Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this clinical study is to determine the effectiveness of low level laser light therapy when applied around the head and ears in improving unaided word recognition in ears with sensorineural hearing loss.
Sensorineural hearing loss accounts for about 90% of all hearing loss and is found in 23% of individuals older than 65 years. Sensorineural hearing loss occurs when the hair cells of the inner ear and the neural pathways to the auditory cortex are damaged. In most cases, sensorineural hearing loss cannot be improved, reversed or 'cured.' Current treatment options focus on methods that amplify external sounds and on teaching the patient various strategies to 'retrain' the brain to interpret external stimuli. Low Level Laser Therapy was first applied for the treatment of inner ear diseases by Uwe Witt, MD of Hamburg, Germany in the 1980's. Hearing impaired patients have inflammation and/or atrophy of the tissues and neural pathways connected to and supporting the cochlea's cilia hair structure, the hearing mechanism of the inner ear. Low level laser therapy is believed to stimulate the mitochondria of the adipocyte cells, which subsequently increases the production of ATP. The resultant surge in ATP production works to repair damaged tissue and regenerate cells reversing some of the damage incurred to the cochlea and thus improving aspects of hearing function.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Hearing Laser | Active Comparator | Active low level laser light therapy of 635 nanometers (nm) |
|
| Placebo Laser | Placebo Comparator | inactive low level laser light therapy with no therapeutic output |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Hearing Laser | Device | Two 6-minute low level laser light applications to the head/neck/ears region, each one week apart. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Participants Whose Change in Percent Correct Word Recognition Scores From Baseline to One Week After Study Treatment Equalled or Exceeded the Minimum Change in a Reference Chart. | Participants were asked to repeat 50 words presented one at a time through headphones to each ear separately at a comfortable listening level to the participant. The 50 words were from a phonetically-balanced list of monosyllabic words called the Central Institute for the Deaf (CID) W-22 lists. For each ear, each word repeated correctly was scored '1'. The total number correct for each ear was summed and multiplied by 2 to attain the percent of total words repeated correctly for each ear. The change in this percent from baseline to one week after study treatment was referenced against a chart. If the change was equal to or greater than the corresponding value in the chart, the participant was considered to have a successful study outcome. | baseline and one week |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Betty McNamara, M.S., CCC-A | Maryjane Rees Language Speech & Hearing Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McDonald Hearing Centers | Sacramento | California | 95818 | United States |
4 subjects (8 ears) were disqualified because the word recognition score recorded for study qualification purposes exceeded the upper inclusive limit of 86% words correct. 4 subjects (8 ears) were disqualified because the subject's primary spoken language was not English, which was also a study exclusion criteria.
40 subjects (80 ears) were recruited across two hearing aid and evaluation test sites from May, 2007 to October, 2008.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Active | Active laser device |
| FG001 | Control | Placebo laser device |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Active | Active laser device |
| BG001 | Control | Placebo laser device |
| BG002 |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Participants Whose Change in Percent Correct Word Recognition Scores From Baseline to One Week After Study Treatment Equalled or Exceeded the Minimum Change in a Reference Chart. | Participants were asked to repeat 50 words presented one at a time through headphones to each ear separately at a comfortable listening level to the participant. The 50 words were from a phonetically-balanced list of monosyllabic words called the Central Institute for the Deaf (CID) W-22 lists. For each ear, each word repeated correctly was scored '1'. The total number correct for each ear was summed and multiplied by 2 to attain the percent of total words repeated correctly for each ear. The change in this percent from baseline to one week after study treatment was referenced against a chart. If the change was equal to or greater than the corresponding value in the chart, the participant was considered to have a successful study outcome. | Posted | Number | participants | baseline and one week |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Active | Active laser device |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elvira Walls, Clinical Consultant | Regulatory Insight, Inc. | 615-712-9743 | elvira@reginsight.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006319 | Hearing Loss, Sensorineural |
| D014012 | Tinnitus |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D034381 | Hearing Loss |
| D006311 | Hearing Disorders |
| D004427 | Ear Diseases |
| D010038 | Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo Laser | Device | inactive low level laser light therapy with no therapeutic output |
|
| Total |
Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
Active laser device
| OG001 | Control | Placebo laser device |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 32 |
| 0 |
| 32 |
| EG001 | Control | Placebo laser device | 0 | 32 | 0 | 32 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D012678 |
| Sensation Disorders |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |