Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of the study is to compare clinical benefits of the cardiac resynchronisation (CRT) achieved by the PEA optimised pacing configuration and a CRT optimised by standard clinical procedure.
PEA optimised configuration (PEA-CRT) is obtained, during patient's follow-up, using the Peak Endocardial Acceleration sensor features onboard the device.
The study is a prospective, multicentre, controlled and randomised clinical investigation, with two single-blinded arms.
The objective of the study is to compare the clinical benefits of Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT) optimised by automatic PEA sensor features (PEA-CRT), with those obtained by standard optimisation procedure (STD-CRT).
The patient candidate for inclusion in the study has a severe chronic Heart Failure, indicated for the implantation of a Biventricular pacing system according to updated ESC guidelines (2005).
All patients included in the study will be followed-up for 1 year; patient's follow-ups are scheduled during hospitalisation, at one month, 3 months, 6 months and one year after implantation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active Comparator | PEA optimized CRT |
|
| 2 | Other | Standard optimized CRT |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Living CHF | Device | PEA CRT optimization |
| |
| New Living CHF |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The primary endpoint will be evaluated at 1 year (M12), in term of improved, unchanged or worsened patient's conditions, with a composite analysis of NYHA class evolution, heart-failure-related hospitalisations and Quality of Life evaluation. | 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| PEA-CRT optimisation is at least effective as the standard optimisation in term of efficacy of the therapy and patients' quality of life. | 12 months | |
| PEA is an index of the patients' clinical status and allows to predict acute HF episode in both arms. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
The patient candidate for inclusion in the study must be indicated for implantation of a Biventricular pacing system, with the following clinical conditions:
Severe Heart Failure (NYHA Class III or IV)
Cardiomyopathy of any etiology
Sinus rhythm
Reduced Left-Ventricular Ejection Fraction
Left-Ventricular End Diastolic Diameter greater than or equal to 30 mm/m2 (LVEDD>30 mm/m2)
QRS Duration:
> 150 ms or
> 120 ms and documented Mechanical Dissynchrony (by ECHO) meeting two out of three of the following criteria:
Optimal and stable (1 month before inclusion) pharmacological treatment, including, if tolerated, Beta Blockers, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitors or ACE Inhibitor substitutes, Spironolactone, and diuretics
Exclusion Criteria:
Any patient who has one of the following characteristics will be excluded from the study:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| P Ritter, Dr | InParys Cardiologie | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH Albi | Albi | France | ||||
| CHU Angers |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Device |
Standard optimized CRT. |
|
| 12 months |
| Efficacy of the therapy comparing the two arms in terms of NYHA | 12 months |
| Efficacy of the therapy comparing the two arms in terms of Cardiovascular mortality | 12 months |
| Efficacy of the therapy comparing the two arms in terms of Heart Failure Quality Of Life (EuroQoL-5D) score | 12 months |
| Efficacy of the therapy comparing the two arms in terms of BNP dosage | 12 months |
| Efficacy of the therapy comparing the two arms in terms of Number and duration of heart-failure-related patient's hospitalisations, during the study period. | 12 months |
| Efficacy of the therapy comparing the two arms in terms of Left Ventricular End Diastolic Diameter | 12 months |
| Efficacy of the therapy comparing the two arms in terms of Left Ventricular End Systolic Diameter | 12 months |
| Efficacy of the therapy comparing the two arms in terms of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction | 12 months |
| Efficacy of the therapy comparing the two arms in terms of Left Pre-Ejection Interval | 12 months |
| Efficacy of the therapy comparing the two arms in terms of Right Pre-Ejection Interval | 12 months |
| Efficacy of the therapy comparing the two arms in terms of Total Duration of Left Systole | 12 months |
| Efficacy of the therapy comparing the two arms in terms of E velocity | 12 months |
| Efficacy of the therapy comparing the two arms in terms of A velocity | 12 months |
| Efficacy of the therapy comparing the two arms in terms of Ventricular spike-Mitral valve closure interval | 12 months |
| Efficacy of the therapy comparing the two arms in terms of Ventricular spike-Mitral valve opening interval | 12 months |
| Efficacy of the therapy comparing the two arms in terms of Mitral Valve regurgitation. | 12 months |
| Time spent to achieve the CRT optimal configuration during each follow-up | 12 months |
| PEA monitoring and prognostic relevance correlating the PEA diagnostic trends with the parameters used to asses the efficacy of the therapy and patients' quality of life (NYHA class, mortality, HF-hospitalisation, EuroQoL-5D score, BNP dosage, Echo | 12 months |
| (LVEF) comparing the changes Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in the two arms with an intermediate analysis at 6 months done by a Core Centre. | 6 and 12 months |
| Angers |
| France |
| CHU Bordeaux | Bordeaux | France |
| CH Lomme | Lomme | France |
| CHU Montpellier | Montpellier | France |
| NC Nantaises | Nantes | France |
| CH Pau | Pau | France |
| CHU Poitiers | Poitiers | France |
| CHR Cardiologie A | Rennes | France |
| CHU Rouen | Rouen | France |
| CH Yves le Foll | Saint-Brieuc | France |
| InParys Cardiology | Saint-Cloud | France |
| UKB Unfallkrankenhaus | Berlin | Germany |
| Univ Saarland | Homburg | Germany |
| Stiftsklinikum Augustinum | München | Germany |
| St.Adolfstift | Reinbek | Germany |
| Osp. B. Ramazzini | Carpi | Italy |
| Osp. Civile | Desio | Italy |
| Osp. S. Maria Nuova | Florence | Italy |
| Osp. Univ. Careggi | Florence | Italy |
| Osp. Niguarda | Milan | Italy |
| Osp. Civile | Rieti | Italy |
| Osp. S. Filippo Neri | Rome | Italy |
| Medisch Centrum Rijnmond-Zuid | Rotterdam | Netherlands |
| Diaconessenhuis | Utrecht | Netherlands |
| Vlietland Ziekenhuis | Vlaardingen | Netherlands |
| Isala Klinieken | Zwolle | Netherlands |
| H. General Universit. | Alicante | Spain |
| H. Virgen de las Nieves | Granada | Spain |
| H. General Universit. | Valencia | Spain |
| Hosp. Clinico | Valencia | Spain |
| Royal Hospital | Bournemouth | United Kingdom |
| Saint Peter's Hospital | Chertsey | United Kingdom |
| General Hospital | Eastbourne | United Kingdom |
| Nothern General | Sheffield | United Kingdom |
| University Hospital | Southampton | United Kingdom |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006333 | Heart Failure |
| D009202 | Cardiomyopathies |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided