Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the HeartWare® LVAD System in patients listed for cardiac transplantation with refractory, advanced heart failure at risk of death. The primary endpoint is survival at 180 days which is defined as alive on the originally implanted HeartWare® LVAD or transplanted or explanted for recovery. Patient must survive 60 days post-explant for recovery to be considered successful. Secondary endpoints include:
The HeartWare® LVAD System was approved by the US FDA on November 20, 2012 as a bridge to cardiac transplantation (reference PMA P100047). Patients enrolled into this study will be followed to an outcome at six months, and then patients will receive continued follow-up in a separate study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| HeartWare® VAS | Experimental | Ventricular Assist Device (HeartWare® VAS) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HeartWare® VAS | Device | The HeartWare® LVAD is an implantable centrifugal pump that was designed to provide flows up to 10 L/min in a small device which is both lightweight and simple to use. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The Primary Endpoint is Success at 180 Days Which is Defined as Alive on the Originally Implanted HeartWare® LVAD or Transplanted or Explanted for Recovery. Patient Must Survive 60 Days Post-explant for Recovery to be Considered Successful. | The primary endpoint is success at 180 days which is defined as alive on the originally implanted HeartWare® LVAD or transplanted or explanted for recovery. A patient must survive 60 days post-explant for recovery to be considered successful. | 180 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Survival to 180 Days | All subjects will be followed for date of death until 180 days. | 180 Days |
| Incidence of Adverse Events, Neurocognitive Status and Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects | Adverse events are only provided for patients who received a HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device (HeartWare® VAS). Adverse events as described by INTERMACS for the contemporaneous control population were not a part of the agreement for analysis and thus not provided by INTERMACS, and so not included in the Adverse Event Module and relevant Outcome Measures for comparison. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Existence of any ongoing mechanical circulatory support (MCS) other than an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP)
Prior cardiac transplant.
History of confirmed, untreated abdominal or thoracic aortic aneurysm > 5 cm.
Cardiothoracic surgery within 30 days of enrollment.
Acute myocardial infarction within 14 days of implant as diagnosed by ST or T wave changes on the ECG, diagnostic biomarkers, ongoing pain and hemodynamic abnormalities as described (Figure 2) in the guidelines published in ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction; A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. JACC Vol. 50, No.7, 2007.
On ventilator support for > 72 hours within the fours days immediately prior to enrollment.
Pulmonary embolus within three weeks of enrollment as documented by computed tomography (CT) scan or nuclear scan.
Symptomatic cerebrovascular disease or a > 80% carotid stenosis.
Patients have moderate to severe aortic insufficiency without plans for correction during pump implantation surgery.
Patients with mechanical, animal or human tissue heart valves are excluded.
Severe right ventricular failure as defined by the anticipated need for right ventricular assist device (RVAD) support or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)at the time of HeartWare® LVAD screening/enrollment or right atrial pressure > 20 mmHg on multiple inotropes, right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) <15% or clinical signs including lower extremity edema, ascites or pleural effusions refractory to treatment with diuretics and two inotropic drugs.
Active, uncontrolled infection diagnosed by a combination of clinical symptoms and laboratory testing, including but not limited to, continued positive cultures, elevated temperature and white blood cell (WBC) count, hypotension, tachycardia, generalized malaise despite appropriate antibiotic, antiviral or antifungal treatment.
Uncorrected thrombocytopenia or generalized coagulopathy (e.g., platelet count < 100,000, INR > 1.6 or PTT > 2.5 times control in the absence of anticoagulation therapy).
Intolerance to anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapies or any other peri- or postoperative therapy that the investigator may administer based upon the patient's health status.
Serum creatinine greater than 3.0 times the upper limit of normal within 48 hours of study enrollment or requiring dialysis (does not include use of ultra-filtration for fluid removal).
All three listed liver enzymes [AST (SGOT), ALT (SGPT), or LDH] > 3 times upper limit of normal or a total bilirubin > 3 mg/dl within 24 hours of study enrollment, or biopsy proven liver cirrhosis or portal hypertension.
