Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| GEN410 | Other Identifier | GENMAB |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Ofatumumab IV trials in RA were prematurely terminated because GSK refocused clinical development of autoimmune indications on the subcutaneous delivery.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a phase III, double-blind, randomized, multicenter, and parallel group trial with a duration of 24 weeks, followed by a 120 week Open-label Period. the primary purpose of the study is to demonstrate the efficacy of ofatumumab in reducing clinical signs and symptoms in adult RA patients after a single course of ofatumumab.
This study consists of a Double-blind , placebo controlled, and parallel group part with eligible patients enrolled into a 24 week Double-Blind Period, and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive ofatumumab (700mg x 2 infusions) or placebo ( saline x 2 infusions) in addition to their background methotrexate treatment. Patients who completed the 24 week Double-Blind period without receiving rescue DMARD treatment will be eligible to proceed into the 120 week Open-Label Period to receive repeat treatment courses with ofatumumab. In the Open-label Period ofatumumab treatment courses will be given at individualized time intervals only if a clinical response has been achieved following the previous treatment course, and followed by a subsequent worsening in disease activity . Patients who have completed the Open-Label Period or have withdrawn will enter a maximum 2 year Follow-up Period, or until their Bcells return to normal or to baseline levels, whichever occurs earlier.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| ofatumumab | Experimental | 1000 mL dilution of 35ml of ofatumumab in sterile, pyrogen free 0.9% NaCl. Each Treatment Cycle consisting of two 700mg IV infusions taken 14 days apart. A total of 8 infusions cycles given over a 144 week period |
|
| 1000 ml Saline | Placebo Comparator | 1000 mL dilution of 35ml of ofatumumab in sterile, pyrogen free 0.9% NaCl. Each Treatment Cycle consisting of two IV infusions taken 14 days apart. Only one placebo treatment cycle provided over a 24 week period |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ofatumumab | Drug | 1000 mL dilution of 35ml of ofatumumab in sterile, pyrogen free 0.9% NaCl. Each Treatment Cycle consisting of two 700mg IV infusions taken 14 days apart. A total of 8 infusions cycles given over a 144 week period |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With a 20% Improvement From Baseline in Their American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20) at Week 24 | The ACR score was based on improvement from baseline in tender (TJC) and swollen joint counts (SJC). A participant had achieved ACR20 if he experienced >=20% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC and a >=20% improvement from baseline in 3 out of 5 of the following assessments: participant pain assessment on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS), participant global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, physician global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, participant self-assessed disability, and C-reactive protein. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With a 20% Improvement From Baseline in Their American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 | The ACR score was based on improvement from baseline in tender (TJC) and swollen joint counts (SJC). A participant had achieved ACR20 if he experienced >=20% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC and a >=20% improvement from baseline in 3 out of 5 of the following assessments: participant pain assessment on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS), participant global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, physician global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, participant self-assessed disability, and C-reactive protein. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria
Age ≥ 18 years;
Active disease at the time of screening as defined by:
≥ 8 swollen joints (of 66 joints assessed) and ≥ 8 tender joints (of 68 joints assessed), C-Reactive Protein (CRP) ≥ 1.0 mg/dL or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) ≥ 22 mm/hour, DAS28≥3.2 (based on ESR);
Inadequate response to previous or current methotrexate treatment;
Treatment with methotrexate (MTX), 7.5-25 mg/week, for at least 12 weeks and at a stable dose for at least 4 weeks.
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| GSK Clinical Trials | GlaxoSmithKline | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Investigational Site | Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires | Buenos Aires | C1419AHN | Argentina | ||
| GSK Investigational Site |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21859685 | Background | Taylor PC, Quattrocchi E, Mallett S, Kurrasch R, Petersen J, Chang DJ. Ofatumumab, a fully human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, in biological-naive, rheumatoid arthritis patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Dec;70(12):2119-25. doi: 10.1136/ard.2011.151522. Epub 2011 Aug 22. |
Not provided
Not provided
Study OFA110635 was comprised of a 24-week Double-blind (DB) Period, followed by a 120-week Open-label (OL) Period. Participants who completed the OL Period, or who were withdrawn, entered a Follow-up (FU) period (approximately 2 years).
