Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Uterine fibroids (leiomyomas) are a common cause of heavy uterine bleeding and pain in reproductive aged women and are the most common cause of hysterectomy in the United States. Women are seeking new ways to treat symptomatic uterine fibroids that allow them to avoid surgery. This study is the first step in this quest. We will study the novel use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in enhancing the safety of the FDA approved technique to treat fibroids called High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU). The term 'high intensity focused ultrasound' means using ultrasound to heat and to thermally destroy tissue, in this case, uterine fibroids. The MRI system will allow us to watch the ultrasound path during treatment and monitor the temperature increase in the fibroid tissue that comes during the procedure.
In this pilot study, women with symptomatic fibroids will undergo MRI guided HIFU and then have a hysterectomy. This will allow us to confirm studies done in animals which show that it is possible to destroy specific tissue without harming normal tissue surrounding the targeted area.
The purpose of this clinical study is to confirm the safety and treatment capabilities of the Philips MR guided HIFU system for ablation of uterine fibroids. This is a single arm pilot study of 10 women who will undergo hysterectomy after the HIFU procedure. This study design of hysterectomy after treatment has been requested by the FDA as part of IDE approval for this new device and mirrors what has been required for similar devices. Safety will be assessed by evaluating treatment accuracy, complications, and adverse events. Treatment capabilities will be assessed by evaluating the fibroid volume ablated and other factors related to the procedure feasibility and acceptance including procedure duration, time to return to normal activity, and pain scores at the time of the procedure.
Study population
The Philips MR-HIFU System is intended for ablation of uterine fibroid tissue in pre- or perimenopausal women with symptomatic uterine fibroids who desire a uterine-sparing procedure. Patients must have completed child bearing prior to enrolling in this study. Patients will be recruited by referral to gynecology and interventional radiology at the NIH Clinical Center. Candidates for enrollment will already have symptomatic uterine leiomyomas and be willing to undergo hysterectomy for treatment. It is estimated that of apparently eligible subjects, at least 30 women will have to be screened in person in order to identify 10 who will be eligible for this study. Other studies of fibroid treatments are currently ongoing at the NIH. Women who have been interested in, but have not been selected for enrollment in those studies and who appear to be eligible to this study will be contacted for potential enrollment.
Study design:
This study is a multi-center, single arm trial evaluating the safety and treatment capabilities of the Philips MR-guided HIFU system in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroid patients who are otherwise healthy women. All patients enrolled in the study will undergo hysterectomy within a window of 30 days following HIFU treatment. Patients who have symptomatic uterine fibroids, meet clinical indications for hysterectomy, are eligible according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and provide informed consent will be enrolled in this study. This study design of treatment followed by hysterectomy has been requested by the FDA as part of IDE approval for this new device and mirrors what has been required for similar devices. It is anticipated that women will participate in the study for a 3 month period to include the screening, HIFU treatment, hysterectomy and post hysterectomy follow-up.
The methodology used for this HIFU device capitalizes on the thermal properties of volumetric ablation rather than point ablation used by other focused ultrasound systems. Thus it is anticipated that this device will have a shorter treatment time compared to other HIFU machines. This HIFU system, via real-time MR thermometry monitoring, has automated thermal feedback during the procedure which may enhance safety. This pilot study will not only assess the safety of this device but will enable us to delineate the treatment capabilities of this system for future use in patients who want uterine sparing non-surgical treatment for symptomatic fibroids.
Uterine fibroids (leiomyomas) are a common cause of heavy uterine bleeding and pain in reproductive aged women and are the most common cause of hysterectomy in the United States. Women are seeking new ways to treat symptomatic uterine fibroids that allow them to avoid surgery. This study is the first step in this quest. We will study the novel use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in enhancing the safety of the FDA approved technique to treat fibroids called High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU). The term high intensity focused ultrasound means using ultrasound to heat and to thermally destroy tissue, in this case, uterine fibroids. The MRI system will allow us to watch the ultrasound path during treatment and monitor the temperature increase in the fibroid tissue that comes during the procedure.
In this pilot study, women with symptomatic fibroids will undergo MRI guided HIFU and then have a hysterectomy. This will allow us to confirm studies done in animals which show that it is possible to destroy specific tissue without harming normal tissue surrounding the targeted area.
