Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A study to compare the skin irritation potential of two marketed gels for acne treatment, each applied to half of the face of healthy volunteers.
At the Baseline Visit, following satisfaction of entry criteria and screening procedures, all subjects will be applying two products on their faces, each on half face. The side of face receiving each product is randomly assigned. One group will use tretinoin facial gel on the left side and adapalene facial gel on the right side of the face daily for two consecutive weeks after washing with study-supplied facial wash. The other group will use the same products, but on opposite sides of the face for two consecutive weeks after washing with the same study-supplied facial wash.
Subjects will return to the study center every weekday morning for evaluation and for the morning application of both study products. Study personnel will monitor application on the weekdays. There will be a daily clinical evaluation of skin irritation by a blinded dermatologist and by subjects. At baseline and at the end of each week subjects will be photographed and have chromometer readings.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tretinoin and Adapalene gels | Experimental | Adapalene facial gel and tretinoin facial gel applied daily for two weeks on opposite sides of the face (in a split-face model) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adapalene Gel | Drug | adapalene gel 0.3% topically applied daily in a split-face model for two weeks |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment of Facial Irritation and Cutaneous Effects | Cumulative daily weekday scores for two weeks on Expert Grader Assessments: Dryness (0-8, none-deep)and Erythema (0-8, none-severe) and Self-Assessments: Burning/Stinging (0-3, none-severe) and Itching (0-3, none-severe) | cumulative daily weekday scores for two weeks |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ana B Rossi, MD | Johnson & Johnson Consumer & Personal Products Companies, Inc. | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A J&J CPPW Investigational Site | Broomall | Pennsylvania | 19008 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12243706 | Result | Nyirady J, Grossman RM, Nighland M, Berger RS, Jorizzo JL, Kim YH, Martin AG, Pandya AG, Schulz KK, Strauss JS. A comparative trial of two retinoids commonly used in the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Dermatolog Treat. 2001 Sep;12(3):149-57. doi: 10.1080/09546630152607880. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| FDA's Drug Finder | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Combined Arms | All subjects received treatment with both gels in a split-face model |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Combined Arms | All subjects received treatment with both gels in a split-face model |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Assessment of Facial Irritation and Cutaneous Effects | Cumulative daily weekday scores for two weeks on Expert Grader Assessments: Dryness (0-8, none-deep)and Erythema (0-8, none-severe) and Self-Assessments: Burning/Stinging (0-3, none-severe) and Itching (0-3, none-severe) | One panelist terminated treatment on Day 2. Her scores were carried over and the analysis was based on Intention to Treat (ITT). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Ordinal data treated as interval | cumulative daily weekday scores for two weeks |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Adapalene | Adapalene facial gel was applied daily to one side of the face of all subjects in a split-face model. On weekdays during the two-week trial, the investigator scored Erythema on a scale of 0 (none) to 8 (severe) and Dryness on a scale of 0 (none) to 8 (deep). Also on weekdays during the two-week trial, subjects performed a self-assessment of Burning/stinging and Itching, which were scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (severe). |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Lineberry, Associate Director Clinical Operations | Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc | 949-973-1153 | David.Linberry@valeant.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000152 | Acne Vulgaris |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017486 | Acneiform Eruptions |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D012625 | Sebaceous Gland Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014212 | Tretinoin |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014801 | Vitamin A |
| D012176 | Retinoids |
| D002338 | Carotenoids |
| D011090 | Polyenes |
| D000475 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Tretinoin Gel | Drug | Tretinoin 0.1% topically applied daily in a split face model for two weeks |
|
|
| Participants |
|
| Age Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| OG001 | Tretinoin | Tretinoin facial gel was applied daily to the opposite side of the face of all subjects in a split-face model. On weekdays during the two-week trial, the investigator scored Erythema on a scale of 0 (none) to 8 (severe) and Dryness on a scale of 0 (none) to 8 (deep). Also on weekdays during the two-week trial, subjects performed a self-assessment of Burning/stinging and Itching, which were scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (severe). |
|
|
| 0 |
| 25 |
| 0 |
| 25 |
| EG001 | Tretinion | Tretinoin facial gel was applied daily to the opposite side of the face of all subjects in a split-face model. On weekdays during the two-week trial, the investigator scored Erythema on a scale of 0 (none) to 8 (severe) and Dryness on a scale of 0 (none) to 8 (deep). Also on weekdays during the two-week trial, subjects performed a self-assessment of Burning/stinging and Itching, which were scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (severe). | 0 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
Not provided
| Alkenes |
| D006839 | Hydrocarbons, Acyclic |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D053138 | Cyclohexenes |
| D003510 | Cyclohexanes |
| D003516 | Cycloparaffins |
| D006840 | Hydrocarbons, Alicyclic |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
| D013729 | Terpenes |
| D004224 | Diterpenes |
| D010860 | Pigments, Biological |
| D001685 | Biological Factors |