Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Susan G. Komen Foundation |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
We aim to compare the sensitivity of mammography to the sensitivity of Molecular Breast Imaging (a new gamma-camera based breast imaging technology) in women with dense breast tissue who are at increased risk for breast cancer.
The sensitivity of conventional mammography (MMO) is poor in women with mammographically dense breast parenchyma. We have developed Molecular Breast Imaging (MBI) - a new technique which utilizes a Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride (CZT) gamma camera for scintimammography that has a high sensitivity (~90%) for the detection of breast cancers independent of breast density.
The aim of this study is to demonstrate the utility of MBI as an adjunct screening modality for the detection of occult breast cancers in women with mammographically dense breast tissue. Initial recruitment will be from the pool of patients awaiting a screening mammogram in the Department of Radiology at Mayo Clinic Rochester. All patients will have a screening MMO and an MBI study. Patients with positive studies (MBI or MMO) will undergo additional diagnostic studies. At 15 months post-recruitment, all patients will be contacted by phone or mail to determine whether subsequent to their study, there has been any change in their breast status.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mammography and Molecular Breast Imaging | Experimental | Participants underwent conventional mammography and molecular breast imaging after a 740-millibecquerel (mBQ) (20-mCi) Technetium (99mTc) sestamibi injection. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Molecular Breast Imaging | Device | Molecular breast imaging is a new nuclear medicine technique for imaging the breast. It uses small field of view semiconductor-based gamma cameras that use Cadmium Zinc Telluride detectors. These have superior spatial and energy resolution to conventional sodium iodide detectors. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic Yield | Diagnostic yield is the likelihood that a test or procedure will provide the information needed to establish a diagnosis. In this case, it is the proportion of women with positive results of a screening test and positive results with the reference standard (verified cancer status). | 12 months after mammography and gamma imaging |
| Number of Participants With Cancer Diagnosis at 12 Months | 12 months after mammography and gamma imaging |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | Sensitivity measures the proportion of actual positives which are correctly identified as such. | 12 months after mammography and gamma imaging |
| Specificity | Specificity measures the proportion of negatives which are correctly identified as such. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Past prior screening mammography (SM) interpreted as negative or benign (This screening must have been performed at Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota).
Past prior SM interpreted as heterogeneously dense or extremely dense (This screening must have been performed at Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota).
Women younger than 50 years who had not undergone prior mammography, as most of these women have dense breasts.
Subjects had to have at least one of the following risk factors:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Deborah J. Rhodes, M.D. | Mayo Clinic | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayo Clinic | Rochester | Minnesota | 55905 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21045179 | Result | Rhodes DJ, Hruska CB, Phillips SW, Whaley DH, O'Connor MK. Dedicated dual-head gamma imaging for breast cancer screening in women with mammographically dense breasts. Radiology. 2011 Jan;258(1):106-18. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100625. Epub 2010 Nov 2. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Mayo Clinic You Tube Channel | View source |
Not provided
969 subjects completed imaging and met eligibility criteria, but 33 were excluded because of lack of the reference standard (unverified cancer status).
