -3 (decreases) to + 3 (increases). The total score is the sum of all 26 items, ranging from -78 to 78. A higher positive score indicates more positive impact. A negative score indicates negative impact. The differences between the measurements taken at the end of 2nd week (end of baseline) and the end of 8th week (end of intervention period) are reported here to show the intervention effect. | Only the data of the participants who completed the study protocol and use the wheelchair were included in the data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | At the end of every two weeks |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Questionnaire Responses: Independence in Community | This outcome was measured in three aspects: Physical Independence, Cognitive Independence, and Mobility, using the three of the subscales of Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique Scale. The scores of each subscale has to be calculated with specific formula and weight based on the manual. The range of each subscale score are: Physical Independence: 28-100; Cognitive Independence: 15-100; and Mobility: 16-100. A higher score indicates greater independence. The analyzed results of the difference between the measurements at the end of 2nd week and 8th week were shown here. | Only the data of the participants who completed the study protocol and use the wheelchair were included in the data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | At the end of 2nd (end of baseline) week and 8th week (end of intervention period) following acquisition of wheelchair |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Frequency of Power Seat Function Usage | Frequency of power seat function usage was measured by the number of times of changing tilt and recline angles averaged by the duration that the participant occupied the wheelchair per day. The results of the difference between the baseline and week 7-8 (last 2 weeks) were shown here. | Only the data of the participants who completed the study protocol and use the wheelchair were included in the data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | times/hour | Every 2 weeks for 8 weeks following acquisition of wheelchair |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Power Wheelchair Usage | Power wheelchair usage was measured by the sum of distances that the power wheelchair traveled (km) divided by the duration of the wheelchair being occupied a day (hr). The result of the difference between the baseline and week 7-8 (last 2 weeks) was shown here. | Only the data of the participants who completed the study protocol and use the wheelchair were included in the data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | km/hour | Every 2 weeks for 8 weeks following acquisition of wheelchair |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Wheelchair Occupancy | Wheelchair occupancy was measured by the sum of duration that the seat of the wheelchair was occupied. The results of the difference between the baseline and week 7-8 (last 2 weeks) were shown here. | Only the data of the participants who completed the study protocol and use the wheelchair were included in the data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | hours | Every 2 weeks for 8 weeks following acquisition of wheelchair |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Control Group | Control Group | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | ||
| EG001 | Instruction Group | Instruction Group Instruction Group: Power seat function usage instruction- verbal and written instruction: Subjects assigned to the Intervention Group will be assigned to an Intervention Group Clinician. The Intervention Group Clinicians will provide the same training as the Control Group Clinicians, with the addition of discussing the veteran's activity and seating function usage data, reviewing and providing a study pamphlet and compact disk as a reference guide on use of power seat functions. | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 | ||
| EG002 | Instruction and Virtual Coach Group | Instruction and Virtual Coach Group Instruction and Virtual Coach Group: Power seat function usage instruction- verbal, written, and virtual coach: Subjects assigned to the Instruction & Virtual Coach Group will be assigned to an Intervention Group Clinician and will receive the same training and instructional materials as the Instruction Group. Subjects will also be instructed in use of the virtual coach system, which will be active during the in-home usage periods to provide personalized feedback. As the Virtual Coach is a dynamic intelligent system, it will adjust its coaching to the needs of the individual. For example, if the person is compliant, the Virtual Coach will give positive feedback and then gradually transition to operating quietly in the background. If a person is not fully compliant, it will alter feedback modes (e.g., verbal cues, auditory tones, visual cues) and timing to attempt to increase compliance. | 0 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
Not provided
Not provided
It was difficult to recruit power wheelchair users to participate in the study. Participants withdrew from the study because the study wheelchair could not meet their needs, or they could not use the Virtual Seating Coach independently.
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical Coordinator | Human Engineering Reserach Laboratories | 412-822-3700 | annmarie.kelleher@va.gov |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004522 | Educational Status |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012959 | Socioeconomic Factors |
| D011154 | Population Characteristics |
Not provided
Not provided
| Between 18 and 65 years |
|
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
| OG002 | Arm 3: Instruction + VSC Group | Participants received: meeting with a clinician once every two weeks, and educational materials (reminder cards, pamphlet, and video CD), and timely alert to remind and guide powered seating function usage delivered by the VSC installed on the study wheelchair. |
|
|
|
Participants received: meeting with a clinician once every two weeks, and educational materials (reminder cards, pamphlet, and video CD), and timely alert to remind and guide powered seating function usage delivered by the VSC installed on the study wheelchair. |
|
|
|
Participants received: meeting with a clinician once every two weeks, and educational materials (reminder cards, pamphlet, and video CD), and timely alert to remind and guide powered seating function usage delivered by the VSC installed on the study wheelchair. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|