A Prospective Study of Thin Prep Versus Papanicolau in Su... | NCT00716196

Studies
A Prospective Study of Thin Prep Versus Papanicolau in Suspected Malignant Lesions During Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)

NCT00716196

Sponsor

Indiana University

Status

Completed

Last Update Posted

Sep 12, 2012Estimated

Enrollment

Not provided

Phase

Not provided

Conditions

Suspected Malignant Lesions

Interventions

Not provided

Countries

United States

Protocol Section

Identification Module Status Module Sponsor/Collaborators Module Oversight Module Description Module Conditions Module Design Module Arms/Interventions Module Outcomes Module Eligibility Module Contacts/Locations Module References Module IPD Sharing Statement Module

Results Section

Participant Flow Module Baseline Characteristics Module Outcome Measures Module Adverse Events Module More Info Module

Annotation Section

Annotation Module

Document Section

Large Document Module

Derived Section

Miscellaneous Info Module Condition Browse Module Intervention Browse Module

Protocol Section

Identification Module

NCT ID

Results Section

No data available

No data is available for this block.

Annotation Section

No data available

No data is available for this block.

Document Section

No data available

No data is available for this block.

Derived Section

Miscellaneous Info Module

Version Holder

Status Module

Record Verification Date

Sep 2012

Overall Recruitment Status or Expanded Access Status

Completed

Last Known Status

Not provided

Delayed Posting

Not provided

Why Stopped

Not provided

Expanded Access Info

Start Date

Mar 2005

Primary Completion Date

Apr 2007Actual

Completion Date

Jul 2008Actual

First Submitted Date

Jul 15, 2008

First Submission Date that Met QC Criteria

Jul 15, 2008

First Posted Date

Jul 16, 2008Estimated

Results Waived

Not provided

Results First Submitted Date

Not provided

Results First Submitted that Met QC Criteria

Not provided

Results First Posted Date

Not provided

Certification/Extension (aka Delayed Results) First Submitted Date

Not provided

Certification/Extension First Submitted that Passed QC Review

Not provided

Certification/Extension First Posted Date

Not provided

Last Update Submitted Date

Sep 11, 2012

Last Update Posted Date

Sep 12, 2012Estimated

Oversight Module

Has Data Monitoring Committee (DMC)

Is FDA Regulated Drug

Not provided

Is FDA Regulated Device

Not provided

Is Unapproved Device

Not provided

Pediatric Postmarket Surveillance of a Device Product

Not provided

Product Exported from US

Not provided

FDAAA801 Violation

Not provided

Description Module

Brief Summary

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of the monolayer preparation (Cyto Lyt or Thin prep) to the routine use of Papanicolau methods on the analysis of specimens obtained using EUS-FNA.

Detailed Description

Introduction: The presence of a pathologist during an endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is often a luxury. In addition, preparation of multiple slides for a fine needle aspiration can be time-consuming for the gastroenterologist who waits for verbal feedback on the adequacy of the specimen. Often, a timely diagnosis is needed to direct patient management. Currently, there is no established standard of care for EUS-FNA preparation. A liquid based cytologic fixative preparation (Thin-prep or CytoLyt), is a well-established process used by pathologists for evaluating cervical smears. It has not yet been adopted or accepted for EUS-FNA. This method combines multiple aspirates on a single slide, thereby decreasing the number of slides that need to be processed and interpreted by the pathologist

Design Module

Study Type

Observational

Number of References to an Expanded Access Study

Not provided

Expanded Access Types

Not provided

Patient Registry

Not provided

Target Follow-Up Duration

Not provided

Phases

Not provided

Interventional Study Design

Allocation

Not provided

Intervention Model

Biospecimen

No data available

No data is available for this block.

Enrollment

Not provided

Eligibility Module

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects with known or suspected malignancy (solid mass or lymph node) that are undergoing EUS will be eligible to participate in this study.
Target lesions such as ascites and cystic lesions will not be considered for this study. However, if a patient has an abnormal solid lesion and abnormal lymph node in addition to the ascites or cystic lesion, they may still be considered for the study. That is, the solid lesions and abnormal lymph nodes are appropriate target lesions for this study.
No evidence of dementia or altered mental status that would prohibit the giving and understanding of informed consent, and no evidence of psychiatric risk that would preclude adequate compliance with this protocol.
Subject must provide signed written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects that have had a previous EUS-FNA are eligible for this study
Target lesions such as ascites and cystic lesions will not be considered for this study.

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sex

All

Sex/Gender Based

Not provided

Sex/Gender Description

Not provided

Minimum Age

18 Years

Maximum Age

Not provided

Standard Ages

AdultOlder Adult

Study Population

Convenience sample from patients presenting at the GI endoscopy unit for an EUS.

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Contacts/Locations Module

Central Contacts

Not provided

Overall Officials

Name	Affiliation	Role
Julia K LeBlanc, MD, MPH	Indiana University	Principal Investigator

Locations

Facility	Status	City	State	ZIP	Country	Contacts
Clarian/Indiana University Hospital		Indianapolis	Indiana	46202	United States