Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to assess long-term ocular safety of fluticasone furoate nasal spray in adult and adolescent subjects diagnosed with perennial allergic rhinitis.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| vehicle placebo nasal spray | Placebo Comparator |
| |
| fluticasone furoate nasal spray | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| fluticasone furoate nasal spray | Drug | fluticasone furoate nasal spray |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cumulative Proportion (CU) of Participants (Par.) With an Event, as Measured as a Percentage, for Posterior Subcapsular Opacity (P) | An event for P (opacity in the lens positioned just anterior to the posterior lens capsule and characterized by the posterior migration of lens epithelial cells from the lens bow) is defined as an increase of >=0.3 from baseline in Lens Opacities Classification System, Version III (LOCS III; system used for the grading and comparison of cataract severity and type based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for P (range=0.1 [lens clear] to 5.9 [lens unclear]), in either eye. Data represent the Kaplan-Meier estimate for the CU of par. with an event of P based on a lifetest table. | Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 52, 64, 76, 88, and 104 |
| Cumulative Proportion of Participants, as Measured as a Percentage, With an Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Event | An event for IOP is defined as an increase of 7 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) or greater from baseline in IOP, in either eye, using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry (GAT). GAT is a commonly used method of determining approximate intraocular pressure. The data below represent the Kaplan-Meier estimate for the cumulative proportion of participants with an IOP event based on a lifetest table. | Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 52, 64, 76, 88, and 104 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity at Week 52 and Week 104 | An event for P (opacity in the lens positioned just anterior to the posterior lens capsule and characterized by the posterior migration of lens epithelial cells from the lens bow) is defined as an increase of >=0.3 from baseline in LOCS III (system used for the grading and comparison of cataract severity and type based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for P (range=0.1 [lens clear] to 5.9 [lens unclear]), in either eye. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 and Week 104 value. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Subjects eligible for enrollment in the study must meet all of the following criteria:
- Informed consent
Subject has provided an appropriately signed and dated informed consent. An appropriately signed and dated assent must be obtained from the parents or guardian if the subject is a child under 18 years of age.
Subject is treatable on an outpatient basis.
12 years of age and older at Visit 2
To be eligible for entry into the study, females of childbearing potential must commit to the consistent and correct use of an acceptable method of birth control, as defined by the following:
Abstinence Females of childbearing potential who are not sexually active must commit to complete abstinence from intercourse for two weeks before exposure to the study drug, throughout the clinical trial, and for a period after the trial to account for elimination of the drug (minimum of six days).
Oral contraceptive (either combined estrogen/progestin or progestin only)
Injectable progestogen
Implants of levonorgestrel
Percutaneous contraceptive patches
Intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS) with a documented failure rate of less than 1% per year,
Male partner who is sterile (vasectomy with documentation of azoospermia) prior to the female subject's entry into the study and is the sole sexual partner for that female subject, or
Double barrier method-condom or occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical /vault caps) plus Spermicide,
Estrogenic vaginal ring. A urine pregnancy test will be done at the screening visit to confirm females of childbearing potential are not pregnant upon entry into the study. In addition, urine pregnancy tests will be done for all females of childbearing potential at each clinic visit.
A positive skin test (by prick method) response to appropriate perennial allergen (house dust mites, animal dander, mold, or cockroach) within last 12 months prior to Visit 1 or at Visit 1.
A positive skin test is defined as a wheal ³3mm larger than the diluent control for prick testing.
•Two year medical history and past treatment of PAR (written or verbal confirmation) which includes perennial, i.e., year-round, symptoms. PAR symptoms could include nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, nasal itching and sneezing.
In vitro tests for specific IgE (such as RAST, PRIST) will not be allowed for the diagnosis of PAR.
NOTE: Subjects who meet the above criteria and who also may have seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) and/or perennial non-allergic rhinitis (PNAR) are eligible for randomization.
Environment
•Subject must be symptomatic to appropriate perennial allergen (animal dander, house dust mites, cockroach, mold) and willing to maintain, as much as possible, the same environment throughout the study.
Ability to comply with study procedures Subject understands and is willing, able and likely to comply with study procedures and restrictions.
Literate Subject must be able to read, comprehend, and record information in English
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects meeting any of the following criteria must not be enrolled in the study:
Significant concomitant medical conditions, defined as but not limited to:
NOTE: Subjects will be allowed to use short-acting inhaled beta2 agonists ONLY on an as needed basis.
Rhinitis medicamentosa
Bacterial or viral infection (e.g., common cold) of the eyes or upper respiratory tract within two weeks of Visit 1 or during the screening period
Documented evidence of acute or significant chronic sinusitis, as determined by the individual investigator
Current or history of glaucoma and/or ocular herpes simplex
Current cataract and/or previous history of cataract surgery
Physical impairment that would affect subject's ability to participate safely and fully in the study
Clinical evidence of a Candida infection of the nose
History of psychiatric disease, intellectual deficiency, poor motivation, substance abuse (including drug and alcohol) or other conditions that will limit the validity of informed consent or that would confound the interpretation of the study results
History of adrenal insufficiency
History of Hepatitis B or C
Intranasal corticosteroid within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 (e.g., VERAMYST, FLONASE™, Nasonex, Rhinocort).
Inhaled, oral, intramuscular, intravenous, ocular, and/or topical corticosteroids (with the exception of topical hydrocortisone, 1% or less, or equivalent) within 8 weeks prior to Visit 1.
Intranasal or ocular cromolyn within 14 days prior to Visit 1 (e.g., Nasalcrom, Crolom)
Short-acting prescription and non-prescription antihistamines, including ocular preparations and antihistamines contained in insomnia and "night time" pain formulations, within 3 days prior to Visit 1 (e.g., Benadryl, Chlortrimeton, Dimetane, Tavist)
Long-acting antihistamines within 10 days prior to Visit 1 (e.g., Allegra, Claritin, Clarinex, Zyrtec).
Intranasal antihistamines (e.g., Astelin) within 2 weeks prior to Visit 1
Oral or intranasal decongestants within 3 days prior to Visit 1 (e.g., Sudafed)
Long-acting beta-agonists within 3 days prior to Visit 1 (e.g., SEREVENT™, Foradil)
Intranasal, oral, or inhaled anticholinergics within 3 days prior to Visit 1 (e.g., Atrovent)
Oral antileukotrienes within 3 days of Visit 1 (e.g., Singulair)
Subcutaneous omalizumab (Xolair) within 5 months of Visit 1
Use of other medications that may affect allergic rhinitis or its symptoms
Chronic use of concomitant medications, such as tricyclic antidepressants, that would affect assessment of the effectiveness of the study drug
Use of other intranasally administered medications (e.g., Miacalcin)
Known hypersensitivity to corticosteroids or any excipients
Has recent exposure to an investigational study drug within 30 days of Visit 1
Participation in a previous or current FFNS (GW685698X) clinical study
Has a positive or inconclusive pregnancy test at Visit 1 or Visit 2
Subject is a participating investigator, sub-investigator, study co-ordinator, or employee of a participating investigator, or is an immediate family member of the aforementioned.
Subject currently uses smoking products including cigarettes, cigars, and pipe or chewing tobacco, or has used these products in the last 6 months
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| GSK Clinical Trials | GlaxoSmithKline | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Investigational Site | Oxford | Alabama | 36203 | United States | ||
| GSK Investigational Site |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23806459 | Background | LaForce C, Journeay GE, Miller SD, Silvey MJ, Wu W, Lee LA, Chylack LT Jr. Ocular safety of fluticasone furoate nasal spray in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis: a 2-year study. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013 Jul;111(1):45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 May 12. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Researchers can use this site to request access to anonymised patient level data and/or supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct further research. | View source |
| ID | Type | URL | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| FFR110537 | Annotated Case Report Form | View IPD |
Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo | The matching placebo nasal spray containing only fluticasone furoate (FF) vehicle was self-administered as two sprays per nostril each morning once daily (QD) for 104 weeks. |
| FG001 | FF 110 mcg QD |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| vehicle placebo nasal spray |
| Drug |
placebo |
|
| Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104 |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | An event for P is defined as an increase of >=0.3 from baseline in LOCS III (classification system based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for P (range=0.1 [lens clear] to 5.9 [lens unclear]), in either eye. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 and Week 104 value. | Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104 |
| Change From Baseline in LOCS III Cortical Opacity (C) at Week 52 and Week 104 | An event for C (an opacity starting at the outer edge of the lens and progressing toward the center) is defined as an increase of >=0.3 from baseline in LOCS III (system used for the grading and comparison of cataract severity and type based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for C (range=0.1 [lens clear] to 5.9 [lens unclear]), in either eye. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 and Week 104 value. | Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104 |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104 | An event for C (an opacity starting at the outer edge of the lens and progressing toward the center) is defined as an increase of >=0.3 from baseline in LOCS III (system used for the grading and comparison of cataract severity and type based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for C (range=0.1 [lens clear] to 5.9 [lens unclear]), in either eye. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 and Week 104 value. | Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104 |
| Change From Baseline in LOCS III Nuclear Opacity (NO) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Nuclear opacity refers to the opacity in the central nucleus of the eye.The range for NO is 0.1 (no opacity) to 6.9 (maximum opacity). Change from baseline in NO was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 or Week 104 value. | Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104 |
| Change From Baseline in Nuclear Color (NC) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Nuclear color is associated with the force required to compress a lens to 75% of its original depth. The range for NC is 0.1 (no opacity) to 6.9 (maximum opacity). Change from baseline in NC was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 or Week 104 value. | Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104 |
| Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Weeks 52 and 104 | An event for IOP is defined as an increase of 7 mm Hg or greater from baseline in IOP, in either eye, using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. Participants without post-baseline ophthalmic exam data were censored at the randomization date. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 or Week 104 value. | Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104 |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | An event for IOP is defined as an increase of 7 mm Hg or greater from baseline in IOP, in either eye, using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. Participants without post-baseline ophthalmic exam data were censored at the randomization date. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 value. | Baseline and Week 52 |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | An event for IOP is defined as an increase of 7 mm Hg or greater from baseline in IOP, in either eye, using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. Participants without post-baseline ophthalmic exam data were censored at the randomization date. Change from baseline in IOP was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 104 value. | Baseline and Week 104 |
| Change From Baseline in Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) Visual Acuity (VA) Using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Charts at Week 52 and Week 104 | ETDRS charts are used to measure VA (the ability to resolve fine image details). Participants must have had a best-corrected distance VA of =< 0.18 on the LogMAR scale using ETDRS charts in both eyes measured separately. The LogMAR scale (expressed as the [decadic] logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [range from +1.00 to -0.30]) converts the geometric sequence of a traditional chart to a linear scale. It measures VA loss; positive values indicate vision loss, whereas negative values denote normal or better VA. A lower LogMAR value indicates better VA. | Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104 |
| Percent Change From Baseline in the Funduscopic Horizontal Cup-to-disc Ratio at Week 104 | The funduscopic horizontal cup-to-risk ratio assesses the progression of glaucoma. Percent change from baseline in funduscopic horizontal cup-to-disc ratio at Week 104 was calculated by substracting the baseline value from the Week 104 value (both expressed as a percent). The cup-to-disc ratio compares the diameter of the "cup" portion of the optic disc with the total diameter of the optic disc. A large cup-to-disc ratio may imply glaucoma or other pathology. | Baseline and Week 104 |
