Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| U01DK074739 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The Evaluating Predictors & Interventions in Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction(SOD) study (EPISOD) is a randomized sham-controlled study of biliary and pancreatic sphincterotomy as treatment for patients with pain after cholecystectomy fitting the criteria for sphincter of Oddi dysfunction type III.
Clinical Trial Phase: Phase III
Study Sites Seven clinical centers in US
Study Period Planned enrollment period - 3 years
Planned duration of the study - 5 years
Study Population SOD III Patients
Primary Study Objective: To ascertain whether subjects with SOD III respond to sphincterotomy,
Secondary Study Objectives
To evaluate:
Study Design The EPISOD Trial is a parallel, randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled, multicenter Phase III clinical trial of endoscopic sphincterotomy as treatment for adults 18 to 65 years of age diagnosed with SOD III.
Sample Size A minimum of 214 subjects will be randomized using a 2:1 allocation in favor of sphincterotomy and will be followed for 12 months post-randomization.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.ERCP with sphincterotomy | Active Comparator | ERCP with sphincterotomy: cutting the biliary sphincter muscle (sphincterotomy) |
|
| 2.ERCP without sphincterotomy | Placebo Comparator | ERCP without cutting the biliary sphincter muscle (sphincterotomy) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERCP with sphincterotomy | Procedure | cutting the biliary sphincter muscle (sphincterotomy) |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Success | The primary outcome was a dichotomous (success/failure) variable. Success was defined as patients having a RAPID score of <6 days at months 9 and 12 post-procedure, without re-intervention and without use of prescription analgesics during months 10, 11 and 12 unless used for non-abdominal pain for no more than 14 days. The subject was considered a failure if the 12-month RAPID score was missing or collected outside the acceptable window. If the 9-month RAPID was missing, or outside of the window, then the 6-month value was used when available. | 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Patients With a Successful Primary Outcome, Out of Those With Abnormal Sphincter Manometry. | Successful outcome was defined using the primary outcome definition of success at 12 months post randomization. Abnormal sphincter manometry was determined as a basal pressure of more than 40mm Hg in both leads. | 1 year |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
9.Patients with SOD with depressive and/or anxiety disorders who receive psychopharmacologic treatment must be on stable medication dose for at least 6 weeks.
10.Access to a telephone. 11.Must be able to speak, read, and write English. 12.Signed and dated informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
Prior ERCP treatment.
Age < 18 or Age > 65.
Pregnancy: Women who are pregnant at the time of Screening* will be excluded from the study. (*Note: Women who become pregnant AFTER the Baseline Visit/ERCP will be allowed to remain in the study for telephone follow-up visits).
Prior gastric resection or surgery involving biliary diversion.
Prior diagnosis of acute pancreatitis (lipase >3 x ULN) including post-ERCP pancreatitis, or of chronic pancreatitis by radiological imaging, EUS 5 or more criteria, or Cambridge criteria moderate or more on ERCP.
Daily use of prescription analgesics over the previous month.
Abdominal discomfort every day for the past month at level of 3 or more on a scale of 1-10.
Presence of significant psychiatric disorders:
The total number of days in the previous 3 months that the subject has taken prescription analgesics due to episodes of abdominal pain is greater than the total number of days the subject had episodes of abdominal pain.
Any condition that, in the investigator's opinion, makes the subject unsuitable for study participation.
ERCP Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Joseph Romagnuolo, MD | Medical Universtiy of South Carolina | Principal Investigator |
| Martin Freeman, MD | University of Minnesota | Principal Investigator |
| Richard Kozarek, MD | Virginia Mason Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Evan Fogel, MD | Indiana University | Principal Investigator |
| Peter Cotton, MD | MUSC Digestive Disease Center | Study Chair |
| Paul Tarnasky, MD | Digestive Health Associates of Texas | Principal Investigator |
| Giuseppe Aliperti, MD | Midwest Therapeutic Endoscopy Consultants | Principal Investigator |
| Priya Jamidar, MD | Yale University | Principal Investigator |
| Jose Serrano | National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yale University | New Haven | Connecticut | 06510 | United States | ||
| Indiana University |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26165739 | Derived | Yaghoobi M, Pauls Q, Durkalski V, Romagnuolo J, Fogel EL, Tarnasky PR, Aliperti G, Freeman ML, Kozarek RA, Jamidar PA, Wilcox CM, Elta GH, Hawes RH, Wood-Williams A, Cotton PB. Incidence and predictors of post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction undergoing biliary or dual sphincterotomy: results from the EPISOD prospective multicenter randomized sham-controlled study. Endoscopy. 2015 Oct;47(10):884-90. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392418. Epub 2015 Jul 10. | |
| 24867013 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Subjects were recruited from medical clinics in 6 gastroenterology referral centers in USA between August 6 2008 and March 23 2012.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | 1.ERCP With Sphincterotomy | Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography (ERCP) with biliary and/or pancreatic sphincterotomy |
| FG001 | 2. ERCP Without Sphincterotomy: | Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography (ERCP) without biliary and/or pancreatic sphincterotomy |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | 1. ERCP With Sphincterotomy | Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography (ERCP) with sphincter manometry and biliary and/or pancreatic sphincterotomy and pancreatic stenting |
| BG001 | 2. ERCP Without Sphincterotomy |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With Success | The primary outcome was a dichotomous (success/failure) variable. Success was defined as patients having a RAPID score of <6 days at months 9 and 12 post-procedure, without re-intervention and without use of prescription analgesics during months 10, 11 and 12 unless used for non-abdominal pain for no more than 14 days. The subject was considered a failure if the 12-month RAPID score was missing or collected outside the acceptable window. If the 9-month RAPID was missing, or outside of the window, then the 6-month value was used when available. | The primary analysis was conducted with the intention-to-treat population defined as all randomized patients. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of paricipants with success | 1 year |
|
One year after randomization
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | 1.ERCP With Sphincterotomy | ERCP with sphincterotomy: cutting the biliary sphincter muscle (sphincterotomy) |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pancreatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr Peter Cotton | Medical University of South Carolina | 8438767217 | cottonp@musc.edu |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D046628 | Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction |
| D010195 | Pancreatitis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001657 | Biliary Dyskinesia |
| D003137 | Common Bile Duct Diseases |
| D001649 | Bile Duct Diseases |
| D001660 | Biliary Tract Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002760 | Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde |
| D000074432 | Sphincterotomy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002758 | Cholangiography |
| D011860 | Radiography, Abdominal |
| D011859 | Radiography |
| D003952 | Diagnostic Imaging |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ERCP without sphincterotomy | Procedure | ERCP with sphincter manometry, but no sphincterotomy |
|
| Indianapolis |
| Indiana |
| 46202 |
| United States |
| University of Minnesota | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55415 | United States |
| Midwest Therapeutic Endoscopy Consultants | St Louis | Missouri | 63141 | United States |
| Medical University of South Carolina Digestive Disease Center | Charleston | South Carolina | 29425 | United States |
| Methodist Dallas Medical Center | Dallas | Texas | 75203 | United States |
| Virginia Mason Medical Center | Seattle | Washington | 98101 | United States |
| Cotton PB, Durkalski V, Romagnuolo J, Pauls Q, Fogel E, Tarnasky P, Aliperti G, Freeman M, Kozarek R, Jamidar P, Wilcox M, Serrano J, Brawman-Mintzer O, Elta G, Mauldin P, Thornhill A, Hawes R, Wood-Williams A, Orrell K, Drossman D, Robuck P. Effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy for suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction on pain-related disability following cholecystectomy: the EPISOD randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014 May;311(20):2101-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.5220. |
| 24472759 | Derived | Romagnuolo J, Cotton PB, Durkalski V, Pauls Q, Brawman-Mintzer O, Drossman DA, Mauldin P, Orrell K, Williams AW, Fogel EL, Tarnasky PR, Aliperti G, Freeman ML, Kozarek RA, Jamidar PA, Wilcox CM, Serrano J, Elta GH. Can patient and pain characteristics predict manometric sphincter of Oddi dysfunction in patients with clinically suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction? Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 May;79(5):765-72. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.11.037. Epub 2014 Jan 25. |
| 21034899 | Derived | Cotton PB, Durkalski V, Orrell KB, Brawman-Mintzer O, Drossman DA, Wilcox CM, Mauldin PD, Elta GH, Tarnasky PR, Fogel EL, Jagganath SB, Kozarek RA, Freeman ML, Romagnuolo J, Robuck PR. Challenges in planning and initiating a randomized clinical study of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Nov;72(5):986-91. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.022. |
Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography(ERCP) with sphincter manometry and pancreatic stenting, but without sphincterotomy
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| OG001 | 2. ERCP Without Sphincterotomy | ERCP without sphincterotomy: ERCP with sphincter manometry, but no sphincterotomy |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With a Successful Primary Outcome, Out of Those With Abnormal Sphincter Manometry. | Successful outcome was defined using the primary outcome definition of success at 12 months post randomization. Abnormal sphincter manometry was determined as a basal pressure of more than 40mm Hg in both leads. | Participants with abnormal sphincter manometry | Posted | Number | percentage of participants with success | 1 year |
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
| 141 |
| 0 |
| 141 |
| EG001 | 2. ERCP Without Sphincterotomy | ERCP without sphincterotomy: ERCP with sphincter manometry, but no sphincterotomy | 12 | 73 | 0 | 73 |
| Perforation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D004066 |
| Digestive System Diseases |
| D010182 | Pancreatic Diseases |
| D019937 |
| Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
| D003938 | Diagnostic Techniques, Digestive System |
| D016145 | Endoscopy, Digestive System |
| D004724 | Endoscopy |
| D003949 | Diagnostic Techniques, Surgical |
| D013505 | Digestive System Surgical Procedures |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D019060 | Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures |
| D000074433 | Myotomy |