Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCT00833794 | Registry Identifier | ClinicalTrials.gov |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to compare the analgesic efficacy, safety and clinical benefit of Tramadol OAD tablets versus Placebo.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Tramadol Once A Day | Experimental |
| |
| 2 Placebo | Placebo Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tramadol Once a day | Drug |
| ||
| Placebo |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain Intensity Score as Measured by the 11-point Pain Intensity-Numerical Rating Scale Score at the End of the Study (Week 12 or Time of Discontinuation) | The Pain Intensity Score is an 11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale ranging from 0: no pain to 10: worst possible pain. The mean score at the end of the study (week 12 or time of discontinuation) was calculated. | 12 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain Intensity Score (11-point PINRS) After 6 Weeks of Maintenance Treatment | The Pain Intensity Score is an 11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale ranging from 0: no pain to 10: worst possible pain | 6 weeks |
| Pain Intensity Score Stratified by Dose, at the End of the Study (Week 12 or Time of Discontinuation) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria for Open-Label phase:
Males or females
Must be between the ages of 40-80
Must meet the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Clinical Classification Criteria for Osteoarthritis of the Knee:
Must have a history of exposure to treatment (for pain due to osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee) with Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), COX II inhibitors or tramadol.
Must be taking one of the above medications on a regular basis in the 30 days prior to Visit 2 (S0).
Must meet the following criteria for severity of pain at Visit 2 (Day S0):
Must have a erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) < 40 mm/hr
Must have oral and written language comprehension at a level sufficient to comply with the protocol and complete study-related materials
Must have signed and dated an approved written Informed Consent form in French, Spanish, English or Romanian, which has also been signed and dated by the Investigator (unless otherwise required by the ethics committee), prior to study participation
Exclusion Criteria for Open-Label phase:
Inclusion criteria for the double-blinded phase:
Exclusion criteria for the double-blinded phase:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17583466 | Result | Burch F, Fishman R, Messina N, Corser B, Radulescu F, Sarbu A, Craciun-Nicodin MM, Chiriac R, Beaulieu A, Rodrigues J, Beignot-Devalmont P, Duplan A, Robertson S, Fortier L, Bouchard S. A comparison of the analgesic efficacy of Tramadol Contramid OAD versus placebo in patients with pain due to osteoarthritis. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Sep;34(3):328-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.11.017. Epub 2007 Jun 21. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Approved labelling | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | 1 Tramadol Once A Day | |
| FG001 | 2 Placebo |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open-label Phase |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
Pain Intensity Score (an 11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale ranging from 0: no pain to 10: worst possible pain) was stratified by final dose level, at week 12 or time of discontinuation. The final optimum dose level based upon efficacy and tolerability was kept for the entire study. The mean score was calculated. |
| 12 weeks |
| WOMAC Pain Subscale Score at the End of the Study (Week 12 or Time of Discontinuation) | Mean WOMAC Pain Subscale score at week 12. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales, using a 5-point Likert-scale ranging from no difficulty to extreme difficulty (0-none; 1-slight; 2-moderate; 3-severe; 4-extreme). The WOMAC pain subscale results from the sum of 5 pain questions. The maximum total score is 20. | 12 weeks |
| WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score at the End of the Study (Week 12 or Time of Discontinuation) | Mean WOMAC Physical Function Subscale score at week 12. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales, using a 5-point Likert-scale ranging from no difficulty to extreme difficulty (0-none; 1-slight; 2-moderate; 3-severe; 4-extreme). The WOMAC Physical Function subscale results from the sum of 17 physical function questions and the maximum possible score is 68. | 12 weeks |
| Patient Global Impression of Change at the End of the Study (Week 12 or Time of Discontinuation) | This assessment of overall status integrates the effect of the treatment on pain, side effects, and the patient's expectation of pain relief. It is made using a 7-point categorical scale (1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse) | 12 weeks |
| Physician Global Impression of Change at the End of the Study (Week 12 or Time of Discontinuation) | This assessment of overall impression of study drug is made using a 7-point categorical scale (1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse) | week 12 |
| Time to Response | Response was defined as a decrease of ≥1 point in an 11-point PINRS (11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale ranging from 0: no pain to 10: worst possible pain) from baseline to the last visit. The time to response was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and a 95% CI for the median time was calculated. | 12 weeks |
| Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy | The number of patients who discontinued due to lack of efficacy was reported. | 12 weeks |
| Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events | The number of patients who discontinued due to adverse events (AEs). An AE is defined as any untoward medical event that occurs during the course of a clinical investigation in which a patient is administered a pharmaceutical or other therapeutic product. Its occurrence does not necessarily imply a causal relationship with the treatment. | 12 weeks |
| Entered run-in Period |
|
| Received Open-Label Treatment |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| Double-blind Phase |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | 1 Tramadol Once A Day | |
