Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| CDR0000592644 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Cancer Institute (NCI) | NIH |
| NRG Oncology | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
RATIONALE: Acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (ALTENS) and pilocarpine may help to relieve chronic xerostomia (dry mouth). It is not yet known which remedy is more effective in treating chronic dry mouth caused by radiation therapy in patients with head and neck cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II/III trial is studying ALTENS to see how well it works compared with pilocarpine in treating chronic dry mouth caused by radiation therapy in patients with head and neck cancer.
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
Secondary
OUTLINE: This is a phase II followed by a phase III multicenter study.
Phase II:Patients undergo placement of surface electrodes at the following acupuncture points: large intestine, spleen, stomach, and conception vessel. Patients then undergo acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (ALTENS) to each of these points using the Codetronâ„¢ unit for 20 minutes twice weekly for 12 weeks. No further treatment is given after 12 weeks.
Phase III:Patients are stratified according to prior use of pilocarpine (no vs yes) and length of time from completion of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (3-6 months vs 6-12 months vs > 12 months). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
Patients undergo quality of life (QOL) assessment at baseline and at 6 months after registration in phase II. In phase III patients complete assessments for basal and stimulated whole salivary production, xerostomia burden, and QOL at baseline and at 4, 6, 9, and 15 months after study entry.
After completion of study therapy, patients are followed at 3 months.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 45 patients will be accrued to the phase II portion and 144 patients to the phase III portion of this study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pilocarpine: Phase III | Active Comparator |
| |
| ALTENS: Phase III | Experimental |
| |
| ALTENS: Phase II | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pilocarpine | Drug | 5mg by mouth 3 times a day for 12 weeks |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Phase II: Treatment Compliance (Number of Compliant Patients) | Patients completing at least 19 out of 24 ALTENS therapy sessions were categorized as compliant. Fleming's two-stage was used, assuming a successful target compliance rate of 80%, statistical power of 0.87, and a type I error rate of 0.13. If fewer than 9 of the first 13 patients were compliant, then treatment delivery will be deemed not feasible. If there were between 9-12 compliant patients, the second stage analysis would be required to determine feasibility of treatment delivery. If all 13 patients are compliant, treatment delivery will immediately be deemed feasible. The second stage analysis required at least 31 compliant out of 39 overall patients for the treatment delivery to be deemed feasible. | Randomization to 12 weeks |
| Phase III: Change From Baseline in Overall Xerostomia Burden at 9 Months | Xerostomia burden is measured by the University of Michigan Xerostomia Related Quality of Life Scale (XeQOLS). The XeQOLS is a validated patient-reported 15-item assessment scale with 4 domains: physical functioning,pain/discomfort, personal/psychologic functioning, and social functioning.The score is the average of all responses of all domains and can range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating increased xerostomia burden. Change in xerostomia burden is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 9-month score such that a negative change indicates an improvement of the xerostomia burden. | Baseline (randomization) and 9 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Phase II: Pecentage of Patients With Beneficial Treatment Response | This secondary objective was to evaluate the effect of ALTENS treatment on overall radiation-induced xerostomia burden by looking at treatment response. Treatment response was determined by a reduction of at least 20% from baseline to 6 months in the University of Michigan Xerostomia Related Quality of Life Scale (XeQOLS). The XeQOLS is a validated patient-reported 15-item assessment scale with 4 domains: physical functioning,pain/discomfort, personal/psychologic functioning, and social functioning.The score is the average of all responses of all domains and can range from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate increased xerostomia burden. This scale has high reproducibility and sensitivity. For the first and second stage analyses, 4 and 10 patients, respectively, must respond to treatment in order to proceed to the phase III component. |
Not provided
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
Diagnosis of head and neck cancer
Completed radiotherapy (i.e., standard or intensity-modulated radiotherapy) with or without chemotherapy ≥ 3 months and up to 2 years prior to study entry
No patients with normal saliva production (i.e., no salivary gland changes or no xerostomia)
No history of serious adverse events after prior treatment with and discontinuation of pilocarpine
No chronic lymphocytic leukemia
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
See Disease Characteristics
Zubrod performance status of 0-2
Not pregnant or nursing
Negative pregnancy test
Fertile patients must use effective contraception
No other invasive malignancy except non-melanomatous skin cancer or cancer from which the patient has been disease-free for at least 3 years (e.g., carcinoma in situ of the breast, oral cavity, or cervix)
No concurrent contraindications to pilocarpine (e.g., uncontrolled asthma, miosis, or hypersensitivity)
No severe, active co-morbidity, including any of the following:
No Sjögren syndrome
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Raimond K. W. Wong, MD | Margaret and Charles Juravinski Cancer Centre | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center | San Francisco | California | 94115 | United States | ||
