Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to assess the ease of deflation of the Titan® OTR pump.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Titan® OTR IPP | Other | Subjects implanted with Titan® One Touch Release (OTR) Inflatable Penile Prosthesis (IPP) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inflatable Penile Prosthesis | Device | Hydraulic system designed to be surgically implanted into the penis for the management of erectile dysfunction. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Assess the Ease of Deflation of the Titan® OTR Pump | The study's primary endpoint was to demonstrate that at least 64% of subjects were mostly or completely satisfied with the ability to deflate the device at the 6-month follow-up. The study's primary objective was to assess the ease of deflation of the Titan® OTR pump via subject questionnaire at 6-month follow-up. Subjects were asked via questionnaire how satisfied they were with ease of deflation of their implant. Success criteria was a response of "satisfactory" or "somewhat satisfactory". Other possible responses were "neither satisfactory nor unsatisfactory", "somewhat unsatisfactory", and "very unsatisfactory". | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 1 | Subject Satisfaction - overall function | 3 months post-surgery |
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 1 | Subject Satisfaction - overall function |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Gerald Brock, MD | St Joseph's Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Ricardo Munarriz, MD | Boston Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Lawrence Levine, MD | Rush Presbyterian | Principal Investigator |
| Chad Ritenour, MD | Emory Healthcare | Principal Investigator |
| LeRoy Jones, MD | Urology San Antonio | Principal Investigator |
| William Bogache, MD | Carolina Urologic Research Center | Principal Investigator |
| Dana Ohl, MD | Michigan Urology Center | Principal Investigator |
| David Ralph, MD | University College London Hospitals | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emory Healthcare | Altanta | Georgia | 30322 | United States | ||
| Rush Presbyterian |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22759540 | Result | Ohl DA, Brock G, Ralph D, Bogache W, Jones L, Munarriz R, Levine L, Ritenour C. Prospective evaluation of patient satisfaction, and surgeon and patient trainer assessment of the Coloplast titan one touch release three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis. J Sex Med. 2012 Sep;9(9):2467-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02819.x. Epub 2012 Jul 3. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Titan® OTR IPP | Subjects implanted with Titan® One Touch Release (OTR) Inflatable Penile Prosthesis (IPP) Inflatable Penile Prosthesis : Hydraulic system designed to be surgically implanted into the penis for the management of erectile dysfunction. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Titan® OTR IPP | Subjects implanted with Titan® One Touch Release (OTR) Inflatable Penile Prosthesis (IPP) Inflatable Penile Prosthesis : Hydraulic system designed to be surgically implanted into the penis for the management of erectile dysfunction. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Assess the Ease of Deflation of the Titan® OTR Pump | The study's primary endpoint was to demonstrate that at least 64% of subjects were mostly or completely satisfied with the ability to deflate the device at the 6-month follow-up. The study's primary objective was to assess the ease of deflation of the Titan® OTR pump via subject questionnaire at 6-month follow-up. Subjects were asked via questionnaire how satisfied they were with ease of deflation of their implant. Success criteria was a response of "satisfactory" or "somewhat satisfactory". Other possible responses were "neither satisfactory nor unsatisfactory", "somewhat unsatisfactory", and "very unsatisfactory". | Posted | Number | % of participants meeting success criter | 6 months |
|
12 months
The analysis is based on the per protocol population (n=113). Of 124 consented subjects, nine (9) subjects did not meet inclusion/exclusion criteria and were not implanted with the study device. Two (2) subjects did not meet enrollment criteria and these two subjects were not followed for safety or efficacy.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Titan® OTR IPP | Subjects implanted with Titan® One Touch Release (OTR) Inflatable Penile Prosthesis (IPP) Inflatable Penile Prosthesis : Hydraulic system designed to be surgically implanted into the penis for the management of erectile dysfunction. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infection | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Auto inflation | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical Trial Manager | Coloplast Corp | 612-302-4990 | usdibe@coloplast.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007172 | Erectile Dysfunction |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005832 | Genital Diseases, Male |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D012735 | Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 6 months post-surgery |
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 1 | Subject Satisfaction - overall function | 12 months post-surgery |
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 2 | Subject Satisfaction - soft enough to conceal when deflated | 3 months post-surgery |
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 2 | Subject Satisfaction - soft enough to conceal when deflated | 6 months post-surgery |
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 2 | Subject Satisfaction - soft enough to conceal when deflated | 12 months post-surgery |
