Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
slow patient recruitment
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the DIAM Spinal Stabilization System as a method of treating patients with symptoms of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis at a single level from L2 to L5.
This pivotal clinical trial is being conducted to evaluate the DIAM Spinal Stabilization System for the treatment of single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis from L2 to L5. The implant under investigation in this clinical trial is the DIAM Spinal Stabilization System. And following a decompression procedure, the device will be implanted using a posterior surgical approach. Patients in the control group will receive a lumbar decompression.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| DIAM Group1 | Experimental |
| |
| Single-Level Posterior Decompression | Active Comparator |
| |
| DIAM Group2 | Experimental |
| |
| Posterolateral Interbody Fusion | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single-Level Posterior Decompression | Procedure | The single level posterior decompression is a posterior surgical procedure. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of Overall Success | Rate of overall success is reported as the percentage of partipants who met all of the following criteria:
| 24 months after operation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Score | The self-administered Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Questionnaire was used to assess patient pain and ability to function. The ODI scale ranges from 0-100. The best score is 0 (no disability) and worst is 100 (maximum disability). | 24 month after operation |
| Success Rate of Oswestry Diability Index Scores |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Leg pain score must be ≥ back pain score
Exclusion Criteria:
Disease state which requires destabilizing decompression
Axial back pain with no pain in leg, buttock, or groin
Baseline strength grade of 0 (total paralysis), 1 (palpable or visible contraction), or 2 (active movement, gravity,eliminated) in any lower extremity motor group as noted on Neuro Status CRF
Segmental kyphosis >0° at indicated level
Cauda equina syndrome
Compression of nerve roots that causes neurogenic bowel, bladder dysfunction
Prior surgical procedure at involved or adjacent levels
Diagnosed with significant peripheral neuropathy
Significant vascular disease causing vascular claudication
Requires tx of spinal stenosis at more than 1 lumbar level
Significant lumbar instability, defined as > 3mm translation on flexion/extension radiographs
Has > 3mm fixed spondylolisthesis at affected level
BMI ≥ 40
Sustained vertebral or hip fracture within last year
Has the following (if "Yes" to any risk below, a lumbar spine DEXA Scan is required for eligibility)
If level of DEXA T-score is -1.0 or lower pt is excluded from study
Lumbar scoliosis with Cobb angle of > 15°
Documented allergy to silicone, polyethylene, titanium or latex
Overt or active bacterial infection, local, systemic, and/or potential for bacteremia
Alcohol and/or drug abuser
Received tx with investigational therapy (device and/or pharmaceutical) within 30 days prior to entering study or such tx is planned during the 24 mos following enrollment in study
Suppressed immune system or has taken steroids at any dose daily for more than 1 mon within the last yr
Presence of active malignancy or prior history of malignancy except for basal cell carcinoma of the skin
History of any endocrine or metabolic disorder known to affect osteogenesis
Chronic or acute renal and/or hepatic failure or prior history of renal and/or hepatic parenchymal disease
History of autoimmune disease
Disease which precludes accurate clinical evaluation of safety and effectiveness of txs in this study
Congenital or iatrogenic posterior element insufficiency
Moderate to advance spondylosis or pts who demonstrate advanced degenerative changes. Such advanced degenerative changes are characterized by 1 or combination of the following a Bridging osteophytes; b Reduction or absence of motion; c Collapse of the intervertebral disc space of > 50% of its normal ht
Mentally incompetent
Waddell Signs of Inorganic Behavior score of ≥ 3
Prisoner
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fremont | California | United States | ||||
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | DIAM Group1 | Patients in this group were implanted DIAM Spinal Stabilization System using a posterior surgical approach. |
| FG001 | Single-Level Posterior Decompression | Patients in this group received a single-level posterior lumbar decompression |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| DIAM Spinal Stabilization | Device | The DIAM Spinal Stabilization System is a spacer that is implanted between adjoining spinous processes using a posterior surgical approach. |
|
| DIAM Spinal Stabilization | Device | The DIAM Spinal Stabilization System is a spacer that is implanted between adjoining spinous processes using a posterior surgical approach |
|
| Fusion | Device | Posterolateral Interbody Fusion |
|
Success rate of Oswestry Diability Index Scores is reported as the percentage of participants who met: Pre-treatment Score - Post-treatment Score ≥ 15. |
| 24 month after operation |
| Success Rate of Neurological Status | Success rate of neurological status is reported as the percentage of participants who met neurological success defined as maintenance or improvement in all sections (motor, sensory, reflex, and straight leg raising) for the time period evaluated. In order for a section to be considered a success, each element in the section must remain the same or improve from the time of the preoperative evaluation to the time period evaluated. | 24 month after operation |
| Back Pain | Numerical rating scales are used to evaluate back pain intensity and frequency. Patients will rate their pain intensity on a scale from 0-10, with a score of 0 representing "no pain" and a score of 10 representing "pain as bad as it could be." Similarly, patients will record their back pain frequency on a scale from 0-10, with a score of 0 being "pain none of the time" and a score of 10 being "pain all of the time." A patient's total pain score will be the sum of pain intensity and frequency scores (0 min, 20 max). | 24 month after operation |
| Back Pain Success Rate | Back pain success rate is reported as the percentage of participants whose back pain improvement met: (Pre Score - Post Score)/ Pre Score > 20%. | 24 month after operation |
| Leg Pain | Numerical rating scales are used to evaluate leg intensity and frequency. Patients will rate their pain intensity on a scale from 0-10, with a score of 0 representing "no pain" and a score of 10 representing "pain as bad as it could be." Similarly, patients will record their back pain frequency on a scale from 0-10, with a score of 0 being "pain none of the time" and a score of 10 being "pain all of the time." A patient's total pain score will be the sum of pain intensity and frequency scores (0 min, 20 max). | 24 month after operation |
