Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCT00799487 | |||
| 2015-001042-28 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this trial is to determine if the study medication, CONCERTA (methylphenidate HCl), is safe and effective in improving academic performance and behavior in children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) when compared to placebo.
The hypothesis is that CONCERTA (methylphenidate HCl) is safe and effective in improving academic performance and behavior in children with ADHD when compared to placebo as demonstrated using specified study measures. This is a double-blind (neither participant nor investigator knows the name of the assigned study drug), randomized (study drug assigned by chance), placebo-controlled, crossover study evaluating the academic, behavioral and cognitive effects of CONCERTA (methylphenidate HCl) on older children with ADHD This means that all eligible children will receive treatment with methylphenidate HCl throughout the study (the titration and assessment periods) and inactive pill (placebo) on 1 of the 2 laboratory classroom days. On the other laboratory classroom day they will receive their regular dose of CONCERTA (methylphenidate HCl). The primary efficacy variable in this study is the Permanent Product Math Test (PERMP) attempted score. Secondary Measures include: SKAMP (Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham), tests of inattention, reading fluency and comprehension, and memory. Assessments will be completed during each of the laboratory assessment days (12.5 hours). Participants will be assessed for adverse events throughout the study. Patients will initiate treatment with oral CONCERTA (methylphenidate HCl) 18 mg at baseline and continue morning dosing with increases every 3 to 7 days until an optimal dose is achieved, up to the maximum of 54 mg/day. Eligible patients will remain in the study for a maximum of 8 weeks.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | CONCERTA (methylphenidate HCl) or placebo Optimal Subject Dose (18mg-54mg) once daily during Lab School Day #1 with placebo on Day #2 |
|
| 2 | Experimental | CONCERTA (methylphenidate HCl) or placebo Optimal Subject Dose (18mg-54mg) once daily during Lab School Day #2 with placebo on Day #1 |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONCERTA (methylphenidate HCl) or placebo | Drug | Optimal Subject Dose (18mg-54mg) once daily during Lab School Day #1 with placebo on Day #2 |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Hour 4 Permanent Product Math Test Attempted Score (PERMP-Attempted) | PERMP (range: 0, 400) is a measure of academic productivity. These seatwork math tasks provide an objective measure of attention and accuracy in calculations. The level of difficulty is established on a screening math pretest. The subsequent laboratory school day assessments employed a series of 10-minute math tests (5 pages of 80 math problem each for a total of 400 problems available). Children were graded on the number of attempted problems. A higher number of problems attempted was indicative of greater attention to detail (higher score is preferable.) | Hour 4 of the Double-Blind Assessment Period Lab School Day |
| Hour 4 Permanent Product Math Test Correct Score (PERMP-Correct) | PERMP (range: 0, 400) is a measure of academic productivity. These seatwork math tasks provide an objective measure of attention and accuracy in calculations. The level of difficulty is established on a screening math pretest. The subsequent laboratory school day assessments employed a series of 10-minute math tests (5 pages of 80 math problem each for a total of 400 problems available). Children were graded on the number of correct problems. A higher number of problems correct, of those attempted, was indicative of greater accuracy. | Hour 4 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Hour 4 Swanson, Kotkin, Alger, M-Flynn and Pelham Scale for Deportment (SKAMP-Deportment) | The SKAMP scale measures the manifestations of ADHD using an independent observer (teacher) rating of children impairment in classroom behavior. The SKAMP-Deportment (SKAMP-D) (range: 0,36) is a sum of ratings on 6 deportment items (interacting with other children, interacting with adults, remaining quiet, staying seated, complying with the teacher's directions, and following the classroom rules). Each item was rated on a 7-point impairment scale (0=normal, 6=maximum impairment), with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC Clinical Trial | Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Little Rock | Arkansas | United States | ||||
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study Evaluating the Academic, Behavioral and Cognitive Effects of CONCERTA on Older Children with ADHD | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Not Randomized | Children who started dose adjustment period, but were not randomized |
| FG001 | Placebo/Concerta | Children randomized to receive Placebo at lab school day 1 and an individualized, optimal dose of Concerta (18mg, 36mg, or 54mg tablet) once daily at lab school day 2 |
| FG002 | Concerta/Placebo | Children randomized to receive an individualized, optimal dose of Concerta (18mg, 36mg, or 54mg tablet) once daily at lab school day 1 and Placebo at lab school day 2 |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dose Adjustment Period |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Double-Blind Assessment Period |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Not Randomized | Children who started dose adjustment period, but were not randomized |
| BG001 | Placebo/Concerta | Children randomized to receive Placebo at lab school day 1 and Concerta lab school day 2 |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Hour 4 Permanent Product Math Test Attempted Score (PERMP-Attempted) | PERMP (range: 0, 400) is a measure of academic productivity. These seatwork math tasks provide an objective measure of attention and accuracy in calculations. The level of difficulty is established on a screening math pretest. The subsequent laboratory school day assessments employed a series of 10-minute math tests (5 pages of 80 math problem each for a total of 400 problems available). Children were graded on the number of attempted problems. A higher number of problems attempted was indicative of greater attention to detail (higher score is preferable.) | No randomized children were included at this time point. The number of children treated with placebo is based on 68 children minus 3 children who did not crossover and minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. The number of children treated with CONCERTA is based on 68 children minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Problems attempted | Hour 4 of the Double-Blind Assessment Period Lab School Day |
|
The sponsor collects adverse events for 14 weeks starting with the signing of the informed consent (up to 4 weeks prior to treatment) continuing until the final visit at early discontinuation or study completion (up to 10 weeks after start of treatment).
