Containing D9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), 27 mg/ml: cannabidiol (CBD), 25 mg/ml. Subjects received study medication delivered in 100 µl actuations by a pump action oromucosal spray. Maximum permitted dose was eight actuations in any three hour period and 48 actuations (THC 130 mg:CBD 120 mg) in 24 hours.

Containing THC, 27 mg/ml, as extract of Cannabis sativa L. Subjects received study medication delivered in 100 µl actuations by a pump action oromucosal spray. Maximum permitted dose was eight actuations in any three hour period and 48 actuations (THC 130 mg) in 24 hours.

The nausea NRS was completed at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening. The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate how sick you felt throughout the day?" where 0 = not sick at all and 10 = very sick. A negative value indicates an improvement in nausea score from baseline.

The memory NRS was completed at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening. The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate how well you are able to remember what you have done in the past 24 hours?" where 0 = very well and 10 = not at all. A negative value indicates an improvement in memory score from baseline.

The appetite NRS was completed at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening. The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate how your appetite has been throughout the day?" where 0 = very good and 10 = very poor. A negative value indicates an improvement in appetite score from baseline.

The concentration NRS was completed at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening. The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate how well have you been able to concentrate throughout the day e.g. when reading a newspaper?" where 0 = very well and 10 = not at all. A negative value indicates an improvement in concentration score from baseline.

Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), a core cancer-specific questionnaire containing 30 items on patients' functioning, global quality of life, disease- and treatment related symptoms. Higher scores indicate a greater degree of symptoms, min.: 0, Max.: 100

The BPI-SF is a 14-item questionnaire that asks patients to rate pain over the prior week and the degree to which it interferes with activities on a 0 to 10 scale, where 0=no pain and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. Severity is measured as worst pain, least pain, average pain, and pain right now. The severity composite score was calculated as the arithmetic mean of the four severity items(range 0-10). The minimum value is zero and maximum is 10. A higher score represents a poor outcome.

Each 100 uL actuation contained colourant and excipients

Total of all reporting groups

Each 100 μl actuation of THC delivered a dose containing 2.7 mg THC only. The maximum permitted dose of study medication was eight actuations in any three hour period, and 48 actuations (130 mg) in any 24 hour period.

Each actuation of placebo delivered the excipients plus colourants. The maximum permitted dose of study medication was eight actuations in any three hour period, and 48 actuations in any 24 hour period.

The sleep disruption NRS was completed at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening. The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate how your pain disrupted your sleep last night?" where 0 = did not disrupt sleep and 10 = completely disrupted (unable to sleep at all). A negative value indicates an improvement in sleep disruption score from baseline.

All subjects who were randomised, received at least one actuation of study medication and had on-treatment efficacy data were included in the ITT population, used for this analysis.

The nausea NRS was completed at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening. The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate how sick you felt throughout the day?" where 0 = not sick at all and 10 = very sick. A negative value indicates an improvement in nausea score from baseline.

All subjects who were randomised, received at least one actuation of study medication and had on-treatment efficacy data were included in the ITT population, used for this analysis.

The memory NRS was completed at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening. The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate how well you are able to remember what you have done in the past 24 hours?" where 0 = very well and 10 = not at all. A negative value indicates an improvement in memory score from baseline.

All subjects who were randomised, received at least one actuation of study medication and had on-treatment efficacy data were included in the ITT population, used for this analysis.

The appetite NRS was completed at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening. The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate how your appetite has been throughout the day?" where 0 = very good and 10 = very poor. A negative value indicates an improvement in appetite score from baseline.

All subjects who were randomised, received at least one actuation of study medication and had on-treatment efficacy data were included in the ITT population, used for this analysis.

The concentration NRS was completed at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening. The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate how well have you been able to concentrate throughout the day e.g. when reading a newspaper?" where 0 = very well and 10 = not at all. A negative value indicates an improvement in concentration score from baseline.

All subjects who were randomised, received at least one actuation of study medication and had on-treatment efficacy data were included in the ITT population, used for this analysis.

Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), a core cancer-specific questionnaire containing 30 items on patients' functioning, global quality of life, disease- and treatment related symptoms. Higher scores indicate a greater degree of symptoms, min.: 0, Max.: 100

All subjects who were randomised, received at least one actuation of study medication and had on-treatment efficacy data were included in the ITT population, used for this analysis.

The BPI-SF is a 14-item questionnaire that asks patients to rate pain over the prior week and the degree to which it interferes with activities on a 0 to 10 scale, where 0=no pain and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. Severity is measured as worst pain, least pain, average pain, and pain right now. The severity composite score was calculated as the arithmetic mean of the four severity items(range 0-10). The minimum value is zero and maximum is 10. A higher score represents a poor outcome.

All subjects who were randomised, received at least one actuation of study medication and had on-treatment efficacy data were included in the ITT population, used for this analysis.

Subjects recorded their use of escape medication each day on their diary card.

The primary population for this analysis was the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, which included all randomised subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had on-treatment efficacy data. The primary analysis escape medication usage i.e. the number of days escape medication was used did not include any covariates.

Maximum number of daily sprays was 48 giving a maximum daily dose of 130 mg THC

Maximum number of daily sprays was 48

Change in pain scores on-treatment were be compared between groups using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The baseline pain score was fitted as a covariate in the model. The significance of the treatment effect after adjusting for baseline pain score was assessed using the F-test from the ANCOVA. If this was significant at the 5% level, then the mean difference between treatments together with the 95% confidence interval was presented for Sativex versus placebo and THC versus placebo.

The on-treatment data was calculated from all available data during the last three days. The number of days the escape medication was used out of the last three days taken in the study was compared between treatments using logistic regression with a cumulative logit model. From this analysis the frequency distribution (%) of number days escape medication was used was presented together with the odds ratio, p-value and 95% CI for the treatment contrasts.