| Change From Baseline in the Daily Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) for the Indicated Study Periods | rTNSS was evaluated on a 4-point categorical scale (sum of the scores for rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing; range=0-12). The data collected were used as a measure for treatment compliance. The scores on the scale were based on the severity of each nasal symptom: 0=none (symptom is not present); 1=mild (sign/symptom is clearly present but minimal awareness; easily tolerated); 2=moderate (definite awareness of sign/symptom that is bothersome but tolerable); 3=severe (sign/symptom is hard to tolerate; causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping). | Baseline, Weeks 1 to 26, Weeks 27 to 52, Weeks 53 to 78, and Weeks 79 to 104 |
| Little Rock |
| Arkansas |
| 72205 |
| United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Fresno | California | 93720 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Huntington Beach | California | 92647 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Los Angeles | California | 90025 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Mission Viejo | California | 92691 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Rolling Hills Estates | California | 90274 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Roseville | California | 95678 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Sacramento | California | 95823 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | San Diego | California | 92120 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | San Diego | California | 92123 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | San Jose | California | 95117 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Stockton | California | 95207 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Vista | California | 92083 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Walnut Creek | California | 94598 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Colorado Springs | Colorado | 80907 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Denver | Colorado | 80230 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Englewood | Colorado | 80112 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Wheat Ridge | Colorado | 80033 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Tallahassee | Florida | 32308 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Conyers | Georgia | 30013 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Gainesville | Georgia | 30501 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Lawrenceville | Georgia | 30045 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Stockbridge | Georgia | 30281 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Indianapolis | Indiana | 46208 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | South Bend | Indiana | 46617 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bethesda | Maryland | 20814 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | North Dartmouth | Massachusetts | 02747 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55402 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | St Louis | Missouri | 63141 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bozeman | Montana | 59718 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bellevue | Nebraska | 68123-4303 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Omaha | Nebraska | 68130 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Omaha | Nebraska | 68131 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Ocean City | New Jersey | 07712 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Skillman | New Jersey | 08558 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Asheville | North Carolina | 28801 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Raleigh | North Carolina | 27607 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Canton | Ohio | 44718 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45231 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Sylvania | Ohio | 43560 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | 73104 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | 73120 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Eugene | Oregon | 97401 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Portland | Oregon | 97213 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Summerville | South Carolina | 29485 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Austin | Texas | 78750 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Dallas | Texas | 75230 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Dallas | Texas | 75231-4307 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | El Paso | Texas | 79903 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Kerrville | Texas | 78028 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | San Antonio | Texas | 78229 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Waco | Texas | 76712 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | South Burlington | Vermont | 05403 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Spokane | Washington | 99204 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Greenfield | Wisconsin | 53228 | United States |
For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| FFR110537 | Individual Participant Data Set | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| FFR110537 | Informed Consent Form | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| FFR110537 | Statistical Analysis Plan | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| FFR110537 | Clinical Study Report | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| FFR110537 | Study Protocol | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| FFR110537 | Dataset Specification | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
FF nasal spray aqueous suspension contained 0.05% micronized FF. Each spray contained approximately 27.5 micrograms (mcg) of FF; participants self-administered two sprays per nostril each morning QD for a total dose of 110 mcg for 104 weeks.
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo | The matching placebo nasal spray containing only fluticasone furoate (FF) vehicle was self-administered as two sprays per nostril each morning once daily (QD) for 104 weeks. |
| BG001 | FF 110 mcg QD | FF nasal spray aqueous suspension contained 0.05% micronized FF. Each spray contained approximately 27.5 micrograms (mcg) of FF; participants self-administered two sprays per nostril each morning QD for a total dose of 110 mcg for 104 weeks. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Baseline Characteristics were collected in members of the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population, comprised of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of double-blind study drug. One participant in the placebo group and one participant in the FF 110 mcg QD group did not receive any study drug and were thus not included in the ITT Population. | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years |
| ||||||||||||||