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo | Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5-25 milligrams [mg]/week [oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous] for 24 weeks) in the DB Period. |
| FG001 |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DB Treatment Period (24 Weeks) |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Drug | 1000 mL dilution of 35ml of ofatumumab in sterile, pyrogen free 0.9% NaCl. Each Treatment Cycle consisting of two IV infusions taken 14 days apart. Only one placebo treatment cycle provided over a 24 week period |
|
| Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 |
| Number of Participants With a 50% Improvement From Baseline in Their ACR Score (ACR50) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The ACR score was based on improvement from baseline in tender (TJC) and swollen joint counts (SJC). A participant had achieved ACR50 if he experienced >=50% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC and a >=50% improvement from baseline in 3 out of 5 of the following assessments: participant pain assessment on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS), participant global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, physician global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, participant self-assessed disability, and C-reactive protein. | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| Number of Participants With a 70% Improvement From Baseline in Their ACR Score (ACR70) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The ACR score was based on improvement from baseline in tender (TJC) and swollen joint counts (SJC). A participant had achieved ACR70 if he experienced >=70% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC and a >=70% improvement from baseline in 3 out of 5 of the following assessments: participant pain assessment on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS), participant global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, physician global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, participant self-assessed disability, and C-reactive protein. | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| Median ACRn at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | ACRn = the largest integer n for which a participant (par.) met the criteria requiring an improvement of n%. ACRn is a measure characterizing percent (%) improvement from baseline (IFBL). A par. with an ACRn of X had an improvement of >=X% in tender/swollen joints (TJC/SJC), and an improvement of >=X% in 3 of the 5 parameters (patient [pt] pain assessment, pt global assessment [GA], physician GA, pt self-assessed disability, acute phase reactant). ACRn = minimum(TJC % IFBL, SJC % IFBL, composite measure % IFBL). Composite measure % IFBL is the 3rd highest value of % IFBL for the 5 parameters. | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| Mean Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joints (DAS28) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using C-reactive Protein (CRP) as the Acute Phase Reactant (APR) | The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity (DA) that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of DA can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. APRs are a class of proteins that are useful markers for inflammation. | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant | The DAS28 is a clinical index of RA disease activity that combines information from swollen joints, tender joints, the acute phase reactant, and general health (patient global assessment). Change from baseline in DAS28 is calculated as the Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 values minus the baseline value. | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| Mean DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) as the Acute Phase Reactant | The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity (DA) that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of DA can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. APRs are a class of proteins that are useful markers for inflammation. | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant | The DAS28 is a clinical index of RA disease activity that combines information from swollen joints, tender joints, the acute phase reactant, and general health (patient global assessment). Change from baseline in DAS28 is calculated as the Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 values minus the baseline value. | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant | The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2 to >5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to <=1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2 to <=5.1); non-responders: change from baseline <=0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and <=1.2 with DAS28 >5.1. | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant | The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2 to >5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to <=1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2 to <=5.1); non-responders: change from baseline <=0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and <=1.2 with DAS28 >5.1. | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| Number of Participants Classified as Responders at Week 24 According to the Self-Assessed Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) | The HAQ-DI is a 20-question instrument used to assess the degree of difficulty a participant had in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (FAs): dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and errands/chores. Responses for each FA were scored from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (inability to perform a task). The total score (range of 0-3) was calculated by adding the 8 individual FA scores, then dividing this sum by the total number of components answered. Responders were defined as participants achieving an improvement from baseline in the HAQ-DI score at Week 24 of >=0.22. | Week 24 |
| Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 24 | Participants achieving clinical remission were defined as those with a low disease activity, i.e., DAS28 score (using CRP) <2.6 at Week 24. | Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count at Week 24 | Change from baseline in tender joint count was calculated as the Week 24 count minus the baseline count. A total of 68 joints were assessed. Joints were classified as either tender or not tender by an independent assessor, who had documented experience in performing joint assessments. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Week 24 | Change from baseline in swollen joint count was calculated as the Week 24 count minus the baseline count. A total of 66 joints were assessed. Joints were classified as either swollen or not swollen by an independent assessor, who had documented experience in performing joint assessments. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in the Participant-assessed Pain Score at Week 24 | A horizontal VAS of 100 mm was used to report the participant's level of joint pain. The scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (unbearable pain). Participants were instructed to draw a vertical line through the horizontal line to indicate how much joint pain they had. The distance from the "no pain" end to the vertical line drawn by the participant was the joint pain score. Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in Participant-assessed Global Disease Score at Week 24 | The participant used a horizontal VAS of 100 mm for overall assessment of disease. The scale ranged from 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor). Participants were instructed to draw a vertical line through the horizontal line to indicate the state of the arthritis. The distance from the "very well" end to the vertical line drawn by the participant was the global disease assessment score. Change from baseline in participant-assessed global disease was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in the Physician-assessed Global Disease Score at Week 24 | The physician used a horizontal VAS of 100 mm for overall assessment of disease. The scale ranged from 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor). Physicians were instructed to draw a vertical line through the horizontal line to indicate the state of the arthritis. The distance from the "very well" end to the vertical line drawn by the participant was the global disease assessment score. Change from baseline in the physician-assessed global disease was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Week 24 | The self-assessed HAQ-DI is a 20-question instrument used to assess the degree of difficulty a participant had in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (FAs): dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and errands/chores. Responses for each FA were scored from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (inability to perform a task). The total score (range of 0-3) was calculated by adding the 8 individual FA scores, then dividing this sum by the total number of components answered. Change from baseline was calculated as the value at Week 24 minus the baseline value. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in CRP at Week 24 | Blood samples for the determination of CRP were taken at pre-specified visits and were sent to the central laboratory for analysis. Change from Baseline in CRP was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. CRP is an acute-phase protein whose plasma concentration increases in response to inflammation. CRP is a useful marker of inflammation. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in ESR at Week 24 | ESR is measured by a blood test that shows the rate at which red blood cells sediment in a period of 1 hour. Blood samples for the determination of ESR were taken at pre-specified visits and were measured immediately at the trial site. Change from baseline in ESR was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in the Short-Form 36 (SF-36v2) Norm-based Scores for Physical Component Summary and Physical Items at Week 24 | The SF-36v2 is a standardized questionnaire used to measure overall subjective health status by measuring 8 health-related parameters (each scored from 0 [poorer health] to 100 [better health]): body pain, general mental health (MH), perception of general health, physical functioning, role limitations (RL) caused by mental condition, RL caused by a physical condition, social functioning, and vitality. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores, as well as psychometrically based physical and MH summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in the SF-36v2 Norm-based Scores for Mental Component Summary and Mental Items at Week 24 | The SF-36v2 is a standardized questionnaire used to measure overall subjective health status by measuring 8 health-related parameters (each scored from 0 [poorer health] to 100 [better health]): body pain, general mental health (MH), perception of general health, physical functioning, role limitations (RL) caused by mental condition, RL caused by a physical condition, social functioning, and vitality. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores, as well as psychometrically based physical and MH summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Questionnaire Score at Week 24 | The FACIT-F score has a valid range of values from 0 to 52, with a higher score indicating a lower burden of fatigue. The subset determining fatigue contains 13 questions. Responses to each question were scored from 0, indicating "Not at all fatigued," to 4, indicating "Very much fatigued." | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in Levels of Anti-CCP, RF-IgA, RF-IgG, and RF-IgM at Week 24 | The following biomarkers were assessed: Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide 3 antibody (Anti-CCP), Rheumatoid factor IgA (RF-IgA), RF IgG (RF-IgG), and RF IgM (RF-IgM). Measurements of RF were used to characterize participants' disease activity and immune status. Anti-CCP was used to characterize the disease type and the immune status of the participants. Assessments for which results were below the lower limit of quantification (LLQ) were reported using a value of LLQ/2. Assessments for which results were above the upper limit of quantification (ULQ) were reported using a value of ULQ. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in Levels of IL-6 and Serum Amyloid A at Week 24 | The following biomarkers were assessed: Interleukin 6 (IL-6) and Serum Amyloid A. These biomarkers were used to further characterize disease activity. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Minimum DAS28-ESR Score During the Double-blind (DB) and Open-label (OL) Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of disease activity can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. The values summarized are the minimum DAS28 score (i.e. lowest level of disease activity) achieved by each participant within the first 24 weeks of each treatment course (TC), assessed using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR; rate at which red blood cells sediment in 1 hour). | First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144) |
| Minimum DAS28-CRP Score During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of disease activity can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. The values summarized are the minimum DAS28 score (i.e. lowest level of disease activity) achieved by each participant within the first 24 weeks of each treatment course, assessed using C-reactive Protein (CRP: used to monitor acute inflammatory phases of rheumatoid arthritis). | First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144) |
| Minimum Change From Baseline in the DAS28-ESR Score, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The level of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity based on the DAS28 score is defined as low if DAS28 <=3.2, moderate if 3.2< DAS28 <=5.1, or high if DAS28 > 5.1. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to clinical remission. The values summarized are the minimum change from baseline DAS28 score (i.e. greatest change in disease activity during the treatment course) achieved by each participant within the first 24 weeks of each treatment course, assessed by using ESR. Baseline score was determined at the start of each treatment course. For change from baseline, participants had to have both a baseline DAS28 value for the treatment course (i.e., the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the treatment course, providing it was done within a 14 day window prior to the date of infusion A) and a DAS28 value during the treatment course (i.e., during first 24 weeks of each treatment course). Change from baseline was calculated as the value during the treatment course minus the baseline value. | First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144) |
| Minimum Change From Baseline in the DAS28-CRP Score, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The level of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity based on the DAS28 score is defined as low if DAS28 <=3.2, moderate if 3.2< DAS28 <=5.1, or high if DAS28 > 5.1. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to clinical remission. The values summarized are the minimum change from baseline DAS28 score (i.e. greatest change in disease activity during the treatment course) achieved by each participant within the first 24 weeks of each treatment course, assessed by using CRP. Baseline score was determined at the start of each treatment course. For change from baseline, participants had to have both a baseline DAS28 value for the treatment course (i.e., the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the treatment course, providing it was done within a 14 day window prior to the date of infusion A) and a DAS28 value during the treatment course (i.e., during first 24 weeks of each treatment course). Change from baseline was calculated as the value during the treatment course minus the baseline value. | First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144) |
| Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using ESR), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of disease activity can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6 at any time during the first 24 weeks of each treatment course. Low disease activity is defined as a DAS28 score >=2.6 and <3.2 at any time during the first 24 weeks of each treatment course. | First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144) |
| Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using CRP), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of disease activity can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6 at any time during the first 24 weeks of each treatment course. Low disease activity is defined as a DAS28 score >=2.6 and <3.2 at any time during the first 24 weeks of each treatment course. | First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144) |
| Time to Retreatment, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | Time to retreatment is defined as the time in days between infusion A of each treatment course and infusion A of the following treatment course. For participants randomized to ofatumumab in the Double-blind Period, Treatment Course 1 refers to the course of ofatumumab received in the Double-blind Period. The minimum period allowed per protocol before retreatment was 24 weeks (end of Double-blind Period). For participants randomized to placebo in the Double-blind Period, Treatment Course 1 refers to the first course of ofatumumab received in the Open-label Period. The minimum period allowed per protocol before retreatment during the Open-label Period was 16 weeks. | From Baseline up to Week 144 |
| Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Adverse Event or Serious Adverse Event, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in disability/incapacity; or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment should have been exercised in other situations. Refer to the general AE/SAE module for a list of AEs (occurring at a frequency threshold >=2%) and SAEs. | First treatment (Day 0) until the participant terminated the trial, assessed up to Week 144 |
| Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The number of participants with a CD19+ cell count greater than or equal to the lower limit of normal (LLN; reference range 0.11 to 0.66 giga [10^9] per liter) or the baseline value (whichever was lower) is presented. The baseline assessment is defined as the start of the Double-blind Period. | From baseline up to Week 144 |
| Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The number of participants with a CD3+ cell count greater than or equal to the lower limit of normal (LLN; reference range 0.11 to 0.66 giga [10^9] per liter) or the baseline value (whichever was lower) is presented. The baseline assessment is defined as the start of the Double-blind Period. | From baseline up to Week 144 |
| Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The number of participants with a CD4+ cell count greater than or equal to the lower limit of normal (LLN; reference range 0.11 to 0.66 giga [10^9] per liter) or the baseline value (whichever was lower) is presented. The baseline assessment is defined as the start of the Double-blind Period. | From baseline up to Week 144 |
| Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The number of participants with a CD8+ cell count greater than or equal to the lower limit of normal (LLN; reference range 0.11 to 0.66 giga [10^9] per liter) or the baseline value (whichever was lower) is presented. The baseline assessment is defined as the start of the Double-blind Period. | From baseline up to Week 144 |
| Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The baseline value for a treatment course is defined as the value before infusion A of each treatment course. The post-baseline visit is defined as any assessment during or after the start of infusion A during the specified treatment course. Pre-defined limits of potential clinical concern for vital signs (Low, High) are: Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (millimeters of mercury [mmHg]): 40, 110; Systolic blood pressure (SBP) (mmHg): 90, 170; Heart rate (beats per minute): 35, 120. LLN=lower limit of normal; ULN=upper limit of normal. | From baseline up to Week 144 |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings, During the OL Period | The number of participants with normal, abnormal clinically significant (CS), and abnormal not clinically significant (NCS) ECG findings, as well as the number of participants with no results (NR), during the OL Period are presented. An overall interpretation of the ECG was made by the investigator, or the investigator could delegate this task to a cardiologist, if applicable. | From DB Period completion (Week 24) until the completion of the OL Period, assessed up to Week 144 |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | Only those parameters for which at least one value of clinical concern (CC) was reported are summarized. Baseline (BL) value for a treatment course (TC) is defined as the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the TC. The post-baseline (PBL) visit is defined as any visit after the date of infusion A during the specified TC. Pre-defined limits of potential CC (CC Low [relative to the lower limit of normal], CC High [relative to the upper limit of normal]) are: Albumin: 0.9, 1.5; Alanine amino transferase (ALT): NA, 2; Alkaline phosphatase (ALP): NA, 1.5; Aspartate amino transferase (AST): NA, 2; Bilirubin total (TBIL): NA, 1.5; Calcium: 0.85, 1.08; CO2 content/bicarbonate (BCO): 0.85/0.75, 1.2/1.3, ; Chloride: 0.9, 1.1; Creatine kinase (CK): NA, 2; Creatinine: NA, 1.2; Gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT): NA, 2; Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH): NA, 2; Potassium: 0.9, 1.1; Sodium: 0.93, 1.07; Total protein: 0.8, 1.15; Urea/blood urea nitrogen (BUN): NA, 1.5; Uric acid: NA, 1.5. | From baseline up to Week 144 |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | Only those parameters for which at least one value of clinical concern (CC) was reported are summarized. The baseline (BL) value for a treatment course (TC) is defined as the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the TC. The post-baseline (PBL) visit is defined as any visit after the date of infusion A during the specified TC. Pre-defined limits of potential clinical concern (CC Low [relative to lower limit of normal], CC High [relative to upper limit of normal]) are: Eosinophils: NA, 2; Hematocrit (HCT): 0.75, 1.2; Hemoglobin (Hb): 0.75, 1.2; Lymphocytes: 0.4, 2; Neutrophils total (TNUE): 0.8, 1.6; Platelet count (PC): 0.65, 1.5; Red blood cell count (RBC): 0.75, 2; White blood cell count (WBC): 0.7, 1.6. | From baseline up to Week 144 |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC) | Only those parameters for a particular flag (<LLN or >ULN) are summarized if at least one value was outside the specified reference range. The Baseline (BL) value for a TC was defined as the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the TC. However to be evaluable as a baseline value, assessments must have been conducted within a 14 day window prior to the date of infusion A. The post-baseline (PBL) was any visit after the date of infusion A during the specified TC. The pre-defined LLN for biomarkers are: B-lymphocyte stimulator (B-ls):<486.5 nanograms per Liter (ng/L); Interleukin-6 (IL-6):<0.31ng/L and Serum amyloid A: <1951 ng/mL. LLN was not defined for Rheumatoid factor (RF)-IgA, RF-IgG, RF-IgM or anti- cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody and RF. The pre- defined ULN range for biomarkers (RF)-IgA: >6 units; RF-IgG:>6 units; RF-IgM:>6 units; Anti-CCP:>19.9999 units; B-ls:>1343.3 ng/L; IL-6: >5 ng/L; RF:>11.9999 kilounits (KU)/L; Serum amyloid A:>82432 ng/mL. | From baseline up to Week 144 |
