Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| EudraCT 2008-005011-18 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| iOMEDICO AG | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Primary:
To evaluate if progression-free survival from first treatment to progression or death during second-line therapy (total PFS) of sorafenib followed by sunitinib is superior compared to sunitinib followed by sorafenib.
Secondary:
The results of three sequential retrospective studies (Sablin et al, ASCO 2007; Dham et al, ASCO 2007; and Tamaskar et al, 2008) support the sequential administration of sorafenib and sunitinib even though these two drugs have an overlap of targets. These results suggest the lack of cross resistance between sorafenib and sunitinib. This study is a sequential, randomized, open-label (1:1), multicenter phase III study starting in first-line of metastatic / advanced RCC using in the experimental arm sorafenib until progression followed by sunitinib and in the control arm sunitinib until progression followed by sorafenib. Sorafenib-patients will switch to sunitinib and vice versa, with a treatment-free period of at least one and up to maximum four weeks after confirmed first-line treatment failure, in order to avoid additive toxicity. In general, the first-line treatment should be continued until progression (RECIST). However, if patients do not tolerate the first-line medication (sorafenib or sunitinib) because of toxicity, they may cross-over to the second-line therapy (sunitinib or sorafenib) despite the lack of progression, if an appropriate attempt according to a specific dose reduction / interruption scheme has been made to cope with the toxicity and try to resume first line therapy, if deemed appropriate with a reduced dose. In case of discontinuation of first-line treatment because of toxicity, patients will be enrolled for the second-line treatment, only after nonhematological toxicity has resolved to grade ≤1 and hematological toxicity to grade ≤2. As an exception, patients who refuse to be treated further with the first-line regimen due to intolerability despite having no progression may be crossed over to the second-line treatment, if they consent and are in general compliance. Any crossover, also without progression, requires a CT scan, which is in this case also considered the baseline scan for the second-line treatment. One cycle is of six weeks duration. Patients will undergo a CT/MRI scan after every second cycle (i.e. after 12 weeks each), which will be evaluated according to RECIST criteria. There will be no continuation of the same study medication beyond progression in both first- or second-line therapy. After the study reached its primary endpoint cut off, i.e. after 194 endpoint events have occurred, clean data for these patients exist and a statistical analysis has been performed data collection will be stopped. After that the trial is terminated and a close out visit will be performed. Remaining patients will be treated outside the study and will be censored in the analysis.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active Comparator | Sunitinib (first-line) followed by Sorafenib (second-line) |
|
| 2 | Experimental | Sorafenib (first-line) followed by Sunitinib (second-line) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sunitinib (Sutent) | Drug | Sunitinib 50 mg once daily 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off, and after discontinuation (due to PD or toxicity), followed by sorafenib 400 mg BID |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| total Progression Free Survival | Last patient last visit (LPLV) to October 2013 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Total Time to Progression | Last patient last visit (LPLV) to October 2013 | |
| Overall survival | Last patient last visit (LPLV) to October 2013 | |
| Disease Control Rate (DCR) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with metastatic / advanced RCC (all histologies), who are not suitable for cytokine therapy and for whom study medication constitutes first-line therapy
Age >= 18 ans <= 85years
ECOG Performance Status of 0 or 1
MSKCC prognostic score, low or intermediate
Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks.
Subjects with at least one uni-dimensional (for RECIST) measurable lesion. Lesions must be measured by CT/MRI-scan.
Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function as assessed by the following laboratory requirements to be conducted within 7 days prior to start of therapy:
Written Informed Consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Excluded therapies and medications, previous and concomitant:
Anticancer chemotherapy or immunotherapy during the study or within 4 weeks of study entry.
Radiotherapy during study or within 3 weeks of start of study drug. (Palliative radiotherapy will be allowed). Major surgery within 4 weeks of start of study
Autologous bone marrow transplant or stem cell rescue within 4 months of study
Use of biologic response modifiers, such as G-CSF, within 3 week of study entry.
[G-CSF and other hematopoietic growth factors may be used in the management of acute toxicity such as febrile neutropenia when clinically indicated or at the discretion of the investigator; however they may not be substituted for a required dose reduction.] [Patients taking chronic erythropoietin are permitted provided no dose adjustment is undertaken within 2 months prior to the study or during the study]
Investigational drug therapy outside of this trial during or within 4 weeks of study entry
Prior exposure to the study drug.
Any St. John's wort containing remedy
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urologische Klinik | Mannheim | Baden-Wurttemberg | 68167 | Germany |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37146227 | Derived | Aldin A, Besiroglu B, Adams A, Monsef I, Piechotta V, Tomlinson E, Hornbach C, Dressen N, Goldkuhle M, Maisch P, Dahm P, Heidenreich A, Skoetz N. First-line therapy for adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 4;5(5):CD013798. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013798.pub2. | |
| 25952317 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002292 | Carcinoma, Renal Cell |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000230 | Adenocarcinoma |
| D002277 | Carcinoma |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000077210 | Sunitinib |
| D000077157 | Sorafenib |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011758 | Pyrroles |
| D001393 | Azoles |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Sorafenib (Nexavar) | Drug | Sorafenib 400 mg BID, followed by Sunitinib 50 mg once daily 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off, and after discontinuation (due to PD or toxicity) |
|
| Last patient last visit (LPLV) to October 2013 |
| Cardiotoxicity | after 100 patients of each arm have completed the study |
| Eichelberg C, Vervenne WL, De Santis M, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Goebell PJ, Lerchenmuller C, Zimmermann U, Bos MM, Freier W, Schirrmacher-Memmel S, Staehler M, Pahernik S, Los M, Schenck M, Florcken A, van Arkel C, Hauswald K, Indorf M, Gottstein D, Michel MS. SWITCH: A Randomised, Sequential, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sorafenib-sunitinib Versus Sunitinib-sorafenib in the Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer. Eur Urol. 2015 Nov;68(5):837-47. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.017. Epub 2015 May 4. |
| 21858552 | Derived | Calvani N, Morelli F, Leo S, Orlando L, Lombardi L, Gnoni A, Cinefra M, Maiello E, Lorusso V, Cinieri S. Sequential use of sorafenib and sunitinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma: does the order of sequencing matter? Med Oncol. 2012 Sep;29(3):1908-13. doi: 10.1007/s12032-011-0048-0. Epub 2011 Aug 20. |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D007680 | Kidney Neoplasms |
| D014571 | Urologic Neoplasms |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D007674 | Kidney Diseases |
| D014570 | Urologic Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
| D007211 |
| Indoles |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D010671 | Phenylurea Compounds |
| D014508 | Urea |
| D000577 | Amides |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D001555 | Benzene Derivatives |
| D006841 | Hydrocarbons, Aromatic |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D009536 | Niacinamide |
| D009539 | Nicotinic Acids |
| D000147 | Acids, Heterocyclic |
| D011725 | Pyridines |