Personalized Information or Basic Information in Helping Patients Make Decisions About Participating in a Clinical Trial
Official Title
Preparatory Aid to Improve Decision Making About Cancer Clinical Trials (PRE-ACT)
Acronym
Not provided
Organization
Case Comprehensive Cancer CenterOTHER
Status Module
Record Verification Date
Jul 2020
Overall Recruitment Status or Expanded Access Status
Completed
Last Known Status
Not provided
Delayed Posting
Not provided
Why Stopped
Not provided
Expanded Access Info
No
Start Date
Apr 2008
Primary Completion Date
Dec 2012Actual
Completion Date
Dec 2012Actual
First Submitted Date
Sep 9, 2008
First Submission Date that Met QC Criteria
Sep 9, 2008
First Posted Date
Sep 10, 2008Estimated
Results Waived
Not provided
Results First Submitted Date
Not provided
Results First Submitted that Met QC Criteria
Not provided
Results First Posted Date
Not provided
Certification/Extension (aka Delayed Results) First Submitted Date
Not provided
Certification/Extension First Submitted that Passed QC Review
Not provided
Certification/Extension First Posted Date
Not provided
Last Update Submitted Date
Jul 23, 2020
Last Update Posted Date
Jul 27, 2020Actual
Sponsor/Collaborators Module
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Lead Sponsor
Case Comprehensive Cancer CenterOTHER
Collaborators
Name
Class
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Oversight Module
Has Data Monitoring Committee (DMC)
Yes
Is FDA Regulated Drug
Not provided
Is FDA Regulated Device
Not provided
Is Unapproved Device
Not provided
Pediatric Postmarket Surveillance of a Device Product
Not provided
Product Exported from US
Not provided
FDAAA801 Violation
Not provided
Description Module
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Providing information that is tailored to answer patients' questions about clinical trials may help patients with cancer decide to enroll in a clinical trial. It is not known whether providing personalized information is more effective than basic information in helping patients make decisions about clinical trials.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying personalized information to see how well it works compared with basic information in helping patients make decisions about participating in a clinical trial.
Detailed Description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
To improve preparation for consideration of clinical trials by providing tailored information to address barriers related to knowledge, goals and values, and beliefs and expectancies before their physician visit in patients with advanced metastatic or early stage cancer.
Secondary
To develop and pilot test a tailored interactive preparatory aid (PRE-ACT) to promote informed cancer treatment decision making by addressing barriers to considering clinical trials as a treatment option.
To evaluate the efficacy of PRE-ACT in improving preparation for considering participation in clinical trials by conducting a randomized clinical trial to compare PRE-ACT vs generic clinical trial information with text (control condition).
To investigate relevant background and psychosocial variables that are associated with preparedness, barriers, and treatment outcomes.
To investigate the impact of PRE-ACT on patient decisional conflict, satisfaction with information received, satisfaction with discussion about clinical trials with the physician, satisfaction with the treatment decision, clinical trials discussion, clinical trials participation, and quality of informed consent.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
Arm I (PRE-ACT): Patients receive tailored feedback and video content to address clinical trial barriers following baseline assessment.
Arm II (control): Patients receive generic clinical trials educational feedback taken from NCI publications following baseline assessment.
All patients complete a baseline assessment to assess demographics, personal characteristics, preparedness, and barriers to clinical trials. All patients also undergo a post-intervention assessment and complete a survey to measure preparedness for consideration of clinical trials, and impact of the intervention on clinical trials barriers. A brief patient post-consultation assessment is completed by patients within two weeks of the physician consultation to determine whether clinical trials were discussed, patient satisfaction with discussion about clinical trials, treatment options, treatment selection, decisional conflict, and satisfaction with treatment decision. Quality of informed consent is also assessed for patients participating in a clinical trial and completing the consent process during their initial physician consultation. Each patient's physician completes a brief Physician Post-Consultation Assessment to define cancer stage, treatment goal, and to determine whether clinical trials were offered and accepted and if not, why not. For patients who have not made a treatment decision after consultation, a brief follow-up phone survey or medical chart review is used to identify the patient's treatment choice.