| Gender | Baseline Characteristics were collected in members of the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population, comprised of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of double-blind study drug. One participant in the placebo group and one participant in the FF 110 mcg QD group did not receive any study drug and were thus not included in the ITT Population. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Baseline Characteristics were collected in members of the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population, comprised of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of double-blind study drug. One participant in the placebo group and one participant in the FF 110 mcg QD group did not receive any study drug and were thus not included in the ITT Population. | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Cumulative Proportion (CU) of Participants (Par.) With an Event, as Measured as a Percentage, for Posterior Subcapsular Opacity (P) | An event for P (opacity in the lens positioned just anterior to the posterior lens capsule and characterized by the posterior migration of lens epithelial cells from the lens bow) is defined as an increase of >=0.3 from baseline in Lens Opacities Classification System, Version III (LOCS III; system used for the grading and comparison of cataract severity and type based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for P (range=0.1 [lens clear] to 5.9 [lens unclear]), in either eye. Data represent the Kaplan-Meier estimate for the CU of par. with an event of P based on a lifetest table. | ITT Population. All participants (par.) with post-baseline ophthalmic examination data were included in the analysis for this endpoint. Par. without post-baseline ophthalmic exam data were censored at the randomization data. Par. who completed the study without an event for P or were discontinued for reasons other than an event for P were censored. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 52, 64, 76, 88, and 104 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Cumulative Proportion of Participants, as Measured as a Percentage, With an Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Event | An event for IOP is defined as an increase of 7 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) or greater from baseline in IOP, in either eye, using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry (GAT). GAT is a commonly used method of determining approximate intraocular pressure. The data below represent the Kaplan-Meier estimate for the cumulative proportion of participants with an IOP event based on a lifetest table. | ITT Population. All participants with post-baseline ophthalmic examination data were included in the analysis for this endpoint. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 52, 64, 76, 88, and 104 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity at Week 52 and Week 104 | An event for P (opacity in the lens positioned just anterior to the posterior lens capsule and characterized by the posterior migration of lens epithelial cells from the lens bow) is defined as an increase of >=0.3 from baseline in LOCS III (system used for the grading and comparison of cataract severity and type based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for P (range=0.1 [lens clear] to 5.9 [lens unclear]), in either eye. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 and Week 104 value. | ITT Population. The number analyzed reflects those participants remaining in the study and contributing data at the indicated time points. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | An event for P is defined as an increase of >=0.3 from baseline in LOCS III (classification system based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for P (range=0.1 [lens clear] to 5.9 [lens unclear]), in either eye. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 and Week 104 value. | ITT Population. The number analyzed reflects those participants remaining in the study and contributing data at the indicated time points. | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in LOCS III Cortical Opacity (C) at Week 52 and Week 104 | An event for C (an opacity starting at the outer edge of the lens and progressing toward the center) is defined as an increase of >=0.3 from baseline in LOCS III (system used for the grading and comparison of cataract severity and type based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for C (range=0.1 [lens clear] to 5.9 [lens unclear]), in either eye. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 and Week 104 value. | ITT Population. The number analyzed reflects those participants remaining in the study and contributing data at the indicated time points. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104 | An event for C (an opacity starting at the outer edge of the lens and progressing toward the center) is defined as an increase of >=0.3 from baseline in LOCS III (system used for the grading and comparison of cataract severity and type based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for C (range=0.1 [lens clear] to 5.9 [lens unclear]), in either eye. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 and Week 104 value. | ITT Population. The number analyzed reflects those participants remaining in the study and contributing data at the indicated time points. | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in LOCS III Nuclear Opacity (NO) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Nuclear opacity refers to the opacity in the central nucleus of the eye.The range for NO is 0.1 (no opacity) to 6.9 (maximum opacity). Change from baseline in NO was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 or Week 104 value. | ITT Population. The number analyzed reflects those participants remaining in the study and contributing data at the indicated time points. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Nuclear Color (NC) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Nuclear color is associated with the force required to compress a lens to 75% of its original depth. The range for NC is 0.1 (no opacity) to 6.9 (maximum opacity). Change from baseline in NC was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 or Week 104 value. | ITT Population. The number analyzed reflects those participants remaining in the study and contributing data at the indicated time points. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Weeks 52 and 104 | An event for IOP is defined as an increase of 7 mm Hg or greater from baseline in IOP, in either eye, using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. Participants without post-baseline ophthalmic exam data were censored at the randomization date. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 or Week 104 value. | ITT Population. The number analyzed reflects those participants remaining in the study and contributing data at the indicated time points. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mm Hg | Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | An event for IOP is defined as an increase of 7 mm Hg or greater from baseline in IOP, in either eye, using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. Participants without post-baseline ophthalmic exam data were censored at the randomization date. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 value. | ITT Population. The number analyzed reflects those participants remaining in the study and contributing data at the indicated time points. | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline and Week 52 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | An event for IOP is defined as an increase of 7 mm Hg or greater from baseline in IOP, in either eye, using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. Participants without post-baseline ophthalmic exam data were censored at the randomization date. Change from baseline in IOP was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 104 value. | ITT Population. The number analyzed reflects those participants remaining in the study and contributing data at the indicated time points. | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline and Week 104 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) Visual Acuity (VA) Using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Charts at Week 52 and Week 104 | ETDRS charts are used to measure VA (the ability to resolve fine image details). Participants must have had a best-corrected distance VA of =< 0.18 on the LogMAR scale using ETDRS charts in both eyes measured separately. The LogMAR scale (expressed as the [decadic] logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [range from +1.00 to -0.30]) converts the geometric sequence of a traditional chart to a linear scale. It measures VA loss; positive values indicate vision loss, whereas negative values denote normal or better VA. A lower LogMAR value indicates better VA. | ITT Population. The number analyzed reflects those participants remaining in the study and contributing data at the indicated time points. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in the Funduscopic Horizontal Cup-to-disc Ratio at Week 104 | The funduscopic horizontal cup-to-risk ratio assesses the progression of glaucoma. Percent change from baseline in funduscopic horizontal cup-to-disc ratio at Week 104 was calculated by substracting the baseline value from the Week 104 value (both expressed as a percent). The cup-to-disc ratio compares the diameter of the "cup" portion of the optic disc with the total diameter of the optic disc. A large cup-to-disc ratio may imply glaucoma or other pathology. | ITT Population. The number analyzed reflects those participants remaining in the study and contributing data at the indicated time points. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percent change | Baseline and Week 104 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Daily Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) for the Indicated Study Periods | rTNSS was evaluated on a 4-point categorical scale (sum of the scores for rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing; range=0-12). The data collected were used as a measure for treatment compliance. The scores on the scale were based on the severity of each nasal symptom: 0=none (symptom is not present); 1=mild (sign/symptom is clearly present but minimal awareness; easily tolerated); 2=moderate (definite awareness of sign/symptom that is bothersome but tolerable); 3=severe (sign/symptom is hard to tolerate; causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping). | ITT Population | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | scores on a scale | Baseline, Weeks 1 to 26, Weeks 27 to 52, Weeks 53 to 78, and Weeks 79 to 104 |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo | The matching placebo nasal spray containing only fluticasone furoate (FF) vehicle was self-administered as two sprays per nostril each morning once daily (QD) for 104 weeks. | 7 | 181 | 97 | 181 | ||
| EG001 | FF 110 mcg QD | FF nasal spray aqueous suspension contained 0.05% micronized FF. Each spray contained approximately 27.5 micrograms (mcg) of FF; participants self-administered two sprays per nostril each morning QD for a total dose of 110 mcg for 104 weeks. | 12 | 367 | 232 | 367 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rib fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tibia fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper limb fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebral haemorrhage | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Convulsion | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Grand mal convulsion | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abortion spontaneous | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intra-uterine death | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchospasm | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper airway obstruction | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vitreous floaters | Eye disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholelithiasis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood pressure increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Uterine leiomyoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Suicide attempt | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nephrolithiasis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cystocele | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Deep vein thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epistaxis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Viral upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oropharyngeal pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasal ulcer | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasal septum ulceration | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Response Center | GlaxoSmithKline | 866-435-7343 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012221 | Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D065631 | Rhinitis, Allergic |
| D012220 | Rhinitis |
| D009668 | Nose Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D012130 | Respiratory Hypersensitivity |
| D010038 | Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases |
| D006969 | Hypersensitivity, Immediate |
| D006967 | Hypersensitivity |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| American Indian or Alaska Native |
|
| Central/South Asian Heritage |
|
| Japanese/East Asian/South East Asian Heritage |
|
| Mixed Asian Heritage |
|
| Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander |
|
| White |
|
| African American/African Heritage & White |
|
| Week 36 |
|
| Week 52 |
|
| Week 64 |
|
| Week 76 |
|
| Week 88 |
|
| Week 104 |
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|