Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A Multicentre, Open-label, Prospective Long-term Study Evaluating the Clinical Benefit and Effectiveness of SEROQUEL XR® (Quetiapine Fumarate Extended-Release Tablets) in Subjects with Schizophrenia.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quetiapine Fumarate Extended- Release | Drug | Open-label seroquel XR tablets: On Day 1 Patients received 300 mg, on Day 2 600 mg, on Day 3 600-800 mg and between Day 4-168 400-800 mg Seroquel XR, according to clinical judgement of investigator. Dose changes were in 200 mg fixed doses. Investigational product (IP) was supplied in open label wallet blister cards and subjects were instructed to take the IP once daily in the evening. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Subjects With Improved Clinical Benefit From Assessment of Clinical Global Impression-Clinical Benefit (CGI-CB) Scale From Baseline to Week 24 or End of Study | Proportional change in CGI-CB score The CGI-CB scale is used to evaluate investigator's global weighted impression of efficacy and interference of adverse events (AEs) from enrolment to every visit. The score ranges from 1 to 10. The lower the score the better the outcome, e.g.: a score of 1 means that there is marked therapeutic effect with no burden of AEs. A score of 10 signifies that the burden of AEs outweighs the therapeutic effect, or no therapeutic effect with high burden of AEs. A change score for each subject will be calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the visit score. | Baseline to 24 weeks (or end of study) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Clinical Global Impression-Clinical Benefit (CGI-CB) Score | Numerical change in CGI-CB score. The CGI-CB scale is used to evaluate investigator's global weighted impression of efficacy and interference of adverse events (AEs) from enrolment to every visit. The score ranges from 1 to 10. The lower the score the better the outcome, e.g.: a score of 1 means that there is marked therapeutic effect with no burden of AEs. A score of 10 signifies that the burden of AEs outweighs the therapeutic effect, or no therapeutic effect with high burden of AEs. A change score for each subject will be calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the visit score. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
First episode, drug naive schizophrenic subjects.
Meeting the criteria for any other (than schizophrenia) DSM-IV Axis I diagnosis, concomitant organic mental disorder or mental retardation that in the opinion of the Principal Investigator may interfere with study conduct or interpretation.
Substance/alcohol dependence or abuse at enrolment [except dependence in full remission (>3 months) and except caffeine and nicotine dependence] as defined by DSM-IV criteria. A urine drug screen will be performed. The Principal Investigator will evaluate the results along with medical history to determine if the patient meets DSM-IV criteria for substance abuse or dependence. However, a single urine toxicology screen for cocaine, heroin, methamphetamine or PCP will lead to exclusion.
Subjects requiring treatment with another antipsychotic agent than investigational product during study.
Subjects on seroquel IR once daily.
Known lack of response to clozapine or treatment with clozapine within 4 weeks prior to enrolment.
Known intolerance to seroquel IR.
Subjects requiring treatment with disallowed medication following enrolment into the study.
Subjects requiring treatment for epilepsy.
Subjects who pose an imminent risk of suicide or danger to themselves or others, as judged by the Principal Investigator.
Pregnancy or lactation.
A thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) concentration more than 10% above the upper limit of the normal range of the laboratory used for sample analysis whether or not the patient is being treated for hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism.
Use of a depot or long-acting injectable antipsychotic drug within 1 dosing interval before Day 1 of treatment or during treatment.
Use of drugs that induce or inhibit the hepatic metabolising cytochrome P450 3A4 enzymes within 14 days of the screening assessment period (Day -7 to 0). See Table 5.
History of idiopathic or drug-induced agranulocytosis.
A QTc interval longer than 450 msec (calculated using the Fridericia correction for heart rate) or ECG considered to show cardiac abnormality at enrolment as determined by a centrally located, experienced cardiologist, and confirmed by the Principal Investigator as clinically significant.
Evidence of clinically relevant disease (eg, renal, hepatic, autonomic, endocrine, hematologic or ophthalmologic impairment, significant coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, viral hepatitis B or C, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome [AIDS] or cancer) or a clinical finding that is unstable or that, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator, would be negatively affected by the investigational product or that would affect the investigational product.
Laboratory test results outside the reference range considered by the Principal Investigator to be clinically significant and potentially interfere with the study outcome.