The purpose of this clinical study is to confirm the safety and treatment capabilities of the Philips MR guided HIFU system for ablation of uterine fibroids. This is a single arm pilot study of 10 women who will undergo hysterectomy after the HIFU procedure. This study design of hysterectomy after treatment has been requested by the FDA as part of IDE approval for this new device and mirrors what has been required for similar devices. Safety will be assessed by evaluating treatment accuracy, complications, and adverse events. Treatment capabilities will be assessed by evaluating the fibroid volume ablated and other factors related to the procedure feasibility and acceptance including procedure duration, time to return to normal activity, and pain scores at the time of the procedure.
Study population
The Philips MR-HIFU System is intended for ablation of uterine fibroid tissue in pre- or perimenopausal women with symptomatic uterine fibroids who desire a uterine-sparing procedure. Patients must have completed child bearing prior to enrolling in this study. Patients will be recruited by referral to gynecology and interventional radiology at the NIH Clinical Center. Candidates for enrollment will already have symptomatic uterine leiomyomas and be willing to undergo hysterectomy for treatment. It is estimated that of apparently eligible subjects, at least 30 women will have to be screened in person in order to identify 10 who will be eligible for this study. Other studies of fibroid treatments are currently ongoing at the NIH. Women who have been interested in, but have not been selected for enrollment in those studies and who appear to be eligible to this study will be contacted for potential enrollment.
Study design:
This study is a multi-center, single arm trial evaluating the safety and treatment capabilities of the Philips MR-guided HIFU system in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroid patients who are otherwise healthy women. All patients enrolled in the study will undergo hysterectomy within a window of 30 days following HIFU treatment. Patients who have symptomatic uterine fibroids, meet clinical indications for hysterectomy, are eligible according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and provide informed consent will be enrolled in this study. This study design of treatment followed by hysterectomy has been requested by the FDA as part of IDE approval for this new device and mirrors what has been required for similar devices. It is anticipated that women will participate in the study for a 3 month period to include the screening, HIFU treatment, hysterectomy and post hysterectomy follow-up.
The methodology used for this HIFU device capitalizes on the thermal properties of volumetric ablation rather than point ablation used by other focused ultrasound systems. Thus it is anticipated that this device will have a shorter treatment time compared to other HIFU machines. This HIFU system, via real-time MR thermometry monitoring, has automated thermal feedback during the procedure which may enhance safety. This pilot study will not only assess the safety of this device but will enable us to delineate the treatment capabilities of this system for future use in patients who want uterine sparing non-surgical treatment for symptomatic fibroids.
Primary Outcome parameters:
Secondary Outcome Parameters:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Philips MR guided HIFU system | Experimental | Patient receiving HIFU treatment |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philips MR guided HIFU system | Device | HIFU is the use of focused ultrasound energy to penetrate through soft tissue and causes localized high temperatures (55°C to 70°C) for a few seconds within the target producing well defined regions of protein denaturation, irreversible cell damage, and coagulative necrosis |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment-related Adverse Events (AE) Per Subject Resulting From HIFU Treatment of the Uterine Fibroids | The number of treatment-related Adverse Events (AE) reported during the study, divided by the total number of treated subjects. This corresponds to the mean number of treatment-related Adverse Events per subject. Relatedness of an AE to the treatment was judged case-by-case by the investigator. | end of follow-up (date of hysterectomy, at latest day 30 after treatment) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| HIFU Treatment Equals Location Per Hysterectomy | Count the number of participants in which both of the following conditions are satisfied: the fibroid treated area as shown on MRI images during treatment is the same as displayed on fibroids from histology slices after hysterectomy, and no unintended lesions are visible in the uterus. | Day 0, Hysterectomy |
Not provided
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike | Bethesda | Maryland | 20892 | United States | ||
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17446521 | Background | Fennessy FM, Tempany CM, McDannold NJ, So MJ, Hesley G, Gostout B, Kim HS, Holland GA, Sarti DA, Hynynen K, Jolesz FA, Stewart EA. Uterine leiomyomas: MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery--results of different treatment protocols. Radiology. 2007 Jun;243(3):885-93. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2433060267. Epub 2007 Apr 19. | |
| 16723104 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| NIH Clinical Center Detailed Web Page | View source |
Not provided
Patients were screened prior to treatment and the primary exclusion criteria was either uterine size per gestational age or fibroid size.