| Leg Pain Success Rate | Leg pain success rate is reported as the percentage of participants whose leg pain improvement met: (Pre Score - Post Score)/ Pre Score > 20%. | 24 month after operation |
| General Health Status (SF-36) | The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) was used to assess general health status. The SF-36 results are summarized into two components, a physical component summary (PCS) and a mental component summary (MCS). The score for PCS and MCS is between 0 and 100, with higher scores denoting better quality of life. | 24 month after operation |
| Success Rate of SF-36 Health Survey | Success rate of SF-36 Health Survey include two components: the success rate of a physical component summary (PCS) and the success rate of a mental component summary (MCS). The success rates of SF-36 PCS and MCS for DIAM Device vs. Single-Level Posterior Decompression were defined as: (Post Score - Pre Score) / Pre Score>= 20%. The success rates of SF-36 PCS and MCS for DIAM vs. Posterolateral Interbody Fusion were defined as: Post Score - Pre Score >= 0. | 24 month after operation |
| Operative Time | at the time of operation |
| Blood Loss | At the time of operation |
| Hospital Stay | At the time of discharge |
| Jacksonville |
| Florida |
| United States |
| Melbourne | Florida | United States |
| Temple Terrace | Florida | United States |
| Columbus | Georgia | United States |
| Baton Rouge | Louisiana | United States |
| New Orleans | Louisiana | United States |
| Winston-Salem | North Carolina | United States |
| Chattanooga | Tennessee | United States |
| FG002 | DIAM Group2 | Patients in this group were implanted DIAM Spinal Stabilization System using a posterior surgical approach. |
| FG003 | Posterolateral Interbody Fusion | Patients in this group received a posterolateral interbody fusion. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | DIAM Group1 | Patients in this group were implanted DIAM Spinal Stabilization System using a posterior surgical approach. |
| BG001 | Single-Level Posterior Decompression | Patients in this group received a single-level posterior lumbar decompression |
| BG002 | DIAM Group2 | Patients in this group were implanted DIAM Spinal Stabilization System using a posterior surgical approach. |
| BG003 | Posterolateral Interbody Fusion | Patients in this group received a posterolateral interbody fusion. |
| BG004 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Height | Mean | Standard Deviation | in. |
| |||||||||||||||
| Weight | Mean | Standard Deviation | lbs |
| |||||||||||||||
| Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Score | The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Questionnaire was used to assess patient pain and ability to function. The ODI score ranges from 0-100. The best score is 0 (no disability) and worst is 100 (maximum disability). | Mean | Standard Deviation | Scores on a scale |
| ||||||||||||||
| General Health Status | The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) was used to assess general health status. The SF-36 results are summarized into two components, a physical component summary (PCS) and a mental component summary (MCS). The score for PCS and MCS is between 0 and 100, with higher scores denoting better quality of life. No overall score (SF-36) was reported. | Mean | Standard Deviation | Scores on a scale |
| ||||||||||||||
| Pain Status | Numerical rating scales are used to evaluate back pain and leg pain intensity and frequency. Patients will rate their pain intensity on a scale from 0-10, with a score of 0 representing "no pain" and a score of 10 representing "pain as bad as it could be." Similarly, patients will record their back pain frequency on a scale from 0-10, with a score of 0 being "pain none of the time" and a score of 10 being "pain all of the time." A patient's total pain score will be the sum of pain intensity and frequency scores (0 min, 20 max). | Mean | Standard Deviation | Scores on a scale |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Rate of Overall Success | Rate of overall success is reported as the percentage of partipants who met all of the following criteria:
| Posted | Number | percentage of patients | 24 months after operation |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Score | The self-administered Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Questionnaire was used to assess patient pain and ability to function. The ODI scale ranges from 0-100. The best score is 0 (no disability) and worst is 100 (maximum disability). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Scores on a scale | 24 month after operation |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Success Rate of Oswestry Diability Index Scores | Success rate of Oswestry Diability Index Scores is reported as the percentage of participants who met: Pre-treatment Score - Post-treatment Score ≥ 15. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 24 month after operation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Success Rate of Neurological Status | Success rate of neurological status is reported as the percentage of participants who met neurological success defined as maintenance or improvement in all sections (motor, sensory, reflex, and straight leg raising) for the time period evaluated. In order for a section to be considered a success, each element in the section must remain the same or improve from the time of the preoperative evaluation to the time period evaluated. | Posted | Number | percentage of particpants | 24 month after operation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Back Pain | Numerical rating scales are used to evaluate back pain intensity and frequency. Patients will rate their pain intensity on a scale from 0-10, with a score of 0 representing "no pain" and a score of 10 representing "pain as bad as it could be." Similarly, patients will record their back pain frequency on a scale from 0-10, with a score of 0 being "pain none of the time" and a score of 10 being "pain all of the time." A patient's total pain score will be the sum of pain intensity and frequency scores (0 min, 20 max). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 24 month after operation |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Back Pain Success Rate | Back pain success rate is reported as the percentage of participants whose back pain improvement met: (Pre Score - Post Score)/ Pre Score > 20%. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 24 month after operation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Leg Pain | Numerical rating scales are used to evaluate leg intensity and frequency. Patients will rate their pain intensity on a scale from 0-10, with a score of 0 representing "no pain" and a score of 10 representing "pain as bad as it could be." Similarly, patients will record their back pain frequency on a scale from 0-10, with a score of 0 being "pain none of the time" and a score of 10 being "pain all of the time." A patient's total pain score will be the sum of pain intensity and frequency scores (0 min, 20 max). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 24 month after operation |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Leg Pain Success Rate | Leg pain success rate is reported as the percentage of participants whose leg pain improvement met: (Pre Score - Post Score)/ Pre Score > 20%. | Posted | Number | percentage of participant | 24 month after operation |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | General Health Status (SF-36) | The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) was used to assess general health status. The SF-36 results are summarized into two components, a physical component summary (PCS) and a mental component summary (MCS). The score for PCS and MCS is between 0 and 100, with higher scores denoting better quality of life. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Scores on a scale | 24 month after operation |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Success Rate of SF-36 Health Survey | Success rate of SF-36 Health Survey include two components: the success rate of a physical component summary (PCS) and the success rate of a mental component summary (MCS). The success rates of SF-36 PCS and MCS for DIAM Device vs. Single-Level Posterior Decompression were defined as: (Post Score - Pre Score) / Pre Score>= 20%. The success rates of SF-36 PCS and MCS for DIAM vs. Posterolateral Interbody Fusion were defined as: Post Score - Pre Score >= 0. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 24 month after operation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Operative Time | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | hrs | at the time of operation |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Blood Loss | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | ml | At the time of operation |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Hospital Stay | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | days | At the time of discharge |
|
|
24 month
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | DIAM Group1 | Patients in this group were implanted DIAM Spinal Stabilization System using a posterior surgical approach. | 5 | 14 | 12 | 14 | ||
| EG001 | Single-Level Posterior Decompression | Patients in this group received a single-level posterior lumbar decompression | 7 | 12 | 11 | 12 | ||
| EG002 | DIAM Group2 | Patients in this group were implanted DIAM Spinal Stabilization System using a posterior surgical approach. | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | ||
| EG003 | Posterolateral Interbody Fusion | Patients in this group received a posterolateral interbody fusion. | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accidental Injury/ Muscle strain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cardiovascular | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cervical spine event | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dural injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Gastrointestinal-other | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Incision-related | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Infection | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Low extremity not of back etiology | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Neurological | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Other | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Skin disorder | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Spinal event at target level | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Upper extremity pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urogenital | Renal and urinary disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accidental injury / muscle strain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Allergic reaction | Immune system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Back and/or leg pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cadiovascular | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dural injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Electrolyte imbalance | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Elevated temperature without infection | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Endocrine | Endocrine disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hematological | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Incision-related | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Lower extremity not of back etiology | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Neck and arm pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Neurological | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Other | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Other pain | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Spinal event at other lumbar level (s) | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Spinal event at target level | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Trauma | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Upper extremity pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urogenital | Renal and urinary disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vertebral fracture | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Studies terminated before full cohort of participants were enrolled. Data and adverse events presented are through 24 months of follow-up.
The PI must provide the sponsor a copy of the results communication ninety (90) days prior to submission or disclosure. The sponsor shall not censor the results communication beyond the protection of confidential information. Investigator agrees to delete confidential information prior to any submission, publication, presentation or other disclosure. The sponsor can embargo results communications up to sixty (60) days.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical Department | Medtrionic spinal and biologics | 1800-876-3133 | 6068 | msbkclinicalresearch@medtronic.com |
| Male |
|
| Black |
|
| Asian |
|
| Hispanic |
|
| other |
|
| Mental Component Summary (SF-36 MCS) |
|
| Leg Pain Score (0-20) |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
Patients in this group received a posterolateral interbody fusion.
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
Patients in this group received a posterolateral interbody fusion.
|
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
Patients in this group received a posterolateral interbody fusion.
|
|
|
|
|