Subjects were enrolled between September 2005 and February 2009 in Rochester, Minnesota.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Mammography and Molecular Breast Imaging | Participants underwent conventional mammography and molecular breast imaging after a 740-millibecquerel (mBQ)(20-mCi) Technetium (99mTc) sestamibi injection. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Mammography and Molecular Breast Imaging | Participants underwent conventional mammography and molecular breast imaging after a 740-mBQ (20-mCi) Technetium (99mTc) sestamibi injection. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Diagnostic Yield | Diagnostic yield is the likelihood that a test or procedure will provide the information needed to establish a diagnosis. In this case, it is the proportion of women with positive results of a screening test and positive results with the reference standard (verified cancer status). | The analysis population only included participants with a verified cancer status at 12 months after the initial screening (mammography and gamma imaging). | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | cancers per 1000 women screened | 12 months after mammography and gamma imaging |
|
Participants were followed for adverse events while they were on the study.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Mammography and Molecular Breast Imaging | Participants underwent conventional mammography and molecular breast imaging after a 740-millibecquerel (mBQ)(20-mCi) Technetium (99mTc) sestamibi injection. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Deborah J. Rhodes | Mayo Clinic | 507-538-1703 | rhodes.deborah@mayo.edu |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017256 | Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009570 | Nitriles |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D015609 | Organotechnetium Compounds |
| D009942 | Organometallic Compounds |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Conventional Mammography | Device | Mammography is the process of using low-energy X-rays (usually around 30 kVp) to examine the human breast and is used as a diagnostic and a screening tool. |
|
| Technetium (99mTc) sestamibi | Drug | Technetium (99mTc) sestamibi is a pharmaceutical agent used in nuclear medicine imaging. The drug is a coordination complex consisting of the radioisotope technetium-99m bound to six methoxyisobutylisonitrile (MIBI) ligands. |
|
|
| 12 month after mammography and gamma imaging |
| Recall Rate | Recall rate was defined as the percentage of participants recalled for follow-up studies initiated because of abnormal findings with mammography or gamma imaging. | 12 months after mammography and gamma imaging |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Race or ethnicity | Number | participants |
|
| Menopausal status | Number | participants |
|
| Mammographic breast density | Eligibility was determined by density assessed on a previous mammogram prior to study entry; mammographic density reported refers to density assessed from the study mammogram. | Number | participants |
|
| Risk factors | Although participants may have qualified for multiple risk factor categories, they were assigned to only one risk factor category in this table. These risk factors are listed in order of priority. The last two risk factors with respect to first and second-degree relatives with a history of breast cancer refer to subjects who qualified on the basis of family history but did not meet the Gail or Claus model risk threshold levels. The Gail risk model focuses on nongenetic risk factors, with limited information on family history. The Claus risk model focuses on genetic risk factors. | Number | participants |
|
For this reporting arm, the interpretation and analysis was done with gamma imaging only. |
| OG002 | Both Mammography and Gamma Imaging | For this reporting arm, the interpretation and analysis was done with both mammography and gamma images together. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Sensitivity | Sensitivity measures the proportion of actual positives which are correctly identified as such. | The analysis population only included participants with a verified cancer status at 12 months after the initial screening (mammography and gamma imaging). | Posted | Number | number of cancers diagnosed | 12 months after mammography and gamma imaging |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Cancer Diagnosis at 12 Months | The analysis population only included participants with a verified cancer status at 12 months after the initial screening (mammography and gamma imaging). | Posted | Number | participants | 12 months after mammography and gamma imaging |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Specificity | Specificity measures the proportion of negatives which are correctly identified as such. | The analysis population only included participants with a verified cancer status at 12 months after the initial screening (mammography and gamma imaging). The number of participants negative for breast cancer was 936-11 = 925. | Posted | Number | number of true negatives | 12 month after mammography and gamma imaging |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Recall Rate | Recall rate was defined as the percentage of participants recalled for follow-up studies initiated because of abnormal findings with mammography or gamma imaging. | The analysis population only included participants with a verified cancer status at 12 months after the initial screening (mammography and gamma imaging). | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | 12 months after mammography and gamma imaging |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 969 |
| 0 |
| 969 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D017437 |
| Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
|
| Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) |
|
| .07 |
| 95 |
| No |
| Superiority or Other |
| For invasive cancers; significant difference p ≤ 0.05 | McNemar | .063 | 95 | No | Superiority or Other |
| For invasive cancers; significant difference p ≤ 0.05 | McNemar | .063 | 95 | No | Superiority or Other |
| For ductal carcinoma in situ; significant difference p ≤ 0.05 | McNemar | .5 | 95 | No | Superiority or Other |
| For ductal carcinoma in situ; significant difference p ≤ 0.05 | McNemar | >.99 | 95 | No | Superiority or Other |
| .069 |
| 95 |
| No |
| Superiority or Other |
| .218 |
| 95 |
| No |
| Superiority or Other |