The first High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) treatment was on February 8, 2009 and the last patient was treated on March 5, 2010. 2 study sites enrolled patients, 2 from St. Lukes in Houston, TX and 9 from National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, MD.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | HIFU Treated | Women indicated for total abdominal hysterectomy underwent a single Magnetic Resonance guided-High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MR-HIFU) session for uterine fibroid ablation prior to surgery. Subjects were followed up until the date of hysterectomy, or for 30 days if hysterectomy was declined. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | HIFU Treated | Women indicated for total abdominal hysterectomy underwent a single Magnetic Resonance guided-High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MR-HIFU) session for uterine fibroid ablation prior to surgery. Subjects were followed up until the date of hysterectomy, or for 30 days if hysterectomy was declined. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Treatment-related Adverse Events (AE) Per Subject Resulting From HIFU Treatment of the Uterine Fibroids | The number of treatment-related Adverse Events (AE) reported during the study, divided by the total number of treated subjects. This corresponds to the mean number of treatment-related Adverse Events per subject. Relatedness of an AE to the treatment was judged case-by-case by the investigator. | Safety was assessed per protocol; all 11 participants were evaluated for adverse events after HIFU treatment. | Posted | Mean | Full Range | treatment-related AE/patient | end of follow-up (date of hysterectomy, at latest day 30 after treatment) |
|
Feb 9, 2009 through March 9, 2010
Adverse events assessed by patient questionnaire.
Only unexpected adverse events were reported in the "Other" Adverse Event Field.
All adverse events were reported including those not related to treatment.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | HIFU Treatment |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neck Pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Descriptive | Systematic Assessment | Neck pain caused by positioning during treatment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarah Baxter | Philips Healthcare | 425-487-7665 | sarah.baxter@philips.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007889 | Leiomyoma |
| D047708 | Myofibroma |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009379 | Neoplasms, Muscle Tissue |
| D018204 | Neoplasms, Connective and Soft Tissue |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Length of Time to Return to Normal Activities | Length of time to return to normal activity measured in number of days from HIFU treatment. Assessed by patient interviews during follow-up. | end of follow-up (date of hysterectomy, at latest day 30 after treatment)] |
| Numerical Range Scale (NRS) of Pain Level | Pain Scores obtained by patient self-assessment on a 0-10 scale, with 0 corresponding to no pain and 10 corresponding to maximum pain. | Treatment Day: Baseline, Recovery, Discharge; Follow-up: 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 1 week, 2 weeks |
| Discomfort Level | Patient's self-assessed discomfort level on a 4-point scale, with: 0 = no pain; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe. | Treatment Day: Baseline, Recovery, Discharge; Follow-up: 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 1 week, 2 weeks |
| St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital |
| Houston |
| Texas |
| 77030 |
| United States |
| Flynn M, Jamison M, Datta S, Myers E. Health care resource use for uterine fibroid tumors in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Oct;195(4):955-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.02.020. Epub 2006 May 24. |
| 15547216 | Background | Hindley J, Gedroyc WM, Regan L, Stewart E, Tempany C, Hynyen K, Mcdannold N, Inbar Y, Itzchak Y, Rabinovici J, Kim HS, Geschwind JF, Hesley G, Gostout B, Ehrenstein T, Hengst S, Sklair-Levy M, Shushan A, Jolesz F. MRI guidance of focused ultrasound therapy of uterine fibroids: early results. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Dec;183(6):1713-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.183.6.01831713. |
| 25634727 | Derived | Sri T, Steren AJ, Stratton P. Endometrial Cancer: Hidden Pathology in a Patient with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding and Known Leiomyoma. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2015;80(4):272-5. doi: 10.1159/000370002. Epub 2015 Jan 27. |
| 22626269 | Derived | Venkatesan AM, Partanen A, Pulanic TK, Dreher MR, Fischer J, Zurawin RK, Muthupillai R, Sokka S, Nieminen HJ, Sinaii N, Merino M, Wood BJ, Stratton P. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided volumetric ablation of symptomatic leiomyomata: correlation of imaging with histology. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012 Jun;23(6):786-794.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.02.015. |
