Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Eli Lilly and Company | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study will compare the effects of 2.0 mg exenatide once weekly injection as monotherapy to 3 active comparators(metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, and thiazolidinedione) in drug naive patients with type 2 diabetes treated with diet and exercise.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exenatide Once Weekly | Experimental |
| |
| Metformin | Active Comparator |
| |
| Sitagliptin | Active Comparator |
| |
| Pioglitazone | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| exenatide once weekly | Drug | subcutaneous injection, 2mg, once weekly plus placebo oral once daily |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26 | Change in HbA1c from baseline to Week 26. | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=7% at Week 26 | Percentage of patients achieving HbA1c <=7% at Week 26 (for patients with baseline HbA1c >7%). | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Fasting Serum Glucose (FSG) From Baseline to Week 26 | Change in FSG from baseline to Week 26. | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26 | Change in Body Weight from baseline to Week 26. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Medical Officer, MD | Eli Lilly and Company | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Research Site | Buena Park | California | United States | |||
| Research Site |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32306296 | Derived | Guja C, Frias JP, Suchower L, Hardy E, Marr G, Sjostrom CD, Jabbour SA. Safety and Efficacy of Exenatide Once Weekly in Participants with Type 2 Diabetes and Stage 2/3 Chronic Kidney Disease. Diabetes Ther. 2020 Jul;11(7):1467-1480. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00815-z. Epub 2020 Apr 18. | |
| 23748507 | Derived | Malloy J, Meloni A, Han J. Efficacy and tolerability of exenatide once weekly versus sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective analysis of pooled clinical trial data. Postgrad Med. 2013 May;125(3):58-67. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2013.05.2661. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Exenatide Once Weekly | Exenatide once weekly (subcutaneous injection of 2 mg exenatide, once a week) + daily oral placebo |
| FG001 | Metformin | Metformin (1000 mg/day for 2 weeks, then 1500 mg/day for 2 weeks, then 2000 mg/day for 22 weeks) + weekly subcutaneous placebo injection |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| metformin | Drug | oral, 1000-2500mg, daily plus placebo once weekly subcutaneous injection |
|
| sitagliptin | Drug | oral, 100 mg, daily plus placebo once weekly subcutaneous injection |
|
| pioglitazone | Drug | oral, 30-45mg, daily plus placebo once weekly subcutaneous injection |
|
| Baseline, Week 26 |
| Change in Fasting Total Cholesterol (TC) From Baseline to Week 26 | Change in Fasting TC from baseline to Week 26. | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Change in Fasting High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) From Baseline to Week 26 | Change in Fasting HDL from baseline to Week 26. | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Ratio of Fasting Triglycerides at Week 26 to Baseline | Ratio of Fasting Triglycerides (measured in mmol/L) at Week 26 to baseline. Log(Post-baseline Triglycerides) - log(Baseline Triglycerides); change from baseline to Week 26 is presented as ratio of endpoint to baseline. | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-emergent Major Hypoglycemic Events | Major hypoglycemia is defined as any event that has symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia resulting in loss of consciousness or seizure that shows prompt recovery in response to administration of glucagon or glucose, or documented hypoglycemia (blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L [54 mg/dL]) requiring the assistance of another person because of severe impairment in consciousness or behavior (whether or not symptoms of hypoglycemia are detected by the patient). Mean event rate = total number of events for all subjects in a treatment regimen / the total number of subject years of exposure for all subjects in that treatment. Standard error = square root of (total number of events / (subject years of exposure)**2). | Baseline to Week 26 |
| Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-Emergent Minor Hypoglycemic Events | Minor hypoglycemia is defined as a sign or symptom associated with hypoglycemia that is either self-treated by the patient or resolves on its own AND has a concurrent finger stick blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) and not classified as major hypoglycemia. Mean event rate = total number of events for all subjects in a treatment regimen / the total number of subject years of exposure for all subjects in that treatment. Standard error = square root of (total number of events / (subject years of exposure)**2). | Baseline to Week 26 |
| Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 26. | Change in Systolic Blood Pressure from baseline to Week 26. | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 26. | Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure from baseline to Week 26. | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Los Angeles |
| California |
| United States |
