Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09-M-0034 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Severe mood dysregulation (SMD) is a very common syndrome in children. Its symptoms include very severe irritability, including persistent anger and frequent outbursts, as well as distractibility, hyperactivity, and other symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Many children with SMD receive the diagnosis of bipolar disorder (BD) in the community, although they do not have clear manic episodes (with symptoms such as extreme happiness and decreased need for sleep). Because SMD has not been studied in depth, we do not know which medications are most helpful to those with SMD. This study will evaluate the effectiveness of the stimulant medication methylphenidate (MPH, more commonly known as Ritalin ) when combined (or not combined) with the antidepressant citalopram (Celexa ) in treating symptoms of SMD in children and adolescents. This study will provide information about how to treat SMD in youth.
This study will include approximately 80 patients between 7 and 17 years of age with SMD. The patient s symptoms must have started before age 12.
The study will consist of four phases carried out over 4 to 5 months. During Phase 1, the patient will undergo blood and urine tests, and will gradually taper off his or her medication. The duration of this phase depends on the patient s medication before starting the study. In Phase 2, the patient remains off all medication for 1 week. In Phase 3, the patient will be treated with MPH for 2 weeks, and then will be randomly assigned to receive either MPH plus citalopram or MPH plus a placebo for a further 8 weeks. In Phase 4, the researchers will evaluate the effectiveness of the medications taken, and begin an open treatment phase using medications that they deem appropriate for that patient (this may include MPH with citalopram and/or other medication combinations).
Most patients will be admitted to the Pediatric Behavioral Health Unit at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center during the medication withdrawal part of the study (Phases 1 and 2). From Phase 3 on, a patient may participate as an inpatient, outpatient, or in day treatment, depending on what is in his or her best interests.
...
Objective: To test the efficacy of citalopram plus methylphenidate vs. placebo plus methylphenidate in decreasing irritability in youth with severe mood dysregulation.
Study population: Youth ages 7-17 with severe mood dysregulation (SMD). SMD is characterized by nonepisodic, impairing irritability (defined as increased reactivity to negative emotional stimuli at least 3 times/week and angry or sad mood, most days, most of the time, noticeable to others) and hyperarousal (three of: distractibility, intrusiveness, pressured speech, racing thoughts, agitation, insomnia), with onset before age 12. Many of these children receive the diagnosis of bipolar disorder (BD) in the community, although they do not meet DSM-IV criteria for BD because of the lack of distinct manic episodes.
Design: Medication withdrawal, followed by a 5-week dose stabilization phase of methylphenidate and an 8-week double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment trial of citalopram plus methylphenidate vs. placebo plus methylphenidate. There will also be optional open treatment at the end, so that all patients have the opportunity to have a total of up to 10 weeks of citalopram plus methylphenidate. The target dose of citalopram will be 20-40 mg/day.
Outcome measures: The primary outcome measures will be the Aberrant Behavior Checklist Irritability subscale and the CGI-I.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Add-on citalopram following optimized methylphenidate | Active Comparator | After optimized treatment with methylphenidate, those who meet threshold for chronic irritability are randomized to add-on citalopram or placebo |
|
| Add-on placebo after optimized methylphenidate | Placebo Comparator | After optimized treatment with methylphenidate, those who meet threshold for chronic irritability are randomized to add-on citalopram or placebo |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Add-on citalopram following optimized methylphenidate | Drug | After optimized treatment with methylphenidate, those who meet threshold for chronic irritability are randomized to add-on citalopram or placebo |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants That "Much Improved" (Score of 2) in, or "Completely Recovered" (Score of 1) From Their Irritability Severity, as Measured With the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I). | A measure of change of irritability severity taking the baseline before randomization as a reference. Scores range 1 to 8, in which 1=Completely recovered,... 5=Unchanged,... 8=Much worse. Percentage of participants who responded are based on an estimation and might not match exactly with discrete numbers of participants based on the denominator. | Collected weekly during the 8-week trial. The 8th-week outcome is reported. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Irritability Severity at 8th Week of Trial. | Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S): A measure of severity of irritability scale (from 1=Normal, not at all ill to 7=Among the most extremely ill patients). | Collected weekly during the 8th week trial. The 8th-week outcome is reported. |
| Functional Impairment at 8th Week of Trial |
Not provided
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
Ages 7-17
Abnormal mood (specifically, anger, sadness, and/or irritability), present at least half of the day most days, and of sufficient severity to be noticeable by people in the child s environment (e.g. parents, teachers, peers).
Hyperarousal, as defined by at least three of the following symptoms: insomnia, agitation, distractibility, racing thoughts or flight of ideas, pressured speech, intrusiveness
Compared to his/her peers, the child exhibits markedly increased reactivity to negative emotional stimuli that is manifest verbally and/or behaviorally. For example, the child responds to frustration with extended temper tantrums (inappropriate for age and/or precipitating event), verbal rages, and/or aggression toward people or property. Such events occur, on average, at least three times a week
Criteria 2, 3, and 4 are currently present and have been present for at least 12 months without any symptom-free periods exceeding two months.
The onset of symptoms must be prior to age 12 years.
The symptoms are severe in at least one setting (e.g. violent outbursts, extreme verbal abuse, assaultiveness at home, school, or with peers). In addition, there are at least mild symptoms (distractibility, intrusiveness) in a second setting.
Currently in treatment with a psychiatrist for the symptoms.
The child is failing his/her treatment. To meet this criterion:
i.The child s current CGAS score must be less than or equal to 60.
ii.The child s psychiatrist/treater must agree that the child s response to his/her current treatment is no more than minimal. According to this criterion, it would be clinically appropriate to change the child s current treatment.
iii.On the basis of record review and interviews with child and parent, the research team agrees that the child s response to his/her current treatment is no more than minimal.
iv.The child has a score of greater than 12 on the irritability subscale of the Aberrant Behavior Checklist.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
As assessed in the mania section of the K-SADS-PL, the individual exhibits any of these cardinal bipolar symptoms in distinct periods lasting more than 1 day, and therefore meets criteria for bipolar disorder not otherwise specified:
i) Elevated or expansive mood
ii) Grandiosity or inflated self-esteem
iii) Decreased need for sleep
iv) Increase in goal-directed activity (this can result in the excessive involvement in pleasurable activities that have a high potential for painful consequences)
Meets criteria for schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, schizoaffective illness, more than mild PDD, or PTSD.
Meets criteria for substance use disorder in the three months prior to randomization.
IQ less than 70
The symptoms are due to the direct physiological effects of a drug of abuse, or to a general medical or neurological condition.
Currently pregnant or lactating, or sexually active without using a barrier method of contraception.
Failed an adequate trial (defined as four weeks of consecutive treatment at the minimally effective) or severe ill effects while on citalopram (at least 20 mg) or escitalopram (at least 10 mg).
Hypersensitivity or severe adverse reaction to methylphenidate
A history of serious adverse reactions (psychosis, severely increased activation compared to baseline) to methylphenidate or amphetamines.
Any chronic medical condition that requires medications that are contraindicated with SSRIs or methylphenidate, or any serious chronic or unstable medical disorder.
Medical contraindications to treatment with SSRI or stimulant (e.g. liver, seizure, renal, platelet disorder).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Argyris Stringaris, M.D. | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike | Bethesda | Maryland | 20892 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15923042 | Background | Amsterdam JD, Shults J. Comparison of fluoxetine, olanzapine, and combined fluoxetine plus olanzapine initial therapy of bipolar type I and type II major depression--lack of manic induction. J Affect Disord. 2005 Jul;87(1):121-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2005.02.018. | |
| 16945343 | Background | Baumer FM, Howe M, Gallelli K, Simeonova DI, Hallmayer J, Chang KD. A pilot study of antidepressant-induced mania in pediatric bipolar disorder: Characteristics, risk factors, and the serotonin transporter gene. Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Nov 1;60(9):1005-12. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.06.010. Epub 2006 Aug 30. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| NIH Clinical Center Detailed Web Page | View source |
Not provided
Enrolled participants (N=103) went through a medication wash-out period. n=22 participants withdrew assent before or during this period, and 12 participants met exclusion criteria. Then 69 participants began methylphenidate optimization; of those, 4 withdrew assent, 12 did not meet inclusion criteria. n=53 were randomized, and 49 analyzed.
