Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Safety and effectiveness of JUVÉDERM™ Injectable Gel with Lidocaine compared to JUVÉDERM™ without Lidocaine for procedural pain in the treatment of nasolabial folds.
Controlled, randomized, split-face study in which subjects receive JUVÉDERM™ Injectable Gel with Lidocaine (Ultra or Ultra Plus) in one nasolabial fold and JUVÉDERM™ Injectable Gel without Lidocaine (Ultra or Ultra Plus) in the other nasolabial fold. The investigator determines whether the subject receives JUVÉDERM™ Ultra or Ultra Plus per the level of correction desired; the lidocaine assignment is randomized.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juvederm with Lidocaine | Experimental | Subjects receive Juvederm with Lidocaine (either Ultra or Ultra Plus at investigator's discretion) in one nasolabial fold. |
|
| Juvederm | Active Comparator | Subjects receive Juvederm without Lidocaine (either Ultra or Ultra Plus at investigator's discretion) in the other nasolabial fold. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JUVÉDERM™ Injectable Gel with Lidocaine | Device | Single treatment, volume determined by investigator |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Procedural Pain Score | Evaluate pain on an 11-point scale, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. | 1 day |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Comparative Pain | A 5-point scale (-2 = Right NLF more painful than Left NLF; -1 = Right NLF slightly more painful than Left NLF; 0 = No difference; 1 = Left NLF slightly more painful than Right NLF; 2 = Left NLF more painful than Right NLF). Subjects selected one category from the scale; the percentage of subjects that selected each category is presented. | 1 day |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mount Kisco | New York | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19735519 | Result | Weinkle SH, Bank DE, Boyd CM, Gold MH, Thomas JA, Murphy DK. A multi-center, double-blind, randomized controlled study of the safety and effectiveness of Juvederm injectable gel with and without lidocaine. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2009 Sep;8(3):205-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2009.00451.x. |
Not provided
Not provided
Other aesthetic procedures and products were not allowed 1 month prior to study entry or any time during the study.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Total Study Participants | Subjects who received Juvederm with Lidocaine in one nasolabial fold and Juvederm without Lidocaine in the other nasolabial fold |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Total Study Participants | Subjects who received Juvéderm with Lidocaine in one nasolabial fold and Juvéderm without Lidocaine in the other nasolabial fold. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Procedural Pain Score | Evaluate pain on an 11-point scale, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. | Intention to treat (ITT) | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | 1 day |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Juvéderm Lidocaine Nasolabial Folds (NLFs) | Nasolabial folds on one side of the face injected with the Juvederm formulation with lidocaine |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injection side induration | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Therapeutic Area Head | Allergan Medical | (805) 961-5500 | devicetrials@allergan.com |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| JUVÉDERM™ Injectable Gel | Device | Single treatment, volume determined by investigator |
|
| Nasolabial Fold (NLF) Severity | Determination of improvement in NLF severity score on 5-point NLF Severity Scale (0 = None; 1 = Mild; 2 = Moderate; 3 = Severe; 4 = Extreme) two weeks after treatment with Juvederm with Lidocaine (either Ultra or Ultra Plus) in one nasolabial fold and Juvederm (either Ultra or Ultra Plus) in the other nasolabial fold. | 2 weeks |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Secondary | Comparative Pain | A 5-point scale (-2 = Right NLF more painful than Left NLF; -1 = Right NLF slightly more painful than Left NLF; 0 = No difference; 1 = Left NLF slightly more painful than Right NLF; 2 = Left NLF more painful than Right NLF). Subjects selected one category from the scale; the percentage of subjects that selected each category is presented. | ITT | Number | Percent of Participants | 1 day |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Nasolabial Fold (NLF) Severity | Determination of improvement in NLF severity score on 5-point NLF Severity Scale (0 = None; 1 = Mild; 2 = Moderate; 3 = Severe; 4 = Extreme) two weeks after treatment with Juvederm with Lidocaine (either Ultra or Ultra Plus) in one nasolabial fold and Juvederm (either Ultra or Ultra Plus) in the other nasolabial fold. | ITT | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | 2 weeks |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 72 |
| 21 |
| 72 |
| EG001 | Juvéderm Nasolabial Folds (NLFs) | Nasolabial folds on the corresponding side of the face injected with Juvederm | 0 | 72 | 20 | 72 |
| Injection site nodule | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site discoloration | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Application site bruising | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site erythema | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site edema | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
At least ninety (90) days prior to any proposed submission for publication or presentation of Study data or other findings related to the Study, the Investigator will provide the Sponsor with a manuscript of such submission(s) for review and comment.
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Juvéderm Lidocaine is Slightly More Painful |
|
| Juvéderm Lidocaine is More Painful than Juvéderm |
|