Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the LINX Reflux Management System in the treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD).
At present, the primary alternative for GERD patients with an incomplete symptomatic response to proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) is laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. This surgical procedure continues to be the prevalent non-medical treatment option for GERD patients, despite several important limitations. First, it is a very traumatic procedure, requiring portions of the stomach to be dissected and then wrapped around the tubular esophagus, creating permanent anatomic alterations. Secondly, it can create significant side effects, such as gas bloat syndrome, the inability to belch and the inability to vomit.
The intent of the LINX System is to allow a surgeon, using existing laparoscopic techniques and instruments, to augment a weak LES and restore the defective barrier at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). This defect of the GEJ is the source of abnormal reflux. The LINX device is an expandable string of individual titanium beads with magnetic cores. The device is laparoscopically placed as a ring around the lower esophageal sphincter. The magnetic attraction of the beads augments the esophageal sphincter's ability to resist gastric pressures that cause reflux. At rest, the LINX device encircles the sphincter with each bead resting against an adjacent bead, to avoid compression of the tubular esophagus. When swallowing, higher pressures are created, allowing the magnetic bond between beads to break, and the LINX implant to expand radially. This serves to preserve swallow and other physiologic functions, such as belching and vomiting, and avoids the side effect of post-prandial bloating. The device can be placed with minimal dissection, preserving anatomy, and is also removable, if necessary. This provides important benefits as it preserves the native anatomy, unlike the Nissen procedure.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation | Other | Single-arm study: all subjects were treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation. A subject's baseline measurements prior to sphincter augmentation were compared to post-sphincter augmentation measurements. Subjects served as their own control. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation | Device | The area of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) is accessed using a standard laparoscopic approach. The tubular esophagus, in the area of the LES, is sized and the appropriately sized sphincter augmentation device is placed circumferentially around the esophagus in the area of the LES. After confirming proper placement, the ends of the device are secured. At this point, the implant procedure is complete, laparoscopic instruments are withdrawn and access points are closed. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of Occurrence for Device and Procedure Related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs). | SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence, whether related to the study device or procedure or not, that meets one or more of the following criteria:
Outcome measure reports number of subjects with reported events. | through 24 months |
| Normalization of Esophageal Acid Exposure Time or Reduced Total Acid Exposure Time of at Least 50% Compared to the Subject's Baseline Measurement by Esophageal pH Testing. | The analysis cohort for the primary efficacy analysis was the treated population which includes all implanted subjects and was determined through esophageal pH testing. | 12 Months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| At Least a 50% Reduction in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) Total Score Compared to Baseline | 12 months | |
| Average Daily Proton-pump Inhibitor (PPI) Dosage Reduced by at Least 50% Compared to Baseline | 12 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USC Keck School of Medicine | Los Angeles | California | 90033 | United States | ||
| University of California - San Diego |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26044316 | Derived | Ganz RA, Edmundowicz SA, Taiganides PA, Lipham JC, Smith CD, DeVault KR, Horgan S, Jacobsen G, Luketich JD, Smith CC, Schlack-Haerer SC, Kothari SN, Dunst CM, Watson TJ, Peters J, Oelschlager BK, Perry KA, Melvin S, Bemelman WA, Smout AJ, Dunn D. Long-term Outcomes of Patients Receiving a Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device for Gastroesophageal Reflux. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 May;14(5):671-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.05.028. Epub 2015 Jun 2. | |
| 23425164 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | LINX System | All subjects are treated with the LINX System during a laparoscopic surgical procedure. Subjects serve as their own control. Baseline measurements are compared to post-implant measurements. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| San Diego |
| California |
| 92103 |
| United States |
| Mayo Clinic | Jacksonville | Florida | 32224 | United States |
| Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital | Albany | Georgia | 31701 | United States |
| Abbott Northwestern Hospital/MNGI | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55407 | United States |
| Washington University - Division of Gastroenterology | St Louis | Missouri | 63110 | United States |
| University of Rochester Medical Center | Rochester | New York | 14642 | United States |
| The Ohio State University Medical Center / Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery | Columbus | Ohio | 43210 | United States |
| Knox Community Hospital | Mount Vernon | Ohio | 43050 | United States |
| Legacy Health System | Portland | Oregon | 97210 | United States |
| University of Pittsburgh Medical Center | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15213 | United States |
| University of Washington Medical Center | Seattle | Washington | 98195 | United States |
| Gundersen Lutheran Clinic | La Crosse | Wisconsin | 54601 | United States |
| Academic Medical Center | Amsterdam | 1105 AZ | Netherlands |
| Derived |
| Ganz RA, Peters JH, Horgan S, Bemelman WA, Dunst CM, Edmundowicz SA, Lipham JC, Luketich JD, Melvin WS, Oelschlager BK, Schlack-Haerer SC, Smith CD, Smith CC, Dunn D, Taiganides PA. Esophageal sphincter device for gastroesophageal reflux disease. N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 21;368(8):719-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205544. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | LINX System | All subjects are treated with the LINX System during a laparoscopic surgical procedure. Subjects serve as their own control. Baseline measurements are compared to post-implant measurements. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percentage of total monitoring time esophageal pH <4 | At baseline, all subjects were evaluated with esophageal pH monitoring with GERD medications discontinued for at least 7 days using the BRAVO System | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percentage of total monitoring time |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) total score | The GERD-HRQL scale was administered at baseline with GERD medications discontinued for at least seven days. GERD-HRQL scale objectively quantifies symptom severity. The GERD-HRQL scale consists of 10 questions with the following Responses Scale: 0 = No Symptoms
The worst possible score is 50 based on a response of "5" to all 10 questions. | Mean | Standard Deviation | Total Score |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Use of daily proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) | At time of enrollment, all medications used by a subject were documented. | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Years of proton-pump inhibitor use | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Rate of Occurrence for Device and Procedure Related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs). | SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence, whether related to the study device or procedure or not, that meets one or more of the following criteria:
Outcome measure reports number of subjects with reported events. | Posted | Number | participants | through 24 months |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Normalization of Esophageal Acid Exposure Time or Reduced Total Acid Exposure Time of at Least 50% Compared to the Subject's Baseline Measurement by Esophageal pH Testing. | The analysis cohort for the primary efficacy analysis was the treated population which includes all implanted subjects and was determined through esophageal pH testing. | Posted | Number | participants | 12 Months |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | At Least a 50% Reduction in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) Total Score Compared to Baseline | Posted | Number | participants | 12 months |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Average Daily Proton-pump Inhibitor (PPI) Dosage Reduced by at Least 50% Compared to Baseline | Posted | Number | participants | 12 months |
|
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | LINX System | All subjects are treated with the LINX System during a laparoscopic surgical procedure. Subjects serve as their own control. Baseline measurements are compared to post-implant measurements. | 6 | 100 | 76 | 100 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dysphagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Odynophagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain | General disorders | Systematic Assessment | unknown causality |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dysphagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Stomach Bloating | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Odynophagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hiccups | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Inability to belch or vomit | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amy Derosier, VP of Clinical Affairs | Torax Medical | 651-361-8900 | aderosier@toraxmedical.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005764 | Gastroesophageal Reflux |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015154 | Esophageal Motility Disorders |
| D003680 | Deglutition Disorders |
| D004935 | Esophageal Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Denominators |
|---|
| Categories |
|---|
|
|