Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | INDUSTRY |
The objective of this trial is to determine the efficacy and safety of linaclotide administered to patients with chronic constipation (CC). The primary efficacy parameter is the percentage of patients in each treatment group that meet the protocol definition for Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) Overall Responder
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Linaclotide 290 micrograms |
|
| 2 | Experimental | Linaclotide 145 micrograms |
|
| 3 | Placebo Comparator | Matching placebo |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linaclotide 290 micrograms | Drug | Oral, once daily each morning at least 30 minutes before breakfast for the duration of the study |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) Overall Responder | A 12-week CSBM overall responders was defined as a patient who for at least 9 of the 12 weeks of the treatment period had a CSBM weekly frequency rate that was 3 or greater and increased by 1 or more from baseline. A CSBM was defined as a spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) that was associated with a sense of complete evacuation. An SBM was defined as a bowel movement (BM) that occurred in the absence of laxative, enema, or suppository use on either the calendar day of the BM or the calendar day before the BM. | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 12-week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) Frequency Rate | The number of CSBMs per week. | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| 12-Week Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM) Frequency Rate | A patient's 12-week spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) frequency rate was the number of SBMs per week calculated over the 12-weeks of the treatment period. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Paul F.C. Eng, PhD | Forest Laboratories | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forest Investigative Site | Birmingham | Alabama | 35205 | United States | ||
| Forest Investigative Site |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25312449 | Derived | Chang L, Lembo AJ, Lavins BJ, Shiff SJ, Hao X, Chickering JG, Jia XD, Currie MG, Kurtz CB, Johnston JM. The impact of abdominal pain on global measures in patients with chronic idiopathic constipation, before and after treatment with linaclotide: a pooled analysis of two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Dec;40(11-12):1302-12. doi: 10.1111/apt.12985. Epub 2014 Oct 13. | |
| 21830967 |
Not provided
Not provided
Patients went through a 14 to 21 day Pretreatment Period during which the patients provided qualifying bowel habit and symptoms, and rescue medicine usage information through an interactive voice response system (IVRS).
Patient Recruitment occurred from October 2008 to March 2009 at 103 study centers (95 in the United States and 8 in Canada).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo | Dose matched placebo, oral administration, once per day. |
| FG001 | Linaclotide 145µg | Linaclotide, 145µg dose, oral administration, once per day |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Linaclotide 145 micrograms | Drug | Oral, once daily each morning at least 30 minutes before breakfast for the duration of the study |
|
| Placebo | Drug | Oral, once daily each morning at least 30 minutes before breakfast for the duration of the study |
|
| Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| 12-Week Stool Consistency | The consistency of each BM was assessed using the 7-point Bristol Stool Form Scale:
| Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| 12-Week Severity of Straining | Straining is measured on a 5-point scale, where a value of 1 is "not at all" and a value of 5 is "an extreme amount. | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| 12-Week Abdominal Discomfort | Abdominal discomfort is based on a 5-point scale where a value of l is "none" and a value of 5 is "very severe." | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| 12-Week Bloating | Bloating was based on a 5-point scale where a value of l is "none" and a value of 5 is "very severe". | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| 12-Week Constipation Severity | Constipation severity was based on a 5-point ordinal scale where a value of l is "none" and a value of 5 is "very severe". | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| Birmingham |
| Alabama |
| 35215 |
| United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Huntsville | Alabama | 35801 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Chandler | Arizona | 85225 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Mesa | Arizona | 85210 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Peoria | Arizona | 85381 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Phoenix | Arizona | 85012 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Scottsdale | Arizona | 85251 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Tucson | Arizona | 85741 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Burbank | California | 91505 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Encinitas | California | 92024 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Foothill Ranch | California | 92610 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Los Angeles | California | 90036 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Orange | California | 92869 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Westlake Village | California | 91361 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Boulder | Colorado | 80304 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Colorado Springs | Colorado | 80909 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Sites | Denver | Colorado | 80205 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Longmont | Colorado | 80501 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Wheat Ridge | Colorado | 80033 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Waterbury | Connecticut | 06708 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Boca Raton | Florida | 33486 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Bradenton | Florida | 34203 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Brooksville | Florida | 34601 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Fort Myers | Florida | 33916 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Jupiter | Florida | 33458 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Kissimmee | Florida | 34741 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Miami | Florida | 33143 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Ocala | Florida | 34471 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Orlando | Florida | 32806 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Panama City | Florida | 32405 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Pembroke Pines | Florida | 33024 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | St. Petersburg | Florida | 33709 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Tampa | Florida | 33606 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Trinity | Florida | 34655 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Zephyrhills | Florida | 33542 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Atlanta | Georgia | 30342 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Marietta | Georgia | 30060 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Marietta | Georgia | 30067 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Stockbridge | Georgia | 30281 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Woodstock | Georgia | 30189 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Idaho Falls | Idaho | 83404 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Rockford | Illinois | 61107 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Elkhart | Indiana | 46514 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Evansville | Indiana | 47714 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Indianapolis | Indiana | 46237 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Indianapolis | Indiana | 46254 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Iowa City | Iowa | 52242 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Arkansas City | Kansas | 67005 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Newton | Kansas | 67114 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Wichita | Kansas | 67205 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Wichita | Kansas | 67207 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Lexington | Kentucky | 40509 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Madisonville | Kentucky | 42431 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Chevy Chase | Maryland | 20815 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Hagerstown | Maryland | 21742 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Lutherville | Maryland | 21093 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Boston | Massachusetts | 02135 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Chaska | Minnesota | 55318 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | St Louis | Missouri | 63110 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | St Louis | Missouri | 63128 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Vineland | New Jersey | 08360 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Albuquerque | New Mexico | 87106 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Brooklyn | New York | 11214 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Great Neck | New York | 11021 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Great Neck | New York | 11023 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Fayetteville | North Carolina | 28304 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Greensboro | North Carolina | 27403 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Hickory | North Carolina | 28601 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Raleigh | North Carolina | 27612 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Wilmington | North Carolina | 28401 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | 27103 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Bismarck | North Dakota | 58501 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Akron | Ohio | 44302 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45219 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Cleveland | Ohio | 44122 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | 73104 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Tulsa | Oklahoma | 74135 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Bensalem | Pennsylvania | 19020 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15206 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Greenville | South Carolina | 29615 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Greer | South Carolina | 29651 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Nashville | Tennessee | 37205 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Austin | Texas | 78705 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Dallas | Texas | 75234 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Houston | Texas | 77090 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Lake Jackson | Texas | 77566 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | San Antonio | Texas | 78209 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | San Antonio | Texas | 78229 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Salt Lake City | Utah | 84102 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Charlottesville | Virginia | 22911 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Christianburg | Virginia | 24073 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Newport News | Virginia | 23606 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Norfolk | Virginia | 23502 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Norfolk | Virginia | 23507 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Richmond | Virginia | 23294 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Bellevue | Washington | 98402 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Lakewood | Washington | 98499 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Wenatchee | Washington | 98801 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | 53209 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site | Vancouver | British Columbia | V67 2K5 | Canada |
| Forest Investigative Site | Greater Sudbury | Ontario | P3E 1H5 | Canada |
| Forest Investigative Site | Hamilton | Ontario | L8N 4A6 | Canada |
| Forest Investigative Site | Newmarket | Ontario | L3Y 7V1 | Canada |
| Forest Investigative Site | Ottawa | Ontario | K2c 3R2 | Canada |
| Forest Investigative Site 1 | Sarnia | Ontario | N7T 4X3 | Canada |
| Forest Investigative Site 2 | Sarnia | Ontario | N7T 4X3 | Canada |
| Forest Investigative Site | Toronto | Ontario | MCN 2V7 | Canada |
| Derived |
| Lembo AJ, Schneier HA, Shiff SJ, Kurtz CB, MacDougall JE, Jia XD, Shao JZ, Lavins BJ, Currie MG, Fitch DA, Jeglinski BI, Eng P, Fox SM, Johnston JM. Two randomized trials of linaclotide for chronic constipation. N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 11;365(6):527-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1010863. |
| FG002 | Linaclotide 290µg | Linaclotide, 290µg dose, oral administration, once per day |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo | Dose matched placebo, oral administration, once per day. |
| BG001 | Linaclotide 145µg | Linaclotide, 145µg dose, oral administration, once per day |
| BG002 | Linaclotide 290µg | Linaclotide, 290µg dose, oral administration, once per day |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Age, Customized | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) Overall Responder | A 12-week CSBM overall responders was defined as a patient who for at least 9 of the 12 weeks of the treatment period had a CSBM weekly frequency rate that was 3 or greater and increased by 1 or more from baseline. A CSBM was defined as a spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) that was associated with a sense of complete evacuation. An SBM was defined as a bowel movement (BM) that occurred in the absence of laxative, enema, or suppository use on either the calendar day of the BM or the calendar day before the BM. | A total of 633 patients were randomized to treatment and received at least 1 dose of study drug. 630 patients were included in the Intent to Treat (ITT) Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Number | participants | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | 12-week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) Frequency Rate | The number of CSBMs per week. | A total of 633 patients were randomized to treatment and received at least 1 dose of study drug. 630 patients were included in the Intent to Treat (ITT) Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | CSBM per week | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | 12-Week Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM) Frequency Rate | A patient's 12-week spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) frequency rate was the number of SBMs per week calculated over the 12-weeks of the treatment period. | A total of 633 patients were randomized to treatment and received at least 1 dose of study drug. 630 patients were included in the Intent to Treat (ITT) Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | SBM per week | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | 12-Week Stool Consistency | The consistency of each BM was assessed using the 7-point Bristol Stool Form Scale:
| A total of 633 patients were randomized to treatment and received at least 1 dose of study drug. 630 patients were included in the ITT Population; 97 patients with no pretreatment spontaneous bowel movements were excluded from the 12-Week Stool Consistency analysis. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | 12-Week Severity of Straining | Straining is measured on a 5-point scale, where a value of 1 is "not at all" and a value of 5 is "an extreme amount. | A total of 633 patients were randomized to treatment and received at least 1 dose of study drug. 630 patients were included in the ITT Population; 97 Patients with no pretreatment spontaneous bowel movements were excluded from the 12-Week Severity of Straining analysis. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | 12-Week Abdominal Discomfort | Abdominal discomfort is based on a 5-point scale where a value of l is "none" and a value of 5 is "very severe." | A total of 633 patients were randomized to treatment and received at least 1 dose of study drug. 630 patients were included in the Intent to Treat (ITT) Population. 1 additional patient without a baseline Abdominal Discomfort score was excluded from analysis in this endpoint. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | 12-Week Bloating | Bloating was based on a 5-point scale where a value of l is "none" and a value of 5 is "very severe". | A total of 633 patients were randomized to treatment and received at least 1 dose of study drug. 630 patients were included in the ITT population; 1 additional patient without a baseline Bloating score was excluded from analysis in this endpoint. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | 12-Week Constipation Severity | Constipation severity was based on a 5-point ordinal scale where a value of l is "none" and a value of 5 is "very severe". | A total of 633 patients were randomized to treatment and received at least 1 dose of study drug. 630 patients were included in the ITT population; 11 additional patients who dropped out prior to finishing 1 week of the trial were excluded from the Constipation Severity endpoint. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
|
Adverse Event reporting occurred from October 2008 through August 2009.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo | Dose matched placebo, oral administration, once per day. | 4 | 215 | 35 | 215 | ||
| EG001 | Linaclotide 145µg | Linaclotide, 145µg dose, oral administration, once per day | 3 | 213 | 70 | 213 | ||
| EG002 | Linaclotide 290µg | Linaclotide, 290µg dose, oral administration, once per day | 7 | 205 | 49 | 205 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bronchitis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholecystitis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diverticulitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Drug toxicity | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 13.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Endometriosis | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lymphoma | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Orthostatic hypotension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pancreatic carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 13.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Postoperative wound infection | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 13.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Small intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Angina pectoris | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cellulitis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholelithiasis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Goitre | Endocrine disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Flatulence | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
All data generated in this study will be the property of Forest Research Institute. An integrated clinical and statistical report will be prepared at the completion of the trial. Publication of the results by the Investigator will be subject to mutual agreement between the Investigator and Forest Research Institute
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul F.C. Eng, PhD. Director, Clinical Development | Forest Research Institute | 201-427-8071 | Paul.Eng@frx.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003248 | Constipation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012817 | Signs and Symptoms, Digestive |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| 65 years and older |
|
| Male |
|
| Canada |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Null hypothesis: There is no difference in the proportion of 12-week CSBM overall responders between patients taking the 290-μg dose and those taking placebo. The power, adjusted for multiplicity, was expected to be 96% based on study NCT00460811 (MCP-103-202) data. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | <0.0001 | The p-value is still less than 0.05 after adjusting multiplicity using a serial gatekeeping multiple comparison procedure. | Odds Ratio (OR) | 4.22 | 2-Sided | 95 | 2.20 | 8.10 | No | Superiority or Other |
|
|
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|