A patient with Diabetes Mellitus (DM) fulfilling one of the following criteria:
Note: If a diabetic patient meets one of these criteria the patient is to be excluded even if the treating physician believes the patient is stable and can participate in the study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Pierre Chue, MD | University of Alberta | Principal Investigator |
| Willie Early, MD | AstraZeneca | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Research Site | Garran | Australian Capital Territory | Australia | |||
| Research Site |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23281876 | Derived | Chue P, Malla A, Bouchard RH, Lessard S, Ganesan S, Stip E, Johnson S, Chen E, Ahn YM, Kim YS, Robinson G, Schweikert C, Gendron A, Eriksson H; SPECTRUM XR Study Group. The long-term clinical benefit and effectiveness of switching to once-daily quetiapine extended release in patients with schizophrenia. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 Mar;29(3):227-39. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.762903. Epub 2013 Jan 22. |
Not provided
Not provided
Patients had to fulfill criteria for schizophrenia according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) and their current antipsychotic treatment had to be considered inadequate because of insufficient efficacy, poor tolerance, and/or non acceptability of dosing regimen.
A total of 331 patients were enrolled across 40 centers in Canada, Australia, Hong Kong and Korea. Out of these 331 enrolled patients, 295 started treatment on seroquel XR. One hundred and eighty three patients completed the 24-week trial.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Seroquel XR | Open-label seroquel XR tablets: On Day 1 Patients received 300 mg, on Day 2 600 mg, on Day 3 600-800 mg and between Day 4-168 400-800 mg Seroquel XR, according to clinical judgement of investigator. Dose changes were in 200 mg fixed doses. Investigational product (IP) was supplied in open label wallet blister cards and subjects were instructed to take the IP once daily in the evening. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Baseline to 24 weeks |
| Change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score | Change in PANSS total score which includes Positive, Negative and General psychopathology. The PANSS is a 30-item scale where each symptom is rated on a severity scale ranging from 1-7, where 1=absent, 7=extreme). Maximum total score: 210, minimum total score is 30. Seven items are referring to positive symptoms (P1-7), seven items to negative symptoms (N1-7) and 16 items to general psychopathology (G1-16). The assessment prior to start of treatment is considered the baseline assessment. | Baseline to 24 weeks |
| Change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score | Change in positive subscale of PANSS. This subscale calculates the sum of the scores in PANSS items P1-P7. (1=absent symptoms, 7=extreme symptoms). Maximum total score: 49, minimum total score: 7. | Baseline to 24 weeks |
| Change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score | Change in negative subscale of PANSS. This subscale calculates the sum of the scores in PANSS items N1-N7. (1=absent symptoms, 7=extreme symptoms). Maximum total score: 49, minimum total score: 7. | Baseline to 24 weeks |
| Change in Global Assessment Scale (GAS) | Change in GAS score. The GAS is a 100-point single item scale that rates patient's functioning on a hypothetical continuum of mental health to mental illness. The scale values range from 1 to 100 (1=most impaired, 100=healthiest). | Baseline to 24 weeks |
| Change in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Scale | The CGI-S assesses severity of illness which is scored to rate the patient's current clinical state at start of treatment. The scores range from 1 to 7, where 1= normal, not at all ill, while a score of 7=among the most extremely ill of subjects. The change from start of treatment in the severity of illness is calculated by subtracting the score at start of treatment from the visit score. Alleviation of symptom severity will be indicated by a negative change score. | Baseline to 24 weeks |
| Change in Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale | Change in CGI-I scale. This scale is the second part of the CGI scale that is scored at Visit 3 to week 24 to observe the patient's change from start of treatment. The scores for the CGI-I subset ranges from 1 to 7 (1=very much improved, 7=very much worse and a score of 4 indicates no change.) | Day 7 - week 24 |
| Change in Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) | Change in SOFAS score. The SOFAS is a 100 point single item scale that rates functioning of a patient. The scale values range from 1=most impaired to 100=healthiest individual. The scale also includes a rating point of 0=missing information. | Baseline to 24 weeks |
| Change in Safety Measure: Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) | The Percentage of patients with change in Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS)was calculated. This is a 10 item scale that is rated on a five-point scale where 0=normal and 4=severe symptoms of Extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) with a focus on parkinsonian symptoms of EPS. | Baseline to 24 weeks |
| Change in Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS) | The Percentage of patients with change in BARS score was calculated. The BARS is a 4 item scale that is rating Extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) on a 4-point scale for the first three questions and on a 6-point scale for the last question. 0=normal and a higher value represents more pronounced symptoms of EPS. BARS has a focus on the akathisia symptoms of EPS. | Baseline to 24 weeks |
| Newcastle |
| New South Wales |
| Australia |
| Research Site | Brisbane | Queensland | Australia |
| Research Site | Meadowbrook | Queensland | Australia |
| Research Site | Dandenong | Victoria | Australia |
| Research Site | Calgary | Alberta | Canada |
| Research Site | Claresholm | Alberta | Canada |
| Research Site | Red Deer | Alberta | Canada |
| Research Site | Vancouver | British Columbia | Canada |
| Research Site | Victoria | British Columbia | Canada |
| Research Site | Miramichi | New Brunswick | Canada |