| BG001 | 2 Placebo | |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Age Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Pain Intensity Score as Measured by the 11-point Pain Intensity-Numerical Rating Scale Score at the End of the Study (Week 12 or Time of Discontinuation) | The Pain Intensity Score is an 11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale ranging from 0: no pain to 10: worst possible pain. The mean score at the end of the study (week 12 or time of discontinuation) was calculated. | Full analysis population: all randomized patients who received at least one dose of the randomized study medication regardless of the status of the post-dosing assessment. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Points on a scale | 12 weeks |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Pain Intensity Score (11-point PINRS) After 6 Weeks of Maintenance Treatment | The Pain Intensity Score is an 11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale ranging from 0: no pain to 10: worst possible pain | Full analysis population: all randomized patients who received at least one dose of the randomized study medication regardless of the status of the post-dosing assessment. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Points on a scale | 6 weeks |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Pain Intensity Score Stratified by Dose, at the End of the Study (Week 12 or Time of Discontinuation) | Pain Intensity Score (an 11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale ranging from 0: no pain to 10: worst possible pain) was stratified by final dose level, at week 12 or time of discontinuation. The final optimum dose level based upon efficacy and tolerability was kept for the entire study. The mean score was calculated. | Full analysis population: all randomized patients who received at least one dose of the randomized study medication regardless of the status of the post-dosing assessment. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Points on a scale | 12 weeks |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | WOMAC Pain Subscale Score at the End of the Study (Week 12 or Time of Discontinuation) | Mean WOMAC Pain Subscale score at week 12. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales, using a 5-point Likert-scale ranging from no difficulty to extreme difficulty (0-none; 1-slight; 2-moderate; 3-severe; 4-extreme). The WOMAC pain subscale results from the sum of 5 pain questions. The maximum total score is 20. | Full analysis population: all randomized patients who received at least one dose of the randomized study medication regardless of the status of the post-dosing assessment. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Points on a scale | 12 weeks |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score at the End of the Study (Week 12 or Time of Discontinuation) | Mean WOMAC Physical Function Subscale score at week 12. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales, using a 5-point Likert-scale ranging from no difficulty to extreme difficulty (0-none; 1-slight; 2-moderate; 3-severe; 4-extreme). The WOMAC Physical Function subscale results from the sum of 17 physical function questions and the maximum possible score is 68. | Full analysis population: all randomized patients who received at least one dose of the randomized study medication regardless of the status of the post-dosing assessment. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Points on a scale | 12 weeks |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Patient Global Impression of Change at the End of the Study (Week 12 or Time of Discontinuation) | This assessment of overall status integrates the effect of the treatment on pain, side effects, and the patient's expectation of pain relief. It is made using a 7-point categorical scale (1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse) | Full analysis population: all randomized patients who received at least one dose of the randomized study medication regardless of the status of the post-dosing assessment. | Posted | Number | participants | 12 weeks |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Physician Global Impression of Change at the End of the Study (Week 12 or Time of Discontinuation) | This assessment of overall impression of study drug is made using a 7-point categorical scale (1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse) | Full analysis population: all randomized patients who received at least one dose of the randomized study medication regardless of the status of the post-dosing assessment. | Posted | Number | participants | week 12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Time to Response | Response was defined as a decrease of ≥1 point in an 11-point PINRS (11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale ranging from 0: no pain to 10: worst possible pain) from baseline to the last visit. The time to response was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and a 95% CI for the median time was calculated. | Full analysis population: all randomized patients who received at least one dose of the randomized study medication regardless of the status of the post-dosing assessment. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | days | 12 weeks |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy | The number of patients who discontinued due to lack of efficacy was reported. | Full analysis population: all randomized patients who received at least one dose of the randomized study medication regardless of the status of the post-dosing assessment. | Posted | Number | participants | 12 weeks |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events | The number of patients who discontinued due to adverse events (AEs). An AE is defined as any untoward medical event that occurs during the course of a clinical investigation in which a patient is administered a pharmaceutical or other therapeutic product. Its occurrence does not necessarily imply a causal relationship with the treatment. | Full analysis population: all randomized patients who received at least one dose of the randomized study medication regardless of the status of the post-dosing assessment. | Posted | Number | participants | 12 weeks |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | 1 Tramadol Once A Day | 9 | 136 | |||||
| EG001 | 2 Placebo | 1 | 29 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grand mal convulsion | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Prostate cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hepatitis | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Renal impairment | Renal and urinary disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Popliteal bursitis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Ischaemic stroke | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Diverticulitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Angina unstable | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Chest pain | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Breast cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Somnolence | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Prior to submitting results communications, the investigator shall allow Labopharm at least 30 days to review the proposed communication. If the proposed publication/disclosure risks Labopharm's ability to patent any invention related to the study, the publication or disclosure will be modified or delayed to allow Labopharm to seek patent protection. This statement does not give Labopharm any editorial rights other than to restrict the disclosure of Labopharm's confidential information.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Director of Regulatory Affairs | Labopharm Inc. | 1 450 686 1017 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| Physician Decision |
|
| Administrative reason |
|
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|