Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this prospective study is to evaluate the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on the defibrillation threshold (DFT) estimates in cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) patients. The hypothesis of the study is that defibrillation threshold (DFT) will decrease with 6 months of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) has emerged as a promising therapeutic addition in patients with drug refractory heart failure (HF). Along with providing relief of symptoms of HF, cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) are used for the prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Although there are concerns that the defibrillation threshold (DFT) estimates are elevated in the heart failure (HF) patient population due to lower LV ejection fraction (EF) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, there is paucity of data available to evaluate this theory.
Recently, two different studies in a retrospective manner evaluated the energy requirements in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D). Burke et al analyzed DFTs in 50 patients each implanted with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) device and an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Although the ejection fraction (EF) in cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT- D) group was lower than the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) group, the mean defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) between the two groups were not significantly different (10.2 ± 6.1 J for the cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) group vs. 9.5 ± 5.0 J for the control group)14. In the ASSURE study, Doshi et al. showed that patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) devices do not have higher energy requirements when compared to patients receiving modern single or dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Although, there was a trend toward higher energy requirements found among patients with higher degrees of heart failure.
Major cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) trials have showed that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) therapy has positive effects on ejection fraction (EF) and the heart failure (HF) condition of the patient over time. But, there is no study that has evaluated the defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) in the heart failure (HF) patients over time of receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This information will help the clinicians decide if they need to perform more invasive procedures during device implant to lower DFTs in patients who do not meet the defibrillation safety margin or they should just wait over time for the CRT to reduce the defibrillation threshold (DFT). Also, there is no published data about the stability of defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) in heart failure (HF) patients over time. The results from this study will also help to clarify whether it is safe to never test the defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) post-implant in this patient population.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Defibrillator (CRT-D) | Other | Patients in the study who received a Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Defibrillator (CRT-D) are indicated for it. It's a single arm study in which patients underwent defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing at implant and 6 months. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Defibrillator (CRT-D) | Device |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Defibrillation Threshold Difference Obtained in Volts (V) Between Implant and 6 Months | All patients underwent defibrillation threshold testing at cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) implant and then at 6 months. The outcome measure is the difference in DFT (defibrillation threshold) in volts between implant and 6 months. | Baseline and 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Defibrillation Threshold Difference Obtained in Joules (J) | Baseline and 6 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Amir Hedayati, MD | Glendale Heart Institute | Principal Investigator |
| Michael Gold, MD, PhD | Medical University of South Carolina | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pacific Heart Institute | Santa Monica | California | 90404 | United States | ||
| Penrose Hospital |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21315841 | Result | Gold MR, Hedayati A, Alaeddini J, Payne JP, Bailin S, Sturdivant JJ, Pradhan S, Oza AL. Temporal stability of defibrillation thresholds with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2011 Jul;8(7):1008-13. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.02.006. Epub 2011 Feb 9. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Defibrillators (CRT-D) | All patients enrolled were indicated for a CRT-D. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Group 1 |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Defibrillation Threshold Difference Obtained in Volts (V) Between Implant and 6 Months | All patients underwent defibrillation threshold testing at cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) implant and then at 6 months. The outcome measure is the difference in DFT (defibrillation threshold) in volts between implant and 6 months. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Volts | Baseline and 6 months |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Group 1 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Death | General disorders |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phrenic Nerve Stimulation | Cardiac disorders |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashish Oza | St. Jude Medical | 818-493-3648 | aoza@sjm.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016757 | Death, Sudden, Cardiac |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006323 | Heart Arrest |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D003645 | Death, Sudden |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Colorado Springs |
| Colorado |
| 80907 |
| United States |
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| Protocol Violation |
|
| One of the required devices not implante |
|
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
| Secondary | Defibrillation Threshold Difference Obtained in Joules (J) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Joules | Baseline and 6 months |
|
|
|
| 1 |
| 77 |
| 4 |
| 77 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D003643 |
| Death |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |