Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| CMS Medical | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Objectives:
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
To compare the in-stent late loss at 9 months of paclitaxel- and sirolimus- eluting stents with the late loss of bare metal control stents.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
Safety:
To compare the occurrence of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) at 30 days, 9 months, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years among the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms.
To compare the occurrence de Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) within 5 years among the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms.
To compare the occurrence of in-stent thrombosis within 5 years among the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms.
Efficacy:
To compare the rate of angiographic success among the study groups To compare the rate of procedural success among the study groups To compare the incidence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 9 months, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years among the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms.
To compare the incidence of clinically driven target vessel revascularization at 9 months, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years among the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms.
To compare the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year cost-effectiveness profile of the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms.
To compare the 9-month in-stent late loss of paclitaxel-eluting stents to the in-stent late loss of sirolimus-eluting stents To compare the 9-month in-segment late loss among the study groups To compare the 9-month in-stent and in-segment binary restenosis rate among the study groups To compare the IVUS percent neointimal obstruction among the study groups
Study Design:
In the present RANDOMIZED study, the paclitaxel-eluting stent Infinnium® and the sirolimus-eluting stent Supralimus® will be compared to a metallic stent with the same structure (Milennium Matrix®) but without drug elution for the treatment of de novo lesions in native coronaries. The study will be a multicenter clinical trial and will include patients for the treatment with one of the three study stents. In total, 275 patients will be enrolled, randomly allocated for the Infinnium®, Supralimus®, or Milennium Matrix® stents in a 2:2:1 proportion. Patients will be followed-up for 12 months after the index procedure. All patients will undergo a follow-up angiography at 9 months. A subgroup of 55 patients will be evaluated at 9 months with IVUS examination.
Treatment:
Patients will be treated, according to the randomization groups, with Infinnium®, Supralimus®, or Milennium Matrix® stents of 19 mm, 23 mm, or 29 mm and nominal diameters of 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 mm.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active Comparator | Percutaneous coronary intervention with bare metal stent |
|
| 2 | Experimental | Percutaneous coronary intervention with paclitaxel-eluting stent |
|
| 3 | Experimental | Percutaneous coronary intervention with sirolimus-eluting stent |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milennium Matrix® (Control) | Device | Percutaneous coronary intervention with bare metal stent |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| compare the in-stent late loss at 9M of paclitaxel- and sirolimus- eluting stents with the late loss of bare metal control stents. | 9 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| MACE at 1,9&12M, SAE & ST until 12M. Rate of angiographic & procedural success, TLR & TVR at 1&9M Instent LL between Supralimus®, Infinnium® & Matrix® Insegment binary restenosis at 9M IVUS% neointimal obstruction cost-effectiveness profile at 12M | 1 Year |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
GENERAL EXCLUSION CRITERIA
ANGIOGRAPHIC EXCLUSION CRITERIA
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Prof. Pedro A. Lemos, MD | Instituto do Coração - InCor | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio | Fortaleza | Ceará | 60430-370 | Brazil | ||
| Hospital Universitário Cassiano Antonio de Moraes |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20379631 | Result | Lemos PA, Moulin B, Perin MA, Oliveira LA, Arruda JA, Lima VC, Lima AA, Caramori PR, Medeiros CR, Barbosa MR, Brito FS Jr, Ribeiro EE, Martinez EE; PAINT study. Rationale and design for the PAINT randomized trial. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2009 Dec;93(6):547-53, 590-7. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2009001200006. English, Portuguese. | |
| 19670303 | Result |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Infinnium® | Device | Percutaneous coronary intervention with paclitaxel-eluting stent |
|
| Supralimus® | Device | Percutaneous coronary intervention with sirolimus-eluting stent |
|
| Vitória |
| Espírito Santo |
| 29042-755 |
| Brazil |
| Hospital Meridional Intercath | Vitória | Espírito Santo | 29156-580 | Brazil |
| Hospital Biocor | Belo Horizonte | Minas Gerais | 34000-000 | Brazil |
| Rede D'Or de Hospitais | Rio de Janeiro | Rio de Janeiro | 20941-150 | Brazil |
| Hospital Natal Center | Natal | Rio Grande do Norte | 59054-630 | Brazil |
| Hospital São Lucas da PUCRS | Porto Alegre | Rio Grande do Sul | 90610-000 | Brazil |
| Hospital São Paulo - UNIFESP | São Paulo | São Paulo | 04024-002 | Brazil |
| Hospital São Camilo | São Paulo | São Paulo | 05022-001 | Brazil |
| Hospital Santa Marcelina | São Paulo | São Paulo | 08270-070 | Brazil |
| Instituto do Coração - InCor | São Paulo | 05403-900 | Brazil |
| Lemos PA, Moulin B, Perin MA, Oliveira LA, Arruda JA, Lima VC, Lima AA, Caramori PR, Medeiros CR, Barbosa MR, Brito FS Jr, Ribeiro EE, Martinez EE; PAINT trial investigators. Randomized evaluation of two drug-eluting stents with identical metallic platform and biodegradable polymer but different agents (paclitaxel or sirolimus) compared against bare stents: 1-year results of the PAINT trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Nov 1;74(5):665-73. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22166. |
| 22580255 | Result | Lemos PA, Moulin B, Perin MA, Oliveira LA, Arruda JA, Lima VC, Lima AA, Caramori PR, Medeiros CR, Barbosa MR, Brito FS Jr, Ribeiro EE. Late clinical outcomes after implantation of drug-eluting stents coated with biodegradable polymers: 3-year follow-up of the PAINT randomised trial. EuroIntervention. 2012 May 15;8(1):117-9. doi: 10.4244/EIJV8I1A18. |
| 25610805 | Result | Marchini JF, Gomes WF, Moulin B, Perin MA, Oliveira LA, Arruda JA, Lima VC, Lima AA, Caramori PR, Medeiros CR, Barbosa MR, Brito FS Jr, Ribeiro EE, Lemos PA. Very late outcomes of drug-eluting stents coated with biodegradable polymers: insights from the 5-year follow-up of the randomized PAINT trial. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2014 Dec;4(6):480-6. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2014.12.05. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D023903 | Coronary Restenosis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D023921 | Coronary Stenosis |
| D003327 | Coronary Disease |
| D017202 | Myocardial Ischemia |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided