Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to determine if the HemCon Dental Dressing is effective in stopping bleeding during dental surgeries.
The HemCon® Bandage has been successfully used to achieve hemostasis in patients with high systolic pressure, high blood volume wounds, and to promote hemostasis on a massive scale compared to the hemostasis requirements of oral surgery wounds. Therefore, a human clinical trial has recently been completed evaluating the efficacy of using the HemCon® Bandage in a smaller finished size for dental extraction and other oral surgery sites. The HemCon® Bandage was proven to be significantly better at promoting hemostasis of oral surgery wounds than the control (cotton gauze or Gelfoam) in all subjects tested. All HemCon® Bandage sites achieved hemostasis faster than the control sites. Based on this data, a 510(k) was submitted and has received FDA clearance for the HemCon® Dental Dressing to be used as an oral wound dressing intended as a physical barrier for temporary protection of oral mucosal tissue and to provide pain relief.
This study evaluates the FDA cleared HemCon® Dental Dressing for use in hemostasis of soft oral tissue subsequent to dental surgical procedures such as tooth extractions excluding procedures involving primary closure of the HemCon® Dental Dressing within the oral wound.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hemcon Dental Dressing | Experimental | The HemCon® Bandage is an FDA-cleared chitosan-based flat bandage that controls severe arterial bleeding from traumatic injuries. In comparison to traditional bandages, the HemCon® Bandage provides superior control of bleeding, wound site adhesiveness, multiple injury site usage, biocompatibility and provides a barrier to infective agents. |
|
| Gauze with pressure and/or Gelfoam | Active Comparator | Post operative care for oral surgery subjects consists of the subject biting on sterile cotton gauze to provide pressure to the extraction site. A common alternative practice involves the placement of Gelfoam (with or without antibiotic/steroid medication) into the extraction socket prior to application of the sterile gauze pressure dressing. This treatment was chosen as the study control to compare the HemCon Dental Dressing to the standard of care for oral surgery subjects, including the use of cotton gauze and/or Gelfoam to control post operative bleeding. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hemcon Dental Dressing | Device | The Hemcon Dental Dressing is an oral wound dressing made of chitosan. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Hemostasis | This outcome measures the time it takes in minutes for the subject's extraction site to stop bleeding. It is divided by intervention. | Minutes After Application |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of Post Surgical Sequelae | 1 week post surgery |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jay P Malmquist, DMD | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rodney Nichols, DMD | Milwaukie | Oregon | 97222 | United States | ||
| Jay P. Malmquist, DMD |
Not provided
Subjects were recruited as they presented at the site of the study for extraction. Subjects served as their own control as they had four extractions per procedure and two served as the experimental sites and two served as the control sites.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Hemcon Dental Dressing With Pressure | Subjects served as their own control. Subject had both the HemCon Dental Dressing and one of two controls: Gelfoam or Gauze with pressure. Subjects had paired extractions; each extraction site within the pair were randomized to the HemCon Dental Dressing or to a control. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Hemcon Dental Dressing and Gauze With Pressure | In the case of this study, participants served as their own control. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Time to Hemostasis | This outcome measures the time it takes in minutes for the subject's extraction site to stop bleeding. It is divided by intervention. | Participants served as their own control thus the total amount of participants is reflected in both of the outcome measures. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | Minutes | Minutes After Application | Extraction Sites | Participants |
|
Adverse events were assessed for over the time in which the patient was in the care of the oral surgeon or was enrolled in the study. In most cases, the time frame for the subject was seven days.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Hemcon Dental Dressing and Gauze With Pressure | In the case of this study, participants served as their own control. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Socket | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Staci McAdams | HemCon Medical Technologies | (503)245-0459 | 103 | staci@hemcon.com |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Gauze with Pressure and/or Gelfoam | Device | Common practice for oral surgery patients involves the use of sterile dressing over the extraction site. The subject will provide the pressure by biting down on the sterile gauze. As previously discussed, other practices involve the use of Gelfoam prior to application of sterile gauze. |
|
| Portland |
| Oregon |
| 97221 |
| United States |
| Participants |
|
| Age Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Diastolic Blood Pressure | Mean | Standard Deviation | mmHg |
|
| Systolic Blood Pressure | Mean | Standard Deviation | mmHg |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Incidence of Post Surgical Sequelae | Posted | Number | Percent of Participants | 1 week post surgery |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 71 |
| 20 |
| 71 |
| Packed Food | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Pain Score: Moderate |
|
| Pain Score: Severe |
|
| Healing Score: HemCon Better than Control |
|
| Healing Score: HemCon Same as Control |
|
| Healing Score: HemCon Worse than Control |
|
| Gingival Inflammation: None |
|
| Gingival Inflammation: Mild |
|
| Gingival Inflammation: Moderate |
|
| Gingival Inflammation: Severe |
|