Recruitment was conducted at the National Institute of Mental Health Division of Intramural Research Programs (NIMH DIRP) from November 2008 until January 2018. The inpatient part of the study took place at the Child Psychiatric Unit of the NIH Clinical Center.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Add-on Citalopram Following Optimized Methylphenidate | After optimized treatment with methylphenidate, those who meet threshold for chronic irritability are randomized to add-on citalopram (this arm) or placebo |
| FG001 | Add-on Placebo Following Optimized Methylphenidate |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Jan 3, 2019 | Mar 21, 2019 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Add-on placebo following optimized methylphenidate | Drug | After optimized treatment with methylphenidate, those who meet threshold for chronic irritability are randomized to add-on citalopram or placebo |
|
Difference in functional impairment at 8th week of trial as measured with Children's Global Impression Scale (CGAS) with scores ranging from 1=Most impaired to 100=Not impaired at all. |
| Collected weekly during the 8th week trial. The 8th-week outcome is reported. |
| Depressive Symptoms at 8th Week of Trial | Difference in depressive symptoms at 8th week of trial as measured with Children's Depression Rating Scale (CDRS) with scores ranging 17-113, where scores >40 are considered over the clinical threshold, and scores <28 are considered within the healthy range. | Collected weekly during the 8th week trial. The 8th-week outcome is reported. |
| Anxiety Symptoms at 8th Week of Trial | Difference in anxiety symptoms at 8th week of trial as measured with the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) with scores ranging 0-25. Higher values represent a worse outcome. | Collected weekly during the 8th week trial. The 8th-week outcome is reported. |
| 16437535 | Background | Binks CA, Fenton M, McCarthy L, Lee T, Adams CE, Duggan C. Pharmacological interventions for people with borderline personality disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25;(1):CD005653. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005653. |
| 31128268 | Derived | Towbin K, Vidal-Ribas P, Brotman MA, Pickles A, Miller KV, Kaiser A, Vitale AD, Engel C, Overman GP, Davis M, Lee B, McNeil C, Wheeler W, Yokum CH, Haring CT, Roule A, Wambach CG, Sharif-Askary B, Pine DS, Leibenluft E, Stringaris A. A Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Citalopram Adjunctive to Stimulant Medication in Youth With Chronic Severe Irritability. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;59(3):350-361. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.05.015. Epub 2019 May 23. |
After optimized treatment with methylphenidate, those who meet threshold for chronic irritability are randomized to add-on citalopram or placebo (this arm) |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Whereas 53 participants were randomized, 49 participants were analyzed using intent-to-treat analysis. The first 4 participants recruited were excluded because a different version of the primary outcome measure (i.e., CGI) was collected in these participants and therefore was not comparable to the remaining participants.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Add-on Citalopram Following Optimized Methylphenidate | After optimized treatment with methylphenidate, those who meet threshold for chronic irritability are randomized to add-on citalopram (this arm) or placebo |
| BG001 | Add-on Placebo Following Optimized Methylphenidate | After optimized treatment with methylphenidate, those who meet threshold for chronic irritability are randomized to add-on citalopram or placebo (this arm) |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) collected at Admission | A measure of severity of irritability scale (from 1=Normal, not at all ill to 7=Among the most extremely ill patients). Two graduate-level, highly-experienced clinicians completed weekly the CGI, with child and parent/nursing staff as a source of information. Ratings were reached by consensus in a case conference with a senior child and adolescent psychiatrist (KT); all clinicians and participants were blind to the treatment condition. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
| ||||||||||||||
| Children's Global Assessment of Severity (CGAS) collected at Admission | A measure of overall functional impairment with scores ranging from 1=Most impaired to 100=Not impaired at all. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
| ||||||||||||||
| Children's Depression Rating Scale (CDRS) collected at Admission | A measure of depressive symptoms severity ranging 17-113, where scores >40 are considered over the clinical threshold, and scores <28 are considered within the healthy range. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
| ||||||||||||||
| Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) collected at Admission | A measure of anxiety symptoms severity with scores ranging 0-25. Higher values represent a worse outcome. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
| ||||||||||||||
| Psychiatric disorders information collected at Admission using the K-SADS-PL | Presence of co-occurring psychiatric disorders at the time of enrollment to study measured with a semi-structured interview, the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL). | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) collected before Randomization | A measure of severity of irritability scale (from 1=Normal, not at all ill to 7=Among the most extremely ill patients). Two graduate-level, highly-experienced clinicians completed weekly the CGI, with child and parent/nursing staff as a source of information. Ratings were reached by consensus in a case conference with a senior child and adolescent psychiatrist (KT); all clinicians and participants were blind to the treatment condition. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
| ||||||||||||||
| Children's Global Assessment of Severity (CGAS) collected before Randomization | A measure of overall functional impairment with scores ranging from 1=Most impaired to 100=Not impaired at all | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
| ||||||||||||||
| Children's Depression Rating Scale (CDRS) collected before Randomization | A measure of depressive symptoms severity ranging 17-113, where scores >40 are considered over the clinical threshold, and scores <28 are considered within the healthy range | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
| ||||||||||||||
| Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) collected before Randomization | A measure of anxiety symptoms severity with scores ranging 0-25. Higher values represent a worse outcome. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants That "Much Improved" (Score of 2) in, or "Completely Recovered" (Score of 1) From Their Irritability Severity, as Measured With the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I). | A measure of change of irritability severity taking the baseline before randomization as a reference. Scores range 1 to 8, in which 1=Completely recovered,... 5=Unchanged,... 8=Much worse. Percentage of participants who responded are based on an estimation and might not match exactly with discrete numbers of participants based on the denominator. | Whereas 53 participants were randomized, 49 participants were analyzed using intent-to-treat analysis. The first 4 participants recruited were excluded because a different version of the primary outcome measure (i.e., CGI) was collected in these participants and therefore was not comparable to the remaining participants | Posted | Number | estimated percentage of participants | Collected weekly during the 8-week trial. The 8th-week outcome is reported. |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Irritability Severity at 8th Week of Trial. | Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S): A measure of severity of irritability scale (from 1=Normal, not at all ill to 7=Among the most extremely ill patients). | Whereas 53 participants were randomized, 49 participants were analyzed using intent-to-treat analysis. The first 4 participants recruited were excluded because a different version of the primary outcome measure (i.e., CGI) was collected in these participants and therefore was not comparable to the remaining participants. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Collected weekly during the 8th week trial. The 8th-week outcome is reported. |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Functional Impairment at 8th Week of Trial | Difference in functional impairment at 8th week of trial as measured with Children's Global Impression Scale (CGAS) with scores ranging from 1=Most impaired to 100=Not impaired at all. | Whereas 53 participants were randomized, 49 participants were analyzed using intent-to-treat analysis. The first 4 participants recruited were excluded because a different version of the primary outcome measure (i.e., CGI) was collected in these participants and therefore was not comparable to the remaining participants. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Collected weekly during the 8th week trial. The 8th-week outcome is reported. |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Depressive Symptoms at 8th Week of Trial | Difference in depressive symptoms at 8th week of trial as measured with Children's Depression Rating Scale (CDRS) with scores ranging 17-113, where scores >40 are considered over the clinical threshold, and scores <28 are considered within the healthy range. | Whereas 53 participants were randomized, 49 participants were analyzed using intent-to-treat analysis. The first 4 participants recruited were excluded because a different version of the primary outcome measure (i.e., CGI) was collected in these participants and therefore was not comparable to the remaining participants. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Collected weekly during the 8th week trial. The 8th-week outcome is reported. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Anxiety Symptoms at 8th Week of Trial | Difference in anxiety symptoms at 8th week of trial as measured with the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) with scores ranging 0-25. Higher values represent a worse outcome. | Whereas 53 participants were randomized, 49 participants were analyzed using intent-to-treat analysis. The first 4 participants recruited were excluded because a different version of the primary outcome measure (i.e., CGI) was collected in these participants and therefore was not comparable to the remaining participants. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Collected weekly during the 8th week trial. The 8th-week outcome is reported. |
|
|
Adverse event information was collected weekly during the study, including the 8th weeks of the trial.
Adverse events were ascertained by checklists. These were completed by nurses (during inpatient admission) or parents (after discharge), all of whom were blind to treatment assignment, and instructed to rate what they observed without reference to changes from baseline irritability, time of day or severity of the presentation. Information on suicidality and manic symptoms were also routinely collected.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Add-on Citalopram Following Optimized Methylphenidate | After optimized treatment with methylphenidate, those who meet threshold for chronic irritability are randomized to add-on citalopram (this arm) or placebo | 0 | 23 | 0 | 23 | 23 | 23 |
| EG001 | Add-on Placebo Following Optimized Methylphenidate | After optimized treatment with methylphenidate, those who meet threshold for chronic irritability are randomized to add-on citalopram or placebo (this arm) | 0 | 26 | 0 | 26 | 24 | 26 |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry mouth | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Drooling | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Increased thirst | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Trouble swallowing | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Stomach pains | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Bloated abdomen | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Changes in stool | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Change in heart rate fast/slow | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Drowsiness morning/afternoon | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Tiredness/fatigue | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Insomnia | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Early morning awakening | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Appetite changes | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Weight changes | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Fever | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Enuresis | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Eyes sensitive to light | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Headache | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Ringing or buzzing in ears | Ear and labyrinth disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Runny nose | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Easy bruising | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Anger | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Agression | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Nervousness | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Clingy/separation anxiety | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Loss of interest/apathy | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Poor concentration | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Disorganized thinking | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Speech changes | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Intrusiveness | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Restless/Inability to sit still | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Stiffness/Involuntary movements | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Extreme stiffness/Lack of movement | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Muscle twitches | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Motor tics | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Difficulty breathing | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Severe or chronic cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Whezzing | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Rash/itch | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Increased sweating | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dry skin | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hair changes | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Acne | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Picking at skin or nails | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
The sample size was smaller than initially planned. Our primary measure of irritability Aberrant Behavior Checklist - Irritability subscale, did not prove suitable for the current study due to its design (i.e., different environments and informants)
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr Argyris Stringaris | Mood, Brain and Development Unit, Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health | (301) 443-8019 | argyris.stringaris@nih.gov |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jun 25, 2018 | Mar 21, 2019 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019964 | Mood Disorders |
| D001289 | Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity |
| D019958 | Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders |
| D001714 | Bipolar Disorder |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D065886 | Neurodevelopmental Disorders |
| D000068105 | Bipolar and Related Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder |
|
| Oppositional Defiant Disorder |
|
| Conduct Disorder |
|
| Any Anxiety disorder |
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|