Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate if DVS SR is safe and effective in the treatment of pain associated with fibromyalgia syndrome, and if so to identify the efficacious doses.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | In the first stage, subjects were randomly assigned to receive placebo. Study was stopped after stage 1 by sponsor. |
|
| DVS SR | Experimental | In the first stage, subjects were randomly assigned to receive DVS SR 200 mg/day. Study was stopped after stage 1 by sponsor. |
|
| Pregabalin | Active Comparator | In the first stage, subjects were randomly assigned to receive Pregabalin 450 mg/day. Study was stopped after stage 1 by sponsor. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desvenlafaxine Sustained Release (DVS SR) | Drug |
| ||
| Lyrica® (Pregabalin) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) | The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline on the NRS. The primary time point was the average pain score during the last data-analysis-interval of week 8. The baseline score was the average of the NRS scores across the last 7 days of the screening period (just prior to the start of the placebo run-in). The primary efficacy variable was the pain severity score measured on an 11 point NRS on which 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain. | Baseline and 8 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in the Treatment of Pain Associated With Fibromyalgia in Adult Female Outpatients | The efficacy variable was the change from baseline on the numeric rating scale (NRS). The time point was the average pain score during the last data-analysis-interval of week 8, data analysis interval. The baseline score was the average of the NRS scores across the last 7 days of the screening period (just prior to the start of the placebo run-in). The efficacy variable was the pain severity score measured on an 11 point NRS on which 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
- Fibromyalgia diagnosed according to 1990 American College of Rheumatology criteria
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Medical Monitor | Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Huntsville | Alabama | 35801 | United States | |||
After a 7 to 30 day screening period, eligible subjects entered a 7 day single blind placebo run-in period during which placebo responses were assessed.
Subjects were recruited in the United States from June 2006 to November 2008.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo | In the first stage, subjects were randomly assigned to receive placebo. Study was stopped after stage 1 by sponsor. |
| FG001 | DVS SR | In the first stage, subjects were randomly assigned to receive DVS SR 200 mg/day. Study was stopped after stage 1 by sponsor. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Drug |
|
| Placebo | Drug |
|
| Baseline and 8 weeks |
| Roseville |
| California |
| 95661 |
| United States |
| San Diego | California | 92108 | United States |
| San Diego | California | 92128 | United States |
| Santa Ana | California | 92705 | United States |
| Walnut Creek | California | 94598 | United States |
| Jacksonville | Florida | 32216 | United States |
| Tampa | Florida | 33606 | United States |
| Decatur | Georgia | 30033 | United States |
| Evansville | Indiana | 47714 | United States |
| Indianapolis | Indiana | 46260 | United States |
| Lexington | Kentucky | 40509 | United States |
| Rockville | Maryland | 20852 | United States |
| Lansing | Michigan | 48910 | United States |
| Raleigh | North Carolina | 27612 | United States |
| Cincinnati | Ohio | 45219 | United States |
| Dayton | Ohio | 45408 | United States |
| Duncansville | Pennsylvania | 16635 | United States |
| Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19152 | United States |
| Chattanooga | Tennessee | 37404 | United States |
| Chattanooga | Tennessee | 37421 | United States |
| Knoxville | Tennessee | 37920 | United States |
| Austin | Texas | 78756 | United States |
| Dallas | Texas | 75231 | United States |
| San Antonio | Texas | 78205 | United States |
| Salt Lake City | Utah | 84102 | United States |
| Middleton | Wisconsin | 53562 | United States |
| FG002 | Pregabalin | In the first stage, subjects were randomly assigned to receive Pregabalin 450 mg/day. Study was stopped after stage 1 by sponsor. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo | In the first stage, subjects were randomly assigned to receive placebo. Study was stopped after stage 1 by sponsor. |
| BG001 | DVS SR | In the first stage, subjects were randomly assigned to receive DVS SR 200 mg/day. Study was stopped after stage 1 by sponsor. |
| BG002 | Pregabalin | In the first stage, subjects were randomly assigned to receive Pregabalin 450 mg/day. Study was stopped after stage 1 by sponsor. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) | The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline on the NRS. The primary time point was the average pain score during the last data-analysis-interval of week 8. The baseline score was the average of the NRS scores across the last 7 days of the screening period (just prior to the start of the placebo run-in). The primary efficacy variable was the pain severity score measured on an 11 point NRS on which 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain. | The Modified Intent to Treat (MITT) population included all randomized subjects who had taken at least one dose of double-blind test article, who had a baseline primary efficacy evaluation, and who had at least one primary efficacy evaluation on double-blind therapy. | Posted | Jan 2010 | Mean | Standard Error | units on scale | Baseline and 8 weeks |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in the Treatment of Pain Associated With Fibromyalgia in Adult Female Outpatients | The efficacy variable was the change from baseline on the numeric rating scale (NRS). The time point was the average pain score during the last data-analysis-interval of week 8, data analysis interval. The baseline score was the average of the NRS scores across the last 7 days of the screening period (just prior to the start of the placebo run-in). The efficacy variable was the pain severity score measured on an 11 point NRS on which 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain. | All randomized subjects who had taken at least one dose of double-blind test article, had a baseline primary efficacy evaluation, and had at least one primary efficacy evaluation on double-blind therapy. Subjects who did not complete the study due to its discontinuation were excluded. | Posted | Jan 2010 | Mean | Standard Error | units on scale | Baseline and 8 weeks |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo | In the first stage, subjects were randomly assigned to receive placebo. Study was stopped after stage 1 by sponsor. | 0 | 40 | 25 | 40 | ||
| EG001 | DVS SR | In the first stage, subjects were randomly assigned to receive DVS SR 200 mg/day. Study was stopped after stage 1 by sponsor. | 0 | 42 | 25 | 42 | ||
| EG002 | Pregabalin | In the first stage, subjects were randomly assigned to receive Pregabalin 450 mg/day. Study was stopped after stage 1 by sponsor. | 1 | 43 | 32 | 43 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and spontaneous abortion | Reproductive system and breast disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eye disorders general | Eye disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dry mouth | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Fatigue | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Injury, poisoning and procedural complications general | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Metabolism and nutrition disorders general | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Migraine | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Somnolence | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Reproductive system and breast disorders general | Reproductive system and breast disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders general | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders general | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
The PIs agreed to allow the sponsor 60 days to review and require changes to presentations or publications but only to protect confidential information and intellectual property, and for the sponsor to file a patent application, as applicable. The PIs also agreed for data to be presented first as a joint, multi-center publication.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| U. S. Contact Center | Wyeth | clintrialresults@wyeth.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005356 | Fibromyalgia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009135 | Muscular Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
| D009468 | Neuromuscular Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000069583 | Pregabalin |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005680 | gamma-Aminobutyric Acid |
| D000613 | Aminobutyrates |
| D002087 | Butyrates |
| D000144 | Acids, Acyclic |
| D002264 | Carboxylic Acids |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D000596 | Amino Acids |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Adjusted mean |
| -0.28 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.33 |
| 0.77 |
| No |
| Superiority or Other |
In the first stage, subjects were randomly assigned to receive Pregabalin 450 mg/day. Study was stopped after stage 1 by sponsor. |
|
|
|