Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| PKHTA12345 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of the use of bipolar plasmakinetic vessel sealing (Gyrus Pk) usage versus standard technique when performing total abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease.
Material and Methods: controlled randomized trial involving 94 women who underwent total abdominal hysterectomy. 47 procedures were performed using bipolar plasmakinetic vessel sealing and the remaining 47 with the standard sutures technique. The primary outcomes were improvement in terms of blood loss, procedure time, length of hospital stay, and overall cost of the procedure. Statistical methodology considered significant P <0.05.
All patients were right-holders of the Petroleos Mexicanos (Mexican oil company) medical network who required hysterectomy surgical treatment for benign causes All patients included in the study signed an informed consent form, knowing all possible implications of the procedure Patients were randomly assigned to one of the two techniques: 1. plasmakinetic bipolar energy forceps (Gyrus PK) and 2. Standard technique using sutures The surgical steps other than placement of suture are identical to those used during standard abdominal hysterectomy. Time of the procedure was considered from the moment skin was first cut-open, until it was fully closed, previously checking satisfactory homeostasis.
Blood loss was estimated by the anesthesiology service. Further data compiled included time spent in hospital and the total cost of the procedure.
Post-surgery complications were recorded at the follow up visits one and 4 weeks after the surgery.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | compare security and effectiveness of use Electrosurgical Bipolar Plasmakinetic Vessel Sealing |
|
| 2 | Active Comparator | traditional abdominal hysterectomy technique with the use of sutures |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plasmakinetic bipolar energy forceps | Procedure | Use of bipolar plasmakinetic vessel sealing during abdominal hysterectomy |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Blood loss measured by anesthesiology service during the procedure | 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Operating time | 1 year | |
| Length of stay | 1 year | |
| The total cost of the procedure |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Carlos H Briones, MD | Servicios Medicos de Petroleos Mexicanos | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital Central Norte | Distrito Federal | Mexico |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11814502 | Background | Farquhar CM, Steiner CA. Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990-1997. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;99(2):229-34. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01723-9. | |
| 10674580 | Background | Broder MS, Kanouse DE, Mittman BS, Bernstein SJ. The appropriateness of recommendations for hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Feb;95(2):199-205. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00519-0. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Abdominal Hysterectomy with traditional suture technique | Procedure | The abdominal hysterectomy was realized using sutures in the haemostasia of pedicles. |
|
|
| 1 year |
| 14738643 | Background | Presthus JB, Brooks PG, Kirchhof N. Vessel sealing using a pulsed bipolar system and open forceps. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003 Nov;10(4):528-33. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60161-2. |
| 15958001 | Background | Hagen B, Eriksson N, Sundset M. Randomised controlled trial of LigaSure versus conventional suture ligature for abdominal hysterectomy. BJOG. 2005 Jul;112(7):968-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00561.x. |
| 10942476 | Background | Dessole S, Rubattu G, Capobianco G, Caredda S, Cherchi PL. Utility of bipolar electrocautery scissors for abdominal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Aug;183(2):396-9. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.105911. |
| Background | Rock J.,Howards WJ. Histerectomía em: Te Linde Ginecologia Quirúrgica .9ed,Editorial Panamericana Argentina 2006 (31):875-896. Uterine Surgery, En Nezhat C., Nezhat F., Luciano A., et al, eds., operative Gynecologic Laparoscopy; 1ª Ed: New York, New York; McGraw Hill, Inc.: 1995; 216-38. Hernández-Denis A. Audifred-Salomón J. Aspectos Generales en Endoscopia. En Hernández-Denis A. Audifred-Salomón J. Manual de Endoscopica en Ginecología. México; 2005:5-23. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000084462 | Hyperthermia |
| D016063 | Blood Loss, Surgical |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001832 | Body Temperature Changes |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D018882 | Heat Stress Disorders |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D006470 | Hemorrhage |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D007431 | Intraoperative Complications |
Not provided
Not provided