| Number of Participants With Any Serious Adverse Event During the Follow-up Period | A serious adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in disability/incapacity; or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment should have been exercised in other situations. Refer to the general SAE module for a list of SAEs. | From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (or maximum of 2 years from Last Subject Last Visit [LSLV]) |
| Number of Participants With Immunoglobulin Values Outside the Reference Range During the Follow-up Period | The reference ranges for immunoglobulins (LLN, ULN) are defined as: IgA (grams/Liter): 0.81, 4.63; IgG (grams/Liter): 6.94, 16.18; IgM (grams/Liter): 0.48, 2.71. | From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (or maximum of 2 years from LSLV) |
| Time to First CD19+ B-cell Repopulation Relative to the First Dose and Last Dose of Ofatumumab | Time to first CD19+ B-cell repopulation (return to normal or baseline level) relative to the first dose was assessed only for those participants whose B-cells repopulated after receiving ofatumumab. Time to first CD19+ B-cell repopulation relative to the last dose of ofatumumab was assessed only for those participants whose B-cells repopulated during their last ofatumumab treatment course or follow-up. | From the first dose of ofatumumab until the last Follow-up Period visit (up to Week 248) |
| Number of Participants With a Positive JC Virus Test Result During the Follow-up Period | Blood samples were collected for analysis of plasma/white blood cell JC Virus (JCV) using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. A positive JC Virus test result indicated the presence of JC Virus. | From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (or maximum of 2 years from LSLV) |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern During the Follow-up Period | Only those parameters for which at least one value of clinical concern (CC) was reported are summarized. Pre-defined limits of potential clinical concern (CC Low [relative to the lower limit of normal], CC High [relative to the upper limit of normal]) are: ALT: NA, 2; ALP: NA, 1.5; Creatinine: N/A, 1.2; CO2/BCO: 0.85/0.75, 1.2/1.3; CK: NA, 2; GGT: NA, 2; Urea/BUN: NA, 1.5. | From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (maximum of 2 years) |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern During the Follow-up Period | Only those parameters for which at least one value of clinical concern (CC) was reported are summarized. Pre-defined limits of potential clinical concern (CC Low [relative to lower limit of normal], CC High [relative to upper limit of normal]) are: Eosinophils: NA, 2; Total neutrophils: 0.8, 1.6; Platelet count: 0.65, 1.5. | From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (maximum of 2 years) |
| Quilmes |
| Buenos Aires |
| 1878 |
| Argentina |
| GSK Investigational Site | Rosario | Santa Fe Province | 2000 | Argentina |
| GSK Investigational Site | Córdoba | 5000 | Argentina |
| GSK Investigational Site | San Miguel de Tucumán | 4000 | Argentina |
| GSK Investigational Site | Camperdown | New South Wales | 2050 | Australia |
| GSK Investigational Site | Maroochydore | Queensland | 4558 | Australia |
| GSK Investigational Site | Clayton | Victoria | 3168 | Australia |
| GSK Investigational Site | Malvern | Victoria | 3144 | Australia |
| GSK Investigational Site | Shenton Park | Western Australia | 6008 | Australia |
| GSK Investigational Site | Liège | 4000 | Belgium |
| GSK Investigational Site | Merksem | 2170 | Belgium |
| GSK Investigational Site | Santiago | Región Metro de Santiago | 7501126 | Chile |
| GSK Investigational Site | Santiago | Región Metro de Santiago | 8380456 | Chile |
| GSK Investigational Site | Santiago | Región Metro de Santiago | Chile |
| GSK Investigational Site | Viña del Mar | Valparaiso | 2570017 | Chile |
| GSK Investigational Site | Ostrava Trebovice | 722 00 | Czechia |
| GSK Investigational Site | Prague | 128 50 | Czechia |
| GSK Investigational Site | ZlÃn | 760 01 | Czechia |
| GSK Investigational Site | Budapest | 1023 | Hungary |
| GSK Investigational Site | Győr | 9024 | Hungary |
| GSK Investigational Site | Callao | Callao 2 | Peru |
| GSK Investigational Site | Lima | Lima 27 | Peru |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bialystok | 15-351 | Poland |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bialystok | 15337 | Poland |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bydgoszcz | 85168 | Poland |
| GSK Investigational Site | Warsaw | 02-256 | Poland |
| GSK Investigational Site | Wroclaw | 50-088 | Poland |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bucharest | 020047 | Romania |
| GSK Investigational Site | Moscow | 115522 | Russia |
| GSK Investigational Site | Saint Petersburg | 190068 | Russia |
| GSK Investigational Site | Saratov | 410012 | Russia |
| GSK Investigational Site | Yaroslavl | 150003 | Russia |
| GSK Investigational Site | Yekaterinburg | 620102 | Russia |
| GSK Investigational Site | Gauteng | 1459 | South Africa |
| GSK Investigational Site | Parow | 7505 | South Africa |
| GSK Investigational Site | Granada | 18012 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Málaga | 29010 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Santander | 39008 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Santander | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Seville | 41071 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Wigan | Lancashire | WN6 9EP | United Kingdom |
| GSK Investigational Site | Cannock | WS11 5XY | United Kingdom |
| GSK Investigational Site | Leytonstone, London | E11 1NR | United Kingdom |
| GSK Investigational Site | Maidstone | ME16 9QQ | United Kingdom |
| Ofatumumab 700 mg |
