Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, 8-week, clinical trial is designed to assess the efficacy and safety of vilazodone and to evaluate genetic biomarkers of treatment response associated with vilazodone use in adult patients diagnosed with MDD by the DSM-IV-TR criteria.
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, 8-week, clinical trial is designed to assess the efficacy and safety of vilazodone and to evaluate genetic biomarkers of treatment response associated with vilazodone use in adult patients diagnosed with MDD by the DSM-IV-TR criteria. This study will enroll approximately 470 patients at approximately 10 clinical sites. Safety and efficacy will be assessed at each visit. A DNA sample will be collected and analyzed for response to vilazodone.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | vilazodone |
|
| 2 | Placebo Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| vilazodone | Drug | titration to 40 mg tablets qd (once a day) for 8 weeks |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) Total Score. | The MADRS is an observer rating scale that has proven to be an efficient and practical measure of depression. The scale was constructed to be sensitive to treatment effects. The change from baseline in MADRS total score has a possible range of -60 to 60 where negative values reflect improvement in depression symptom severity. The method of last observation carried forward was utilized for subjects who discontinued prematurely. | Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the HAM-D 17 (17-Item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression) Total Score | The HAM-D 17 is a 17-item subscale of the HAM-D 21, which is designed to be completed by a trained rater. It is designed for rating depressive symptom severity in patients with a confirmed diagnosis of depressive disorder. The change in HAM-D 17 has a possible range of -52 to 52 with negative values indicating improvment in depression symptom severity. The method of last observation carried forward was utilized for subjects who discontinued prematurely. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with a current (or within 6 months prior to the Screening Visit) Axis I disorder of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Eating Disorder, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.
Patients with a history of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or bipolar I or II disorder (with a history of hypomanic or manic episodes).
Patients who meet DSM-IV-TR criteria for substance abuse (alcohol or drugs) within 3 months prior to the Screening Visit or substance dependence within 6 months prior to the Screening Visit.
Patients who meet criteria for any of the following DSM-IV-TR MDD Specifiers: [a] With Catatonic Features; [b] With Postpartum Onset; [c] With Seasonal Pattern [d]severe with Psychotic Features.
Patients who are receiving formal psychotherapy or have had psychotherapy within the 12 weeks prior to the Screening Visit.
Patients who have any one of the following:
Patients who have had an inadequate response to at least 2 consecutive antidepressants from different classes given at adequate doses for an adequate duration.
Patients who have received electroconvulsive therapy within the 6 months prior to the Screening Visit.
Patients currently taking a psychotropic drug. Patients who have taken psychotropic drugs must have discontinued these prior to the Screening Visit. The minimum discontinuation periods are outlined in the study protocol.
Patients taking migraine medications with a serotonergic mechanism of action
Patients taking CYP3A4 inhibitors such as grapefruit juice, ketoconazole, diltiazem, and macrolide antibiotics or montelukast
Patients with known hypersensitivity to SSRIs (selective serotonin reyptake inhibitors) or 5-HT1a agonists.
Patients previously treated with vilazodone (also known as SB-659746-A or EMD 68 843).
Patients with a history of clinically significant cardiac, renal, neurologic, cerebrovascular, hepatic, hematologic, metabolic or pulmonary disorders.
Patients with any serious medical disorder or condition that would, in the investigator's opinion, preclude the administration of study medication.
Female patients must not be pregnant, lactating, or planning to become pregnant during the time of study participation. All female patients must be at least 1 year post menopausal or irreversibly surgically sterilized (by hysterectomy, oophorectomy, or bilateral tubal ligation with resection) or determined not to be at risk of pregnancy.
Patients with clinically significant abnormalities on electrocardiogram.
Patients having clinically significant abnormal laboratory findings.
Patients with a positive drug screen.
Patients who, in the opinion of the investigator, would be noncompliant with the visit schedule or study procedures.
Patients that have taken an investigational drug or participated in an investigational drug trial within the past 30 days.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Carol R Reed, MD | Forest Laboratories | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology Research Institute | Newport Beach | California | 92660 | United States | ||
| Florida Clinical Research Center |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29608461 | Derived | Kornstein S, Chang CT, Gommoll CP, Edwards J. Vilazodone efficacy in subgroups of patients with major depressive disorder: a post-hoc analysis of four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018 Jul;33(4):217-223. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000217. | |
| 24940525 | Derived |
Not provided
Not provided
This study included a washout period to allow patients to discontinue their current antidepressant medications and any additional medications prohibited by the protocol, if applicable.
Recruitment period was 31Mar2008 to 10Feb2009.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Vilazodone | Vilazodone titrated to 40mg. Two tablets per day. |
| FG001 | Placebo | Placebo to match vilazodone. Two tablets per day. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| placebo | Drug | placebo |
|
| Baseline, week 1, week 2, week 4, week 6, week 8 |
| The CGI-I (Clinician's Global Impression of Improvement) Score at Week 8 | The CGI-I scale measures change from the baseline state at every visit after the baseline visit. It permits a global evaluation of the patient's improvement over time. At the scheduled clinic visits, the clinician assessed the patient's improvement relative to the symptoms at baseline on a CGI-I item using a 7-point scale, where 1 = very much improved and 7 = very much worse. The method of last observation carried forward was utilized for subjects who discontinued prematurely. | Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8 |
| Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the HAM-A ( Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale) Total Score | The HAM-A is a rating scale developed to quantify the severity of anxiety. It consists of 14 items, each defined by a series of symptoms. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 (not present) to 4 (severe). Change from baseline in the HAM-A total score may range from -52 to 52 with negative value indicating improvement in anxiety symptom severity. The method of last observation carried forward was utilized for subjects who discontinued prematurely. | Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8 |
| MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) Response Rate at Week 8 | MADRS response was defined as ≥ 50% decrease from baseline in MADRS total score at Week 8. The response rate is the percentage of subjects in each treatment group meeting the criteria for response. The method of last observation carrier forward was utilized for subjects who discontinued prematurely. | Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8 |
| MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) Remission Rate at Week 8 | MADRS remission was defined as a MADRS total score < 10 at Week 8. The remission rate is the percentage of subjects in each treatment group who met the criteria for remission. The method of last observation carried forward was utilized for subjects who discontinued prematurely. | Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8 |
| Bradenton |
| Florida |
| 34208 |
| United States |
| Atlanta Institute of Medicine and Research | Atlanta | Georgia | 30328 | United States |
| Summit Research Network | Portland | Oregon | 97210 | United States |
| University of Pennsylvania Department of Psychiatry Mood and Anxiety Disorders | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104 | United States |
| Mood Disorders Research Program and Clinic Exchange Park | Dallas | Texas | 75235 | United States |
| University of Utah Health Sciences Ctr, Dept of Psychiatry Mood Disorders Clinic | Salt Lake City | Utah | 84132 | United States |
| Northwest Clinical Research Center | Bellevue | Washington | 98004 | United States |
| Summit Research Network | Seattle | Washington | 98104 | United States |
| Culpepper L, Mathews M, Ghori R, Edwards J. Clinical relevance of vilazodone treatment in patients with major depressive disorder: categorical improvement in symptoms. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2014;16(1):PCC.13m01571. doi: 10.4088/PCC.13m01571. Epub 2014 Jan 30. |
| 24127687 | Derived | Jain R, Chen D, Edwards J, Mathews M. Early and sustained improvement with vilazodone in adult patients with major depressive disorder: post hoc analyses of two phase III trials. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Feb;30(2):263-70. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.855188. Epub 2013 Oct 31. |
| 23216998 | Derived | Clayton AH, Kennedy SH, Edwards JB, Gallipoli S, Reed CR. The effect of vilazodone on sexual function during the treatment of major depressive disorder. J Sex Med. 2013 Oct;10(10):2465-76. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12004. Epub 2012 Dec 6. |
| 22106941 | Derived | Reed CR, Kajdasz DK, Whalen H, Athanasiou MC, Gallipoli S, Thase ME. The efficacy profile of vilazodone, a novel antidepressant for the treatment of major depressive disorder. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Jan;28(1):27-39. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.628303. Epub 2011 Nov 23. |
| 21527122 | Derived | Khan A, Cutler AJ, Kajdasz DK, Gallipoli S, Athanasiou M, Robinson DS, Whalen H, Reed CR. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week study of vilazodone, a serotonergic agent for the treatment of major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;72(4):441-7. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10m06596. |
| Intent to Treat Population |
|
| Safety Population |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Vilazodone (ITT Population) | Vilazodone, 40 mg |
| BG001 | Placebo (ITT Population) | placebo to match vilazodone |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) Total Score. | The MADRS is an observer rating scale that has proven to be an efficient and practical measure of depression. The scale was constructed to be sensitive to treatment effects. The change from baseline in MADRS total score has a possible range of -60 to 60 where negative values reflect improvement in depression symptom severity. The method of last observation carried forward was utilized for subjects who discontinued prematurely. | Intent-to-Treat (ITT): the ITT population consisted of patients who were randomized, took at least 1 dose of study drug, and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy endpoint measurement. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Units on a scale | Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the HAM-D 17 (17-Item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression) Total Score | The HAM-D 17 is a 17-item subscale of the HAM-D 21, which is designed to be completed by a trained rater. It is designed for rating depressive symptom severity in patients with a confirmed diagnosis of depressive disorder. The change in HAM-D 17 has a possible range of -52 to 52 with negative values indicating improvment in depression symptom severity. The method of last observation carried forward was utilized for subjects who discontinued prematurely. | Intent-to-Treat (ITT): the ITT population consisted of patients who were randomized, took at least 1 dose of study drug, and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy endpoint measurement. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Units on a scale | Baseline, week 1, week 2, week 4, week 6, week 8 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | The CGI-I (Clinician's Global Impression of Improvement) Score at Week 8 | The CGI-I scale measures change from the baseline state at every visit after the baseline visit. It permits a global evaluation of the patient's improvement over time. At the scheduled clinic visits, the clinician assessed the patient's improvement relative to the symptoms at baseline on a CGI-I item using a 7-point scale, where 1 = very much improved and 7 = very much worse. The method of last observation carried forward was utilized for subjects who discontinued prematurely. | Intent-to-Treat (ITT): the ITT population consisted of patients who were randomized, took at least 1 dose of study drug, and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy endpoint measurement. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Units on a scale | Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the HAM-A ( Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale) Total Score | The HAM-A is a rating scale developed to quantify the severity of anxiety. It consists of 14 items, each defined by a series of symptoms. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 (not present) to 4 (severe). Change from baseline in the HAM-A total score may range from -52 to 52 with negative value indicating improvement in anxiety symptom severity. The method of last observation carried forward was utilized for subjects who discontinued prematurely. | Intent-to-Treat (ITT): the ITT population consisted of patients who were randomized, took at least 1 dose of study drug, and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy endpoint measurement. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Units on a scale | Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) Response Rate at Week 8 | MADRS response was defined as ≥ 50% decrease from baseline in MADRS total score at Week 8. The response rate is the percentage of subjects in each treatment group meeting the criteria for response. The method of last observation carrier forward was utilized for subjects who discontinued prematurely. | Intent-to-Treat (ITT): the ITT population consisted of patients who were randomized, took at least 1 dose of study drug, and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy endpoint measurement. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) Remission Rate at Week 8 | MADRS remission was defined as a MADRS total score < 10 at Week 8. The remission rate is the percentage of subjects in each treatment group who met the criteria for remission. The method of last observation carried forward was utilized for subjects who discontinued prematurely. | Intent-to-Treat (ITT): the ITT population consisted of patients who were randomized, took at least 1 dose of study drug, and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy endpoint measurement. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8 |
|
|
8 weeks
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Vilazodone (Safety Population) | Vilazodone, 40mg | 4 | 235 | 148 | 235 | ||
| EG001 | Placebo (Safety Population) | placebo to match vilazodone | 2 | 233 | 85 | 233 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angina pectoris | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (11.1) | Systematic Assessment | This subject also had the SAE of carotid arteriosclerosis. |
|
| Ankle fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (11.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthma | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (11.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Carotid arteriosclerosis | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (11.1) | Systematic Assessment | This subject also had the SAE of angina pectoris |
|
| Chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA (11.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholecystitis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (11.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (11.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abnormal Dreams | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (11.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (11.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (11.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dry Mouth | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (11.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (11.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (11.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (11.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper Respiratory Infections | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (11.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (11.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
The investigators have the right to publish or permit the publication of any information or material relating to or arising out of this protocol after prior submission to PGxHealth provided that, if PGxHealth requests, the investigator will delay publication for a maximum of six months to enable PGxHealth to protect their rights in such information or material.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Director of Medical Affairs | PGxHealth, LLC | 203-786-3400 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003865 | Depressive Disorder, Major |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003866 | Depressive Disorder |
| D019964 | Mood Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000069503 | Vilazodone Hydrochloride |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010879 | Piperazines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D001572 | Benzofurans |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D007211 | Indoles |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|