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 3 | Subject Satisfaction - ease of locating the deflation touch pads | 3 months post-surgery |
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 3 | Subject Satisfaction - ease of locating the deflation touch pads | 6 months post-surgery |
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 3 | Subject Satisfaction - ease of locating the deflation touch pads | 12 months post-surgery |
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 4 | Subject Satisfaction - ease of inflation | 3 months post-surgery |
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 4 | Subject Satisfaction - ease of inflation | 6 months post-surgery |
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 4 | Subject Satisfaction - ease of inflation | 12 months post-surgery |
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 5 | Subject Satisfaction - ease of deflation | 3 months post-surgery |
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 5 | Subject Satisfaction - ease of deflation | 6 months post-surgery |
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 5 | Subject Satisfaction - ease of deflation | 12 months post-surgery |
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 6 | Subject Satisfaction - hardness of erection when inflated | 3 months post-surgery |
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 6 | Subject Satisfaction - hardness of erection when inflated | 6 months post-surgery |
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 6 | Subject Satisfaction - hardness of erection when inflated | 12 months post-surgery |
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 7 | Subject Satisfaction - width when inflated | 3 months post-surgery |
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 7 | Subject Satisfaction - width when inflated | 6 months post-surgery |
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 7 | Subject Satisfaction - width when inflated | 12 months post-surgery |
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 8 | Subject Satisfaction - length when inflated | 3 months post-surgery |
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 8 | Subject Satisfaction - length when inflated | 6 months post-surgery |
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 8 | Subject Satisfaction - length when inflated | 12 months post-surgery |
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 9 | Subject Satisfaction - would you recommend this penile implant device to men with the same erectile difficulty that you had? | 3 months post-surgery |
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 9 | Subject Satisfaction - would you recommend this penile implant device to men with the same erectile difficulty that you had? | 6 months post-surgery |
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 9 | Subject Satisfaction - would you recommend this penile implant device to men with the same erectile difficulty that you had? | 12 months post-surgery |
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 10 | Subject Satisfaction - if you had the decision to make again, would you undergo this penile implant procedure again? | 3 months post-surgery |
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 10 | Subject Satisfaction - if you had the decision to make again, would you undergo this penile implant procedure again? | 6 months post-surgery |
| Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 10 | Subject Satisfaction - if you had the decision to make again, would you undergo this penile implant procedure again? | 12 months post-surgery |
| Assess the Ease of Implant of the Titan® OTR Question 1 | Titan OTR pre-implant product preparation was straightforward/simple? | At implant |
| Assess the Ease of Implant of the Titan® OTR - Question 2 | Titan OTR pre-implant product preparation was easier than your usual pump of choice? | At implant |
| Assess the Ease of Implant of the Titan® OTR - Question 3 | The subject was easily able to accommodate the OTR pump? | At implant |
| Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 1 | It was easy for the subject to find the inflation bulb? | 6 weeks |
| Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 2 | It was easy for the subject to find the deflation touch pads? | 6 weeks |
| Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 3 | It was easy for the subject to inflate the device? | 6 weeks |
| Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 4 | It was easy for the subject to compress the deflation touch pads? | 6 weeks |
| Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 5 | Subject training with OTR pump was easier than with previous pump? | 6 weeks |
| Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 6 | The OTR pump was easy to use at 1st cycling? | 6 weeks |
| Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 7 | The subject likes the OTR pump? | 6 weeks |
| Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 8 | How easy was it for the subject to learn? | 6 weeks |
| Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 9 | How likely the subject will need continued training or retraining? | 6 weeks |
| Assess Partner Satisfaction (Where Applicable) | The Partner Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS) was used. The TSS provides scores ranging from 0 to 100 in 5 domains of Ease of erection, Erectile function, Pleasure from sexual activity, Satisfaction with orgasm and Confidence to complete sexual activity with higher scores indicative of worse symptoms. Available data is summarized for each domain at each visit along with change from baseline. | Baseline |
| Assess Partner Satisfaction (Where Applicable) | The Partner Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS) was used. The TSS provides scores ranging from 0 to 100 in 5 domains of Ease of erection, Erectile function, Pleasure from sexual activity, Satisfaction with orgasm and Confidence to complete sexual activity with higher scores indicative of worse symptoms. Available data is summarized for each domain at each visit along with change from baseline. | 6 months |
| Chicago |
| Illinois |
| 60612 |
| United States |
| Boston Medical Center | Boston | Massachusetts | 02118 | United States |
| Michigan Urology Center | Ann Arbor | Michigan | 48109 | United States |
| Carolina Urologic Research Center | Myrtle Beach | South Carolina | 29572 | United States |
| Urology San Antonio | San Antonio | Texas | 78229 | United States |
| St Joseph's Hospital | London | Ontario | N6A 4V2 | Canada |
| University College London Hospital | London | UK | W1G 6BJ | United Kingdom |
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| Did not meet enrollment criteria |
|
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 1 | Subject Satisfaction - overall function | Posted | Number | % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory | 3 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 1 | Subject Satisfaction - overall function | Posted | Number | % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory | 6 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 1 | Subject Satisfaction - overall function | Posted | Number | % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory | 12 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 2 | Subject Satisfaction - soft enough to conceal when deflated | Posted | Number | % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory | 3 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 2 | Subject Satisfaction - soft enough to conceal when deflated | Posted | Number | % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory | 6 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 2 | Subject Satisfaction - soft enough to conceal when deflated | Posted | Number | % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory | 12 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 3 | Subject Satisfaction - ease of locating the deflation touch pads | Posted | Number | % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory | 3 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 3 | Subject Satisfaction - ease of locating the deflation touch pads | Posted | Number | % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory | 6 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 3 | Subject Satisfaction - ease of locating the deflation touch pads | Posted | Number | % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory | 12 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 4 | Subject Satisfaction - ease of inflation | Posted | Number | % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory | 3 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 4 | Subject Satisfaction - ease of inflation | Posted | Number | % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory | 6 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 4 | Subject Satisfaction - ease of inflation | Posted | Number | % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory | 12 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 5 | Subject Satisfaction - ease of deflation | Posted | Number | % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory | 3 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 5 | Subject Satisfaction - ease of deflation | Posted | Number | % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory | 6 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 5 | Subject Satisfaction - ease of deflation | Posted | Number | % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory | 12 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 6 | Subject Satisfaction - hardness of erection when inflated | Posted | Number | % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory | 3 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 6 | Subject Satisfaction - hardness of erection when inflated | Posted | Number | % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory | 6 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 6 | Subject Satisfaction - hardness of erection when inflated | Posted | Number | % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory | 12 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 7 | Subject Satisfaction - width when inflated | Posted | Number | % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory | 3 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 7 | Subject Satisfaction - width when inflated | Posted | Number | % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory | 6 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 7 | Subject Satisfaction - width when inflated | Posted | Number | % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory | 12 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 8 | Subject Satisfaction - length when inflated | Posted | Number | % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory | 3 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 8 | Subject Satisfaction - length when inflated | Posted | Number | % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory | 6 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 8 | Subject Satisfaction - length when inflated | Posted | Number | % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory | 12 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 9 | Subject Satisfaction - would you recommend this penile implant device to men with the same erectile difficulty