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo | Placebo was received during the lab school day |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VP Medical Affairs, CNS | Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC | 609-730-2136 |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001289 | Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019958 | Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders |
| D065886 | Neurodevelopmental Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008774 | Methylphenidate |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010648 | Phenylacetates |
| D000146 | Acids, Carbocyclic |
| D002264 | Carboxylic Acids |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| CONCERTA (methylphenidate HCl) or placebo | Drug | Optimal Subject Dose (18mg-54mg) once daily during Lab School Day #2 with placebo on Day #1 |
|
| Hour 4 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
| Hour 4 Swanson, Kotkin, Alger, M-Flynn and Pelham Scale for Attention (SKAMP-Attention) | The SKAMP scale measures the manifestations of ADHD using an independent observer (teacher) rating of children impairment in classroom behavior. The SKAMP-Attention (SKAMP-A) (range: 0, 42) is a sum of the ratings on 7 attention items (getting started, sticking with tasks, attending to an activity, making activity transitions, completing assigned tasks, performing work accurately, and being neat and careful while writing or drawing). Each item was rated on a 7-point impairment scale (0=normal, 6=maximum impairment), with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. | Hour 4 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
| Hour 4 Swanson, Kotkin, Alger, M-Flynn and Pelham Scale for Composite (SKAMP-Composite) | The SKAMP scale measures the manifestations of ADHD using an independent observer (teacher) rating of child impairment in classroom behavior. A composite score (range: 0, 78) for the SKAMP variable (13 items total) was obtained by summing the SKAMP-D and SKAMP-A subscale scores. A lower score was preferable, as a higher score represented greater behavioral impairment. | Hour 4 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
| Hour 5.5 Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) ADHD Score | The TOVA is a computerized, visual continuous performance test which provides measures of attention. The stimulus, presented for 100 milliseconds (ms) at the rate of 30 per minute, is a computer-presented square containing a square hole near the top (target) or bottom (non-target) edge. The first half of the TOVA requires that the child sustain attention while the second half requires inhibition of response to a non-target (observed range: -15.2, 5.2). An ADHD score of less than -1.80 is suggestive of ADHD. | Hour 5.5 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
| Hour 5.5 Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) Reaction Time (Msec) | The TOVA is a computerized, visual continuous performance test which provides measures of attention. The stimulus, presented for 100 milliseconds (ms) at the rate of 30 per minute, is a computer-presented square containing a square hole near the top (target) or bottom (non-target) edge. The first half of the TOVA requires that the child sustain attention while the second half requires inhibition of response to a non-target. Mean response latency in msecs (observed range: -75.4, 129.5). Higher score indicates faster reaction time. | Hour 5.5 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
| Hour 5.5 Test of Variables of Attention(TOVA) Reaction Time Variability (Standard Deviation in Milliseconds (Msecs)) | The TOVA is a computerized, visual continuous performance test which provides measures of attention. The stimulus, presented for 100 milliseconds (ms) at the rate of 30 per minute, is a computer-presented square containing a square hole near the top (target) or bottom (non-target) edge. The first half of the TOVA requires that the child sustain attention while the second half requires inhibition of response to a non-target. SD of response times (msecs) (observed range: -177.6, 132.9). Higher score indicates less variability. | Hour 5.5 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
| Hour 5.5 Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning (WRAML-2) Finger Windows Backwards | WRAML-2 (range: 0, 28) is designed to evaluate a child's ability to learn and to memorize information, consists of 9 subtests from which 4 summary indexes can be calculated: verbal memory index, visual memory index, learning index, and general memory index. During this test the investigator pointed to a longer and longer series of windows on a card at the rate of 1 location per second, and then the child was asked to reproduce the sequence exactly in reverse order. One point was given for each correctly recalled sequence, and the test was discontinued after 3 consecutive errors. | Hour 5.5 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
| Hour 5.5 Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning (WRAML-2) Finger Windows Forwards | WRAML-2 (range: 0, 28) is designed to evaluate a child's ability to learn and to memorize information, consists of 9 subtests from which 4 summary indexes can be calculated: verbal memory index, visual memory index, learning index, and general memory index. During this test the investigator pointed to a longer and longer series of windows on a card at the rate of 1 location per second, and then the child was asked to reproduce the sequence exactly. One point was given for each correctly recalled sequence, and the test was discontinued after 3 consecutive errors. | Hour 5.5 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
