Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The primary objective of this investigation was to evaluate & compare the performance of the P.F.C. Sigma Knee Cruciate-retaining all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibia components using RSA.
The secondary objectives of this investigation are to evaluate the clinical and patient outcomes and survivorship associated with the P.F.C. Sigma Knee Cruciate-retaining all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibia components.
Using RSA, is it possible to evaluate the performance of both the all polyethylene and metal backed tibia components to determine whether there are differences in migration, if present, across the tibial components.
The original protocol intended to perform clinical assessment using the Nottingham Knee Score and the Knee Society Clinical rating system pre-and post-operatively, at six months, 1 year, and annually thereafter. Per Protocol Amendment 01 (effective June 18, 1999) clinical data would also be collected via the SF-12 questionnaire. Radiological evaluation would also use the Knee Society scoring system at the same time points. However, data collected included only the SF-12 and Oxford Knee Scores, comparing change from baseline at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 - All Polyethylene Tibia | Other | Total knee replacement with an all polyethylene tibial tray |
|
| 2 - Poly & Metal Tibia | Active Comparator | Total knee replacement with a metal-backed tibial component |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFC Sigma knee with all-poly tibial component | Device | Orthopaedic implant for total knee replacement with an all-polyethylene tibial component |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Using RSA it is possible to evaluate the performance of both the all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibia components to determine whether there are differences in migration between the two components | 2 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Comparative evaluation of any post-operative variation between subjects receiving all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibia components in change from baseline at each post operative time points in terms of SF 12 and OKS | 6 months, 1 year and 2 years |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Orthopaedics, Freeman Hospital | Newcastle upon Tyne | NE7 7DN | United Kingdom |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17159170 | Result | Muller SD, Deehan DJ, Holland JP, Outterside SE, Kirk LM, Gregg PJ, McCaskie AW. Should we reconsider all-polyethylene tibial implants in total knee replacement? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Dec;88(12):1596-602. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B12.17695. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020370 | Osteoarthritis, Knee |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| PFC Sigma knee with metal backed tibia | Device | Orthopaedic implant for total knee replacement with a metal-backed tibial component |
|
| D012216 |
| Rheumatic Diseases |