| Participants |
|
| Age Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
|
| Secondary | HIFU Treatment Equals Location Per Hysterectomy | Count the number of participants in which both of the following conditions are satisfied: the fibroid treated area as shown on MRI images during treatment is the same as displayed on fibroids from histology slices after hysterectomy, and no unintended lesions are visible in the uterus. | All participants who underwent hysterectomy following MR-HIFU treatment were included in this endpoint measure. Patients who refused hysterectomy were not included. | Posted | Number | participants | Day 0, Hysterectomy |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Length of Time to Return to Normal Activities | Length of time to return to normal activity measured in number of days from HIFU treatment. Assessed by patient interviews during follow-up. | per protocol | Posted | Mean | Full Range | days | end of follow-up (date of hysterectomy, at latest day 30 after treatment)] |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Numerical Range Scale (NRS) of Pain Level | Pain Scores obtained by patient self-assessment on a 0-10 scale, with 0 corresponding to no pain and 10 corresponding to maximum pain. | Subjects were included into analysis at a given time point if they had not received hysterectomy yet prior to that time point. Analysed subject numbers were: from baseline up to including 72 hours: 11 subjects (per protocol population); at 1 week: 6 subjects; at 2 weeks: 4 subjects; | Posted | Mean | Full Range | units on a scale | Treatment Day: Baseline, Recovery, Discharge; Follow-up: 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 1 week, 2 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Discomfort Level | Patient's self-assessed discomfort level on a 4-point scale, with: 0 = no pain; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe. | Subjects were included into analysis at a given time point if they had not received hysterectomy yet prior to that time point. Analysed subject numbers were: from baseline up to including 72 hours: 11 subjects (per protocol population); at 1 week: 6 subjects; at 2 weeks: 4 subjects; | Posted | Mean | Full Range | units on a scale | Treatment Day: Baseline, Recovery, Discharge; Follow-up: 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 1 week, 2 weeks |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 11 |
| 6 |
| 11 |
|
| Pain at Rib Cage or Chest Level | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Descriptive | Systematic Assessment | Pain caused by positioning during treatment |
|
| Right leg pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Descriptive | Systematic Assessment | pain possibly due to positioning during treatment |
|
| Lower back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Descriptive | Systematic Assessment | Pain most likely due to positioning during treatment |
|
| Rectal Bleeding | Gastrointestinal disorders | Descriptive | Systematic Assessment | Bleeding unlikely caused by treatment |
|
| Fatigue | Reproductive system and breast disorders | Descriptive | Systematic Assessment | not related to treatment |
|
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Descriptive | Systematic Assessment | Unlikely related to procedure |
|
| Shin discomfort | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Descriptive | Systematic Assessment | Definitely related |
|
| pain right buttock | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Descriptive | Systematic Assessment | possibly related to treatment |
|
| Pruritis | General disorders | Descriptive | Systematic Assessment | Not related to treatment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Descriptive | Systematic Assessment | Not related to treatment |
|
| Shoulder pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Descriptive | Systematic Assessment | probably related to treatment positioning |
|
| Right foot swelling | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Descriptive | Systematic Assessment | possibly related |
|
| Fever | General disorders | Descriptive | Systematic Assessment | Caught a cold before treatment |
|
| Cold | General disorders | Descriptive | Systematic Assessment | Caught a cold before treatment |
|
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | Descriptive | Systematic Assessment | Not related |
|
| Sharp burning pain at abdomen | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Descriptive | Systematic Assessment | possibly related to treatment |
|
Not provided
| D009372 | Neoplasms, Connective Tissue |
| D003240 | Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
|
| 24 hours after treatment |
|
| 48 hours after treatment |
|
| 72 hours after treatment |
|
| 1 week after treatment |
|
| 2 weeks after treatment |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| 24 hours after treatment |
|
| 48 hours after treatment |
|
| 72 hours after treatment |
|
| 1 week after treatment |
|
| 2 weeks after treatment |
|