Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To determine the safety and efficacy of SEP-225441 (eszopiclone) in subjects with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD).
This is a multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study of the safety and efficacy of SEP-225441 (eszopiclone) in male and female adult subjects with a diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). The study consists of a screening period of 7-10 days, 8 weeks of treatment, and a 7 day follow-up period. This study was previously posted by Sepracor Inc. In October 2009, Sepracor Inc. was acquired by Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma., and in October 2010, Sepracor Inc's name was changed to Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active Comparator | SEP-225441 (eszopiclone) total daily dose of 1.5 mg |
|
| 2 | Active Comparator | SEP-225441 (eszopiclone) total daily dose of 0.9 mg |
|
| 3 | Placebo Comparator | Placebo total daily dose 0.9 mg |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| eszopiclone | Drug | SEP-225441 (eszopiclone) total daily dose of 1.5 mg |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Total Score on the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), as Assessed by the Site-trained Rater | THe HAM-M was administered by a site-trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-M rating scale. These items included: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. All items are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). The Ham-A total score can range from 0 to 56 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety symptoms. | Baseline to Week 8 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score (Except for Week 8) | The HAM-A was administered by a site-trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-A rating scale. These items included: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. all items are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). Ham-A total score can range from 0 to 56 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety symptoms. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| CNS Medical Director | Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birmingham Psychiatry Pharaceutical Studies, Inc. | Birmingham | Alabama | 35226 | United States | ||
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26488677 | Derived | Williams JB, Kobak KA, Giller E, Reasner DS, Curry L, Detke MJ. Comparison of Site-Based Versus Central Ratings in a Study of Generalized Anxiety Disorder. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015 Dec;35(6):654-60. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000422. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo Arm | Placebo |
| FG001 | Eszopiclone Low Dose Arm | SEP-225441 (eszopiclone) total daily dose of 0.9 mg |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| eszopiclone | Drug | SEP-225441 (eszopiclone) total daily dose of 0.9 mg |
|
|
| Placebo | Drug | Placebo total daily dose 0.9 mg |
|
| Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6 based on last observation carried forward (LOCF) |
| Change in Individual Item Scores on HAM-A | The HAM-A was administered by a site trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-A rating scale. These items include: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. All items are measured on a t5-point scale (0-4). Each HAM-A individual item score can range from 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety questions. | Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8 |
| Change From Baseline in Clinician Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) | The CGI-Swas completed by a board certified psychiatrist and represents the clinician's subjective assessment of severity of the subject's anxiety symptoms as assessed by a 7-scale score for a single question, "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how anxious is the subject at this time?" The score was based on the following scale: 1=normal, not at all anxious; 2=borderline anxious; 3=mildly anxious; 4=moderately anxious; 5=markedly anxious; 6=severly anxious; 7=among the most extremely anxious subjects. CGI-S score can range from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating higher severity. | Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF) |
| Clinical Global Impression- Improvement (CGI-I) | CGI-I was completed by a board certified psychiatrist and represented the clinician's subjective assessment of improvement of the subject's anxiety symptoms based on the following question, "Compared to his/her condition at Visit 2, how much has he/she changed?" The score was based on the following scale: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse. CGI-I score can range from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating less improvement. | Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 9, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF) |
| Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) 50% Anxiolytic Response | The HAM-A was administered by a site-trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-A rating scale. These items include: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. All items are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). A 50% anxiolytic response was defined as a 50% or greater reduction from baseline in the HAM-A total score. The Ham-A total score can range from 0 to 56 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety symptoms. | Week 2, 4, 6, 8 |
| Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Remission | The HAM-A was administered by a site-trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-A rating scale. These items include: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. All items are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). Remission was defined as a HAM-A total score of 7 or less. The Ham-A total score can range from 0 to 56 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety symptoms. | Week 2, 4, 6, 8 based on last observation carried forward (LOCF) |