that you had? | Posted | Number | % responding "yes" and "probably" | 3 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 9 | Subject Satisfaction - would you recommend this penile implant device to men with the same erectile difficulty that you had? | Posted | Number | % responding "yes" and "probably" | 6 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 9 | Subject Satisfaction - would you recommend this penile implant device to men with the same erectile difficulty that you had? | Posted | Number | % responding "yes" and "probably" | 12 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 10 | Subject Satisfaction - if you had the decision to make again, would you undergo this penile implant procedure again? | Posted | Number | % responding "yes" and "probably" | 3 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 10 | Subject Satisfaction - if you had the decision to make again, would you undergo this penile implant procedure again? | Posted | Number | % responding "yes" and "probably" | 6 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 10 | Subject Satisfaction - if you had the decision to make again, would you undergo this penile implant procedure again? | Posted | Number | % responding "yes" and "probably" | 12 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Assess the Ease of Implant of the Titan® OTR Question 1 | Titan OTR pre-implant product preparation was straightforward/simple? | Posted | Number | percentage of responses | At implant |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Assess the Ease of Implant of the Titan® OTR - Question 2 | Titan OTR pre-implant product preparation was easier than your usual pump of choice? | Posted | Number | percentage of responses | At implant |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Assess the Ease of Implant of the Titan® OTR - Question 3 | The subject was easily able to accommodate the OTR pump? | Posted | Number | percentage of responses | At implant |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 1 | It was easy for the subject to find the inflation bulb? | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 6 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 2 | It was easy for the subject to find the deflation touch pads? | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 6 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 3 | It was easy for the subject to inflate the device? | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 6 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 4 | It was easy for the subject to compress the deflation touch pads? | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 6 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 5 | Subject training with OTR pump was easier than with previous pump? | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 6 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 6 | The OTR pump was easy to use at 1st cycling? | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 6 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 7 | The subject likes the OTR pump? | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 6 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 8 | How easy was it for the subject to learn? | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 6 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 9 | How likely the subject will need continued training or retraining? | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 6 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Assess Partner Satisfaction (Where Applicable) | The Partner Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS) was used. The TSS provides scores ranging from 0 to 100 in 5 domains of Ease of erection, Erectile function, Pleasure from sexual activity, Satisfaction with orgasm and Confidence to complete sexual activity with higher scores indicative of worse symptoms. Available data is summarized for each domain at each visit along with change from baseline. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Assess Partner Satisfaction (Where Applicable) | The Partner Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS) was used. The TSS provides scores ranging from 0 to 100 in 5 domains of Ease of erection, Erectile function, Pleasure from sexual activity, Satisfaction with orgasm and Confidence to complete sexual activity with higher scores indicative of worse symptoms. Available data is summarized for each domain at each visit along with change from baseline. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 6 months |
|
|
|
| 10 |
| 113 |
| 14 |
| 113 |
| Hematoma | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Device malfunction | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Chronic pain | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cylinder extrusion | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Scrotal abscess | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
| D020018 | Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| Measurements |
|---|
|
| Somewhat agree |
|
| Completely agree |
|
| Measurements |
|---|
|
| Somewhat agree |
|
| Completely agree |
|
| Measurements |
|---|
|
| Somewhat agree |
|
| Completely agree |
|
| Very |
|
| Extremely |
|
|
| Very |
|
| Extremely |
|
| Very |
|
| Extremely |
|
|
| Very |
|
| Extremely |
|
|
| Very |
|
| Extremely |
|
| Very |
|
| Extremely |
|
| Very |
|
| Extremely |
|
| Very |
|
| Extremely |
|
|
| Very |
|
| Extremely |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Satisfaction with orgasm |
|
| Confidence to complete sexual activity |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Satisfaction with orgasm |
|
| Confidence to complete sexual activity |
|