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22252927 | Result | Wong RK, James JL, Sagar S, Wyatt G, Nguyen-Tan PF, Singh AK, Lukaszczyk B, Cardinale F, Yeh AM, Berk L. Phase 2 results from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study 0537: a phase 2/3 study comparing acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation versus pilocarpine in treating early radiation-induced xerostomia. Cancer. 2012 Sep 1;118(17):4244-52. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27382. Epub 2012 Jan 17. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Data Available: Select individual patient-level data from this trial can be requested from the NCTN/NCORP Data Archive. | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | ALTENS: Phase II | Acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (ALTENS) twice weekly for 12 weeks via a Codetron unit |
| FG001 | Pilocarpine: Phase III | 5mg pilocarpine by mouth 3 times a day for 12 weeks |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
One arm Phase II followed by a two-arm Phase III
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ALTENS | Procedure | Acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (ALTENS) twice weekly for 12 weeks via a Codetron unit |
|
|
| Pre-treatment and 6 months from registration |
| Change From Baseline in Overall Xerostomia Burden at 4, 6, and 15 Months (Phase III) | Xerostomia burden is measured by the University of Michigan Xerostomia Related Quality of Life Scale (XeQOLS). The XeQOLS is a validated patient-reported 15-item assessment scale with 4 domains: physical functioning,pain/discomfort, personal/psychologic functioning, and social functioning.The score is the average of all responses of all domains and can range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating increased xerostomia burden. Change in xerostomia burden is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 9-month score such that a negative change indicates an improvement of the xerostomia burden. | Baseline, 4, 6, and 15 months from randomization |
| Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III) | Symptom burden is measured by the University of Michigan Xerostomia Related Quality of Life Scale (XeQOLS). The XeQOLS is a validated patient-reported 15-item assessment scale with 4 domains: physical functioning,pain/discomfort, personal/psychologic functioning, and social functioning. The domain score is the average of all responses on a given domain and can range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating increased symptom burden. Change in symptom burden is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 9-month score such that a negative change indicates an improvement of the symptom burden. | Baseline, 4, 6, 9 and 15 months from randomization |
| Change From Baseline in Stimulated Whole Salivary Production (WSP) at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III) | Stimulated (citric acid primed) whole salivary production (WSP) was measured by expectoration weight, with one gram of saliva produced considered as one ml of saliva. WSP is expressed in ml/min calculated by dividing the measured weight or volume of WSP by five. Procedure: Patients refrain from eating, drinking, and smoking at least two hours prior to each measurement. Stimulation is elicited by asking patients to rinse 5 ml of 2% citric acid solution in the mouth for 15 seconds and then completely expectorating the citric acid. For each measurement, patients are asked to expectorate continuously into a pre-weighed dry plastic container over a 5-minute period without swallowing. The collected saliva with the plastic container will be weighed (total weight) immediately after each collection. The total weight minus the weight of the container is the weight or volume of whole saliva collected. | Baseline, 4, 6, 9 and 15 months from randomization |
| Change From Baseline in Unstimulated Whole Salivary Production (WSP) at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III) | Basal whole salivary production (WSP) was measured by expectoration weight, with one gram of saliva produced considered as one ml of saliva. WSP is expressed in ml/min calculated by dividing the measured weight or volume of WSP by five. Procedure: Patients refrain from eating, drinking, and smoking at least two hours prior to each measurement. For each measurement, patients are asked to expectorate continuously into a pre-weighed dry plastic container over a 5-minute period without swallowing. The collected saliva with the plastic container will be weighed (total weight) immediately after each collection. The total weight minus the weight of the container is the weight or volume of whole saliva collected. | Pre-treatment to 4, 6, 9 and 15 months from randomization |
| Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the University of Washington Head and Neck Questionnaire (UWHNSS) Phase III | The UWHNSS includes ten categories-pain, disfigurement, activity, recreation/entertainment, employment, eating, saliva, taste, speech, mucus/phlegm. Patient scores on the UWHNSS range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating declining quality of life. Change in total score was calculated by subtracting baseline from follow-up , thus a positive change score indicates a worsening while a negative change score indicates an improvement. | Baseline and 9 months from randomization. |
| Hospital of Saint Raphael |
| New Haven |
| Connecticut |
| 06511 |
| United States |
| Emory Crawford Long Hospital | Atlanta | Georgia | 30308 | United States |
| Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University | Atlanta | Georgia | 30322 | United States |
| Saint Anthony's Hospital at Saint Anthony's Health Center | Alton | Illinois | 62002 | United States |
| Bloomington Hospital Regional Cancer Institute | Bloomington | Indiana | 47403 | United States |
| Center for Cancer Care at Goshen General Hospital | Goshen | Indiana | 46526 | United States |
| Methodist Cancer Center at Methodist Hospital | Indianapolis | Indiana | 46202 | United States |
| Boston University Cancer Research Center | Boston | Massachusetts | 02118 | United States |
| CCOP - St. Louis-Cape Girardeau | St Louis | Missouri | 63141 | United States |
| Roswell Park Cancer Institute | Buffalo | New York | 14263-0001 | United States |
| Blumenthal Cancer Center at Carolinas Medical Center | Charlotte | North Carolina | 28232-2861 | United States |