| Change From Baseline on Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) Short Form | The Q-LES-Q was completed by the subject and assessed quaility of life based on 16 items, each evaluated on a 5-point scale of overall level of enjoyment/satisfaction: 1=very poor; 2=poor; 3=fair; 4=good; 5=very good. The overall percentage score was computed as a sum of items 1 to 14 as expressed as a percentage of the maximum possible score: Overall Percentage Score = Sum [item 1... item 14]-14)/(70-14 ) *100%. Q-LES-Q overall percentage score can range from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating higher quality of life. | Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF) |
| Change From Baseline Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) Total Score | The ISI was completed by the subject and is an assessment of the severity of insomnia. The administered extended ISI questionnaire consists of 5 items (containing 7 questions, as item 1 contains 3 questions) comprising the original ISI questionnaire, plus 6 quality of life related items (sleep quality, restedness/refreshness upon arising, daytime fatigue, attention/concentration, relationships and mood disturbances), and 2 items assessing duration and frequency of sleep problems. All items, except for the insomnia duration and frequency questions, are measured on a Likert-type 5-point scale (0-4). ISI total score can range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating more severe insomnia. | Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on lst observation carried forward (LOCF) |
| Change From Baseline Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) | The SDS was completed by the subject and captured the subject's level of disability. The subject rated the extent to which his or her work, social life or leisure activities, and home life or family responsibilities were impaired by his or her symptoms on a 10-point visual analog scale. SDS total score can range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating higher functional impairment. | Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF) |
| Change From Baseline Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) | ESS was completed by the subject and assessed daytime sedation based on 8 items, each presenting a situation for which the subject needed to evaluate how likely he/she is to doze off or fall asleep in contrast to feeling just tired. Each item was evaluated on the following scale: 0 = would never doze; 1 = slight chance of dozing; 2 = moderate chance of dozing; 3 = high chance of dozing. ESS total score can range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating higher levels of daytime sleepiness. | Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF) |
| Arcadia |
| California |
| 91007 |
| United States |
| Southwestern Research, Inc. | Beverly Hills | California | 90210 | United States |
| Southwestern Research, Inc. | Burbank | California | 91506 | United States |
| California Clinical Trials Medical Group | Glendale | California | 91202 | United States |
| California clinical Trials Medical Group | Glendale | California | 91206 | United States |
| Newport Beach | California | 92660 | United States |
| Excell Research | Oceanside | California | 92056 | United States |
| California Clinical Trials Medical Group | Paramount | California | 90723 | United States |
| Southwestern Research, Inc. | Pasadena | California | 91107 | United States |
| California clinical Trials Medical Group | San Diego | California | 92123 | United States |
| Stanford Universtiy Medical center | Stanford | California | 94302 | United States |
| University of CT Health Center | Farmington | Connecticut | 06032 | United States |
| Comprehensive Psychiatric Care, PC | Norwich | Connecticut | 06360 | United States |
| Florida Clinical Research Center LLC | Bradenton | Florida | 34208 | United States |
| Sarkis Clinical Trials | Gainsville | Florida | 32607 | United States |
| Clinical Neuroscience Solutions, Inc. | Jacksonville | Florida | 32216 | United States |
| Clinical Neuroscience Solutions, Inc. | Orlando | Florida | 32806 | United States |
| Comprehensive NeuroScience, Inc. | St. Petersburg | Florida | 33702 | United States |
| Stedman Clinical Trials, LLC | Tampa | Florida | 33613 | United States |
| Janus Center for Psychiatric Research | West Palm Beach | Florida | 33407 | United States |
| Comprehensive NeuroScience, Inc. | Atlanta | Georgia | 30328 | United States |
| Carmen Research | Smyrna | Georgia | 30080 | United States |
| Alexian Brothers Center for Psychiatric Research | Hoffman Estates | Illinois | 60194 | United States |
| Comprehensive NeuroScience, Inc. | Park Ridge | Illinois | 60068 | United States |
| Vince and Associats Clinical Research | Overland Park | Kansas | 66212 | United States |
| Clinical Trials Technology, Inc. | Prairie Village | Kansas | 66206 | United States |
| Pedia Research, LLC | Owensboro | Kentucky | 42301 | United States |
| Pharasite Research, Inc. | Baltimore | Maryland | 21208 | United States |
| Massachusetts General Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | 02114 | United States |
| Coastal Research Associates, Inc. | Braintree | Massachusetts | 02184 | United States |
| Center for Emotional Fitness | Cherry Hill | New Jersey | 08002 | United States |
| CRI Worldwide, LLC | Clementon | New Jersey | 08021 | United States |
| Social Psychiatry Research Institute | Brooklyn | New York | 11235 | United States |
| Neurobehavioral Research, Inc. | Cedarhurst | New York | 11516 | United States |
| Comprehensive NeuroScience, Inc. | Fresh Meadows | New York | 11366 | United States |
| Fieve Clinica Services, Inc. | New York | New York | 10021 | United States |
| Medical & Behavioral Health Research, PC | New York | New York | 10021 | United States |
| Medical & Behavioral Health Research, P.C. | New York | New York | 10023 | United States |
| Richmond Behavioral Associates | Staten Island | New York | 10312 | United States |
| Glenwood Psychiatric Associates, P.L.L.C. | Raleigh | North Carolina | 27609 | United States |
| Horizon Medical Services | Bismarck | North Dakota | 58501 | United States |
| North Coast Clinical Trials | Beachwood | Ohio | 44122 | United States |
| Patient Priority Clinical Sties, LLC | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45242 | United States |
| Midwest Clinical Research Center | Dayton | Ohio | 45408 | United States |