Pulmonary vascular resistance is unresponsive (fixed) to pharmacologic manipulation as demonstrated by a pulmonary artery systolic pressure exceeding 60mmHg in conjunction with any one of the three following variables:
Patients requiring aortic, mitral, tricuspid or pulmonary valve replacements (including bioprosthetic valves) or left ventricular (LV) aneurysm resections.
Participation in any other study involving investigational drugs or devices.
Severe illness, other than heart disease, which would exclude cardiac transplantation.
Pregnancy.
Patient unwilling or unable to comply with study requirements.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mark Slaughter, MD | Jewish Hospital/Univ of Louisville | Principal Investigator |
| Keith Aaronson, MD | Univ of Michigan Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayo Clinic (Arizona) | Phoenix | Arizona | 85054 | United States | ||
| Sharp Memorial Hospital |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22619284 | Result | Aaronson KD, Slaughter MS, Miller LW, McGee EC, Cotts WG, Acker MA, Jessup ML, Gregoric ID, Loyalka P, Frazier OH, Jeevanandam V, Anderson AS, Kormos RL, Teuteberg JJ, Levy WC, Naftel DC, Bittman RM, Pagani FD, Hathaway DR, Boyce SW; HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device (HVAD) Bridge to Transplant ADVANCE Trial Investigators. Use of an intrapericardial, continuous-flow, centrifugal pump in patients awaiting heart transplantation. Circulation. 2012 Jun 26;125(25):3191-200. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.058412. Epub 2012 May 22. | |
| 32740343 |
Not provided
Not provided
This was a non randomized,open label,contemporaneously controlled trial. Pats. in the treatment arm were screened against the incl. & excl. criteria to determine eligibility to proceed to implant of the investigational device. Control Pats.contemporaneously entered into the INTERMACS (NCT00119834) database were selected using specified criteria.
A total of 140 patients were enrolled at 30 sites into the study by giving written informed consent and were implanted with a HeartWare HVAD between August 18 2008 and February 23 2010.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | HeartWare® VAS | Patients who received a HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device (HeartWare® VAS) |
| FG001 | Contemporaneous Control | Patients who received an FDA approved durable device for mechanically assisted support and enrolled into INTERMACS during the same enrollment period. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 180 Days |
| Incidence of All Device Failures and Device Malfunctions | The INTERMACS event device malfunction defined a failure of the HeartWare VAS as either pump failure or non-pump failure. | 180 Days |
| Quality of Life Change From Baseline to 180 Days, as Measured by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) | KCCQ is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life for patients with congestive heart failure. It is a predictive tool that tracks how patients are doing if they have weakened heart muscle due to prior heart attacks, heart valve problems, viral infections, or other causes. The KCCQ's questions are used to calculate scores in ten domains: Physical Limitation, Symptom Stability, Frequency, Burden and Total Symptom. Social Limitation, Self-Efficacy, Quality of Life, and Clinical Summary. Overall Summary: a combined measure of all the above For each domain, the validity, reproducibility, responsiveness and interpretability have been independently established. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. | Baseline and 180 Days |
| Change in Distance Walked in the 6-minute Walk Test Between Baseline and 180 Days | The 6MWT is a simple test which does not require expensive equipment or advanced training for technicians. The test involves asking the patient to walk the longest distance possible in a set interval of 6 min, through a walking course (corridor) preferably 30-m long. The patient can stop or slow down at any time and then resume walking, depending on his/her degree of fatigue. A longer distance walked is indicative of a better outcome. | Baseline and 180 Days |
| Quality of Life Change From Baseline to 180 Days, as Measured by EuroQoL EQ-5D | The EQ-5D is a standardized instrument for use as a generic measure of the quality of health-related life and of health outcome. The EuroQoL EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take one of five responses. The responses record five levels of severity (no problems/slight problems/moderate problems/severe problems/extreme problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. | Baseline and 180 Days |
| San Diego |
| California |
| 92123 |
| United States |
| Stanford University School of Medicine | Stanford | California | 94305 | United States |
| Washington Hospital Center | Washington D.C. | District of Columbia | 20010 | United States |
| University of Florida Gainesville | Gainesville | Florida | 32610 | United States |
| University of Miami / Jackson Memorial Hospital | Miami | Florida | 33136 | United States |
| The Emory Clinic | Atlanta | Georgia | 30322 | United States |
| Northwestern Memorial Hospital | Chicago | Illinois | 60611 | United States |
