Study of Milk Allergy and Tolerance in Children | NCT00778258 | Trialant
NCT00778258
Sponsor
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Status
Completed
Last Update Posted
Mar 30, 2016Estimated
Enrollment
170Actual
Phase
Phase 2
Conditions
Food Hypersensitivity
Milk Hypersensitivity
Interventions
Baked Milk
Non-baked Milk
Countries
United States
Protocol Section
Identification Module
NCT ID
Results Section
Participant Flow Module
Pre-assignment Details
Annotation Section
No data available
No data is available for this block.
Document Section
No data available
No data is available for this block.
Derived Section
Miscellaneous Info Module
Version Holder
NCT00778258
Obsolete or Duplicate NCT IDs
Not provided
Organization Study
DAIT AADCRC-MSSM-02
Secondary IDs
Not provided
Brief Title
Study of Milk Allergy and Tolerance in Children
Official Title
Dietary Intervention in Milk Allergy and Tolerance Development
Acronym
Not provided
Organization
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)NIH
Status Module
Record Verification Date
Mar 2016
Overall Recruitment Status or Expanded Access Status
Completed
Last Known Status
Not provided
Delayed Posting
Not provided
Why Stopped
Not provided
Expanded Access Info
No
Start Date
Aug 2008
Primary Completion Date
Nov 2014Actual
Completion Date
Nov 2014Actual
First Submitted Date
Oct 21, 2008
First Submission Date that Met QC Criteria
Oct 21, 2008
First Posted Date
Oct 23, 2008Estimated
Results Waived
Not provided
Results First Submitted Date
Dec 17, 2015
Results First Submitted that Met QC Criteria
Mar 29, 2016
Results First Posted Date
Mar 30, 2016Estimated
Certification/Extension (aka Delayed Results) First Submitted Date
Not provided
Certification/Extension First Submitted that Passed QC Review
Not provided
Certification/Extension First Posted Date
Not provided
Last Update Submitted Date
Mar 29, 2016
Last Update Posted Date
Mar 30, 2016Estimated
Sponsor/Collaborators Module
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Lead Sponsor
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)NIH
Collaborators
Name
Class
Asthma and Allergic Diseases Cooperative Research Centers
OTHER
Oversight Module
Has Data Monitoring Committee (DMC)
Yes
Is FDA Regulated Drug
Not provided
Is FDA Regulated Device
Not provided
Is Unapproved Device
Not provided
Pediatric Postmarket Surveillance of a Device Product
Not provided
Product Exported from US
Not provided
FDAAA801 Violation
Not provided
Description Module
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if children who are allergic to milk can increase tolerance through frequent dose-escalation every 6 months versus 12 months leading to eventual tolerance of less heated milk and ultimately unheated milk.
Detailed Description
Milk is among the most common food allergens in infants and children. The majority of children outgrow their milk allergies; however, the exact mechanisms by which food tolerance is achieved are unknown. Strict avoidance of the offending food is currently the only known therapy. However, some have been known to tolerate milk products cooked at high heat such as when baked in foods.
This clinical trial involves a diet containing extensively baked milk protein to investigate the effects of ingestion of heat-denatured milk on development of oral tolerance to non-baked milk.
Conditions Module
Conditions
Food Hypersensitivity
Milk Hypersensitivity
Keywords
Food Allergy
Milk Allergy
Design Module
Study Type
Interventional
Number of References to an Expanded Access Study
Not provided
Expanded Access Types
Not provided
Patient Registry
Not provided
Target Follow-Up Duration
Not provided
Phases
Phase 2
Interventional Study Design
Allocation
Biospecimen
No data available
No data is available for this block.
Enrollment
170Actual
Arms/Interventions Module
Arm Groups
Label
Type
Description
Intervention Names
Milk-allergic; Non-consumption
Experimental
Subjects in this arm reacted to the lowest baseline dose of baked milk (muffin) and will continue strict milk avoidance, returning for re-evaluation with laboratory tests at 12 and 24 months and baked milk challenge at 36 months. Individual participants may be challenged at 12 and or 24 months.
Biological: Baked Milk
Tolerated Muffin, Reacted to Pizza
Experimental
Subjects will be assigned to this arm, if they can tolerate ingesting a muffin but react to ingesting the amount of baked milk in a standardized portion of pizza. Within the arm, subjects will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to either return for re-evaluation at 6 months (Dose Escalation sub-arm) or 12 months (Maintenance sub-arm) to determine whether they might progress to ingesting higher amounts of baked milk protein.
Biological: Baked Milk
Reacted to Rice Pudding
Experimental
Subjects will be assigned to this arm, if they can tolerate ingesting a muffin and a standardized portion of pizza but react to a standardized dose of baked milk in rice pudding. Within the arm, subjects will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to either return for re-evaluation at 6 months (Dose Escalation sub-arm) or 12 months (Maintenance sub-arm) to determine whether they might progress to ingesting higher amounts of baked milk protein.
Biological: Baked Milk
Reacted to Non-baked Milk
Experimental
Subjects will be assigned to this arm, if they can tolerate ingesting a muffin, pizza and rice pudding but react to a standardized dose of non-baked milk. Within the arm, subjects will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to either return for re-evaluation at 6 months (Dose Escalation sub-arm) or 12 months (Maintenance sub-arm) to determine whether they might progress to ingesting higher amounts of baked milk protein.
Interventions
Name
Type
Description
Arm Group Labels
Other Names
Baked Milk
Biological
At baseline, each subject will undergo sequential oral food challenges with the products that contain increasing amounts of milk protein that are baked: Stage 1 (muffin), Stage 2 (pizza), and Stage 3 (rice pudding) doses of baked milk to determine the extent to which they tolerate various baked milk proteins. Based on the outcomes of the baseline oral food challenges, subjects will be assigned to one of the 5 study arms.
Outcomes Module
Primary Outcomes
Measure
Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With a Positive Progression in Tolerance of Baked Milk and Ultimately Unheated Milk in Dose Escalation Sub-arm Compared to Maintenance Sub-arm
Participants were grouped based on the food to which they experienced a reaction at the baseline Oral Food Challenge (OFC). Group 1=reacted to muffin; Group 2=reacted to pizza; Group 3=reacted to rice pudding; Group 4=reacted to non-baked milk; Group 5=did not react. Groups 2, 3, and 4 were randomized to dose escalation or maintenance, and at each visit following randomization, participants performed an OFC where they were given food products containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively less denatured milk protein food items until they had an allergic reaction. Participants were considered to have a positive progression in tolerance of baked milk if they experienced a reaction to a less denatured milk protein food item at any post randomization visits than the one to which they reacted at their baseline visit.
Randomization through end of study (up to 36 months)
Secondary Outcomes
Measure
Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With a Positive Progression in Tolerating More Allergenic Forms of Milk at 12 and 24 Months
Participants were grouped based on the food they experienced a reaction to at the baseline Oral Food Challenge (OFC). Group 1 = reacted to muffin; Group 2 = reacted to pizza; Group 3 = reacted to rice pudding; Group 4 = reacted to non-baked milk; Group 5 = did not react. Groups 2, 3 and 4 were randomized to dose escalation or maintenance, and at each visit following randomization, performed an OFC where food products containing milk protein denatured through baking were given. Participants were given progressively less denatured milk protein food items until an allergic reaction occurred. A positive progression in tolerance of baked milk was defined as a reaction to a less denatured milk protein food at 12 months than at baseline. Positive progression at 24 months was defined as experiencing a reaction to a less denatured milk protein food at 24 months than at 12 months.
Other Outcomes
Not provided
Eligibility Module
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
One or more of the following inclusion criteria for enrollment in the study have to be met:
Convincing history of an allergic reaction to milk or a positive double blind placebo controlled milk challenge (DBPCMC) within the past 2 years and either detectable milk immunoglobulin E (IgE) or positive prick skin test to milk OR
Serum milk-IgE of high predictive value >14 kUa/L or prick skin test to milk > 10mm wheal within the past 6 months regardless of past clinical history of reactions OR
Convincing history of an allergic reaction to milk or a positive DBPCMC more than 2 years ago and either a positive serum milk-IgE < 14 kUA/L or positive prick skin test to milk < 10 mm wheal within the past 6 months (eligible only for the active arm of the study and will undergo a reversed sequence of initial baked-milk challenges)
Exclusion Criteria:
Inability or unwillingness of a participant to give written informed consent or to comply with study protocol
Nowak-Wegrzyn A, Bloom KA, Sicherer SH, Shreffler WG, Noone S, Wanich N, Sampson HA. Tolerance to extensively heated milk in children with cow's milk allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Aug;122(2):342-7, 347.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.05.043. Epub 2008 Jul 11.
At baseline, participants had an oral food challenge (OFC). They were given food containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively increasing quantities of less denatured milk protein foods until they had an allergic reaction. The food they experienced a reaction to was their baseline group. Participants in this group reacted to pizza and were then randomized to return for re-evaluation every 6 months (dose escalation) to determine whether they might progress to ingesting higher amounts of baked milk protein. Participants in this group received instructions for intake of baked milk foods at home and were followed up to 46 months.
FG001
Dose Escalation - Reacted to Rice Pudding
At baseline, participants performed an oral food challenge (OFC). They were given food containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively increasing quantities of less denatured milk protein foods until they had an allergic reaction. The food they experienced a reaction to was their baseline group. Participants in this group reacted to rice pudding and were then randomized to return for re-evaluation every 6 months (dose escalation) to determine whether they might progress to ingesting higher amounts of baked milk protein. Participants in this group received instructions for intake of baked milk foods at home and were followed up to 46 months.
FG002
Dose Escalation - Reacted to Non-baked Milk
At baseline, participants performed an oral food challenge (OFC). They were given food containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively increasing quantities of less denatured milk protein foods until they had an allergic reaction. The food they experienced a reaction to was their baseline group. Participants in this group reacted to non-baked milk and were then randomized to re-try less denatured milk protein food items every 6 months (dose escalation). Participants in this group received instructions for intake of baked milk foods at home and were followed up to 46 months.
FG003
Maintenance - Reacted to Pizza
At baseline, participants had an oral food challenge (OFC). They were given food containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively increasing quantities of less denatured milk protein foods until they had an allergic reaction. The food they experienced a reaction to was their baseline group. Participants in this group reacted to pizza and were then randomized to return for re-evaluation every 12 months (maintenance) to determine whether they might progress to ingesting higher amounts of baked milk protein. Participants in this group received instructions for intake of baked milk foods at home and were followed up to 46 months.
FG004
Maintenance - Reacted to Rice Pudding
At baseline, participants had an oral food challenge (OFC). They were given food containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively increasing quantities of less denatured milk protein foods until they had an allergic reaction. The food they experienced a reaction to was their baseline group. Participants in this group reacted to rice pudding and were then randomized to continue eating the food at the same level of milk denaturalization and come in for OFCs every 12 months. Participants in this group received instructions for intake of baked milk foods at home and were followed up to 46 months.
FG005
Maintenance- Reacted to Non-baked Milk
At baseline, participants had an oral food challenge (OFC). They were given food containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively increasing quantities of less denatured milk protein foods until they had an allergic reaction. The food they experienced a reaction to was their baseline group. Participants in this group reacted to rice pudding and were then randomized to continue eating the food at the same level of milk denaturalization and come in for OFCs every 12 months. Participants in this group received instructions for intake of baked milk foods at home and were followed up to 46 months.
FG006
Not Randomized - Comparison
Participants in this group fulfilled inclusion criteria into the study but refused participation. These participants were used as comparison to other groups
FG007
Non-Randomized - Reacted to Muffin
At baseline, participants had an oral food challenge (OFC). They were given food containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively increasing quantities of less denatured milk protein foods until they had an allergic reaction. The food they experienced a reaction to was their baseline group. Participants in this group reacted to muffin and were not randomized. Participants were instructed to avoid milk and return for re-evaluation with laboratory tests at 12 and 24 months and baked milk challenge at 36 months
FG008
Non-Randomized - Tolerant to Baked and Non-baked Milk
At baseline, participants had an oral food challenge (OFC). They were given food containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively increasing quantities of less denatured milk protein foods until they had an allergic reaction. The food they experienced a reaction to was their baseline group. Participants in this group passed all OFCs without a reaction were not randomized. Participants were instructed to include full milk products to their diet for 3 months, followed by complete dietary milk elimination for 1 month. Participants were then re-challenged to unheated milk. Following successful challenge, participants were placed on an unrestricted milk diet and brought in for re-evaluation at 6 months. If participants were not successful in their challenge to unheated milk, they had baked milk products progressively re-introduced to their diets.
Periods
Title
Milestones
Reasons Not Completed
Overall Study
Type
Comment
Milestone Data
STARTED
FG00016 subjects
FG0015 subjects
FG00220 subjects
FG00315 subjects
FG0046 subjects
FG00523 subjects
FG00634 subjects
FG00741 subjects
FG00810 subjects
COMPLETED
FG0009 subjects
FG0013 subjects
FG00210 subjects
FG00312 subjects
FG004
NOT COMPLETED
FG0007 subjects
FG0012 subjects
FG00210 subjects
FG0033 subjects
FG004
Type
Comment
Reasons
Adverse Event
FG0001 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG003
Baseline Characteristics Module
Baseline Analysis Population Description
All Enrolled
Type of Units Analyzed
Not provided
Arm/Group Information
ID
Title
Description
BG000
Dose Escalation - Reacted to Pizza
At baseline, participants had an oral food challenge (OFC). They were given food containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively increasing quantities of less denatured milk protein foods until they had an allergic reaction. The food they experienced a reaction to was their baseline group. Participants in this group reacted to pizza and were then randomized to return for re-evaluation every 6 months (dose escalation) to determine whether they might progress to ingesting higher amounts of baked milk protein. Participants in this group received instructions for intake of baked milk foods at home and were followed up to 46 months.
Denominators
Units
Counts
Participants
BG000
Baseline Measures
Title
Description
Population Description
Parameter Type
Dispersion Type
Unit of Measure
Calculate Percentage
Denominator Units Selected
Denominators
Classes
Age, Continuous
Mean
Outcome Measures Module
Outcome Measures
Type
Title
Description
Population Description
Reporting Status
Anticipated Posting Date
Parameter Type
Dispersion Type
Unit of Measure
Calculate Percentage
Time Frame
Units Analyzed
Denominator Units Selected
Arm/Group Information
Denominators
Classes
Analyses
Primary
Number of Participants With a Positive Progression in Tolerance of Baked Milk and Ultimately Unheated Milk in Dose Escalation Sub-arm Compared to Maintenance Sub-arm
Participants were grouped based on the food to which they experienced a reaction at the baseline Oral Food Challenge (OFC). Group 1=reacted to muffin; Group 2=reacted to pizza; Group 3=reacted to rice pudding; Group 4=reacted to non-baked milk; Group 5=did not react. Groups 2, 3, and 4 were randomized to dose escalation or maintenance, and at each visit following randomization, participants performed an OFC where they were given food products containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively less denatured milk protein food items until they had an allergic reaction. Participants were considered to have a positive progression in tolerance of baked milk if they experienced a reaction to a less denatured milk protein food item at any post randomization visits than the one to which they reacted at their baseline visit.
Randomized intent-to-treat
Posted
Number
participants
Randomization through end of study (up to 36 months)
ID
Title
Adverse Events Module
Frequency Threshold
5
Time Frame
Enrollment through end of study (up to 3 years)
Description
Not provided
All-Cause Mortality Comment
Not provided
Arm/Groups
ID
Title
Description
Deaths (Affected)
Deaths (At Risk)
Serious Events (Affected)
Serious Events (At Risk)
Other Events (Affected)
Other Events (At Risk)
EG000
Dose Escalation - Reacted to Pizza
At baseline, participants had an oral food challenge (OFC). They were given food containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively increasing quantities of less denatured milk protein foods until they had an allergic reaction. The food they experienced a reaction to was their baseline group. Participants in this group reacted to pizza and were then randomized to return for re-evaluation every 6 months (dose escalation) to determine whether they might progress to ingesting higher amounts of baked milk protein. Participants in this group received instructions for intake of baked milk foods at home and were followed up to 46 months.
Serious Adverse Events
Term
Organ System
Source Vocabulary
Assessment Type
Notes
Statistical Information
Adnexal torsion
Reproductive system and breast disorders
MedDRA 11.1
Systematic Assessment
Other Adverse Events
Term
Organ System
Source Vocabulary
Assessment Type
Notes
Statistical Information
Hypoacusis
Ear and labyrinth disorders
MedDRA 11.1
Systematic Assessment
More Info Module
Limitations and Caveats
Not provided
Certain Agreements
Are all PI(s) employees of the sponsor?
No
Restriction Type
Point of Contact
Title
Organization
Phone
Extension
Email
Director, Clinical Research Operations Program
DAIT/NIAID
301-594-7669
DAITClinicalTrialsGov@niaid.nih.gov
Jul 10, 2026
Removed Countries
Not provided
Submission Tracking
No data available
No data is available for this block.
Condition Browse Module
MeSH Terms
ID
Term
D005512
Food Hypersensitivity
D016269
Milk Hypersensitivity
Ancestor Terms
ID
Term
D006969
Hypersensitivity, Immediate
D006967
Hypersensitivity
D007154
Immune System Diseases
Browse Leaves
Not provided
Browse Branches
Not provided
Intervention Browse Module
No data available
No data is available for this block.
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description
Not provided
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Observational Model
Not provided
Time Perspective
Not provided
Masking Info
Masking
None (Open Label)
Masking Description
Not provided
Who Masked
Not provided
Biological: Baked Milk
Biological: Non-baked Milk
Tolerant to Baked and Non-baked Milk
Experimental
Biological/Vaccine: Baked Milk At baseline, each subject will undergo sequential oral food challenges with the products that contain increasing amounts of milk protein that are baked: Stage 1 (muffin), Stage 2 (pizza), and Stage 3 (rice pudding) doses of baked milk to determine the extent to which they tolerate various baked milk proteins. Based on the outcomes of the baseline oral food challenges, subjects will be assigned to one of the 5 study arms.
Biological/Vaccine: Non-baked Milk Those subjects tolerant to rice pudding will undergo oral food challenge with non-baked milk.
Biological: Baked Milk
Biological: Non-baked Milk
Non-Interventional Comparison
No Intervention
Thirty subjects who fulfill inclusion criteria but are unwilling to participate in the full protocol will be enrolled as a comparison group to the active arms.
Milk-allergic; Non-consumption
Reacted to Non-baked Milk
Reacted to Rice Pudding
Tolerant to Baked and Non-baked Milk
Tolerated Muffin, Reacted to Pizza
Non-baked Milk
Biological
Those subjects tolerant to rice pudding will undergo oral food challenge with non-baked milk.
Reacted to Non-baked Milk
Tolerant to Baked and Non-baked Milk
12 months, 24 months
Percent of Participants Becoming Tolerant to Unheated Cow's Milk at 12, 24, and 36 Months
Participants were grouped based on the food to which they experienced a reaction at the baseline Oral Food Challenge (OFC). Group 1 = reacted to muffin; Group 2 = reacted to pizza; Group 3 = reacted to rice pudding; Group 4 = reacted to non-baked milk; Group 5 = did not react. Groups 2, 3 and 4 were randomized to dose escalation or maintenance, and at each visit following randomization, participants performed an OFC where they were given food products containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively less denatured milk protein food items until they had an allergic reaction. Participants were considered to become tolerant to unheated cow's milk if at the specified visit, they did not react to any of the foods given in the OFC.
12 months, 24 months, and 36 months
Percent of Participants Becoming Tolerant to Unheated Cow's Milk
Participants were grouped based on the food to which they experienced a reaction at the baseline Oral Food Challenge (OFC). Group 1 = reacted to muffin; Group 2 = reacted to pizza; Group 3 = reacted to rice pudding; Group 4 = reacted to non-baked milk; Group 5 = did not react. Groups 2, 3 and 4 were randomized to dose escalation or maintenance, and at each visit following randomization, participants performed an OFC where they were given food products containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively less denatured milk protein food items until they had an allergic reaction. Participants were considered to become tolerant to unheated cow's milk if at any post-randomization visit up through 36 months, they did not react to any of the food given in the OFC.
Randomization through end of study (up to 36 months)
Comparison of Baseline Basophil Percent Maximal Degranulation With the Outcome of the Baseline OFC to Identify the Biomarkers of Clinical Reactivity
This endpoint evaluates the correlation between the mechanistic biomarkers of basophil reactivity and the food to which participants reacted at baseline. Participants were grouped according to food at which participants experienced a reaction during their baseline oral food challenge: Group 1 = reacted to muffin; Group 2 = reacted to pizza; Group 3 = reacted to rice pudding; Group 4 = reacted to non-baked milk; Group 5 = did not react. Basophils come from blood drawn at baseline. Basophils counts were done using whole blood specimens. Basophil reactivity as measured as maximal degranulation percentage after stimulation with titrated dilutions of milk powder (from 1x103 to 1x10-1 µg/mL total protein) and was correlated to group assignment using Spearman correlation coefficients.
Baseline
Comparison of Baseline IgE With the Outcome of the Baseline OFC to Identify the Biomarkers of Clinical Reactivity
This endpoint evaluates the correlation between the mechanistic biomarker of IgE to milk proteins and allergic reaction at baseline. Participants were grouped according to food at which participants experienced a reaction during their baseline oral food challenge: Group 1 = reacted to muffin; Group 2 = reacted to pizza; Group 3 = reacted to rice pudding; Group 4 = reacted to non-baked milk; Group 5 = did not react. Quantitative IgE to milk proteins was done using FEIA (UniCAP) on serum from blood drawn at baseline.
Baseline
Comparison of Baseline Mechanistic Studies [Treg and Basophil] With the Outcome of the Baseline OFC to Identify the Biomarkers of Clinical Reactivity
This endpoint evaluates the correlation between the mechanistic biomarker of the number of basophils and T regulatory cells reactive to milk proteins and the food to which participants reacted at baseline. Participants were grouped according to food at which participants experienced a reaction during their baseline oral food challenge: Group 1 = reacted to muffin; Group 2 = reacted to pizza; Group 3 = reacted to rice pudding; Group 4 = reacted to non-baked milk; Group 5 = did not react. Quantitative IgE to milk proteins was done using FEIA (UniCAP) on serum from blood drawn at baseline.
Baseline
Relationship Between Initial Dose of Tolerated Baked-milk Protein and Time to Complete Tolerance
Participants were grouped based on the food to which they experienced a reaction at the baseline Oral Food Challenge (OFC). Group 1 = reacted to muffin; Group 2 = reacted to pizza; Group 3 = reacted to rice pudding; Group 4 = reacted to non-baked milk; Group 5 = did not react. Groups 2, 3 and 4 were randomized to dose escalation or maintenance, and at each visit following randomization, participants performed an OFC where they were given food products containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively less denatured milk protein food items until they had an allergic reaction. Participants were considered to become tolerant to unheated cow's milk if at any post-randomization visit up through 36 months, they did not react to any food, including unheated whole milk.
Randomization through end of study (up to 36 months)
Relationship Between Dose of Baked-milk Protein and Reactivity to Casein Versus Whey
Participants were grouped based on the food to which they experienced a reaction at the baseline Oral Food Challenge (OFC). Group 1 = reacted to muffin; Group 2 = reacted to pizza; Group 3 = reacted to rice pudding; Group 4 = reacted to non-baked milk; Group 5 = did not react. Groups 2, 3 and 4 were randomized to dose escalation or maintenance, and at each visit following randomization, participants performed an OFC where they were given food products containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively less denatured milk protein food items until they had an allergic reaction. The relationship between serum IgE to betalactoglobulin and casein, and the food level at which the participant reacted, were evaluated at each post randomization OFC visit. It is expected that those who reacted to muffin would have a higher ratio of casein to betalactoglobulin than those who reacted to less heated forms of milk.
Baseline, Month 12, Month 24, Month 36
Comparison of Percent of Participants Tolerant to Non-heated Milk Between the Participants Who Ingested Baked-milk Products and Participants Who Continued to Avoid All Forms of Milk
Participants were grouped based on the food they reacted to, at the baseline Oral Food Challenge (OFC). Group 1= reacted to muffin; Group 2= reacted to pizza; Group 3= reacted to rice pudding; Group 4= reacted to non-baked milk; Group 5= did not react. Groups 2- 4 were randomized to dose escalation or maintenance, and Group 1, and a Control group that chose not to participate in the study, continued to avoid milk. Randomized participants performed an OFC at each visit during which they were given progressively less denatured/ baked milk protein food items until they had an allergic reaction. Participants were considered tolerant to unheated cow's milk if at any post-randomization visit up through 36 months, they did not react to any food, including unheated whole milk. Tolerance of non-heated milk was assessed by report among those who continued to avoid milk.
Month 36
Changes in Mechanistic Values [Humoral, T Cell and Basophil]
This outcome measure was not well defined in the protocol and was not analyzed.
Baseline, Month 12, Month 24, and Month 36
Changes in Mechanistic Values [Humoral, T Cell and Basophil]
This outcome measure was not well defined in the protocol and was not analyzed.
Baseline to the time complete milk tolerance was established
Staden U, Rolinck-Werninghaus C, Brewe F, Wahn U, Niggemann B, Beyer K. Specific oral tolerance induction in food allergy in children: efficacy and clinical patterns of reaction. Allergy. 2007 Nov;62(11):1261-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01501.x.
Vandenplas Y, Koletzko S, Isolauri E, Hill D, Oranje AP, Brueton M, Staiano A, Dupont C. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cow's milk protein allergy in infants. Arch Dis Child. 2007 Oct;92(10):902-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.110999.
6 subjects
FG00513 subjects
FG00619 subjects
FG00726 subjects
FG0086 subjects
0 subjects
FG00510 subjects
FG00615 subjects
FG00715 subjects
FG0084 subjects
0 subjects
FG0040 subjects
FG0051 subjects
FG0060 subjects
FG0070 subjects
FG0080 subjects
Lost to Follow-up
FG0000 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0022 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG0040 subjects
FG0053 subjects
FG0062 subjects
FG0072 subjects
FG0080 subjects
Withdrawal by Subject
FG0006 subjects
FG0012 subjects
FG0028 subjects
FG0032 subjects
FG0040 subjects
FG0056 subjects
FG00612 subjects
FG00712 subjects
FG0084 subjects
New Contraindication
FG0000 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG0040 subjects
FG0050 subjects
FG0060 subjects
FG0071 subjects
FG0080 subjects
Non-compliance
FG0000 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0031 subjects
FG0040 subjects
FG0050 subjects
FG0060 subjects
FG0070 subjects
FG0080 subjects
Other
FG0000 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG0040 subjects
FG0050 subjects
FG0061 subjects
FG0070 subjects
FG0080 subjects
BG001
Dose Escalation - Reacted to Rice Pudding
At baseline, participants performed an oral food challenge (OFC). They were given food containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively increasing quantities of less denatured milk protein foods until they had an allergic reaction. The food they experienced a reaction to was their baseline group. Participants in this group reacted to rice pudding and were then randomized to re-try less denatured milk protein food items every 6 months (dose escalation). Participants in this group received instructions for intake of baked milk foods at home and were followed up to 46 months.
BG002
Dose Escalation - Reacted to Non-baked Milk
At baseline, participants performed an oral food challenge (OFC). They were given food containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively increasing quantities of less denatured milk protein foods until they had an allergic reaction. The food they experienced a reaction to was their baseline group. Participants in this group reacted to non-baked milk and were then randomized to re-try less denatured milk protein food items every 6 months (dose escalation). Participants in this group received instructions for intake of baked milk foods at home and were followed up to 46 months.
BG003
Maintenance - Reacted to Pizza
At baseline, participants had an oral food challenge (OFC). They were given food containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively increasing quantities of less denatured milk protein foods until they had an allergic reaction. The food they experienced a reaction to was their baseline group. Participants in this group reacted to pizza and were then randomized to return for re-evaluation every 12 months (maintenance) to determine whether they might progress to ingesting higher amounts of baked milk protein. Participants in this group received instructions for intake of baked milk foods at home and were followed up to 46 months.
BG004
Maintenance - Reacted to Rice Pudding
At baseline, participants had an oral food challenge (OFC). They were given food containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively increasing quantities of less denatured milk protein foods until they had an allergic reaction. The food they experienced a reaction to was their baseline group. Participants in this group reacted to rice pudding and were then randomized to continue eating the food at the same level of milk denaturalization and come in for OFCs every 12 months. Participants in this group received instructions for intake of baked milk foods at home and were followed up to 46 months.
BG005
Maintenance- Reacted to Non-baked Milk
At baseline, participants had an oral food challenge (OFC). They were given food containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively increasing quantities of less denatured milk protein foods until they had an allergic reaction. The food they experienced a reaction to was their baseline group. Participants in this group reacted to rice pudding and were then randomized to continue eating the food at the same level of milk denaturalization and come in for OFCs every 12 months. Participants in this group received instructions for intake of baked milk foods at home and were followed up to 46 months.
BG006
Not Randomized - Comparison
Participants in this group fulfilled inclusion criteria into the study but refused participation. These participants were used as comparison to other groups
BG007
Non-Randomized - Reacted to Muffin
At baseline, participants had an oral food challenge (OFC). They were given food containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively increasing quantities of less denatured milk protein foods until they had an allergic reaction. The food they experienced a reaction to was their baseline group. Participants in this group reacted to muffin and were not randomized. Participants were instructed to avoid milk and return for re-evaluation with laboratory tests at 12 and 24 months and baked milk challenge at 36 months
BG008
Non-Randomized - Tolerant to Baked and Non-baked Milk
At baseline, participants had an oral food challenge (OFC). They were given food containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively increasing quantities of less denatured milk protein foods until they had an allergic reaction. The food they experienced a reaction to was their baseline group. Participants in this group passed all OFCs without a reaction were not randomized. Participants were instructed to include full milk products to their diet for 3 months, followed by complete dietary milk elimination for 1 month. Participants were then re-challenged to unheated milk. Following successful challenge, participants were placed on an unrestricted milk diet and brought in for re-evaluation at 6 months. If participants were not successful in their challenge to unheated milk, they had baked milk products progressively re-introduced to their diets.
BG009
Total
Total of all reporting groups
16
BG0015
BG00220
BG00315
BG0046
BG00523
BG00634
BG00741
BG00810
BG009170
Standard Deviation
years
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
BG0006.6± 2.3
BG0016.2± 1.6
BG0027.7± 2.1
BG0037.3± 2.2
BG0046.7± 2.7
BG0056.3± 2.1
BG0066.5± 2.3
BG0077.5± 1.9
BG0086.5± 2.2
BG0096.9± 2.2
Sex: Female, Male
Count of Participants
Participants
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
Female
BG0004
BG0011
BG0027
BG0033
BG0043
BG0056
BG00611
BG00712
BG0085
BG00952
Male
BG00012
BG0014
BG00213
BG00312
BG004
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Count of Participants
Participants
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
Hispanic or Latino
BG0000
BG0010
BG0020
BG0030
BG0040
BG0050
BG0060
BG0070
BG0080
BG0090
Not Hispanic or Latino
BG00016
BG0015
BG00220
BG00315
BG004
Unknown or Not Reported
BG0000
BG0010
BG0020
BG0030
BG004
Race (NIH/OMB)
Count of Participants
Participants
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
American Indian or Alaska Native
BG0000
BG0010
BG0020
BG0030
BG0040
BG0050
BG0060
BG0070
BG0080
BG0090
Asian
BG0002
BG0011
BG0021
BG0032
BG004
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
BG0000
BG0010
BG0020
BG0030
BG004
Black or African American
BG0000
BG0010
BG0021
BG0030
BG004
White
BG00014
BG0014
BG00218
BG00313
BG004
More than one race
BG0000
BG0010
BG0020
BG0030
BG004
Unknown or Not Reported
BG0000
BG0010
BG0020
BG0030
BG004
Region of Enrollment
Number
participants
Title
Denominators
Categories
United States
Title
Measurements
BG00016
BG0015
BG00220
BG00315
BG0046
BG00523
BG00634
BG00741
BG00810
BG009170
Baseline Boiled Milk Wheal
A skin prick test (SPT) measured the presence of immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies for the food tested. During the SPT, a drop of solution containing the food allergen was placed on the forearm. Using a small plastic needle, the skin was gently pricked or scratched to allow a tiny amount of the solution to enter just below the surface. After 15 minutes, positive results were indicated by a wheal, a raised white bump surrounded by a small circle of red skin. The wheal was measured in millimeters. Larger sizes indicated a greater chance of experiencing an allergic reaction to the food tested.
Mean
Standard Deviation
Mm
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
BG0007.3± 2.4
BG0016.1± 3.5
BG0026.6± 2.8
BG0037.6± 1.9
BG0047.6± 2.0
BG0055.5± 3.2
BG0067.7± 4.5
BG0077.9± 2.6
BG0083.4± 2.5
BG0096.9± 3.2
Baseline Milk Extract Wheal
A skin prick test (SPT) measured the presence of immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies for the food tested. During the SPT, a drop of solution containing the food allergen was placed on the forearm. Using a small plastic needle, the skin was gently pricked or scratched to allow a tiny amount of the solution to enter just below the surface. After 15 minutes, positive results were indicated by a wheal, a raised white bump surrounded by a small circle of red skin. The wheal was measured in millimeters. Larger sizes indicated a greater chance of experiencing an allergic reaction to the food tested.
Mean
Standard Deviation
Mm
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
BG0008.9± 2.4
BG0018.6± 1.2
BG0029.1± 3.4
BG0038.9± 2.8
BG0048.1± 2.7
BG0058.5± 3.4
BG0069.0± 3.8
BG00710.5± 3.7
BG0085.0± 2.6
BG0098.9± 3.4
Baseline Unheated Milk Wheal
A skin prick test (SPT) measured the presence of immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies for the food tested. During the SPT, a drop of solution containing the food allergen was placed on the forearm. Using a small plastic needle, the skin was gently pricked or scratched to allow a tiny amount of the solution to enter just below the surface. After 15 minutes, positive results were indicated by a wheal, a raised white bump surrounded by a small circle of red skin. The wheal was measured in millimeters. Larger sizes indicated a greater chance of experiencing an allergic reaction to the food tested.
Mean
Standard Deviation
Mm
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
BG00010.4± 4.2
BG00111.6± 4.2
BG0028.3± 2.5
BG0038.8± 2.3
BG00410.0± 2.7
BG0059.7± 4.0
BG0069.6± 4.3
BG00710.1± 2.6
BG0085.6± 2.8
BG0099.3± 3.4
Baseline Cow's Milk IgE
When cow's milk immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies are present in serum samples, this is indicative of a potential for an allergic reaction to cow's milk. The greater the concentration of IgE antibodies present, the more likely an allergic reaction to cow's milk is to occur.
Mean
Standard Deviation
kUa/L
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
BG00010.3± 11.5
BG00110.5± 7.8
BG0025.3± 5.4
BG0037.8± 9.7
BG00413.7± 13.1
BG0054.1± 4.5
BG00614.7± 21.3
BG00715.1± 12.7
BG0084.9± 8.1
BG00910.6± 13.6
Description
OG000
Dose-Escalation Group
Participants in groups 2-4 were randomized to re-try less denatured milk protein food items every 6 months.
OG001
Maintenance Group
Participants in groups 2-4 were randomized to re-try less denatured milk protein food items every 12 months.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00041
OG00144
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00026
OG00131
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG001
Regression, Logistic
0.58
Odds Ratio, log
0.77
2-Sided
95
0.31
1.93
No
Superiority or Other
Secondary
Number of Participants With a Positive Progression in Tolerating More Allergenic Forms of Milk at 12 and 24 Months
Participants were grouped based on the food they experienced a reaction to at the baseline Oral Food Challenge (OFC). Group 1 = reacted to muffin; Group 2 = reacted to pizza; Group 3 = reacted to rice pudding; Group 4 = reacted to non-baked milk; Group 5 = did not react. Groups 2, 3 and 4 were randomized to dose escalation or maintenance, and at each visit following randomization, performed an OFC where food products containing milk protein denatured through baking were given. Participants were given progressively less denatured milk protein food items until an allergic reaction occurred. A positive progression in tolerance of baked milk was defined as a reaction to a less denatured milk protein food at 12 months than at baseline. Positive progression at 24 months was defined as experiencing a reaction to a less denatured milk protein food at 24 months than at 12 months.
Randomized intent-to-treat
Posted
Number
participants
12 months, 24 months
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Dose-Escalation Group
Participants in groups 2-4 were randomized to re-try less denatured milk protein food items every 6 months.[Dose Escalation arm].
OG001
Maintenance Group
Participants in groups 2-4 were randomized to re-try less denatured milk protein food items every 12 months.[Maintenance arm].
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00041
OG00144
Title
Denominators
Categories
Progressed at 12 Months
Title
Measurements
OG00018
OG00118
Progressed at 24 Months
Title
Measurements
OG000
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG001
Progression comparison at 12 Months
Chi-squared
0.78
Odds Ratio, log
1.13
2-Sided
95
0.48
2.68
No
Superiority or Other
OG000
OG001
Progression comparison at 24 Months
Chi-squared
Secondary
Percent of Participants Becoming Tolerant to Unheated Cow's Milk at 12, 24, and 36 Months
Participants were grouped based on the food to which they experienced a reaction at the baseline Oral Food Challenge (OFC). Group 1 = reacted to muffin; Group 2 = reacted to pizza; Group 3 = reacted to rice pudding; Group 4 = reacted to non-baked milk; Group 5 = did not react. Groups 2, 3 and 4 were randomized to dose escalation or maintenance, and at each visit following randomization, participants performed an OFC where they were given food products containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively less denatured milk protein food items until they had an allergic reaction. Participants were considered to become tolerant to unheated cow's milk if at the specified visit, they did not react to any of the foods given in the OFC.
Randomized intent-to-treat
Posted
Number
percentage of participants
12 months, 24 months, and 36 months
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Dose-Escalation Group
Participants in groups 2-4 were randomized to re-try less denatured milk protein food items every 6 months.[Dose Escalation arm].
OG001
Maintenance Group
Participants in groups 2-4 were randomized to re-try less denatured milk protein food items every 12 months.[Maintenance arm].
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00041
OG00144
Title
Denominators
Categories
Tolerant at 12 Month
Title
Measurements
OG00029.3
OG00115.9
Tolerant at 24 Months
Title
Measurements
OG000
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG001
Comparison at 12 Months
Chi-squared
0.14
2-Sided
No
Superiority or Other
OG000
OG001
Comparison at 24 Months
Chi-squared
Secondary
Percent of Participants Becoming Tolerant to Unheated Cow's Milk
Participants were grouped based on the food to which they experienced a reaction at the baseline Oral Food Challenge (OFC). Group 1 = reacted to muffin; Group 2 = reacted to pizza; Group 3 = reacted to rice pudding; Group 4 = reacted to non-baked milk; Group 5 = did not react. Groups 2, 3 and 4 were randomized to dose escalation or maintenance, and at each visit following randomization, participants performed an OFC where they were given food products containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively less denatured milk protein food items until they had an allergic reaction. Participants were considered to become tolerant to unheated cow's milk if at any post-randomization visit up through 36 months, they did not react to any of the food given in the OFC.
Randomized intent-to-treat
Posted
Number
percentage of participants
Randomization through end of study (up to 36 months)
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Group 2 - Pizza
Participants in this group experienced a reaction to pizza during their baseline visit oral food challenge
OG001
Group 3 - Rice Pudding
Participants in this group experienced a reaction to rice pudding during their baseline visit oral food challenge
OG002
Group 4 - Milk
Participants in this group experienced a reaction to unheated milk during their baseline visit oral food challenge
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00031
OG00111
OG00243
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00038.7
OG00154.5
OG00253.5
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG001
OG002
Chi-squared
0.41
2-Sided
No
Superiority or Other
Secondary
Comparison of Baseline Basophil Percent Maximal Degranulation With the Outcome of the Baseline OFC to Identify the Biomarkers of Clinical Reactivity
This endpoint evaluates the correlation between the mechanistic biomarkers of basophil reactivity and the food to which participants reacted at baseline. Participants were grouped according to food at which participants experienced a reaction during their baseline oral food challenge: Group 1 = reacted to muffin; Group 2 = reacted to pizza; Group 3 = reacted to rice pudding; Group 4 = reacted to non-baked milk; Group 5 = did not react. Basophils come from blood drawn at baseline. Basophils counts were done using whole blood specimens. Basophil reactivity as measured as maximal degranulation percentage after stimulation with titrated dilutions of milk powder (from 1x103 to 1x10-1 µg/mL total protein) and was correlated to group assignment using Spearman correlation coefficients.
Intent-to-treat
Posted
Median
Inter-Quartile Range
percentage of max basophil degranulation
Baseline
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Group 1 = Muffin
Participants in this group experienced an allergic reaction to eating a muffin during their baseline oral food challenge
OG001
Group 2 = Pizza
Participants in this group experienced an allergic reaction to eating pizza during their baseline oral food challenge
OG002
Group 3 = Rice Pudding
Participants in this group experienced an allergic reaction to eating rice pudding during their baseline oral food challenge
OG003
Group 4 = Milk
Participants in this group experienced an allergic reaction to drinking unheated milk during their baseline oral food challenge
OG004
Group 5 = Passed All
Participants in this group passed all oral food challenges without an allergic reaction during their baseline visit
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00041
OG00131
OG00211
OG003
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00041.0(16.9 to 76.7)
OG00129.3(12.8 to 47.8)
OG00245.6(13.9 to 85.3)
OG003
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG001
OG002
OG003
OG004
Kruskal-Wallis
0.09
2-Sided
No
Superiority or Other
OG000
OG001
OG002
OG003
OG004
Spearman's Correlation
Secondary
Comparison of Baseline IgE With the Outcome of the Baseline OFC to Identify the Biomarkers of Clinical Reactivity
This endpoint evaluates the correlation between the mechanistic biomarker of IgE to milk proteins and allergic reaction at baseline. Participants were grouped according to food at which participants experienced a reaction during their baseline oral food challenge: Group 1 = reacted to muffin; Group 2 = reacted to pizza; Group 3 = reacted to rice pudding; Group 4 = reacted to non-baked milk; Group 5 = did not react. Quantitative IgE to milk proteins was done using FEIA (UniCAP) on serum from blood drawn at baseline.
Intent-to-treat
Posted
Median
Inter-Quartile Range
kUa/L
Baseline
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Group 1 = Muffin
Participants in this group experienced an allergic reaction to eating a muffin during their baseline oral food challenge
OG001
Group 2 = Pizza
Participants in this group experienced an allergic reaction to eating pizza during their baseline oral food challenge
OG002
Group 3 = Rice Pudding
Participants in this group experienced an allergic reaction to eating rice pudding during their baseline oral food challenge
OG003
Group 4 = Milk
Participants in this group experienced an allergic reaction to drinking unheated milk during their baseline oral food challenge
OG004
Group 5 = Passed All
Participants in this group passed all oral food challenges without an allergic reaction during their baseline visit
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00041
OG00131
OG00211
OG003
Title
Denominators
Categories
Beta-lactoglobulin IgE
Title
Measurements
OG0001.9(0.6 to 4.0)
OG0010.6(0.2 to 2.4)
OG0021.3(0.4 to 3.5)
OG003
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG001
OG002
OG003
OG004
Analysis on Betalactoglobulin
Kruskal-Wallis
<0.01
No
Superiority or Other
OG000
OG001
OG002
OG003
OG004
Analysis on Betalactoglobulin IgE
Secondary
Comparison of Baseline Mechanistic Studies [Treg and Basophil] With the Outcome of the Baseline OFC to Identify the Biomarkers of Clinical Reactivity
This endpoint evaluates the correlation between the mechanistic biomarker of the number of basophils and T regulatory cells reactive to milk proteins and the food to which participants reacted at baseline. Participants were grouped according to food at which participants experienced a reaction during their baseline oral food challenge: Group 1 = reacted to muffin; Group 2 = reacted to pizza; Group 3 = reacted to rice pudding; Group 4 = reacted to non-baked milk; Group 5 = did not react. Quantitative IgE to milk proteins was done using FEIA (UniCAP) on serum from blood drawn at baseline.
Intent-to-treat
Posted
Median
Inter-Quartile Range
cells/µL
Baseline
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Group 1 = Muffin
Participants in this group experienced an allergic reaction to eating a muffin during their baseline oral food challenge
OG001
Group 2 = Pizza
Participants in this group experienced an allergic reaction to eating pizza during their baseline oral food challenge
OG002
Group 3 = Rice Pudding
Participants in this group experienced an allergic reaction to eating rice pudding during their baseline oral food challenge
OG003
Group 4 = Milk
Participants in this group experienced an allergic reaction to drinking unheated milk during their baseline oral food challenge
OG004
Group 5 = Passed All
Participants in this group passed all oral food challenges without an allergic reaction during their baseline visit
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00041
OG00131
OG00211
OG003
Title
Denominators
Categories
Max Basophil Assessment
Title
Measurements
OG0001160.0(635.0 to 1981.0)
OG001717.0(456.0 to 982.0)
OG0021589.5(1287.5 to 3972.0)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG001
OG002
OG003
OG004
Analysis on Max Basophil Assessment
Kruskal-Wallis
0.01
No
Superiority or Other
OG000
OG001
OG002
OG003
OG004
Analysis on Max Basophil Assessment
Secondary
Relationship Between Initial Dose of Tolerated Baked-milk Protein and Time to Complete Tolerance
Participants were grouped based on the food to which they experienced a reaction at the baseline Oral Food Challenge (OFC). Group 1 = reacted to muffin; Group 2 = reacted to pizza; Group 3 = reacted to rice pudding; Group 4 = reacted to non-baked milk; Group 5 = did not react. Groups 2, 3 and 4 were randomized to dose escalation or maintenance, and at each visit following randomization, participants performed an OFC where they were given food products containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively less denatured milk protein food items until they had an allergic reaction. Participants were considered to become tolerant to unheated cow's milk if at any post-randomization visit up through 36 months, they did not react to any food, including unheated whole milk.
Randomized intent-to-treat participants who achieved tolerance
Posted
Mean
Standard Deviation
months
Randomization through end of study (up to 36 months)
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Group 2 - Pizza
Participants in this group experienced a reaction to pizza during their baseline visit oral food challenge
OG001
Group 3 - Rice Pudding
Participants in this group experienced a reaction to rice pudding during their baseline visit oral food challenge
OG002
Group 4 - Milk
Participants in this group experienced a reaction to unheated milk during their baseline visit oral food challenge
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00012
OG0016
OG00223
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00024.0± 12.6
OG00117.8± 12.7
OG00219.6± 10.7
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG001
OG002
Kruskal-Wallis
0.50
2-Sided
No
Superiority or Other
Secondary
Relationship Between Dose of Baked-milk Protein and Reactivity to Casein Versus Whey
Participants were grouped based on the food to which they experienced a reaction at the baseline Oral Food Challenge (OFC). Group 1 = reacted to muffin; Group 2 = reacted to pizza; Group 3 = reacted to rice pudding; Group 4 = reacted to non-baked milk; Group 5 = did not react. Groups 2, 3 and 4 were randomized to dose escalation or maintenance, and at each visit following randomization, participants performed an OFC where they were given food products containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively less denatured milk protein food items until they had an allergic reaction. The relationship between serum IgE to betalactoglobulin and casein, and the food level at which the participant reacted, were evaluated at each post randomization OFC visit. It is expected that those who reacted to muffin would have a higher ratio of casein to betalactoglobulin than those who reacted to less heated forms of milk.
Intent-to-treat
Posted
Median
Inter-Quartile Range
Ratio
Baseline, Month 12, Month 24, Month 36
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Group 1 = Muffin
Participants in this group experienced an allergic reaction to eating a muffin during their baseline oral food challenge
OG001
Group 2 = Pizza
Participants in this group experienced an allergic reaction to eating pizza during their baseline oral food challenge
OG002
Group 3 = Rice Pudding
Participants in this group experienced an allergic reaction to eating rice pudding during their baseline oral food challenge
OG003
Group 4 = Milk
Participants in this group experienced an allergic reaction to drinking unheated milk during their baseline oral food challenge
OG004
Group 5 = Passed All
Participants in this group passed all oral food challenges without an allergic reaction during their baseline visit
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00041
OG00131
OG00211
OG003
Title
Denominators
Categories
Baseline
Title
Measurements
OG0004.6(3.0 to 6.5)
OG0014.6(1.8 to 9.0)
OG0025.5(0.9 to 14.2)
OG003
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG001
OG002
OG003
OG004
Baseline Comparison
Spearman Correlation
0.033
Correlation = -0.18
No
Superiority or Other
OG000
OG001
OG002
OG003
OG004
Secondary
Comparison of Percent of Participants Tolerant to Non-heated Milk Between the Participants Who Ingested Baked-milk Products and Participants Who Continued to Avoid All Forms of Milk
Participants were grouped based on the food they reacted to, at the baseline Oral Food Challenge (OFC). Group 1= reacted to muffin; Group 2= reacted to pizza; Group 3= reacted to rice pudding; Group 4= reacted to non-baked milk; Group 5= did not react. Groups 2- 4 were randomized to dose escalation or maintenance, and Group 1, and a Control group that chose not to participate in the study, continued to avoid milk. Randomized participants performed an OFC at each visit during which they were given progressively less denatured/ baked milk protein food items until they had an allergic reaction. Participants were considered tolerant to unheated cow's milk if at any post-randomization visit up through 36 months, they did not react to any food, including unheated whole milk. Tolerance of non-heated milk was assessed by report among those who continued to avoid milk.
Randomized and comparison participants
Posted
Number
percent participants
Month 36
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Active
This group included participants who were in baseline groups 2 through 4.
OG001
Comparison Group
This group comprised of participants who did not want to participate in OFCs and were advised to avoid milk-based food products for the remainder of the study
OG002
Reacted to Muffin
This group included participants who were in baseline group 1
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00085
OG00134
OG00241
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00048.2
OG0010.0
OG0020.0
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG001
OG002
36 Month Comparison
Chi-squared
<0.01
2-Sided
No
Superiority or Other
Secondary
Changes in Mechanistic Values [Humoral, T Cell and Basophil]
This outcome measure was not well defined in the protocol and was not analyzed.
Data were not collected and therefore no analyses could be performed.
Posted
Baseline, Month 12, Month 24, and Month 36
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Active
This group included participants who were in baseline groups 2 through 4.
OG001
Comparison Group
This group comprised of participants who did not want to participate in OFCs and were advised to avoid milk-based food products for the remainder of the study
OG002
Reacted to Muffin
This group included participants who were in baseline group 1
Units
Counts
Participants
OG0000
OG0010
OG0020
Secondary
Changes in Mechanistic Values [Humoral, T Cell and Basophil]
This outcome measure was not well defined in the protocol and was not analyzed.
Data were not collected and therefore no analyses could be performed.
Posted
Baseline to the time complete milk tolerance was established
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Active
This group included participants who were in baseline groups 2 through 4.
OG001
Comparison Group
This group comprised of participants who did not want to participate in OFCs and were advised to avoid milk-based food products for the remainder of the study
OG002
Reacted to Muffin
This group included participants who were in baseline group 1
Units
Counts
Participants
OG0000
OG0010
OG0020
1
16
16
16
EG001
Dose Escalation - Reacted to Rice Pudding
At baseline, participants performed an oral food challenge (OFC). They were given food containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively increasing quantities of less denatured milk protein foods until they had an allergic reaction. The food they experienced a reaction to was their baseline group. Participants in this group reacted to rice pudding and were then randomized to re-try less denatured milk protein food items every 6 months (dose escalation). Participants in this group received instructions for intake of baked milk foods at home and were followed up to 46 months.
0
5
5
5
EG002
Dose Escalation - Reacted to Non-baked Milk
At baseline, participants performed an oral food challenge (OFC). They were given food containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively increasing quantities of less denatured milk protein foods until they had an allergic reaction. The food they experienced a reaction to was their baseline group. Participants in this group reacted to non-baked milk and were then randomized to re-try less denatured milk protein food items every 6 months (dose escalation). Participants in this group received instructions for intake of baked milk foods at home and were followed up to 46 months.
0
20
20
20
EG003
Maintenance - Reacted to Pizza
At baseline, participants had an oral food challenge (OFC). They were given food containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively increasing quantities of less denatured milk protein foods until they had an allergic reaction. The food they experienced a reaction to was their baseline group. Participants in this group reacted to pizza and were then randomized to return for re-evaluation every 12 months (maintenance) to determine whether they might progress to ingesting higher amounts of baked milk protein. Participants in this group received instructions for intake of baked milk foods at home and were followed up to 46 months.
0
15
15
15
EG004
Maintenance - Reacted to Rice Pudding
At baseline, participants had an oral food challenge (OFC). They were given food containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively increasing quantities of less denatured milk protein foods until they had an allergic reaction. The food they experienced a reaction to was their baseline group. Participants in this group reacted to rice pudding and were then randomized to continue eating the food at the same level of milk denaturalization and come in for OFCs every 12 months. Participants in this group received instructions for intake of baked milk foods at home and were followed up to 46 months.
1
6
6
6
EG005
Maintenance - Reacted to Non-baked Milk
At baseline, participants had an oral food challenge (OFC). They were given food containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively increasing quantities of less denatured milk protein foods until they had an allergic reaction. The food they experienced a reaction to was their baseline group. Participants in this group reacted to rice pudding and were then randomized to continue eating the food at the same level of milk denaturalization and come in for OFCs every 12 months. Participants in this group received instructions for intake of baked milk foods at home and were followed up to 46 months.
0
23
23
23
EG006
Not Randomized - Comparison
Participants in this group fulfilled inclusion criteria into the study but refused participation. These participants were used as comparison to other groups
0
34
20
34
EG007
Non-Randomized - Reacted to Muffin
At baseline, participants had an oral food challenge (OFC). They were given food containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively increasing quantities of less denatured milk protein foods until they had an allergic reaction. The food they experienced a reaction to was their baseline group. Participants in this group reacted to muffin and were not randomized. Participants were instructed to avoid milk and return for re-evaluation with laboratory tests at 12 and 24 months and baked milk challenge at 36 months
0
41
40
41
EG008
Non-Randomized - Tolerant to Baked and Non-baked Milk
At baseline, participants had an oral food challenge (OFC). They were given food containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively increasing quantities of less denatured milk protein foods until they had an allergic reaction. The food they experienced a reaction to was their baseline group. Participants in this group passed all OFCs without a reaction were not randomized. Participants were instructed to include full milk products to their diet for 3 months, followed by complete dietary milk elimination for 1 month. Participants were then re-challenged to unheated milk. Following successful challenge, participants were placed on an unrestricted milk diet and brought in for re-evaluation at 6 months. If participants were not successful in their challenge to unheated milk, they had baked milk products progressively re-introduced to their diets.