| North Star Mdical Research, LLC | Middleburg Heights | Ohio | 44130 | United States |
| IPS Research Company | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | 73103 | United States |
| Oregon Center for Clinical Investigations, Inc. | Eugene | Oregon | 97401 | United States |
| Oregon Center for Clinical Investigations, Inc. | Salem | Oregon | 97301 | United States |
| CRI Worldwide, LLC | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19139 | United States |
| rhode Island Mood & Memory Research Institute | East Providence | Rhode Island | 02915 | United States |
| Clinical Neuroscience Solutions, Inc. | Memphis | Tennessee | 38119 | United States |
| Future Search Trials | Austin | Texas | 78756 | United States |
| Carolos Guerra, Jr., M.D. | Houston | Texas | 77042 | United States |
| San Antonio Psychiatric Research Center | San Antonio | Texas | 78229 | United States |
| Grayline Clinical Drug Trials | Wichita Falls | Texas | 76309 | United States |
| University of Virginia, Center for Psychiatric Clinical Research | Charlottesville | Virginia | 22903 | United States |
| FG002 |
| Eszopiclone High Dose Arm |
SEP-225441 (eszopiclone) total daily dose of 1.5 mg |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
ITT Population
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo Arm | Placebo |
| BG001 | Eszopiclone Low Dose Arm | SEP-225441 (eszopiclone) total daily dose of 0.9 mg |
| BG002 | Eszopiclone High Dose Arm | SEP-225441 (eszopiclone) total daily dose of 1.5 mg |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Total Score on the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), as Assessed by the Site-trained Rater | THe HAM-M was administered by a site-trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-M rating scale. These items included: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. All items are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). The Ham-A total score can range from 0 to 56 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety symptoms. | ITT Population: /The ITT population will include all randomized subjects who received at least one does of study medication during the double-blind period. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Baseline to Week 8 |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score (Except for Week 8) | The HAM-A was administered by a site-trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-A rating scale. These items included: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. all items are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). Ham-A total score can range from 0 to 56 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety symptoms. | ITT Population: The ITT population will include all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication during the double-blind period. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | unit on a scale | Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6 based on last observation carried forward (LOCF) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Individual Item Scores on HAM-A | The HAM-A was administered by a site trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-A rating scale. These items include: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. All items are measured on a t5-point scale (0-4). Each HAM-A individual item score can range from 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety questions. | ITT Population: The ITT population will include all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication during the double-blind period. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Clinician Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) | The CGI-Swas completed by a board certified psychiatrist and represents the clinician's subjective assessment of severity of the subject's anxiety symptoms as assessed by a 7-scale score for a single question, "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how anxious is the subject at this time?" The score was based on the following scale: 1=normal, not at all anxious; 2=borderline anxious; 3=mildly anxious; 4=moderately anxious; 5=markedly anxious; 6=severly anxious; 7=among the most extremely anxious subjects. CGI-S score can range from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating higher severity. | ITT Population: The ITT population will include all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication during the double-blind period. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Clinical Global Impression- Improvement (CGI-I) | CGI-I was completed by a board certified psychiatrist and represented the clinician's subjective assessment of improvement of the subject's anxiety symptoms based on the following question, "Compared to his/her condition at Visit 2, how much has he/she changed?" The score was based on the following scale: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse. CGI-I score can range from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating less improvement. | ITT Population: The ITT population will include all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication during the double-blind period. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 9, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) 50% Anxiolytic Response | The HAM-A was administered by a site-trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-A rating scale. These items include: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. All items are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). A 50% anxiolytic response was defined as a 50% or greater reduction from baseline in the HAM-A total score. The Ham-A total score can range from 0 to 56 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety symptoms. | ITT Population: The ITT population will include all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication during the double-blind period. | Posted | Number | participants | Week 2, 4, 6, 8 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Remission | The HAM-A was administered by a site-trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-A rating scale. These items include: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. All items are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). Remission was defined as