| Research Site | St. John's | Newfoundland and Labrador | Canada |
| Research Site | Sydney | Nova Scotia | Canada |
| Research Site | Belleville | Ontario | Canada |
| Research Site | Brantford | Ontario | Canada |
| Research Site | Chatham | Ontario | Canada |
| Research Site | Cornwall | Ontario | Canada |
| Research Site | Greater Sudbury | Ontario | Canada |
| Research Site | London | Ontario | Canada |
| Research Site | Markham | Ontario | Canada |
| Research Site | Mississauga | Ontario | Canada |
| Research Site | Newmarket | Ontario | Canada |
| Research Site | Oakville | Ontario | Canada |
| Research Site | Orléans | Ontario | Canada |
| Research Site | Toronto | Ontario | Canada |
| Research Site | Windsor | Ontario | Canada |
| Research Site | Gatineau | Quebec | Canada |
| Research Site | Greenfield Park | Quebec | Canada |
| Research Site | Montreal | Quebec | Canada |
| Research Site | Québec | Quebec | Canada |
| Research Site | Rouyn-Noranda | Quebec | Canada |
| Research Site | Verdun | Quebec | Canada |
| Research Site | Prince Albert | Saskatchewan | Canada |
| Research Site | Saskatoon | Saskatchewan | Canada |
| Research Site | Hong Kong | Hong Kong |
| Research Site | Seoul | Korea | South Korea |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Seroquel XR | Open-label seroquel XR tablets: On Day 1 Patients received 300 mg, on Day 2 600 mg, on Day 3 600-800 mg and between Day 4-168 400-800 mg Seroquel XR, according to clinical judgement of investigator. Dose changes were in 200 mg fixed doses. Investigational product (IP) was supplied in open label wallet blister cards and subjects were instructed to take the IP once daily in the evening. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Subjects With Improved Clinical Benefit From Assessment of Clinical Global Impression-Clinical Benefit (CGI-CB) Scale From Baseline to Week 24 or End of Study | Proportional change in CGI-CB score The CGI-CB scale is used to evaluate investigator's global weighted impression of efficacy and interference of adverse events (AEs) from enrolment to every visit. The score ranges from 1 to 10. The lower the score the better the outcome, e.g.: a score of 1 means that there is marked therapeutic effect with no burden of AEs. A score of 10 signifies that the burden of AEs outweighs the therapeutic effect, or no therapeutic effect with high burden of AEs. A change score for each subject will be calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the visit score. | The intention to treat (ITT) population (i.e., all subjects who received at least one dose of the study medication) comprised the population for the analysis (n=295) | Posted | Jul 2011 | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of Participants | Baseline to 24 weeks (or end of study) |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Clinical Global Impression-Clinical Benefit (CGI-CB) Score | Numerical change in CGI-CB score. The CGI-CB scale is used to evaluate investigator's global weighted impression of efficacy and interference of adverse events (AEs) from enrolment to every visit. The score ranges from 1 to 10. The lower the score the better the outcome, e.g.: a score of 1 means that there is marked therapeutic effect with no burden of AEs. A score of 10 signifies that the burden of AEs outweighs the therapeutic effect, or no therapeutic effect with high burden of AEs. A change score for each subject will be calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the visit score. | The intention to treat (ITT) population (i.e., all subjects who received at least one dose of the study medication) comprised the population for the analysis (n=295) | Posted | Jul 2011 | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline to 24 weeks |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score | Change in PANSS total score which includes Positive, Negative and General psychopathology. The PANSS is a 30-item scale where each symptom is rated on a severity scale ranging from 1-7, where 1=absent, 7=extreme). Maximum total score: 210, minimum total score is 30. Seven items are referring to positive symptoms (P1-7), seven items to negative symptoms (N1-7) and 16 items to general psychopathology (G1-16). The assessment prior to start of treatment is considered the baseline assessment. | The intention to treat (ITT) population (i.e., all subjects who received at least one dose of the study medication) comprised the population for the analysis (n=295) | Posted | Jul 2011 | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline to 24 weeks |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score | Change in positive subscale of PANSS. This subscale calculates the sum of the scores in PANSS items P1-P7. (1=absent symptoms, 7=extreme symptoms). Maximum total score: 49, minimum total score: 7. | The intention to treat (ITT) population (i.e., all subjects who received at least one dose of the study medication) comprised the population for the analysis (n=295) | Posted | Jul 2011 | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline to 24 weeks |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score | Change in negative subscale of PANSS. This subscale calculates the sum of the scores in PANSS items N1-N7. (1=absent symptoms, 7=extreme symptoms). Maximum total score: 49, minimum total score: 7. | The intention to treat (ITT) population (i.e., all subjects who received at least one dose of the study medication) comprised the population for the analysis (n=295) | Posted | Jul 2011 | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline to 24 weeks |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Global Assessment Scale (GAS) | Change in GAS score. The GAS is a 100-point single item scale that rates patient's functioning on a hypothetical continuum of mental health to mental illness. The scale values range from 1 to 100 (1=most impaired, 100=healthiest). | The intention to treat (ITT) population (i.e., all subjects who received at least one dose of the study medication) comprised the population for the analysis (n=295) | Posted | Jul 2011 | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline to 24 weeks |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Scale | The CGI-S assesses severity