A Randomised Phase 3 Study Comparing Biweekly and Tailored Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide Followed by Biweekly Tailored Docetaxel Versus Three Weekly Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide + 5-fluorouracil Followed by Docetaxel in Lymph Node Positive or High Risk Lymph Node Negative Breast Cancer Patients
A Randomised Phase 3 Study Comparing Biweekly and Tailored Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide Followed by Biweekly Tailored Docetaxel Versus Three Weekly Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide + 5-fluorouracil Followed by Docetaxel in Lymph Node Positive or High Risk Lymph Node Negative Breast Cancer Patients
This is an adjuvant, open, prospective, randomized study to compare:
A. Individually tailored and two weekly dosed epirubicin + cyclophosphamide followed by a three weeks break followed by biweekly and tailored docetaxel (dtEC→dtT) given every second week, to
B. Fixed dosed and three weekly epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil, followed by fixed dosed and three weekly docetaxel (FEC→T).
Patients with primary node-positive or high risk lymph node negative breast cancer will be eligible for the study.
The primary objective of the phase 3 study is to compare breast cancer relapse-free survival (BCRFS) between the dtEC→dtT and FE100C→T. To detect a five-year BCRFS difference of 0.710 to 0.790 about 1000 patients per arm will be needed. They will be recruited during four years and followed another two years for breast cancer events.
Secondary objectives are to compare
Distant disease-free survival (DDFS)
Event-free survival and
Overall survival
Health-related quality of life and toxicity analyses according to CTC
Outcome in relation to tumour biological factors and polymorphism patterns
Tumour tissue will be obtained and stored for studies of prognostication and therapy prediction.
Last patient randomized was September 2011.
Are described under the heading "Outcome measures"
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Saint Veit/Glan, Austria