| Case Comprehensive Cancer Center | Cleveland | Ohio | 44106-5065 | United States |
| Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center | Cleveland | Ohio | 44195 | United States |
| Oklahoma University Cancer Institute | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | 73104 | United States |
| Schiffler Cancer Center at Wheeling Hospital | Wheeling | West Virginia | 26003 | United States |
| Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital | Montreal | Quebec | H1T 2M4 | Canada |
| Hopital Notre-Dame du CHUM | Montreal | Quebec | H2L 4M1 | Canada |
| McGill Cancer Centre at McGill University | Montreal | Quebec | H2W 1S6 | Canada |
| Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Quebec | Québec | Quebec | G1R 2J6 | Canada |
| FG002 | ALTENS: Phase III | Acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (ALTENS) twice weekly for 12 weeks via a Codetron unit |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Eligible patients (i.e. without protocol violation)
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | ALTENS: Phase II | Acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (ALTENS) twice weekly for 12 weeks via a Codetron unit |
| BG001 | Pilocarpine: Phase III | 5mg pilocarpine by mouth 3 times a day for 12 weeks |
| BG002 | ALTENS: Phase III | Acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (ALTENS) twice weekly for 12 weeks via a Codetron unit |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median | Full Range | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Phase II: Treatment Compliance (Number of Compliant Patients) | Patients completing at least 19 out of 24 ALTENS therapy sessions were categorized as compliant. Fleming's two-stage was used, assuming a successful target compliance rate of 80%, statistical power of 0.87, and a type I error rate of 0.13. If fewer than 9 of the first 13 patients were compliant, then treatment delivery will be deemed not feasible. If there were between 9-12 compliant patients, the second stage analysis would be required to determine feasibility of treatment delivery. If all 13 patients are compliant, treatment delivery will immediately be deemed feasible. The second stage analysis required at least 31 compliant out of 39 overall patients for the treatment delivery to be deemed feasible. | Eligible patients starting protocol treatment | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Randomization to 12 weeks |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Phase III: Change From Baseline in Overall Xerostomia Burden at 9 Months | Xerostomia burden is measured by the University of Michigan Xerostomia Related Quality of Life Scale (XeQOLS). The XeQOLS is a validated patient-reported 15-item assessment scale with 4 domains: physical functioning,pain/discomfort, personal/psychologic functioning, and social functioning.The score is the average of all responses of all domains and can range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating increased xerostomia burden. Change in xerostomia burden is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 9-month score such that a negative change indicates an improvement of the xerostomia burden. | Eligible randomized patients with both baseline and 9 month XeQOLS scores | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | units on a scale | Baseline (randomization) and 9 months |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Phase II: Pecentage of Patients With Beneficial Treatment Response | This secondary objective was to evaluate the effect of ALTENS treatment on overall radiation-induced xerostomia burden by looking at treatment response. Treatment response was determined by a reduction of at least 20% from baseline to 6 months in the University of Michigan Xerostomia Related Quality of Life Scale (XeQOLS). The XeQOLS is a validated patient-reported 15-item assessment scale with 4 domains: physical functioning,pain/discomfort, personal/psychologic functioning, and social functioning.The score is the average of all responses of all domains and can range from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate increased xerostomia burden. This scale has high reproducibility and sensitivity. For the first and second stage analyses, 4 and 10 patients, respectively, must respond to treatment in order to proceed to the phase III component. | Eligible patients who started treatment and have both baseline and 6-month XeQOLS scores | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Pre-treatment and 6 months from registration |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Overall Xerostomia Burden at 4, 6, and 15 Months (Phase III) | Xerostomia burden is measured by the University of Michigan Xerostomia Related Quality of Life Scale (XeQOLS). The XeQOLS is a validated patient-reported 15-item assessment scale with 4 domains: physical functioning,pain/discomfort, personal/psychologic functioning, and social functioning.The score is the average of all responses of all domains and can range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating increased xerostomia burden. Change in xerostomia burden is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 9-month score such that a negative change indicates an improvement of the xerostomia burden. | Eligible patients with both baseline and respective follow-up (4,6,15 months) XeQOLS scores. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | units on a scale | Baseline, 4, 6, and 15 months from randomization |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III) | Symptom burden is measured by the University of Michigan Xerostomia Related Quality of Life Scale (XeQOLS). The XeQOLS is a validated patient-reported 15-item assessment scale with 4 domains: physical functioning,pain/discomfort, personal/psychologic functioning, and social functioning. The domain score is the average of all responses on a given domain and can range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating increased symptom burden. Change in symptom burden is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 9-month score such that a negative change indicates an improvement of the symptom burden. | Eligible patients with both baseline and respective follow-up (4,6, 9,15 months) XeQOLS scores. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | units on a scale | Baseline, 4, 6, 9 and 15 months from randomization |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Stimulated Whole Salivary Production (WSP) at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III) | Stimulated (citric acid primed) whole salivary production (WSP) was measured by expectoration weight, with one gram of saliva produced considered as one ml of saliva. WSP is expressed in ml/min calculated by dividing the measured weight or volume of WSP by five. Procedure: Patients refrain from eating, drinking, and smoking at least two hours prior to each measurement. Stimulation is elicited by asking patients to rinse 5 ml of 2% citric acid solution in the mouth for 15 seconds and then completely expectorating the citric acid. For each measurement, patients are asked to expectorate continuously into a pre-weighed dry plastic container over a 5-minute period without swallowing. The collected saliva with the plastic container will be weighed (total weight) immediately after each collection. The total weight minus the weight of the container is the weight or volume of whole saliva collected. | Eligible patients with both baseline and respective follow-up (4,6, 9,15 months) WSP measurements. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | ml/min | Baseline, 4, 6, 9 and 15 months from randomization |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Unstimulated Whole Salivary Production (WSP) at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III) | Basal whole salivary production (WSP) was measured by expectoration weight, with one gram of saliva produced considered as one ml of saliva. WSP is expressed in ml/min calculated by dividing the measured weight or volume of WSP by five. Procedure: Patients refrain from eating, drinking, and smoking at least two hours prior to each measurement. For each measurement, patients are asked to expectorate continuously into a pre-weighed dry plastic container over a 5-minute period without swallowing. The collected saliva with the plastic container will be weighed (total weight) immediately after each collection. The total weight minus the weight of the container is the weight or volume of whole saliva collected. | Eligible randomized patients with both baseline and respective follow-up (4,6, 9,15 months) WSP measurements. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | ml/min | Pre-treatment to 4, 6, 9 and 15 months from randomization |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the University of Washington Head and Neck Questionnaire (UWHNSS) Phase III | The UWHNSS includes ten categories-pain, disfigurement, activity, recreation/entertainment, employment, eating, saliva, taste, speech, mucus/phlegm. Patient scores on the UWHNSS range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating declining quality of life. Change in total score was calculated by subtracting baseline from follow-up , thus a positive change score indicates a worsening while a negative change score indicates an improvement. | Eligible randomized patients with both baseline and 9-month UWHNSS total scores. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | units on a scale | Baseline and 9 months from randomization. |
|
|
Not provided
Adverse events are reported for all eligible patients who started protocol treatment. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | ALTENS: Phase II | Acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (ALTENS) twice weekly for 12 weeks via a Codetron unit | 1 | 47 | 7 | 47 | ||
| EG001 | Pilocarpine: Phase III | 5mg pilocarpine by mouth 3 times a day for 12 weeks | 0 | 73 | 51 | 73 | ||
| EG002 | ALTENS: Phase III | Acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (ALTENS) twice weekly for 12 weeks via a Codetron unit | 1 | 72 | 27 | 72 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gastrointestinal disorder | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Appendicitis perforated | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tinnitus | Ear and labyrinth disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vision blurred | Eye disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dry mouth | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysphagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chills | General disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Localized edema [head and neck] | General disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neck pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Taste alteration | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary frequency | Renal and urinary disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Allergic rhinitis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skin induration | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sweating | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
PI's are required to abide by the sponsor's publication guidelines which require review by coauthors and subsequent review and approval by the sponsor.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy Seiferheld, M.S. | NRG Oncology | seiferheldw@nrgoncology.org |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006258 | Head and Neck Neoplasms |
| D014987 | Xerostomia |
| D007012 | Hypopharyngeal Neoplasms |
| D007822 | Laryngeal Neoplasms |
| D009062 | Mouth Neoplasms |
| D009303 | Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms |
| D009959 | Oropharyngeal Neoplasms |
| D012468 | Salivary Gland Neoplasms |
| D014062 | Tongue Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D012466 | Salivary Gland Diseases |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
| D010610 | Pharyngeal Neoplasms |
| D010039 | Otorhinolaryngologic Neoplasms |
| D010608 | Pharyngeal Diseases |
| D010038 | Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases |
| D007818 | Laryngeal Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D012142 | Respiratory Tract Neoplasms |
| D009302 | Nasopharyngeal Diseases |
| D014060 | Tongue Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010862 | Pilocarpine |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000470 | Alkaloids |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|