Conditions Module
Conditions
Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors
Chronic Myeloproliferative Disorders
Leukemia
Lymphoma
Lymphoproliferative Disorder
Multiple Myeloma and Plasma Cell Neoplasm
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Unspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol Specific
Keywords
unspecified adult solid tumor, protocol specific
accelerated phase chronic myelogenous leukemia
acute undifferentiated leukemia
adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia in remission
adult acute myeloid leukemia in remission
adult acute myeloid leukemia with 11q23 (MLL) abnormalities
adult acute myeloid leukemia with inv(16)(p13;q22)
adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(15;17)(q22;q12)
adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(16;16)(p13;q22)
adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21)(q22;q22)
childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in remission
childhood acute myeloid leukemia in remission
Design Module
Study Type
Interventional
Number of References to an Expanded Access Study
Not provided
Expanded Access Types
Not provided
Patient Registry
Not provided
Target Follow-Up Duration
Not provided
Phases
Phase 3
Interventional Study Design
Allocation
Biospecimen
No data available
No data is available for this block.
Enrollment
583Actual
Arms/Interventions Module
Arm Groups
Label
Type
Description
Intervention Names
Arm I (PRE-ACT)
Experimental
Patients receive tailored feedback and video content to address clinical trial barriers following baseline assessment.
Other: educational intervention
Arm II (control)
Active Comparator
Patients receive generic clinical trials educational feedback taken from NCI publications following baseline assessment.
Other: educational intervention
Interventions
Name
Type
Description
Arm Group Labels
Other Names
educational intervention
Other
Patients receive a tailored intervention or generic information
Arm I (PRE-ACT)
Arm II (control)
Outcomes Module
Primary Outcomes
Measure
Description
Time Frame
Improvement in preparation for consideration of clinical trials
after pts.complete all survey measures
Secondary Outcomes
Measure
Description
Time Frame
Development and pilot testing of a tailored interactive preparatory aid (PRE-ACT)
after pts.complete all survey measures
Efficacy of PRE-ACT
after pts.complete all survey measures
Other Outcomes
Not provided
Eligibility Module
Eligibility Criteria
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
Diagnosis of 1 of the following:
Advanced (metastatic) disease
Early stage (i.e., appropriate for adjuvant therapy) disease
Scheduled for first outpatient consultation with a medical oncologist at the Clinical Centers
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Able to read and verbally communicate in English
Patients who choose to complete the intervention at home rather than at the Clinical Center before their visit must have high-speed (i.e., DSL or cable) Internet access
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Not specified
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sex
All
Sex/Gender Based
Not provided
Sex/Gender Description
Not provided
Minimum Age
18 Years
Maximum Age
120 Years
Standard Ages
AdultOlder Adult
Study Population
Not provided
Sampling Method
Not provided
Contacts/Locations Module
Central Contacts
Not provided
Overall Officials
Name
Affiliation
Role
Neal J. Meropol, MD
Case Medical Center, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Principal Investigator
Locations
Facility
Status
City
State
ZIP
Country
Contacts
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit
Michigan
48201-1379
United States
Case Medical Center, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Meropol NJ, Wong YN, Albrecht T, Manne S, Miller SM, Flamm AL, Benson AB 3rd, Buzaglo J, Collins M, Egleston B, Fleisher L, Katz M, Kinzy TG, Liu TM, Margevicius S, Miller DM, Poole D, Roach N, Ross E, Schluchter MD. Randomized Trial of a Web-Based Intervention to Address Barriers to Clinical Trials. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb 10;34(5):469-78. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.2257. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
Wong YN, Schluchter MD, Albrecht TL, Benson AB 3rd, Buzaglo J, Collins M, Flamm AL, Fleisher L, Katz M, Kinzy TG, Liu TM, Manne S, Margevicius S, Miller DM, Miller SM, Poole D, Raivitch S, Roach N, Ross E, Meropol NJ. Financial Concerns About Participation in Clinical Trials Among Patients With Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb 10;34(5):479-87. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.2463. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
recurrent childhood anaplastic large cell lymphoma
stage I childhood anaplastic large cell lymphoma
stage II childhood anaplastic large cell lymphoma
stage III childhood anaplastic large cell lymphoma
stage IV childhood anaplastic large cell lymphoma
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description
Not provided
Primary Purpose
Other
Observational Model
Not provided
Time Perspective
Not provided
Masking Info
Masking
Double
Masking Description
Not provided
Who Masked
ParticipantInvestigator
Comparison of PRE-ACT and genomic clinical trial information with text
after pts.complete all survey measures
Relevant background and psychosocial variables that are associated with preparedness, barriers, and treatment outcomes
after pts.complete all survey measures
Impact of PRE-ACT on patient
To investigate the impact of PRE-ACT on patient decisional conflict, satisfaction with information received, satisfaction with discussion about clinical trials with the physician, satisfaction with the treatment decision, clinical trials discussion, clinical trials participation, and quality of informed consent. (Exploratory Aim)
after pts.complete all survey measures
Cleveland
Ohio
44106
United States
Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center