| Research Site | Valencia | California | United States |
| Research Site | Jacksonville | Florida | United States |
| Research Site | Atlanta | Georgia | United States |
| Research Site | Meridian | Idaho | United States |
| Research Site | Des Moines | Iowa | United States |
| Research Site | Grand Rapids | Michigan | United States |
| Research Site | Minneapolis | Minnesota | United States |
| Research Site | Billings | Montana | United States |
| Research Site | Toms River | New Jersey | United States |
| Research Site | Wilmington | North Carolina | United States |
| Research Site | Danville | Pennsylvania | United States |
| Research Site | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | United States |
| Research Site | Wilke Barre | Pennsylvania | United States |
| Research Site | Austin | Texas | United States |
| Research Site | El Paso | Texas | United States |
| Research Site | New Branufels | Texas | United States |
| Research Site | Buenos Aires | Argentina |
| Research Site | Mar del Plata | Argentina |
| Research Site | Leuven | Belgium |
| Research Site | Marchovelette | Belgium |
| Research Site | Tessenderlo | Belgium |
| Research Site | Brasília | Brazil |
| Research Site | Campinas | Brazil |
| Research Site | Curitiba | Brazil |
| Research Site | Fortaleza | Brazil |
| Research Site | Joinville | Brazil |
| Research SIte | Porto Alegre | Brazil |
| Research Site | Recife | Brazil |
| Research Site | São Paulo | Brazil |
| Research Site | Coquitlam | British Columbia | Canada |
| Research Site | Penticton | British Columbia | Canada |
| Research Site | Ottawa | Ontario | Canada |
| Research Site | Gatineu | Quebec | Canada |
| Research Site | Mississauga | Canada |
| Research Site | Petitcodiac | Canada |
| Research Site | Pointe-Claire | Canada |
| Research Site | Regina | Canada |
| Research Site | Saint John | Canada |
| Research Site | Châteaugiron | France |
| Research Site | Mûrs-Erigné | France |
| Research Site | Nantes | France |
| Research Site | Vieux-Condé | France |
| Research Site | Dresden | Germany |
| Research Site | Mainz | Germany |
| Research Site | Münster | Germany |
| Research Site | Rodgau | Germany |
| Research Site | Budapest | Hungary |
| Research Site | Gyula | Hungary |
| Research Site | Hódmezővásárhely | Hungary |
| Research Site | Pécs | Hungary |
| Research Site | Ahmedabad | India |
| Research Site | Bangalore | India |
| Research Site | Channai | India |
| Research Site | Kochi | India |
| Research Site | Mumbai | India |
| Research Site | New Dehli | India |
| Research SIte | Pune | India |
| Research Site | Holon | Israel |
| Research SIte | Tel Litwinsky | Israel |
| Research Site | Florence | Italy |
| Research Site | Milan | Italy |
| Research Site | Siena | Italy |
| Research Site | Chihuahua City | Mexico |
| Research Site | Guadalajara | Mexico |
| Research Site | Monterrey | Mexico |
| Research Site | Lublin | Poland |
| Research Site | Szczecin | Poland |
| Research Site | Wroclaw | Poland |
| Research Site | Manati | Puerto Rico |
| Research Site | Toa Baja | Puerto Rico |
| Research Site | Galati | Romania |
| Research Site | Oradea | Romania |
| Research Site | Târgu Mureş | Romania |
| Research Site | Arkhangelsk | Russia |
| Research Site | Moscow | Russia |
| Research Site | Rostov-on-Don | Russia |
| Research Site | Saint Petersburg | Russia |
| Research Site | Stavropol | Russia |
| Research Site | Bratislava | Slovakia |
| Research Site | Trebišov | Slovakia |
| Research Site | Johannesburg | South Africa |
| Research Site | Kempton Park | South Africa |
| Research Site | Midrand | South Africa |
| Research Site | Soweto | South Africa |
| Research Site | Busan | South Korea |
| Research Site | Daegu | South Korea |
| Research Site | Jeonju | South Korea |
| Research Site | Seoul | South Korea |
| Research Site | Sungnam | South Korea |
| Research Site | Alicante | Spain |
| Research Site | Barcelona | Spain |
| Research Site | Madrid | Spain |
| Research Site | Seville | Spain |
| Research Site | Ankara | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| Research Site | Istanbul | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| Research Site | Sisli-Istanbul | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| Research Site | Bath | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | Birmingham | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | Edinburgh | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | Frome | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | Guildford | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | Hull | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | Sheffield | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | Swansea | United Kingdom |
| 23748506 | Derived | Grimm M, Han J, Weaver C, Griffin P, Schulteis CT, Dong H, Malloy J. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of exenatide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: an integrated analysis of the DURATION trials. Postgrad Med. 2013 May;125(3):47-57. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2013.05.2660. |
| 23522121 | Derived | Meloni AR, DeYoung MB, Han J, Best JH, Grimm M. Treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes with exenatide once weekly versus oral glucose-lowering medications or insulin glargine: achievement of glycemic and cardiovascular goals. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2013 Mar 23;12:48. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-12-48. |
| 22210563 | Derived | Russell-Jones D, Cuddihy RM, Hanefeld M, Kumar A, Gonzalez JG, Chan M, Wolka AM, Boardman MK; DURATION-4 Study Group. Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus metformin, pioglitazone, and sitagliptin used as monotherapy in drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-4): a 26-week double-blind study. Diabetes Care. 2012 Feb;35(2):252-8. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1107. Epub 2011 Dec 30. |
| FG002 | Pioglitazone | Pioglitazone (30 mg/day for 4 weeks, then 45 mg/day for 22 weeks) + weekly subcutaneous placebo injection |
| FG003 | Sitagliptin | Sitagliptin (100 mg/day for 26 weeks) + weekly subcutaneous placebo injection |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Exenatide Once Weekly | Exenatide once weekly (subcutaneous injection of 2 mg exenatide, once a week) + daily oral placebo |
| BG001 | Metformin | Metformin (1000 mg/day for 2 weeks, then 1500 mg/day for 2 weeks, then 2000 mg/day for 22 weeks) + weekly subcutaneous placebo injection |
| BG002 | Pioglitazone | Pioglitazone (30 mg/day for 4 weeks, then 45 mg/day for 22 weeks) + weekly subcutaneous placebo injection |
| BG003 | Sitagliptin | Sitagliptin (100 mg/day for 26 weeks) + weekly subcutaneous placebo injection |
| BG004 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage of total hemoglobin |
| |||||||||||||||
| Weight | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26 | Change in HbA1c from baseline to Week 26. | Intent to treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized patients who had taken at least one dose of study drug. All scheduled post-baseline measurements were included in the analysis. Unscheduled visit observations were carried forward to the next scheduled visits. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percentage of total hemoglobin | Baseline, Week 26 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=7% at Week 26 | Percentage of patients achieving HbA1c <=7% at Week 26 (for patients with baseline HbA1c >7%). | ITT subjects with baseline HbA1c>7%. Only patients with non-missing baseline value and at least one non-missing post-baseline value of the response variable were included in analysis. Missing data at endpoint was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach. | Posted | Number | percentage of patients | Baseline, Week 26 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Fasting Serum Glucose (FSG) From Baseline to Week 26 | Change in FSG from baseline to Week 26. | ITT population. Only patients with non-missing baseline value and at least one non-missing post-baseline value of the response variable were included in analysis. All scheduled post-baseline measurements were included in the analysis, with no imputation of missing data other than that inherent in the MMRM model was used. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | mmol/L | Baseline, Week 26 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26 | Change in Body Weight from baseline to Week 26. | ITT population. Only patients with non-missing baseline value and at least one non-missing post-baseline value of the response variable were included in analysis. All scheduled post-baseline measurements were included in the analysis, with no imputation of missing data other than that inherent in the MMRM model was used. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | kg | Baseline, Week 26 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Fasting Total Cholesterol (TC) From Baseline to Week 26 | Change in Fasting TC from baseline to Week 26. | ITT population. Only patients with non-missing baseline value and at least one non-missing post-baseline value of the response variable were included in analysis. All scheduled post-baseline measurements were included in the analysis, with no imputation of missing data other than that inherent in the MMRM model was used. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | mmol/L | Baseline, Week 26 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Fasting High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) From Baseline to Week 26 | Change in Fasting HDL from baseline to Week 26. | ITT population. Only patients with non-missing baseline value and at least one non-missing post-baseline value of the response variable were included in analysis. All scheduled post-baseline measurements were included in the analysis, with no imputation of missing data other than that inherent in the MMRM model was used. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | mmol/L | Baseline, Week 26 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Ratio of Fasting Triglycerides at Week 26 to Baseline | Ratio of Fasting Triglycerides (measured in mmol/L) at Week 26 to baseline. Log(Post-baseline Triglycerides) - log(Baseline Triglycerides); change from baseline to Week 26 is presented as ratio of endpoint to baseline. | ITT population. Only patients with non-missing baseline value and at least one non-missing post-baseline value of the response variable were included in analysis. Missing data at endpoint was imputed using LOCF approach. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | ratio | Baseline, Week 26 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-emergent Major Hypoglycemic Events | Major hypoglycemia is defined as any event that has symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia resulting in loss of consciousness or seizure that shows prompt recovery in response to administration of glucagon or glucose, or documented hypoglycemia (blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L [54 mg/dL]) requiring the assistance of another person because of severe impairment in consciousness or behavior (whether or not symptoms of hypoglycemia are detected by the patient). Mean event rate = total number of events for all subjects in a treatment regimen / the total number of subject years of exposure for all subjects in that treatment. Standard error = square root of (total number of events / (subject years of exposure)**2). | ITT population. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | events per subject-year | Baseline to Week 26 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-Emergent Minor Hypoglycemic Events | Minor hypoglycemia is defined as a sign or symptom associated with hypoglycemia that is either self-treated by the patient or resolves on its own AND has a concurrent finger stick blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) and not classified as major hypoglycemia. Mean event rate = total number of events for all subjects in a treatment regimen / the total number of subject years of exposure for all subjects in that treatment. Standard error = square root of (total number of events / (subject years of exposure)**2). | ITT population. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | events per subject-year | Baseline to Week 26 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 26. | Change in Systolic Blood Pressure from baseline to Week 26. | ITT population. Only patients with non-missing baseline value and at least one non-missing post-baseline value of the response variable were included in analysis. All scheduled post-baseline measurements were included in the analysis, with no imputation of missing data other than that inherent in the MMRM model was used. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | mmHg | Baseline, Week 26 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 26. | Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure from baseline to Week 26. | ITT population. Only patients with non-missing baseline value and at least one non-missing post-baseline value of the response variable were included in analysis. All scheduled post-baseline measurements were included in the analysis, with no imputation of missing data other than that inherent in the MMRM model was used. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | mmHg | Baseline, Week 26 |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Exenatide Once Weekly | Exenatide once weekly (subcutaneous injection of 2 mg exenatide, once a week) + daily oral placebo | 4 | 248 | 109 | 248 | ||
| EG001 | Metformin | Metformin (1000 mg/day for 2 weeks, then 1500 mg/day for 2 weeks, then 2000 mg/day for 22 weeks) + weekly subcutaneous placebo injection | 12 | 246 | 94 | 246 | ||
| EG002 | Pioglitazone | Pioglitazone (30 mg/day for 4 weeks, then 45 mg/day for 22 weeks) + weekly subcutaneous placebo injection | 9 | 163 | 57 | 163 | ||
| EG003 | Sitagliptin | Sitagliptin (100 mg/day for 26 weeks) + weekly subcutaneous placebo injection | 3 | 163 | 55 | 163 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calculus ureteric | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperglycaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Joint sprain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Prostate cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Road traffic accident | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Angina pectoris | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Angina unstable | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arteriovenous malformation | Congenital, familial and genetic disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arteritis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthritis bacterial | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ascites | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchopneumopathy | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiopulmonary failure | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebrovascular accident | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chondromalacia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diabetic foot | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastric cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatic neoplasm malignant | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hysterectomy | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Jaundice | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Loss of consciousness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lumbar hernia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myocardial ischaemia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oedema | General disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peritonsillar abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rotator cuff syndrome | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Typhoid fever | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Wound infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injection site nodule | General disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspepsia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oedema peripheral | General disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Ohman, Medical Science Director | AstraZeneca | ClinicalTrialTransparency@astrazeneca.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003924 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008687 | Metformin |
| D000068900 | Sitagliptin Phosphate |
| D000077205 | Pioglitazone |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001645 | Biguanides |
| D006146 | Guanidines |
| D000578 | Amidines |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D014230 | Triazoles |
| D001393 | Azoles |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D011719 | Pyrazines |
| D045162 | Thiazolidinediones |
| D013844 | Thiazoles |
| D013457 | Sulfur Compounds |
Not provided
Not provided
| Between 18 and 65 years |
|
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Yes |
| Non-Inferiority or Equivalence |
Noninferiority Null Hypotheses: H1: The effect of exenatide is inferior to that of metformin. H2: The effect of exenatide is inferior to that of sitagliptin. H3: The effect of exenatide is inferior to that of pioglitazone. Then, the 3 superiority null hypotheses were tested. Change in HbA1c was analyzed using an MMRM analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment, baseline HbA1c, country, week of visit, and treatment-by week interaction as fixed effects; and patient and error as random effects. |
| Power calculation: A sample of 740 (222 exenatide once weekly, 222 metformin, 148 pioglitazone, and 148 sitagliptin) would provide approximately 90% power to detect a true differences between exenatide once weekly and the 3 comparators: metformin, pioglitazone, and sitagliptin of 0.4%, 0.5%, and 0.5%, respectively in change in HbA1c from baseline to Week 26 with a 2-sided t test at a significance level of 0.05, assuming a common standard deviation of 1.2%. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.328 | Noninferiority was tested by Bonferroni (margin 0.3%, adjusted significance of 0.0167). Superiority was tested by Hommel (nominal significance level was between 0.0167 and 0.05 depended on the number of noninferiority hypotheses rejected). | Least Squares Mean Difference | 0.10 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.10 | 2-Sided | 98.3 | -0.15 | 0.35 | Yes | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence | Noninferiority Null Hypotheses: H1: The effect of exenatide is inferior to that of metformin. H2: The effect of exenatide is inferior to that of sitagliptin. H3: The effect of exenatide is inferior to that of pioglitazone. Then, the 3 superiority null hypotheses were tested. Change in HbA1c was analyzed using an MMRM analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment, baseline HbA1c, country, week of visit, and treatment-by week interaction as fixed effects; and patient and error as random effects. |
| Power calculation: A sample of 740 (222 exenatide once weekly, 222 metformin, 148 pioglitazone, and 148 sitagliptin) would provide approximately 90% power to detect a true differences between exenatide once weekly and the 3 comparators: metformin, pioglitazone, and sitagliptin of 0.4%, 0.5%, and 0.5%, respectively in change in HbA1c from baseline to Week 26 with a 2-sided t test at a significance level of 0.05, assuming a common standard deviation of 1.2%. | Mixed Models Analysis | <.001 | Noninferiority was tested by Bonferroni (margin 0.3%, adjusted significance of 0.0167). Superiority was tested by Hommel (nominal significance level was between 0.0167 and 0.05 depended on the number of noninferiority hypotheses rejected). | Least Squares Mean Difference | -0.37 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.10 | 2-Sided | 98.3 | -0.62 | -0.13 | Yes | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence | Noninferiority Null Hypotheses: H1: The effect of exenatide is inferior to that of metformin. H2: The effect of exenatide is inferior to that of sitagliptin. H3: The effect of exenatide is inferior to that of pioglitazone. Then, the 3 superiority null hypotheses were tested. Change in HbA1c was analyzed using an MMRM analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment, baseline HbA1c, country, week of visit, and treatment-by week interaction as fixed effects; and patient and error as random effects. |
Sitagliptin (100 mg/day for 26 weeks) + weekly subcutaneous placebo injection
|
|
|
Sitagliptin (100 mg/day for 26 weeks) + weekly subcutaneous placebo injection
|
|
|
Sitagliptin (100 mg/day for 26 weeks) + weekly subcutaneous placebo injection
|
|
|
Sitagliptin (100 mg/day for 26 weeks) + weekly subcutaneous placebo injection
|
|
|
Sitagliptin (100 mg/day for 26 weeks) + weekly subcutaneous placebo injection
|
|
|
Sitagliptin (100 mg/day for 26 weeks) + weekly subcutaneous placebo injection |
|
|
|
Pioglitazone (30 mg/day for 4 weeks, then 45 mg/day for 22 weeks) + weekly subcutaneous placebo injection
| OG003 | Sitagliptin | Sitagliptin (100 mg/day for 26 weeks) + weekly subcutaneous placebo injection |
|
|
| OG003 |
| Sitagliptin |
Sitagliptin (100 mg/day for 26 weeks) + weekly subcutaneous placebo injection |
|
|
Sitagliptin (100 mg/day for 26 weeks) + weekly subcutaneous placebo injection
|
|
|
Sitagliptin (100 mg/day for 26 weeks) + weekly subcutaneous placebo injection
|
|
|