Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| McMaster University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Ulnar nerve blockade is necessary for sensory anesthesia and analgesia in the hand during minor procedures. The course of the ulnar nerve in the forearm, wrist, and hand is predictable and has low variability. However even with known anatomic location and landmarks, ulnar nerve blocks at the wrist frequently are inadequate for procedural anesthesia. The antebrachial fascia at the wrist acts as a barrier to local infiltration. Since the fascia can not be visualized or palpated, it is commonly not penetrated, resulting in an inadequate block. Furthermore at the level of the wrist the ulnar artery lies in close proximity to the nerve and there is potential for arterial puncture while attempting injection for volar wrist block. The palmar ulnar nerve block is an injection distal to the hook of the hamate in the thenar eminence which avoids the ulnar artery and antebrachial fascia. This block has been used successfully for many years in clinical practice but has not been assessed or compared in a research study. The purpose of this study is to assess the validity of using a palmar ulnar nerve block for procedures in the hand as compared to the standard volar wrist ulnar nerve block.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypothenar Palm block | Active Comparator | Hypothenar Palmar block group. Local anesthetic is placed at this location in this study group. The same local composition (Intervention) is used for both study groups. The trial is a comparison of location not the Intervention. |
|
| Volar Wrist Block | Active Comparator | Volar Wrist block group. Local anesthetic is placed at this location in this study group. The same local composition (Intervention) is used for both study groups. The trial is a comparison of location not the Intervention. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volar Wrist Block | Procedure | Injection medial to Flexor Carpi Ulnaris Tendon at volar proximal wrist crease Local Block - total 3 cc injection (1.5 cc 1% plain lidocaine and 1.5 cc of 0.25% bupivicaine) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Primary outcome is efficacy of sensory anesthesia and analgesia | 15-45 minutes |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Secondary outcome is patient perceived discomfort with block | 15-45 Minutes |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Stuart Martin | McMaster University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hamilton General Hospital | Hamilton | Ontario | Canada |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Hypothenar Palm block | Procedure | Injection at Hook of the Hamate on Palmar surface Local Block - total 3 cc injection (1.5 cc 1% plain lidocaine and 1.5 cc of 0.25% bupivicaine) |
|