| Hour 5.5 Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) Commissions | The TOVA is a computerized, visual continuous performance test which provides measures of attention. The stimulus, presented for 100 milliseconds (ms) at the rate of 30 per minute, is a computer-presented square containing a square hole near the top (target) or bottom (non-target) edge. The first half of the TOVA requires that the child sustain attention while the second half requires inhibition of response to a non-target. Responses to non-targets. Higher score is preferable (observed range: -82.4, 128.9). | Hour 5.5 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
| Hour 5.5 Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - 3rd ed. (WISC-III-PI) Digit Span Backwards | Each child individually was given a sequence of numbers with the sequence becoming progressively longer. The child was then asked to repeat the digits in the same sequence, either forwards or backwards. Each sequence length was attempted twice. The test was complete after failure on both trials of any sequence length. One point was awarded if the participant passed only 1 trial of a sequence length. Zero points were given if the participant failed both trials. The maximum raw scores were 16 forwards and 14 backwards. A higher score was indicative of better recall and attention (range: 0, 14). | Hour 5.5 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
| Hour 8.75 Gray Silent Reading Test (GSRT) | Gray Silent Reading Test (GSRT) is a reliable, validated measure of reading comprehension administered in the group setting during the first half hour of the homework session (observed range: 0, 141). A higher score is preferable as it means more questions were answered correctly. | Hour 8.75 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
| Hour 7.5 Test of Handwriting Skills (Revised) (THS-R) | The THS-R is a standardized, untimed assessment designed to evaluate neurosensory integration manifested in manuscript and cursive writing. The test includes the 10 subtests: writing from memory the upper- and lower-case letters of the alphabet in order, writing from dictation the upper and lower-case letters of the alphabet out of order, single digit-numbers out of order, selected words, and copying selected letters, words, and sentences. Each subtest was scored from zero (poorly formed letters) to 3 (perfectly formed letters). A higher score was preferable (observed range: 0, 118). | Hour 7.5 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
| Hour 3.5 Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) | The DIBELS (observed range: 0, 212), used to assess reading fluency, consists of standardized, individually administered measures of early literacy development. These short (1 minute) fluency measures were developed based upon essential early literacy domains to assess development of phonological awareness, alphabetic understanding, and automaticity and fluency. Only the paragraph fluency component of an age/grade-appropriate DIBELS was used. Children read 3 stories and completed the forms. A higher score was preferable and indicated a greater number of words read correctly in the time allowed | Hour 3.5 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
| Hour 5.5 Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - 3rd ed. (WISC-III-PI) Digit Span Forwards | Each child individually was given a sequence of numbers with the sequence becoming progressively longer. The child was then asked to repeat the digits in the same sequence, either forwards or backwards. Each sequence length was attempted twice. The test was complete after failure on both trials of any sequence length. One point was awarded if the participant passed only 1 trial of a sequence length. Zero points were given if the participant failed both trials. The maximum raw scores were 16 forwards and 14 backwards. A higher score was indicative of better recall and attention (range: 0, 16). | Hour 5.5 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
| Hour 5.5 Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) Omissions | The TOVA is a computerized, visual continuous performance test which provides measures of attention. The stimulus, presented for 100 milliseconds (ms) at the rate of 30 per minute, is a computer-presented square containing a square hole near the top (target) or bottom (non-target) edge. The first half of the TOVA requires that the child sustain attention while the second half requires inhibition of response to a non-target. Number of targets missed. Higher score is preferable (observed range: -419.4, 108.9). | Hour 5.5 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
| Hour 3.0 Grammar Task | This task, presented once during a laboratory school day, was designed to index "attention to detail" by determining how many grammatical mistakes each child could identify and circle in a brief paragraph. The errors were not difficult to identify and were designed to show attention to task, not comprehension. A higher number of errors identified, of those possible, was indicative of better attention - identification of grammatical errors (range: 0, 1 represents correct responses divided by the number of possible responses). | Hour 3.0 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
| Hour 8.75 Packet Activity - Short Story With Questions for Comprehension | Packet Activities: Assessment of ability to organize, listen to instructions, initiate task, complete task, and distractibility, by completing a word search, reading a short story for comprehension on a multiple choice test, reading a longer story for comprehension on a true/false test, decoding a mystery sentence, and completing various vocabulary assessments (word choice, homophones; base/root words, alphabetic order)(range: 0, 1 represents correct responses divided by the number of possible responses). | Hour 8.75 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