| University of Chicago | Chicago | Illinois | 60637 | United States |
| Advocate Christ Medical Center | Oak Lawn | Illinois | 60453 | United States |
| IU Health Methodist | Indianapolis | Indiana | 46202 | United States |
| St. Vincent Health | Indianapolis | Indiana | 46260 | United States |
| Jewish Hospital - Rudd Heart and Lung Institute | Louisville | Kentucky | 40202 | United States |
| John Ochsner Heart & Vascular Institute | New Orleans | Louisiana | 70115 | United States |
| Johns Hopkins Hospital | Baltimore | Maryland | 21287 | United States |
| Tufts Medical Center | Boston | Massachusetts | 02111 | United States |
| University of Michigan Hospital | Ann Arbor | Michigan | 48109 | United States |
| Henry Ford Hospital | Detroit | Michigan | 48202 | United States |
| University of Minnesota | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55455 | United States |
| Mayo Clinic / St. Marys Hospital | Rochester | Minnesota | 55902 | United States |
| Washington University / Barnes Jewish Hospital | St Louis | Missouri | 63110 | United States |
| Montefiore Medical Center | The Bronx | New York | 10467 | United States |
| Duke University Medical Center | Durham | North Carolina | 27710 | United States |
| Cleveland Clinic Foundatiojn | Cleveland | Ohio | 44195 | United States |
| Ohio State University Medical Center | Columbus | Ohio | 43210 | United States |
| Milton S. Hershey Medical Center | Hershey | Pennsylvania | 17033 | United States |
| Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104 | United States |
| University of Pittsburgh Medical Center | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15213 | United States |
| UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas | Dallas | Texas | 75390 | United States |
| Texas Heart Institute | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| The Methodist Hospital | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| Intermountain Medical Center | Murray | Utah | 84107 | United States |
| Inova Fairfax Hospital | Falls Church | Virginia | 22042 | United States |
| Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center | Spokane | Washington | 99204 | United States |
| Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | 53215 | United States |
| Derived |
| Mahr C, McGee E Jr, Cheung A, Mokadam NA, Strueber M, Slaughter MS, Danter MR, Levy WC, Cheng RK, Beckman JA, May DM, Ismyrloglou E, Tsintzos SI, Silvestry SC. Cost-Effectiveness of Thoracotomy Approach for the Implantation of a Centrifugal Left Ventricular Assist Device. ASAIO J. 2020 Aug;66(8):855-861. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001209. |
| 32740129 | Derived | Silvestry SC, Mahr C, Slaughter MS, Levy WC, Cheng RK, May DM, Ismyrloglou E, Tsintzos SI, Tuttle E, Cook K, Birk E, Gomes A, Graham S, Cotts WG. Cost-Effectiveness of a Small Intrapericardial Centrifugal Left Ventricular Assist Device. ASAIO J. 2020 Aug;66(8):862-870. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001211. |
| 31030606 | Derived | Rahman F, McEvoy JW, Ohkuma T, Marre M, Hamet P, Harrap S, Mancia G, Rodgers A, Selvin E, Williams B, Muntner P, Chalmers J, Woodward M. Effects of Blood Pressure Lowering on Clinical Outcomes According to Baseline Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Hypertension. 2019 Jun;73(6):1291-1299. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12414. |
| 26450000 | Derived | Teuteberg JJ, Slaughter MS, Rogers JG, McGee EC, Pagani FD, Gordon R, Rame E, Acker M, Kormos RL, Salerno C, Schleeter TP, Goldstein DJ, Shin J, Starling RC, Wozniak T, Malik AS, Silvestry S, Ewald GA, Jorde UP, Naka Y, Birks E, Najarian KB, Hathaway DR, Aaronson KD; ADVANCE Trial Investigators. The HVAD Left Ventricular Assist Device: Risk Factors for Neurological Events and Risk Mitigation Strategies. JACC Heart Fail. 2015 Oct;3(10):818-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2015.05.011. |
| 25813372 | Derived | Birks EJ, McGee EC Jr, Aaronson KD, Boyce S, Cotts WG, Najjar SS, Pagani FD, Hathaway DR, Najarian K, Jacoski MV, Slaughter MS; ADVANCE Trial Investigators. An examination of survival by sex and race in the HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device for the Treatment of Advanced Heart Failure (ADVANCE) Bridge to Transplant (BTT) and continued access protocol trials. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 Jun;34(6):815-24. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.12.011. Epub 2014 Dec 29. |
| 25770405 | Derived | Goldstein DJ, Aaronson KD, Tatooles AJ, Silvestry SC, Jeevanandam V, Gordon R, Hathaway DR, Najarian KB, Slaughter MS; ADVANCE Investigators. Gastrointestinal bleeding in recipients of the HeartWare Ventricular Assist System. JACC Heart Fail. 2015 Apr;3(4):303-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2014.11.008. Epub 2015 Mar 11. |
| 25200052 | Derived | Milano C, Pagani FD, Slaughter MS, Pham DT, Hathaway DR, Jacoski MV, Najarian KB, Aaronson KD; ADVANCE Investigators. Clinical outcomes after implantation of a centrifugal flow left ventricular assist device and concurrent cardiac valve procedures. Circulation. 2014 Sep 9;130(11 Suppl 1):S3-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.007911. |
| 25087103 | Derived | John R, Aaronson KD, Pae WE, Acker MA, Hathaway DR, Najarian KB, Slaughter MS; HeartWare Bridge to Transplant ADVANCE Trial Investigators. Drive-line infections and sepsis in patients receiving the HVAD system as a left ventricular assist device. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Oct;33(10):1066-73. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.05.010. Epub 2014 Jun 4. |
| 24418731 | Derived | Najjar SS, Slaughter MS, Pagani FD, Starling RC, McGee EC, Eckman P, Tatooles AJ, Moazami N, Kormos RL, Hathaway DR, Najarian KB, Bhat G, Aaronson KD, Boyce SW; HVAD Bridge to Transplant ADVANCE Trial Investigators. An analysis of pump thrombus events in patients in the HeartWare ADVANCE bridge to transplant and continued access protocol trial. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Jan;33(1):23-34. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2013.12.001. Epub 2013 Dec 12. |
| 23796152 | Derived | Slaughter MS, Pagani FD, McGee EC, Birks EJ, Cotts WG, Gregoric I, Howard Frazier O, Icenogle T, Najjar SS, Boyce SW, Acker MA, John R, Hathaway DR, Najarian KB, Aaronson KD; HeartWare Bridge to Transplant ADVANCE Trial Investigators. HeartWare ventricular assist system for bridge to transplant: combined results of the bridge to transplant and continued access protocol trial. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013 Jul;32(7):675-83. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2013.04.004. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | HeartWare® VAS | Patients who received a HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device (HeartWare® VAS) |
| BG001 | Contemporaneous Control | Patients who received an FDA approved durable device for mechanically assisted support and enrolled into INTERMACS (NCT00119834) during the same enrollment period. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Body Surface Area (BSA) | Mean | Standard Deviation | m^2 |
| |||||||||||||||
| Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) | Mean | Standard Deviation | mmol/L |
| |||||||||||||||
| Right Atrial Pressure (RAP) | Mean | Standard Deviation | mmHg |
| |||||||||||||||
| Serum creatinine | Mean | Standard Deviation | µmol/L |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | The Primary Endpoint is Success at 180 Days Which is Defined as Alive on the Originally Implanted HeartWare® LVAD or Transplanted or Explanted for Recovery. Patient Must Survive 60 Days Post-explant for Recovery to be Considered Successful. | The primary endpoint is success at 180 days which is defined as alive on the originally implanted HeartWare® LVAD or transplanted or explanted for recovery. A patient must survive 60 days post-explant for recovery to be considered successful. | The primary effectiveness analyses was performed on the safety population, consisting of all enrolled subjects who received a Ventricular Assist Device (VAD). | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants with success | 180 days |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Survival to 180 Days | All subjects will be followed for date of death until 180 days. | The secondary effectiveness analyses were performed on the safety population, consisting of all enrolled subjects who received a Ventricular Assist Device (VAD). | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants with survival | 180 Days |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Incidence of Adverse Events, Neurocognitive Status and Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects | Adverse events are only provided for patients who received a HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device (HeartWare® VAS). Adverse events as described by INTERMACS for the contemporaneous control population were not a part of the agreement for analysis and thus not provided by INTERMACS, and so not included in the Adverse Event Module and relevant Outcome Measures for comparison. | The secondary effectiveness analyses were performed on the safety population, consisting of all enrolled subjects who received a Ventricular Assist Device (VAD). | Posted | Number | percentage of patients | 180 Days |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Incidence of All Device Failures and Device Malfunctions | The INTERMACS event device malfunction defined a failure of the HeartWare VAS as either pump failure or non-pump failure. | The secondary effectiveness analyses were performed on the safety population, consisting of all enrolled subjects who received a Ventricular Assist Device (VAD). | Posted | Number | Number of events | 180 Days |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Quality of Life Change From Baseline to 180 Days, as Measured by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) | KCCQ is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life for patients with congestive heart failure. It is a predictive tool that tracks how patients are doing if they have weakened heart muscle due to prior heart attacks, heart valve problems, viral infections, or other causes. The KCCQ's questions are used to calculate scores in ten domains: Physical Limitation, Symptom Stability, Frequency, Burden and Total Symptom. Social Limitation, Self-Efficacy, Quality of Life, and Clinical Summary. Overall Summary: a combined measure of all the above For each domain, the validity, reproducibility, responsiveness and interpretability have been independently established. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. | Number of participants with both baseline and 180 day data were used for this analysis of QOL. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a KCCQ scale | Baseline and 180 Days |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Distance Walked in the 6-minute Walk Test Between Baseline and 180 Days | The 6MWT is a simple test which does not require expensive equipment or advanced training for technicians. The test involves asking the patient to walk the longest distance possible in a set interval of 6 min, through a walking course (corridor) preferably 30-m long. The patient can stop or slow down at any time and then resume walking, depending on his/her degree of fatigue. A longer distance walked is indicative of a better outcome. | Number of participants with both baseline and 180 day data were used for this analysis of 6 minute walk distance. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | meters | Baseline and 180 Days |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Quality of Life Change From Baseline to 180 Days, as Measured by EuroQoL EQ-5D | The EQ-5D is a standardized instrument for use as a generic measure of the quality of health-related life and of health outcome. The EuroQoL EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take one of five responses. The responses record five levels of severity (no problems/slight problems/moderate problems/severe problems/extreme problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. | Number of participants with both baseline and 180 day data were used for this analysis of QOL | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a EuroQol EQ-5D scale | Baseline and 180 Days |
|
|
Adverse events were collected and are reported during the 180 day primary endpoint period.
Treatment emergent adverse events are defined as events occurring after the skin incision for implantation of the pump. Adverse events that resulted in death, those assessed by the principal investigator as an SAE, any UADE, or those that met the definition of an INTERMACS event, were sent to the Clinical Events Committee with associated data.The Clinical Events Committee evaluated whether the event met the appropriate definition and determined the event's relationship to the device.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | HeartWare® VAS | Patients who received a HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device (HeartWare® VAS) | 118 | 140 | 105 | 140 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardiac disorders | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| "Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders" | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Infections and infestations | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| "Injury, poisoning and procedural complications" | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nervous system disorders | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrointestinal disorders | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vascular disorders | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Investigations | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal and urinary disorders | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| General disorders and administration site conditions | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Psychiatric disorders | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Eye disorders | Eye disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Reproductive system and breast disorders | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatobiliary disorders | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ear and labyrinth disorders | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Immune system disorders | Immune system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| "Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (including cysts and polyps)" | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Social circumstances | Social circumstances | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| "Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders" | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac disorders | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nervous system disorders | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Investigations | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrointestinal disorders | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| "Injury, poisoning and procedural complications" | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| General disorders and administration site conditions | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vascular disorders | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Infections and infestations | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Director Clinical Project Management | HeartWare Inc | 508 739-0867 | sbell@heartwareinc.com |
| Male |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|