Average hours per day that contact lens were worn.

Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

Average hours per day that contact lens were worn comfortably.

Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

Lens comfort at time of month 6 visit, using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10=excellent.

Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

Subjective measure of typical daily eye discomfort reported at month 6 visit using a scale of 0 to 3. 0=Never, 1=Infrequently, 2=Frequently, 3=Constantly.

Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

Subjective measure of typical daily contact lens dryness reported at month 6 visit using a scale of 0 to 3. 0=Never, 1=Infrequently, 2=Frequently, 3=Constantly.

Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

Subjective measure of typical daily eye burning and stinging reported at month 6 visit using a scale of 0 to 3. 0=Never, 1=Infrequently, 2=Frequently, 3=Constantly.

Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

Subjective measure of typical daily eye burning and stinging reported at month 6 visit using a scale of 0 to 3. 0=Never, 1=Infrequently, 2=Frequently, 3=Constantly.

Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

Subjective measure of typical daily tearing related to lens wear reported at month 6 visit using a scale of 0 to 3. 0=Never, 1=Infrequently, 2=Frequently, 3=Constantly.

Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

staining measured over five sectors of the cornea and classified as a type of staining on a scale of 0 to 4. 0=None, 1=Micropunctate, 2=Macropunctate, 3=Coalesced Macropunctate, 4=Patch.

Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

corneal staining measured over 5 areas, averaged, and graded as a single score average on a scale of 0 to 10, 0=0%, 1=10%, 2=20%, 3=30%, 4=40%, 5=50%, 6=60%, 7=70%, 8=80%, 9=90%, 10=100%.

Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

Redness at the transition zone between the white of the eye and the clear window of the eye, the cornea, on a scale of 0 to 4. 0=None, 1=Trace, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe

Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

Redness of the blood vessels in the tissues overlaying the white of the eye, on a scale of 0 to 4. 0=None, 1=Trace, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe

Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

Redness of the blood vessels in the inner lining of the lower eyelid, on a scale of 0 to 4. 0=None, 1=Trace, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe

Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

Redness of the blood vessels in the inner lining of the upper eyelid, on a scale of 0 to 4. 0=None, 1=Trace, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe

Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

The roughness of the inner lining of the eyelids, measured on a 0 to 7 scale. 0=Smooth, 1=Slightly uneven, 2=Uneven surface, 3=Uneven surface with loss of transparency & superficial vessels, 4=Small papillae, poor transparency, 5=Papillae greater than 0.5mm in size, no transparency, 6=Papillae greater than 0.5mm in size, vessels inside papillae, 7=Large papillae

Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

Mean of physiological outcomes for those subjects who are identified as susceptible versus non-susceptible to "Solution Induced Corneal Staining (SICS)". These measures are related to intensity of outcomes, i.e. discomfort, burning, dryness, etc. with lower scores being better on a scale of 1-5.

All subjects, enrolled, randomized, and completed the study. Subjects where identified as 'stainers' or 'non-stainers' and outcomes were reported per this stratification.

Mean of physiological outcomes for those subjects who are identified as susceptible versus non-susceptible for "Solution Induced Corneal Staining (SICS)". Average wearing time and average comfortable wearing time.

All subjects, enrolled, randomized, and completed the study. Subjects where identified as 'stainers' or 'non-stainers' and outcomes were reported per this stratification.

Mean of physiological outcomes for those subjects who are identified as susceptible versus non-susceptible for "Solution Induced Corneal Staining (SICS)". Physiological findings are done through a slit lamp examination and are known as biomicroscopy measurements. Measures are given in terms of average score with a minimum of zero and a worse grade the higher the value with a range of 0 to 4, (tarsal roughness is 0-7 scale).

All subjects, enrolled, randomized, and completed the study. Subjects where identified as 'stainers' or 'non-stainers' and outcomes were reported by this stratification.