| Hour 8.75 Packet Activity - Identiy Root Word | Packet Activities: Assessment of ability to organize, listen to instructions, initiate task, complete task, and distractibility, by completing a word search, reading a short story for comprehension on a multiple choice test, reading a longer story for comprehension on a true/false test, decoding a mystery sentence, and completing various vocabulary assessments (word choice, homophones; base/root words, alphabetic order) (range: 0, 1 represents correct responses divided by the number of possible responses). | Hour 8.75 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
| Hour 8.75 Packet Activity - Alphabetize List of Words | Packet Activities: Assessment of ability to organize, listen to instructions, initiate task, complete task, and distractibility, by completing a word search, reading a short story for comprehension on a multiple choice test, reading a longer story for comprehension on a true/false test, decoding a mystery sentence, and completing various vocabulary assessments (word choice, homophones; base/root words, alphabetic order) (range: 0, 1 represents correct responses divided by the number of possible responses). | Hour 8.75 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
| Hour 8.75 Packet Activity - Identify Multiple Meanings for Words | Packet Activities: Assessment of ability to organize, listen to instructions, initiate task, complete task, and distractibility, by completing a word search, reading a short story for comprehension on a multiple choice test, reading a longer story for comprehension on a true/false test, decoding a mystery sentence, and completing various vocabulary assessments (word choice, homophones; base/root words, alphabetic order) (range: 0, 1 represents correct responses divided by the number of possible responses). | Hour 8.75 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
| Hour 8.75 Packet Activity - Complete Sentences Using Words Provided | Packet Activities: Assessment of ability to organize, listen to instructions, initiate task, complete task, and distractibility, by completing a word search, reading a short story for comprehension on a multiple choice test, reading a longer story for comprehension on a true/false test, decoding a mystery sentence, and completing various vocabulary assessments (word choice, homophones; base/root words, alphabetic order) (range: 0, 1 represents correct responses divided by the number of possible responses). | Hour 8.75 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
| Hour 8.75 Packet Activity - Word Search | Packet Activities: Assessment of ability to organize, listen to instructions, initiate task, complete task, and distractibility, by completing a word search, reading a short story for comprehension on a multiple choice test, reading a longer story for comprehension on a true/false test, decoding a mystery sentence, and completing various vocabulary assessments (word choice, homophones; base/root words, alphabetic order) (range: 0, 1 represents correct responses divided by the number of possible responses). | Hour 8.75 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
| Hour 8.75 Packet Activity - Decode the Mystery Sentence | Packet Activities: Assessment of ability to organize, listen to instructions, initiate task, complete task, and distractibility, by completing a word search, reading a short story for comprehension on a multiple choice test, reading a longer story for comprehension on a true/false test, decoding a mystery sentence, and completing various vocabulary assessments (word choice, homophones; base/root words, alphabetic order) (range: 0, 1 represents correct responses divided by the number of possible responses). | Hour 8.75 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
| Las Vegas |
| Nevada |
| United States |
| Durham | North Carolina | United States |
| Optimal Dose Not Achieved |
|
| Investigator Discretion |
|
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| Parent to home school child (exclusion) |
|
| Child too young (exclusion) |
|
| Missed laboratory day 1 |
|
| ADHD RS-IV rating scale >85th percentile |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| BG002 | Concerta/Placebo | Children randomized to receive Concerta at lab school day 1 and Placebo at lab school day 2 |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| OG000 | Not Randomized | Children who started dose adjustment period, but were not randomized |
| OG001 | Placebo | Children randomized to receive Placebo at lab school day 1 or lab school day 2 |
| OG002 | Concerta | Children randomized to receive Concerta at lab school day 1 or lab school day 2 |
|
|
|
| Primary | Hour 4 Permanent Product Math Test Correct Score (PERMP-Correct) | PERMP (range: 0, 400) is a measure of academic productivity. These seatwork math tasks provide an objective measure of attention and accuracy in calculations. The level of difficulty is established on a screening math pretest. The subsequent laboratory school day assessments employed a series of 10-minute math tests (5 pages of 80 math problem each for a total of 400 problems available). Children were graded on the number of correct problems. A higher number of problems correct, of those attempted, was indicative of greater accuracy. | No randomized children were included at this time point. The number of children treated with placebo is based on 68 children minus 3 children who did not crossover and minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. The number of children treated with CONCERTA is based on 68 children minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Problems correct | Hour 4 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Hour 4 Swanson, Kotkin, Alger, M-Flynn and Pelham Scale for Deportment (SKAMP-Deportment) | The SKAMP scale measures the manifestations of ADHD using an independent observer (teacher) rating of children impairment in classroom behavior. The SKAMP-Deportment (SKAMP-D) (range: 0,36) is a sum of ratings on 6 deportment items (interacting with other children, interacting with adults, remaining quiet, staying seated, complying with the teacher's directions, and following the classroom rules). Each item was rated on a 7-point impairment scale (0=normal, 6=maximum impairment), with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. | No randomized children were included at this time point. The number of children treated with placebo is based on 68 children minus 3 children who did not crossover and minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. The number of children treated with CONCERTA is based on 68 children minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Hour 4 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Hour 4 Swanson, Kotkin, Alger, M-Flynn and Pelham Scale for Attention (SKAMP-Attention) | The SKAMP scale measures the manifestations of ADHD using an independent observer (teacher) rating of children impairment in classroom behavior. The SKAMP-Attention (SKAMP-A) (range: 0, 42) is a sum of the ratings on 7 attention items (getting started, sticking with tasks, attending to an activity, making activity transitions, completing assigned tasks, performing work accurately, and being neat and careful while writing or drawing). Each item was rated on a 7-point impairment scale (0=normal, 6=maximum impairment), with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. | No randomized children were included at this time point. The number of children treated with placebo is based on 68 children minus 3 children who did not crossover and minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. The number of children treated with CONCERTA is based on 68 children minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Hour 4 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Hour 4 Swanson, Kotkin, Alger, M-Flynn and Pelham Scale for Composite (SKAMP-Composite) | The SKAMP scale measures the manifestations of ADHD using an independent observer (teacher) rating of child impairment in classroom behavior. A composite score (range: 0, 78) for the SKAMP variable (13 items total) was obtained by summing the SKAMP-D and SKAMP-A subscale scores. A lower score was preferable, as a higher score represented greater behavioral impairment. | No randomized children were included at this time point. The number of children treated with placebo is based on 68 children minus 3 children who did not crossover and minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. The number of children treated with CONCERTA is based on 68 children minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Hour 4 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Hour 5.5 Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) ADHD Score | The TOVA is a computerized, visual continuous performance test which provides measures of attention. The stimulus, presented for 100 milliseconds (ms) at the rate of 30 per minute, is a computer-presented square containing a square hole near the top (target) or bottom (non-target) edge. The first half of the TOVA requires that the child sustain attention while the second half requires inhibition of response to a non-target (observed range: -15.2, 5.2). An ADHD score of less than -1.80 is suggestive of ADHD. | No randomized children were included at this time point. The number of children treated with placebo is based on 68 children minus 3 children who did not crossover and minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. The number of children treated with CONCERTA is based on 68 children minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Hour 5.5 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Hour 5.5 Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) Reaction Time (Msec) | The TOVA is a computerized, visual continuous performance test which provides measures of attention. The stimulus, presented for 100 milliseconds (ms) at the rate of 30 per minute, is a computer-presented square containing a square hole near the top (target) or bottom (non-target) edge. The first half of the TOVA requires that the child sustain attention while the second half requires inhibition of response to a non-target. Mean response latency in msecs (observed range: -75.4, 129.5). Higher score indicates faster reaction time. | No randomized children were included at this time point. The number of children treated with placebo is based on 68 children minus 3 children who did not crossover and minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. The number of children treated with CONCERTA is based on 68 children minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Milliseconds (msecs) | Hour 5.5 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Hour 5.5 Test of Variables of Attention(TOVA) Reaction Time Variability (Standard Deviation in Milliseconds (Msecs)) | The TOVA is a computerized, visual continuous performance test which provides measures of attention. The stimulus, presented for 100 milliseconds (ms) at the rate of 30 per minute, is a computer-presented square containing a square hole near the top (target) or bottom (non-target) edge. The first half of the TOVA requires that the child sustain attention while the second half requires inhibition of response to a non-target. SD of response times (msecs) (observed range: -177.6, 132.9). Higher score indicates less variability. | No randomized children were included at this time point. The number of children treated with placebo is based on 68 children minus 3 children who did not crossover and minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. The number of children treated with CONCERTA is based on 68 children minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | milliseconds | Hour 5.5 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Hour 5.5 Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning (WRAML-2) Finger Windows Backwards | WRAML-2 (range: 0, 28) is designed to evaluate a child's ability to learn and to memorize information, consists of 9 subtests from which 4 summary indexes can be calculated: verbal memory index, visual memory index, learning index, and general memory index. During this test the investigator pointed to a longer and longer series of windows on a card at the rate of 1 location per second, and then the child was asked to reproduce the sequence exactly in reverse order. One point was given for each correctly recalled sequence, and the test was discontinued after 3 consecutive errors. | No randomized children were included at this time point. The number of children treated with placebo is based on 68 children minus 3 children who did not crossover and minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. The number of children treated with CONCERTA is based on 68 children minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Correct Sequences | Hour 5.5 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Hour 5.5 Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning (WRAML-2) Finger Windows Forwards | WRAML-2 (range: 0, 28) is designed to evaluate a child's ability to learn and to memorize information, consists of 9 subtests from which 4 summary indexes can be calculated: verbal memory index, visual memory index, learning index, and general memory index. During this test the investigator pointed to a longer and longer series of windows on a card at the rate of 1 location per second, and then the child was asked to reproduce the sequence exactly. One point was given for each correctly recalled sequence, and the test was discontinued after 3 consecutive errors. | No randomized children were included at this time point. The number of children treated with placebo is based on 68 children minus 3 children who did not crossover and minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. The number of children treated with CONCERTA is based on 68 children minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Correct Sequences | Hour 5.5 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Hour 5.5 Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) Commissions | The TOVA is a computerized, visual continuous performance test which provides measures of attention. The stimulus, presented for 100 milliseconds (ms) at the rate of 30 per minute, is a computer-presented square containing a square hole near the top (target) or bottom (non-target) edge. The first half of the TOVA requires that the child sustain attention while the second half requires inhibition of response to a non-target. Responses to non-targets. Higher score is preferable (observed range: -82.4, 128.9). | No randomized children were included at this time point. The number of children treated with placebo is based on 68 children minus 3 children who did not crossover and minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. The number of children treated with CONCERTA is based on 68 children minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Responses to non-targets | Hour 5.5 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Hour 5.5 Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - 3rd ed. (WISC-III-PI) Digit Span Backwards | Each child individually was given a sequence of numbers with the sequence becoming progressively longer. The child was then asked to repeat the digits in the same sequence, either forwards or backwards. Each sequence length was attempted twice. The test was complete after failure on both trials of any sequence length. One point was awarded if the participant passed only 1 trial of a sequence length. Zero points were given if the participant failed both trials. The maximum raw scores were 16 forwards and 14 backwards. A higher score was indicative of better recall and attention (range: 0, 14). | No randomized children were included at this time point. The number of children treated with placebo is based on 68 children minus 3 children who did not crossover and minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. The number of children treated with CONCERTA is based on 68 children minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Correct Sequences | Hour 5.5 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Hour 8.75 Gray Silent Reading Test (GSRT) | Gray Silent Reading Test (GSRT) is a reliable, validated measure of reading comprehension administered in the group setting during the first half hour of the homework session (observed range: 0, 141). A higher score is preferable as it means more questions were answered correctly. | No randomized children were included at this time point. The number of children treated with placebo is based on 68 children minus 3 children who did not crossover and minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. The number of children treated with CONCERTA is based on 68 children minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Hour 8.75 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Hour 7.5 Test of Handwriting Skills (Revised) (THS-R) | The THS-R is a standardized, untimed assessment designed to evaluate neurosensory integration manifested in manuscript and cursive writing. The test includes the 10 subtests: writing from memory the upper- and lower-case letters of the alphabet in order, writing from dictation the upper and lower-case letters of the alphabet out of order, single digit-numbers out of order, selected words, and copying selected letters, words, and sentences. Each subtest was scored from zero (poorly formed letters) to 3 (perfectly formed letters). A higher score was preferable (observed range: 0, 118). | No randomized children were included at this time point. The number of children treated with placebo is based on 68 children minus 3 children who did not crossover and minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. The number of children treated with CONCERTA is based on 68 children minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Hour 7.5 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Hour 3.5 Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) | The DIBELS (observed range: 0, 212), used to assess reading fluency, consists of standardized, individually administered measures of early literacy development. These short (1 minute) fluency measures were developed based upon essential early literacy domains to assess development of phonological awareness, alphabetic understanding, and automaticity and fluency. Only the paragraph fluency component of an age/grade-appropriate DIBELS was used. Children read 3 stories and completed the forms. A higher score was preferable and indicated a greater number of words read correctly in the time allowed | No randomized children were included at this time point. The number of children treated with placebo is based on 68 children minus 3 children who did not crossover and minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. The number of children treated with CONCERTA is based on 68 children minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Hour 3.5 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Hour 5.5 Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - 3rd ed. (WISC-III-PI) Digit Span Forwards | Each child individually was given a sequence of numbers with the sequence becoming progressively longer. The child was then asked to repeat the digits in the same sequence, either forwards or backwards. Each sequence length was attempted twice. The test was complete after failure on both trials of any sequence length. One point was awarded if the participant passed only 1 trial of a sequence length. Zero points were given if the participant failed both trials. The maximum raw scores were 16 forwards and 14 backwards. A higher score was indicative of better recall and attention (range: 0, 16). | No randomized children were included at this time point. The number of children treated with placebo is based on 68 children minus 3 children who did not crossover and minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. The number of children treated with CONCERTA is based on 68 children minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Correct Sequences | Hour 5.5 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Hour 5.5 Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) Omissions | The TOVA is a computerized, visual continuous performance test which provides measures of attention. The stimulus, presented for 100 milliseconds (ms) at the rate of 30 per minute, is a computer-presented square containing a square hole near the top (target) or bottom (non-target) edge. The first half of the TOVA requires that the child sustain attention while the second half requires inhibition of response to a non-target. Number of targets missed. Higher score is preferable (observed range: -419.4, 108.9). | No randomized children were included at this time point. The number of children treated with placebo is based on 68 children minus 3 children who did not crossover and minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. The number of children treated with CONCERTA is based on 68 children minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Targets missed | Hour 5.5 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Hour 3.0 Grammar Task | This task, presented once during a laboratory school day, was designed to index "attention to detail" by determining how many grammatical mistakes each child could identify and circle in a brief paragraph. The errors were not difficult to identify and were designed to show attention to task, not comprehension. A higher number of errors identified, of those possible, was indicative of better attention - identification of grammatical errors (range: 0, 1 represents correct responses divided by the number of possible responses). | No randomized children were included at this time point. The number of children treated with placebo is based on 68 children minus 3 children who did not crossover and minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. The number of children treated with CONCERTA is based on 68 children minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Hour 3.0 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Hour 8.75 Packet Activity - Short Story With Questions for Comprehension | Packet Activities: Assessment of ability to organize, listen to instructions, initiate task, complete task, and distractibility, by completing a word search, reading a short story for comprehension on a multiple choice test, reading a longer story for comprehension on a true/false test, decoding a mystery sentence, and completing various vocabulary assessments (word choice, homophones; base/root words, alphabetic order)(range: 0, 1 represents correct responses divided by the number of possible responses). | No randomized children were included at this time point. The number of children treated with placebo is based on 68 children minus 3 children who did not crossover and minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. The number of children treated with CONCERTA is based on 68 children minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Hour 8.75 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Hour 8.75 Packet Activity - Identiy Root Word | Packet Activities: Assessment of ability to organize, listen to instructions, initiate task, complete task, and distractibility, by completing a word search, reading a short story for comprehension on a multiple choice test, reading a longer story for comprehension on a true/false test, decoding a mystery sentence, and completing various vocabulary assessments (word choice, homophones; base/root words, alphabetic order) (range: 0, 1 represents correct responses divided by the number of possible responses). | No randomized children were included at this time point. The number of children treated with placebo is based on 68 children minus 3 children who did not crossover and minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. The number of children treated with CONCERTA is based on 68 children minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Hour 8.75 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Hour 8.75 Packet Activity - Alphabetize List of Words | Packet Activities: Assessment of ability to organize, listen to instructions, initiate task, complete task, and distractibility, by completing a word search, reading a short story for comprehension on a multiple choice test, reading a longer story for comprehension on a true/false test, decoding a mystery sentence, and completing various vocabulary assessments (word choice, homophones; base/root words, alphabetic order) (range: 0, 1 represents correct responses divided by the number of possible responses). | No randomized children were included at this time point. The number of children treated with placebo is based on 68 children minus 3 children who did not crossover and minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. The number of children treated with CONCERTA is based on 68 children minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Hour 8.75 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Hour 8.75 Packet Activity - Identify Multiple Meanings for Words | Packet Activities: Assessment of ability to organize, listen to instructions, initiate task, complete task, and distractibility, by completing a word search, reading a short story for comprehension on a multiple choice test, reading a longer story for comprehension on a true/false test, decoding a mystery sentence, and completing various vocabulary assessments (word choice, homophones; base/root words, alphabetic order) (range: 0, 1 represents correct responses divided by the number of possible responses). | No randomized children were included at this time point. The number of children treated with placebo is based on 68 children minus 3 children who did not crossover and minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. The number of children treated with CONCERTA is based on 68 children minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Hour 8.75 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Hour 8.75 Packet Activity - Complete Sentences Using Words Provided | Packet Activities: Assessment of ability to organize, listen to instructions, initiate task, complete task, and distractibility, by completing a word search, reading a short story for comprehension on a multiple choice test, reading a longer story for comprehension on a true/false test, decoding a mystery sentence, and completing various vocabulary assessments (word choice, homophones; base/root words, alphabetic order) (range: 0, 1 represents correct responses divided by the number of possible responses). | No randomized children were included at this time point. The number of children treated with placebo is based on 68 children minus 3 children who did not crossover and minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. The number of children treated with CONCERTA is based on 68 children minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Hour 8.75 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Hour 8.75 Packet Activity - Word Search | Packet Activities: Assessment of ability to organize, listen to instructions, initiate task, complete task, and distractibility, by completing a word search, reading a short story for comprehension on a multiple choice test, reading a longer story for comprehension on a true/false test, decoding a mystery sentence, and completing various vocabulary assessments (word choice, homophones; base/root words, alphabetic order) (range: 0, 1 represents correct responses divided by the number of possible responses). | No randomized children were included at this time point. The number of children treated with placebo is based on 68 children minus 3 children who did not crossover and minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. The number of children treated with CONCERTA is based on 68 children minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Hour 8.75 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Hour 8.75 Packet Activity - Decode the Mystery Sentence | Packet Activities: Assessment of ability to organize, listen to instructions, initiate task, complete task, and distractibility, by completing a word search, reading a short story for comprehension on a multiple choice test, reading a longer story for comprehension on a true/false test, decoding a mystery sentence, and completing various vocabulary assessments (word choice, homophones; base/root words, alphabetic order) (range: 0, 1 represents correct responses divided by the number of possible responses). | No randomized children were included at this time point. The number of children treated with placebo is based on 68 children minus 3 children who did not crossover and minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. The number of children treated with CONCERTA is based on 68 children minus 1 child who dropped out before laboratory day 2. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Hour 8.75 of the Lab School Day During the Double-Blind Assessment Period |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 67 |
| 5 |
| 67 |
| EG001 | Concerta | Concerta was received during the lab school day | 0 | 67 | 9 | 67 |
| EG002 | Open Label | dose adjustment period and double blind period other than lab school day | 0 | 89 | 75 | 89 |
| Affect lability | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Decreased appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Anorexia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Irritability | General disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 11.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 11.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Nasal congestion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Weight decreased | Investigations | MedDRA 11.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D010880 |
| Piperidines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |