Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm, dose-ranging study in subjects with eosinophilic esophagitis, 2-18 years of age. Eligible subjects will be randomized into one of four treatment groups. The Treatment Period will be 12 weeks during which subjects will visit the clinic at study weeks 0 (Baseline Visit), 2, 4, 8 and 12 (Final Treatment Evaluation) for clinical symptom assessment and safety evaluation (including adverse events and vital signs). All study treatments (active drug and placebo) will be administered orally twice daily during the Treatment Period, once in the morning after breakfast and once in the evening at bedtime.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Placebo Comparator |
| |
| 2 | Experimental | Low Dose Group |
|
| 3 | Experimental | Medium Dose Group |
|
| 4 | Experimental | High Dose Group |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| budesonide | Drug | oral suspension |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percent of Participants Who Responded to Therapy | Response was defined as a ≥50% reduction from baseline in the eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) clinical symptom score (CSS) and a reduction in peak eosinophil count to ≤6/high power field (light microscopy) from esophageal biopsies collected at the final evaluation. The EoE CSS, scored from 0 to 18 by a doctor, assessed 6 categories: 1) heartburn, 2) abdominal pain, 3) nocturnal awakening with symptoms, 4) nausea, regurgitation, or vomiting, 5) anorexia or early satiety, and 6) dysphagia, odynophagia, or food impaction (a severe symptom). Each domain was scored as follows, based on symptoms in the 2 weeks prior to the assessment: 0 = No symptoms and no coping behaviors required; 1 = Mild: Symptoms limited to 1-3 days or no symptoms because coping behaviors were required to avoid symptoms; 2 = Moderate: Symptoms on >3 days, with or without minor coping behaviors; 3 = Severe: Symptoms interfered with activities of daily living or symptoms persisted and required major coping behaviors. | 12 weeks after the start of treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percent of Participants With Histologic Response | Histologic response was defined as a maximum peak eosinophil count at the final treatment evaluation of ≤6 eosinophils/high power field (light microscopy). The maximum peak was identified by examining the peak eosinophil counts obtained from the proximal, mid, and distal esophageal biopsies and selecting the maximum value. | 12 weeks after the start of treatment |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Study Director | Takeda | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phoenix Children's Hospital | Phoenix | Arizona | 85006 | United States | ||
| Children's Hospital of Orange County |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35666852 | Derived | Gupta SK, Hill M, Vitanza JM, Farber RH, Desai NK, Williams J, Song IH. Pharmacokinetics of Budesonide Oral Suspension in Children and Adolescents With Eosinophilic Esophagitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2022 Aug 1;75(2):186-191. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003482. Epub 2022 Jun 6. | |
| 24907502 | Derived | Gupta SK, Vitanza JM, Collins MH. Efficacy and safety of oral budesonide suspension in pediatric patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jan;13(1):66-76.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.05.021. Epub 2014 Jun 4. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo | Participants received placebo twice daily at bedtime (hs) and after breakfast (qAM, pc) for 12 weeks with a 3 week taper period. |
| FG001 | Low Dose | Participants received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.05 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and placebo after breakfast (qAM, pc) for 12 weeks, with a total daily dose of 0.35 mg (2 to 9 years) or 0.50 mg (10 to 18 years), followed by a 3 week taper period. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| placebo |
| Drug |
oral suspension matching budesonide |
|
| Percent of Participants With Histologic Remission | Histologic remission was defined as a maximum peak eosinophil count at the final treatment evaluation of ≤1 eosinophils/high power field (light microscopy). The maximum peak was identified by examining the peak eosinophil counts obtained from the proximal, mid, and distal esophageal biopsies and selecting the maximum value. | 12 weeks after the start of treatment |
| Percent Change From Baseline in Peak Eosinophil Count | The maximum peak number of eosinophils at baseline and at the final treatment evaluation was identified by examining the peak eosinophil counts obtained from the proximal, mid, and distal esophageal biopsies and selecting the maximum value. A negative change from baseline indicates that eosinophil count has decreased. | Baseline, 12 weeks after the start of treatment |
| Change From Baseline in Endoscopy Score | Esophageal endoscopy was used to assess the level of inflammation and eosinophilia. Four categories of endoscopic findings were evaluated and scored for this study: (1) pallor and diminished vascular markings; (2) furrowing with thickened mucosa; (3) presence of white mucosal plaques; and (4) concentric rings or strictures. For each category, 0 points were allocated if no esophageal sites were involved, 1 point if 1 or 2 esophageal sites were involved, and 2 points for pan-esophageal involvement (see Aceves et al., 2007). The maximum possible endoscopy score was 8 points. A negative change from baseline indicates that esophageal inflammation decreased. | Baseline, 12 weeks after the start of treatment |
| Percent of Participants With Clinical Response | Response was defined as a ≥50% reduction from baseline in the eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) clinical symptom score (CSS). The EoE CSS, scored from 0 to 18 by a doctor, assessed 6 categories: 1) heartburn, 2) abdominal pain, 3) nocturnal awakening with symptoms, 4) nausea, regurgitation, or vomiting, 5) anorexia or early satiety, and 6) dysphagia, odynophagia, or food impaction (a severe symptom). Each domain was scored as follows, based on symptoms in the 2 weeks prior to the assessment: 0 = No symptoms and no coping behaviors required; 1 = Mild: Symptoms limited to 1-3 days or no symptoms because coping behaviors were required to avoid symptoms; 2 = Moderate: Symptoms on >3 days, with or without minor coping behaviors; 3 = Severe: Symptoms interfered with activities of daily living or symptoms persisted and required major coping behaviors. | 12 weeks after the start of treatment |
| Percent of Participants With Clinical Remission | Clinical remission was defined as an eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) clinical symptom score (CSS) of zero. EoE CSS, scored from 0 to 18 by a doctor, assessed 6 categories: 1) heartburn, 2) abdominal pain, 3) nocturnal awakening with symptoms, 4) nausea, regurgitation, or vomiting, 5) anorexia or early satiety, and 6) dysphagia, odynophagia, or food impaction (a severe symptom). Each domain was scored as follows, based on symptoms in the 2 weeks prior to the assessment: 0 = No symptoms and no coping behaviors required; 1 = Mild: Symptoms limited to 1-3 days or no symptoms because coping behaviors were required to avoid symptoms; 2 = Moderate: Symptoms on >3 days, with or without minor coping behaviors; 3 = Severe: Symptoms interfered with activities of daily living or symptoms persisted and required major coping behaviors. | 12 weeks after the start of treatment |
| Percent Change From Baseline in Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) Clinical Symptom Score (CSS) | The EoE CSS, scored from 0 to 18 by a doctor, assessed 6 categories: 1) heartburn, 2) abdominal pain, 3) nocturnal awakening with symptoms, 4) nausea, regurgitation, or vomiting, 5) anorexia or early satiety, and 6) dysphagia, odynophagia, or food impaction (a severe symptom). Each domain was scored as follows, based on symptoms in the 2 weeks prior to the assessment: 0 = No symptoms and no coping behaviors required; 1= Mild: Symptoms limited to 1-3 days or no symptoms because coping behaviors were required to avoid symptoms; 2= Moderate: Symptoms on >3 days, with or without minor coping behaviors; 3= Severe: Symptoms interfered with activities of daily living or symptoms persisted and required major coping behaviors. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms decreased. | Baseline, 12 weeks after the start of treatment |
| Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment Score of Disease Severity | Physician investigators were asked to complete a visual analog scale (VAS) to provide a global assessment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) activity in each participant. The VAS was a 100-mm horizontal line on which the right extreme (100) was labeled "worst possible disease activity" and the left (0) was labeled "no disease activity." Investigators were instructed to consider the line for the VAS as a continuum with their own opinion of extremes on either end. Investigators drew a vertical line at a point that best approximated the participant's current level of EoE disease activity. The investigator was to take into consideration how esophageal disease was impacting the participant's daily activities. The following instruction was given to the investigators: "Using the visual analog scale below, please mark a vertical line on the scale to indicate your assessment of EoE activity in this participant at this time." A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms decreased. | Baseline, 12 weeks after the start of treatment |
| Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Budesonide | On the day that pharmacokinetic (PK) blood samples were obtained, each participant delayed the morning dose of study medication until instructed to dose in the clinic. The sampling timepoints included pre-dose (0), and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose. The lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) for the analytical method was approximately 20 pg/mL in plasma using 0.2 mL of the sample. Because the PK analyses for the medium and high dose oral budesonide suspension (OBS) groups were based on plasma samples collected following administration of identical single doses of OBS, the data for the medium-dose group (OBS once-daily) and high-dose group (OBS twice-daily) were summarized together. | Week 2, 4, or 8, or at the Final Treatment Evaluation |
| Time to Maximum (Tmax) And Half Maximum (T1/2) Plasma Concentration of Budesonide | On the day that pharmacokinetic (PK) blood samples were obtained, each participant delayed the morning dose of study medication until instructed to dose in the clinic. The sampling timepoints included pre-dose (0), and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose. The lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) for the analytical method was approximately 20 pg/mL in plasma using 0.2 mL of the sample. Because the PK analyses for the medium and high dose oral budesonide suspension (OBS) groups were based on plasma samples collected following administration of identical single doses of OBS, the data for the medium-dose group (OBS once-daily) and high-dose group (OBS twice-daily) were summarized together. T1/2 is the time to terminal elimination half-life. | Week 2, 4, or 8, or at the Final Treatment Evaluation |
| Area Under The Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Budesonide From Time Zero to Time of The Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) | On the day that pharmacokinetic (PK) blood samples were obtained, each participant delayed the morning dose of study medication until instructed to dose in the clinic. The sampling timepoints included pre-dose (0), and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose. The lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) for the analytical method was approximately 20 pg/mL in plasma using 0.2 mL of the sample. Because the PK analyses for the medium and high dose oral budesonide suspension (OBS) groups were based on plasma samples collected following administration of identical single doses of OBS, the data for the medium-dose group (OBS once-daily) and high-dose group (OBS twice-daily) were summarized together. | Week 2, 4, or 8, or at the Final Treatment Evaluation |
| Percent of Participants With Potential Corticosteroid-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Corticosteroid-Related TEAEs included candidiasis, oesophageal candidiasis, crying, psychomotor hyperactivity, aggression, anger, anxiety, conduct disorder, emotional disorder, insomnia, or mood altered mood. Corticosteroid-Related TEAEs were assessed systematically during the treatment and taper periods. | 15 weeks after the start of treatment |
| Mean Change in Blood Pressure (BP) at End of Treatment | BP was assessed for each treatment group at baseline and at each post-baseline visit including the final treatment evaluation. | Baseline, 12 weeks after the start of treatment |
| Orange |
| California |
| 92868 |
| United States |
| Stanford University Medical Center | Palo Alto | California | 94305 | United States |
| Rady Children's Hospital | San Diego | California | 92123 | United States |
| The Children's Hospital | Aurora | Colorado | 80045 | United States |
| Emory University-Emory Children's Center | Atlanta | Georgia | 30322 | United States |
| Children's Center for Digestive Healthcare | Atlanta | Georgia | 30342 | United States |
| Children's Memorial Hospital | Chicago | Illinois | 60614 | United States |
| Center for Children's Digestive Health | Park Ridge | Illinois | 60068 | United States |
| Riley Hospital for Children | Indianapolis | Indiana | 46202 | United States |
| Tufts Medical Center | Boston | Massachusetts | 02111 | United States |
| Children's Hospital Boston | Boston | Massachusetts | 02115 | United States |
| The Center for Human Nutrition | Omaha | Nebraska | 68105 | United States |
| Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition Associates | Las Vegas | Nevada | 89109 | United States |
| South Jersey Pediatric Gastroenterology | Mays Landing | New Jersey | 08330 | United States |
| Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104 | United States |
| Children's Center for Digestive Health | Greenville | South Carolina | 29615 | United States |
| Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters | Norfolk | Virginia | 23507 | United States |
| Virginia Commonwealth University, Medical College of Virginia | Richmond | Virginia | 23219 | United States |
| Carilion Pediatric Gastroenterology | Roanoke | Virginia | 24013 | United States |
| FG002 | Medium Dose | Participants received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.2 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and placebo after breakfast (qAM, pc) for 12 weeks, with a total daily dose of 1.4 mg (2 to 9 years) or 2.0 mg (10 to 18 years), followed by a 3 week taper period. |
| FG003 | High Dose | Participants received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.2 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and after breakfast (qAM, pc) for 12 weeks, with a total daily dose of 2.8 mg (2 to 9 years) or 4.0 mg (10 to 18 years), followed by a 3 week taper period. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
The Safety Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who received at least one dose of double-blind study drug. Treatment group assignment was the treatment actually received. One participant in the medium dose group was enrolled and randomized then withdrew consent and did not receive study drug.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo | Participants received placebo twice daily at bedtime (hs) and after breakfast (qAM, pc) for 12 weeks with a 3 week taper period. |
| BG001 | Low Dose | Participants received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.05 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and placebo after breakfast (qAM, pc) for 12 weeks, with a total daily dose of 0.35 mg (2 to 9 years) or 0.50 mg (10 to 18 years), followed by a 3 week taper period. |
| BG002 | Medium Dose | Participants received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.2 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and placebo after breakfast (qAM, pc) for 12 weeks, with a total daily dose of 1.4 mg (2 to 9 years) or 2.0 mg (10 to 18 years), followed by a 3 week taper period. |
| BG003 | High Dose | Participants received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.2 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and after breakfast (qAM, pc) for 12 weeks, with a total daily dose of 2.8 mg (2 to 9 years) or 4.0 mg (10 to 18 years), followed by a 3 week taper period. |
| BG004 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Age, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percent of Participants Who Responded to Therapy | Response was defined as a ≥50% reduction from baseline in the eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) clinical symptom score (CSS) and a reduction in peak eosinophil count to ≤6/high power field (light microscopy) from esophageal biopsies collected at the final evaluation. The EoE CSS, scored from 0 to 18 by a doctor, assessed 6 categories: 1) heartburn, 2) abdominal pain, 3) nocturnal awakening with symptoms, 4) nausea, regurgitation, or vomiting, 5) anorexia or early satiety, and 6) dysphagia, odynophagia, or food impaction (a severe symptom). Each domain was scored as follows, based on symptoms in the 2 weeks prior to the assessment: 0 = No symptoms and no coping behaviors required; 1 = Mild: Symptoms limited to 1-3 days or no symptoms because coping behaviors were required to avoid symptoms; 2 = Moderate: Symptoms on >3 days, with or without minor coping behaviors; 3 = Severe: Symptoms interfered with activities of daily living or symptoms persisted and required major coping behaviors. | The Full Analysis Set (FAS), defined as participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable post-baseline esophageal biopsy and clinical symptom data. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 12 weeks after the start of treatment |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent of Participants With Histologic Response | Histologic response was defined as a maximum peak eosinophil count at the final treatment evaluation of ≤6 eosinophils/high power field (light microscopy). The maximum peak was identified by examining the peak eosinophil counts obtained from the proximal, mid, and distal esophageal biopsies and selecting the maximum value. | The FAS, defined as participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable post-baseline esophageal biopsy and clinical symptom data. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 12 weeks after the start of treatment |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent of Participants With Histologic Remission | Histologic remission was defined as a maximum peak eosinophil count at the final treatment evaluation of ≤1 eosinophils/high power field (light microscopy). The maximum peak was identified by examining the peak eosinophil counts obtained from the proximal, mid, and distal esophageal biopsies and selecting the maximum value. | The FAS, defined as participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable post-baseline esophageal biopsy and clinical symptom data. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 12 weeks after the start of treatment |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Peak Eosinophil Count | The maximum peak number of eosinophils at baseline and at the final treatment evaluation was identified by examining the peak eosinophil counts obtained from the proximal, mid, and distal esophageal biopsies and selecting the maximum value. A negative change from baseline indicates that eosinophil count has decreased. | The FAS, defined as all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable post-baseline esophageal biopsy and clinical symptom data. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percent change | Baseline, 12 weeks after the start of treatment |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Endoscopy Score | Esophageal endoscopy was used to assess the level of inflammation and eosinophilia. Four categories of endoscopic findings were evaluated and scored for this study: (1) pallor and diminished vascular markings; (2) furrowing with thickened mucosa; (3) presence of white mucosal plaques; and (4) concentric rings or strictures. For each category, 0 points were allocated if no esophageal sites were involved, 1 point if 1 or 2 esophageal sites were involved, and 2 points for pan-esophageal involvement (see Aceves et al., 2007). The maximum possible endoscopy score was 8 points. A negative change from baseline indicates that esophageal inflammation decreased. | The FAS, defined as all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable post-baseline esophageal biopsy and clinical symptom data. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Baseline, 12 weeks after the start of treatment |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent of Participants With Clinical Response | Response was defined as a ≥50% reduction from baseline in the eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) clinical symptom score (CSS). The EoE CSS, scored from 0 to 18 by a doctor, assessed 6 categories: 1) heartburn, 2) abdominal pain, 3) nocturnal awakening with symptoms, 4) nausea, regurgitation, or vomiting, 5) anorexia or early satiety, and 6) dysphagia, odynophagia, or food impaction (a severe symptom). Each domain was scored as follows, based on symptoms in the 2 weeks prior to the assessment: 0 = No symptoms and no coping behaviors required; 1 = Mild: Symptoms limited to 1-3 days or no symptoms because coping behaviors were required to avoid symptoms; 2 = Moderate: Symptoms on >3 days, with or without minor coping behaviors; 3 = Severe: Symptoms interfered with activities of daily living or symptoms persisted and required major coping behaviors. | The FAS, defined as participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable post-baseline esophageal biopsy and clinical symptom data. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 12 weeks after the start of treatment |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent of Participants With Clinical Remission | Clinical remission was defined as an eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) clinical symptom score (CSS) of zero. EoE CSS, scored from 0 to 18 by a doctor, assessed 6 categories: 1) heartburn, 2) abdominal pain, 3) nocturnal awakening with symptoms, 4) nausea, regurgitation, or vomiting, 5) anorexia or early satiety, and 6) dysphagia, odynophagia, or food impaction (a severe symptom). Each domain was scored as follows, based on symptoms in the 2 weeks prior to the assessment: 0 = No symptoms and no coping behaviors required; 1 = Mild: Symptoms limited to 1-3 days or no symptoms because coping behaviors were required to avoid symptoms; 2 = Moderate: Symptoms on >3 days, with or without minor coping behaviors; 3 = Severe: Symptoms interfered with activities of daily living or symptoms persisted and required major coping behaviors. | The FAS, defined as all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable post-baseline esophageal biopsy and clinical symptom data. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 12 weeks after the start of treatment |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) Clinical Symptom Score (CSS) | The EoE CSS, scored from 0 to 18 by a doctor, assessed 6 categories: 1) heartburn, 2) abdominal pain, 3) nocturnal awakening with symptoms, 4) nausea, regurgitation, or vomiting, 5) anorexia or early satiety, and 6) dysphagia, odynophagia, or food impaction (a severe symptom). Each domain was scored as follows, based on symptoms in the 2 weeks prior to the assessment: 0 = No symptoms and no coping behaviors required; 1= Mild: Symptoms limited to 1-3 days or no symptoms because coping behaviors were required to avoid symptoms; 2= Moderate: Symptoms on >3 days, with or without minor coping behaviors; 3= Severe: Symptoms interfered with activities of daily living or symptoms persisted and required major coping behaviors. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms decreased. | The FAS, defined as all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable post-baseline esophageal biopsy and clinical symptom data. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percent change | Baseline, 12 weeks after the start of treatment |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment Score of Disease Severity | Physician investigators were asked to complete a visual analog scale (VAS) to provide a global assessment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) activity in each participant. The VAS was a 100-mm horizontal line on which the right extreme (100) was labeled "worst possible disease activity" and the left (0) was labeled "no disease activity." Investigators were instructed to consider the line for the VAS as a continuum with their own opinion of extremes on either end. Investigators drew a vertical line at a point that best approximated the participant's current level of EoE disease activity. The investigator was to take into consideration how esophageal disease was impacting the participant's daily activities. The following instruction was given to the investigators: "Using the visual analog scale below, please mark a vertical line on the scale to indicate your assessment of EoE activity in this participant at this time." A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms decreased. | The FAS, defined as all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable post-baseline esophageal biopsy and clinical symptom data. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Baseline, 12 weeks after the start of treatment |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Budesonide | On the day that pharmacokinetic (PK) blood samples were obtained, each participant delayed the morning dose of study medication until instructed to dose in the clinic. The sampling timepoints included pre-dose (0), and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose. The lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) for the analytical method was approximately 20 pg/mL in plasma using 0.2 mL of the sample. Because the PK analyses for the medium and high dose oral budesonide suspension (OBS) groups were based on plasma samples collected following administration of identical single doses of OBS, the data for the medium-dose group (OBS once-daily) and high-dose group (OBS twice-daily) were summarized together. | The Pharmacokinetic (PK) Set, defined as all participants in the safety analysis set who received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) and had sufficient PK samples to calculate PK parameters. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | pg/mL | Week 2, 4, or 8, or at the Final Treatment Evaluation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Time to Maximum (Tmax) And Half Maximum (T1/2) Plasma Concentration of Budesonide | On the day that pharmacokinetic (PK) blood samples were obtained, each participant delayed the morning dose of study medication until instructed to dose in the clinic. The sampling timepoints included pre-dose (0), and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose. The lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) for the analytical method was approximately 20 pg/mL in plasma using 0.2 mL of the sample. Because the PK analyses for the medium and high dose oral budesonide suspension (OBS) groups were based on plasma samples collected following administration of identical single doses of OBS, the data for the medium-dose group (OBS once-daily) and high-dose group (OBS twice-daily) were summarized together. T1/2 is the time to terminal elimination half-life. | The PK Set, defined as all participants in the safety analysis set who received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) and had sufficient PK samples to calculate PK parameters. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | hours | Week 2, 4, or 8, or at the Final Treatment Evaluation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Area Under The Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Budesonide From Time Zero to Time of The Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) | On the day that pharmacokinetic (PK) blood samples were obtained, each participant delayed the morning dose of study medication until instructed to dose in the clinic. The sampling timepoints included pre-dose (0), and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose. The lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) for the analytical method was approximately 20 pg/mL in plasma using 0.2 mL of the sample. Because the PK analyses for the medium and high dose oral budesonide suspension (OBS) groups were based on plasma samples collected following administration of identical single doses of OBS, the data for the medium-dose group (OBS once-daily) and high-dose group (OBS twice-daily) were summarized together. | The PK Set, defined as all participants in the safety analysis set who received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) and had sufficient PK samples to calculate PK parameters. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | hr*pg/mL | Week 2, 4, or 8, or at the Final Treatment Evaluation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent of Participants With Potential Corticosteroid-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Corticosteroid-Related TEAEs included candidiasis, oesophageal candidiasis, crying, psychomotor hyperactivity, aggression, anger, anxiety, conduct disorder, emotional disorder, insomnia, or mood altered mood. Corticosteroid-Related TEAEs were assessed systematically during the treatment and taper periods. | The Safety Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who received at least one dose of double-blind study drug. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 15 weeks after the start of treatment |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean Change in Blood Pressure (BP) at End of Treatment | BP was assessed for each treatment group at baseline and at each post-baseline visit including the final treatment evaluation. | The Safety Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who received at least one dose of double-blind study drug. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mmHg | Baseline, 12 weeks after the start of treatment |
|
Not provided
Adverse events are presented for the Safety Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who received at least one dose of double-blind study drug. Treatment group assignment was the treatment actually received. One participant in the medium dose group was enrolled and randomized then withdrew consent and did not receive study drug.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo | Participants received placebo twice daily at bedtime (hs) and after breakfast (qAM, pc) for 12 weeks with a 3 week taper period. | 0 | 21 | 10 | 21 | ||
| EG001 | Low Dose | Participants received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.05 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and placebo after breakfast (qAM, pc) for 12 weeks with a 3 week taper period. | 0 | 21 | 13 | 21 | ||
| EG002 | Medium Dose | Participants received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.2 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and placebo after breakfast (qAM, pc) for 12 weeks with a 3 week taper period. | 0 | 19 | 16 | 19 | ||
| EG003 | High Dose | Participants received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.2 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and after breakfast (qAM, pc) for 12 weeks with a 3 week taper period. | 1 | 20 | 17 | 20 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diet refusal | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oropharyngeal pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasal congestion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anxiety | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Crying | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ear infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Candidiasis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oesophageal candidiasis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Psychomotor hyperactivity | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Emotional Disorder | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Conjunctivitis | Eye disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aphthous stomatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Flatulence | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oral pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Teething | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Early Satiety | General disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Feeling jittery | General disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain | General disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thirst | General disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Milk allergy | Immune system disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory tract infection viral | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Viral infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Animal bite | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthropod sting | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Meniscus lesion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper limb fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood alkaline phosphatase increased | Investigations | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood pressure increased | Investigations | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Failure to thrive | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pollakiuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthma | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchial hyperreactivity | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Epistaxis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rhinorrhoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cellulitis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Eczema | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ingrowing nail | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hot flush | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight decreased | Investigations | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Limb discomfort | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Musculoskeletal stiffness | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscle spasms | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
If a multicenter publication is not submitted within twelve (12) months after conclusion, abandonment or termination of the Study at all sites, or after Sponsor confirms there shall be no multicenter Study publication, the Institution and/or such Principal Investigator may publish the results from the Institution site individually.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study Director | Shire | +1 866 842 5335 | ClinicalTransparency@shire.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D057765 | Eosinophilic Esophagitis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004941 | Esophagitis |
| D004935 | Esophageal Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D005759 | Gastroenteritis |
| D004802 | Eosinophilia |
| D007960 | Leukocyte Disorders |
| D006402 | Hematologic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
| D006969 | Hypersensitivity, Immediate |
| D006967 | Hypersensitivity |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019819 | Budesonide |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011282 | Pregnenediones |
| D011283 | Pregnenes |
| D011278 | Pregnanes |
| D013256 | Steroids |
| D000072473 | Fused-Ring Compounds |
| D011083 | Polycyclic Compounds |
Not provided
Not provided
| 10 to 18 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Regression, Logistic |
| 0.0092 |
p-values comparing each active treatment group to placebo were determined by a logistic regression analysis with treatment (all four groups) and age as main effects. |
| Odds Ratio (OR) |
| 18.860 |
| 2-Sided |
| Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Regression, Logistic | 0.0174 | p-values comparing each active treatment group to placebo were determined by a logistic regression analysis with treatment (all four groups) and age as main effects. | Odds Ratio (OR) | 15.009 | 2-Sided | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| OG003 | High Dose | Participants received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.2 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and after breakfast (qAM, pc) for 12 weeks, with a total daily dose of 2.8 mg (2 to 9 years) or 4.0 mg (10 to 18 years), followed by a 3 week taper period. |
|
|
|
| OG003 | High Dose | Participants received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.2 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and after breakfast (qAM, pc) for 12 weeks, with a total daily dose of 2.8 mg (2 to 9 years) or 4.0 mg (10 to 18 years), followed by a 3 week taper period. |
|
|
|
| OG003 | High Dose | Participants received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.2 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and after breakfast (qAM, pc) for 12 weeks, with a total daily dose of 2.8 mg (2 to 9 years) or 4.0 mg (10 to 18 years), followed by a 3 week taper period. |
|
|
|
| OG002 | Medium Dose | Participants received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.2 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and placebo after breakfast (qAM, pc) for 12 weeks, with a total daily dose of 1.4 mg (2 to 9 years) or 2.0 mg (10 to 18 years), followed by a 3 week taper period. |
| OG003 | High Dose | Participants received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.2 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and after breakfast (qAM, pc) for 12 weeks, with a total daily dose of 2.8 mg (2 to 9 years) or 4.0 mg (10 to 18 years), followed by a 3 week taper period. |
|
|
|
| OG002 | Medium Dose | Participants received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.2 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and placebo after breakfast (qAM, pc) for 12 weeks, with a total daily dose of 1.4 mg (2 to 9 years) or 2.0 mg (10 to 18 years), followed by a 3 week taper period. |
| OG003 | High Dose | Participants received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.2 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and after breakfast (qAM, pc) for 12 weeks, with a total daily dose of 2.8 mg (2 to 9 years) or 4.0 mg (10 to 18 years), followed by a 3 week taper period. |
|
|
|
| OG002 | Medium Dose | Participants received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.2 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and placebo after breakfast (qAM, pc) for 12 weeks, with a total daily dose of 1.4 mg (2 to 9 years) or 2.0 mg (10 to 18 years), followed by a 3 week taper period. |
| OG003 | High Dose | Participants received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.2 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and after breakfast (qAM, pc) for 12 weeks, with a total daily dose of 2.8 mg (2 to 9 years) or 4.0 mg (10 to 18 years), followed by a 3 week taper period. |
|
|
|
| OG002 | Medium Dose | Participants received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.2 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and placebo after breakfast (qAM, pc) for 12 weeks, with a total daily dose of 1.4 mg (2 to 9 years) or 2.0 mg (10 to 18 years), followed by a 3 week taper period. |
| OG003 | High Dose | Participants received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.2 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and after breakfast (qAM, pc) for 12 weeks, with a total daily dose of 2.8 mg (2 to 9 years) or 4.0 mg (10 to 18 years), followed by a 3 week taper period. |
|
|
|
Participants received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.05 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and placebo after breakfast (qAM, pc) for 12 weeks, with a total daily dose of 0.35 mg (2 to 9 years) or 0.50 mg (10 to 18 years), followed by a 3 week taper period. |
| OG002 | Medium Dose | Participants received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.2 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and placebo after breakfast (qAM, pc) for 12 weeks, with a total daily dose of 1.4 mg (2 to 9 years) or 2.0 mg (10 to 18 years), followed by a 3 week taper period. |
| OG003 | High Dose | Participants received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.2 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and after breakfast (qAM, pc) for 12 weeks, with a total daily dose of 2.8 mg (2 to 9 years) or 4.0 mg (10 to 18 years), followed by a 3 week taper period. |
|
|
|
| OG002 | 1.4 mg Dose | Participants 2 to 9 years old received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.2 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and either placebo or OBS 0.2 mg/ml after breakfast (qAM, pc), with a total daily dose of 1.4 mg (medium dose group) or 2.8 mg (high dose group). |
| OG003 | 2.0 mg Dose | Participants 10 to 18 years old received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.2 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and either placebo or OBS 0.2 mg/ml after breakfast (qAM, pc), with a total daily dose of 2.0 mg (medium dose group) or 4.0 mg (high dose group). |
|
|
| OG002 | 1.4 mg Dose | Participants 2 to 9 years old received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.2 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and either placebo or OBS 0.2 mg/ml after breakfast (qAM, pc), with a total daily dose of 1.4 mg (medium dose group) or 2.8 mg (high dose group). |
| OG003 | 2.0 mg Dose | Participants 10 to 18 years old received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.2 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and either placebo or OBS 0.2 mg/ml after breakfast (qAM, pc), with a total daily dose of 2.0 mg (medium dose group) or 4.0 mg (high dose group). |
|
|
| OG002 | 1.4 mg Dose | Participants 2 to 9 years old received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.2 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and either placebo or OBS 0.2 mg/ml after breakfast (qAM, pc), with a total daily dose of 1.4 mg (medium dose group) or 2.8 mg (high dose group). |
| OG003 | 2.0 mg Dose | Participants 10 to 18 years received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.2 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and either placebo or OBS 0.2 mg/ml after breakfast (qAM, pc), with a total daily dose of 2.0 mg (medium dose group) or 4.0 mg (high dose group). |
|
|
| OG003 | High Dose | Participants received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.2 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and after breakfast (qAM, pc) for 12 weeks, with a total daily dose of 2.8 mg (2 to 9 years) or 4.0 mg (10 to 18 years), followed by a 3 week taper period. |
|
|
| OG003 |
| High Dose |
Participants received oral budesonide suspension (OBS) 0.2 mg/mL at bedtime (hs) and after breakfast (qAM, pc) for 12 weeks, with a total daily dose of 2.8 mg (2 to 9 years) or 4.0 mg (10 to 18 years), followed by a 3 week taper period. |
|
|