Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| R01OH008961 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH/CDC) | FED |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Awkward postures during computer keyboard use have been hypothesized to be one cause of musculoskeletal pain/discomfort as well as musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremity (MSD-UE). Alternative computer keyboards purport to reduce musculoskeletal pain/discomfort and have been shown to change aspects of keyboard users' kinematics under laboratory conditions. However, research that has examined the effectiveness of alternative keyboards in reducing musculoskeletal pain/discomfort in the workplace is equivocal, and no study has examined the association between postures and musculoskeletal pain. The Aims of this 3-year prospective double cross-over trial are: 1) To examine the effectiveness of an alternative keyboard in reducing reports of pain over 6-months; 2) To examine the neutrality and stability of postures during keyboard use; and 3) To identify which postures are associated with lower levels of musculoskeletal pain. Seventy-five computer users will be randomly assigned to one of two keyboard use orders: Group 1 - AB (standard keyboard, alternative keyboard); Group 2 - BA (alternative keyboard, standard keyboard). All subjects will use their assigned keyboards for 6-months before switching to the next keyboard. Every week, subjects will report their musculoskeletal pain levels. Just prior to and just after each 6-month intervention subjects' kinematics performances on the keyboards will be recorded at the worksite using the Keyboard - Personal Computing Style (K-PeCS) instrument and in a laboratory setting using 3-dimensional motion capture technology.
Aim 1: To examine the effectiveness of an alternative keyboard in reducing pain over 6-months.
Hypothesis 1 (H-1) - At six months subjects using an alternative keyboard will have significantly lower musculoskeletal pain levels than when using a standard keyboard.
Aim 2: To examine the neutrality and stability of postures during keyboard use.
Hypothesis 3 (H-2) - Subjects using an alternative keyboard will have significantly more neutral postures than when using a standard keyboard at baseline and at 6 months Hypothesis 3 (H-3) - Subjects 6-months keyboarding postures will remain equivalent to the keyboarding postures documented at baseline.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Experimental | Subject receives typical keyboard first for 6 months and alternative keyboard second for 6 months |
|
| B | Experimental | Subject receives alternative keyboard first for 6 months and typical keyboard second for 6 months |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alternative Keyboard | Device | Subjects use either a typical or alternative keyboard |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Musculoskeletal Discomfort | Discomfort Survey (WDS) was used to assess symptoms and activity limitations. Participants reported on their work schedule, medication used for pain control, and discomfort in their neck/shoulder, back, and bilateral lower arms (elbows, forearms, wrists, and hands) using an 11-point numerical rating scale (0 = no discomfort/no limitations; 10 = unbearable discomfort/major limitations). We had to dichotomize the data during analysis due to severe skew towards not discomfort (0). Thus the final outcome was discomfort -yes or no | 6 months and 12 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Pittsburgh | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15260 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Group A (Typical/Alternative) | Subject receives typical keyboard for 5-6 months first and alternative keyboard second for 5-6 months (total 12 months in study |
| FG001 | Group B (Alternative/Typical) | Subject receives alternate keyboard for 5-6 months first and typical keyboard second for 5-6 months (total 12 months in study |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Period 1 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Period 2 |
|
GEE analyses allows a subjects inclusion even if they did not complete the full trial. Although we had a total of 15 subjects not complete the full trial we had sufficient data on 77 subjects to complete the GEE statistical analyses. With the crossover design we compared 77 subjects using the standard keyboard to 77 subjects using the alternative
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Group A | Subject receives typical keyboard first (0-6 months) and alternative keyboard second (7-12 months). In this crossover design all subjects received both standard and alternative keyboard, each group just received the keyboards in a different order |
| BG001 | Group B |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Musculoskeletal Discomfort | Discomfort Survey (WDS) was used to assess symptoms and activity limitations. Participants reported on their work schedule, medication used for pain control, and discomfort in their neck/shoulder, back, and bilateral lower arms (elbows, forearms, wrists, and hands) using an 11-point numerical rating scale (0 = no discomfort/no limitations; 10 = unbearable discomfort/major limitations). We had to dichotomize the data during analysis due to severe skew towards not discomfort (0). Thus the final outcome was discomfort -yes or no | Posted | Number | percentage of subjects with MSD | 6 months and 12 months |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Typical Keyboard | MSD reported when a subject was typing on a typical keyboard (regardless of order) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Nancy Baker | University of Pittsburgh | 412 383-6607 | nab36@pitt.edu |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Subject receives alternative keyboard first (0-6 months) and typical keyboard second (7-12 months). In this crossover design all subjects received both standard and alternative keyboard, each group just received the keyboards in a different order |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Avg Computer Use | Mean | Standard Deviation | hrs/day |
|
| Typing Speed | Number | participants |
|
| Baseline Discomfort | Number | participants |
|
MSD reported when a subject was typing on an alternative keyboard (regardless of order) |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 85 |
| 0 |
| 85 |
| EG001 | Alternative Keyboard | MSD reported when a subject was typing on an alternative keyboard (regardless of order) | 0 | 85 | 0 | 85 |
Not provided
Not provided