a HAM-A total score of 7 or less. The Ham-A total score can range from 0 to 56 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety symptoms. | ITT Population: The ITT population will include all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication during the double-blind period. | Posted | Number | participants | Week 2, 4, 6, 8 based on last observation carried forward (LOCF) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline on Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) Short Form | The Q-LES-Q was completed by the subject and assessed quaility of life based on 16 items, each evaluated on a 5-point scale of overall level of enjoyment/satisfaction: 1=very poor; 2=poor; 3=fair; 4=good; 5=very good. The overall percentage score was computed as a sum of items 1 to 14 as expressed as a percentage of the maximum possible score: Overall Percentage Score = Sum [item 1... item 14]-14)/(70-14 ) *100%. Q-LES-Q overall percentage score can range from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating higher quality of life. | ITT Population: The ITT population will include all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication during the double-blind period. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) Total Score | The ISI was completed by the subject and is an assessment of the severity of insomnia. The administered extended ISI questionnaire consists of 5 items (containing 7 questions, as item 1 contains 3 questions) comprising the original ISI questionnaire, plus 6 quality of life related items (sleep quality, restedness/refreshness upon arising, daytime fatigue, attention/concentration, relationships and mood disturbances), and 2 items assessing duration and frequency of sleep problems. All items, except for the insomnia duration and frequency questions, are measured on a Likert-type 5-point scale (0-4). ISI total score can range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating more severe insomnia. | ITT Population: The ITT population will include all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication during the double-blind period. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on lst observation carried forward (LOCF) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) | The SDS was completed by the subject and captured the subject's level of disability. The subject rated the extent to which his or her work, social life or leisure activities, and home life or family responsibilities were impaired by his or her symptoms on a 10-point visual analog scale. SDS total score can range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating higher functional impairment. | ITT Population: The ITT population will include all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication during the double-blind period. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) | ESS was completed by the subject and assessed daytime sedation based on 8 items, each presenting a situation for which the subject needed to evaluate how likely he/she is to doze off or fall asleep in contrast to feeling just tired. Each item was evaluated on the following scale: 0 = would never doze; 1 = slight chance of dozing; 2 = moderate chance of dozing; 3 = high chance of dozing. ESS total score can range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating higher levels of daytime sleepiness. | ITT Population: The ITT population will include all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication during the double-blind period. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF) |
|
10 weeks
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo Arm | Placebo | 0 | 149 | 104 | 149 | ||
| EG001 | Eszopiclone Low Dose Arm | SEP-225441 (eszopiclone) total daily dose of 0.9 mg | 3 | 146 | 111 | 146 | ||
| EG002 | Eszopiclone High Dose Arm | SEP-225441 (eszopiclone) total daily dose of 1.5 mg | 0 | 145 | 116 | 145 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amniotic Cavity Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (10.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colon Cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (10.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Traumatic Brain Injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (10.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Self Injurious Behavior | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abortion Spontaneous | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | MedDRA (10.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dry Mouth | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal Pain Upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper Respiratory Tract Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (10.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasaopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (10.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back Pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysgeusia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Somnolence | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pharyngolaryngeal Pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
In the event the Study is part of a multi-center study, the first publication of the results of the Study shall be made in conjunction with the results of other participating study sites as a multi-center publication; provided however, if a multi-center publication is not forthcoming within twenty-four (24) months following completion of the Study at all sites, Institution and Investigator shall be free to publish
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eszopiclone Medical Director | Sunovion | 866-503-7813 | clinicaltrialdisclosure@sunovion.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000098647 | Generalized Anxiety Disorder |
| D001008 | Anxiety Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000069582 | Eszopiclone |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010879 | Piperazines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D011719 | Pyrazines |
| D011725 | Pyridines |
Not provided
Not provided
| Between 18 and 65 years |
|
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEP-225441 (eszopiclone) total daily dose of 1.5 mg
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|