of illness which is scored to rate the patient's current clinical state at start of treatment. The scores range from 1 to 7, where 1= normal, not at all ill, while a score of 7=among the most extremely ill of subjects. The change from start of treatment in the severity of illness is calculated by subtracting the score at start of treatment from the visit score. Alleviation of symptom severity will be indicated by a negative change score. | The intention to treat (ITT) population (i.e., all subjects who received at least one dose of the study medication) comprised the population for the analysis (n=295) | Posted | Jul 2011 | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline to 24 weeks |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale | Change in CGI-I scale. This scale is the second part of the CGI scale that is scored at Visit 3 to week 24 to observe the patient's change from start of treatment. The scores for the CGI-I subset ranges from 1 to 7 (1=very much improved, 7=very much worse and a score of 4 indicates no change.) | The intention to treat (ITT) population (i.e., all subjects who received at least one dose of the study medication) comprised the population for the analysis (n=295) | Posted | Jul 2011 | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Day 7 - week 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) | Change in SOFAS score. The SOFAS is a 100 point single item scale that rates functioning of a patient. The scale values range from 1=most impaired to 100=healthiest individual. The scale also includes a rating point of 0=missing information. | The intention to treat (ITT) population (i.e., all subjects who received at least one dose of the study medication) comprised the population for the analysis (n=295) | Posted | Jul 2011 | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline to 24 weeks |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Safety Measure: Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) | The Percentage of patients with change in Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS)was calculated. This is a 10 item scale that is rated on a five-point scale where 0=normal and 4=severe symptoms of Extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) with a focus on parkinsonian symptoms of EPS. | The intention to treat (ITT) population (i.e., all subjects who received at least one dose of the study medication) comprised the population for the analysis (n=295) | Posted | Jul 2011 | Number | Percentage of subjects | Baseline to 24 weeks |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS) | The Percentage of patients with change in BARS score was calculated. The BARS is a 4 item scale that is rating Extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) on a 4-point scale for the first three questions and on a 6-point scale for the last question. 0=normal and a higher value represents more pronounced symptoms of EPS. BARS has a focus on the akathisia symptoms of EPS. | The intention to treat (ITT) population (i.e., all subjects who received at least one dose of the study medication) comprised the population for the analysis (n=295) | Posted | Jul 2011 | Number | percentage of subjects | Baseline to 24 weeks |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Seroquel XR | Open-label seroquel XR tablets: On Day 1 Patients received 300 mg, on Day 2 600 mg, on Day 3 600-800 mg and between Day 4-168 400-800 mg Seroquel XR, according to clinical judgement of investigator. Dose changes were in 200 mg fixed doses. Investigational product (IP) was supplied in open label wallet blister cards and subjects were instructed to take the IP once daily in the evening. | 33 | 295 | 224 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gastritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Appendicitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Overdose | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute psychosis | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aggression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Delusion | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Delusional Perception | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hallucination | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hallucination; Auditory | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Homicidal Ideation | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Major Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Psychotic Disorder | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Schizoaffective Disorder Bipolar Type | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Schizophrenia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Schizophrenia; Disorganised Type | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Suicidal Behaviour | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Suicidal Ideation | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Suicide Attempt | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Orthostatic Hypotension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Somnolence | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sedation | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dry Mouth | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anxiety | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight Increased | Investigations | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
The open-label design and lack of a placebo group constitute potential limitations. In addition, the small sample size of some of the subgroups may limit conclusions drawn from subgroup analyses.
AstraZeneca shall have a period of 30 days from receipt of the proposed final manuscript for any publication or other disclosure to review it and may within such time require that submission for publication or disclosure of the manuscript be delayed for an additional period of ninety (90) days in order for AstraZeneca to file patent applications.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gerard Lynch | AstraZeneca | 441625 518062 | aztrial_results_posting@astrazeneca.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012559 | Schizophrenia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019967 | Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|