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week [oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous] for 24 weeks) in the DB Period. Participants completing the 24-week DB Period without receiving rescue disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment were eligible to proceed into the 120-week OL Period to receive repeat ofatumumab treatment courses (at individualized time intervals if a clinical response had been achieved after the previous treatment course). |
| FG002 | Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period | Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| OL Treatment Period (120 Weeks) |
|
|
| Follow-up Period (Approximately 2 Years) |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo | Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams [mg]/week [oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous] for 24 weeks). |
| BG001 | Ofatumumab 700 mg | Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week [oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous] for 24 weeks). |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Baseline characteristics are reported for members of the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population, comprised of all randomized participants who were exposed to investigational product irrespective of their compliance to the planned course of treatment. Participants were analyzed according to their randomized treatment. | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years |
| ||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Baseline characteristics are reported for members of the ITT Population, comprised of all randomized participants who were exposed to investigational product irrespective of their compliance to the planned course of treatment. Participants were analyzed according to their randomized treatment. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Baseline characteristics are reported for members of the ITT Population, comprised of all randomized participants who were exposed to investigational product irrespective of their compliance to the planned course of treatment. Participants were analyzed according to their randomized treatment. | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With a 20% Improvement From Baseline in Their American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20) at Week 24 | The ACR score was based on improvement from baseline in tender (TJC) and swollen joint counts (SJC). A participant had achieved ACR20 if he experienced >=20% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC and a >=20% improvement from baseline in 3 out of 5 of the following assessments: participant pain assessment on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS), participant global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, physician global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, participant self-assessed disability, and C-reactive protein. | Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants who were exposed to investigational product irrespective of their compliance to the planned course of treatment. Participants were analyzed according to their randomized treatment. | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline and Week 24 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With a 20% Improvement From Baseline in Their American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 | The ACR score was based on improvement from baseline in tender (TJC) and swollen joint counts (SJC). A participant had achieved ACR20 if he experienced >=20% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC and a >=20% improvement from baseline in 3 out of 5 of the following assessments: participant pain assessment on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS), participant global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, physician global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, participant self-assessed disability, and C-reactive protein. | ITT Population | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With a 50% Improvement From Baseline in Their ACR Score (ACR50) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The ACR score was based on improvement from baseline in tender (TJC) and swollen joint counts (SJC). A participant had achieved ACR50 if he experienced >=50% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC and a >=50% improvement from baseline in 3 out of 5 of the following assessments: participant pain assessment on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS), participant global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, physician global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, participant self-assessed disability, and C-reactive protein. | ITT Population | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With a 70% Improvement From Baseline in Their ACR Score (ACR70) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The ACR score was based on improvement from baseline in tender (TJC) and swollen joint counts (SJC). A participant had achieved ACR70 if he experienced >=70% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC and a >=70% improvement from baseline in 3 out of 5 of the following assessments: participant pain assessment on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS), participant global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, physician global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, participant self-assessed disability, and C-reactive protein. | ITT Population | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Median ACRn at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | ACRn = the largest integer n for which a participant (par.) met the criteria requiring an improvement of n%. ACRn is a measure characterizing percent (%) improvement from baseline (IFBL). A par. with an ACRn of X had an improvement of >=X% in tender/swollen joints (TJC/SJC), and an improvement of >=X% in 3 of the 5 parameters (patient [pt] pain assessment, pt global assessment [GA], physician GA, pt self-assessed disability, acute phase reactant). ACRn = minimum(TJC % IFBL, SJC % IFBL, composite measure % IFBL). Composite measure % IFBL is the 3rd highest value of % IFBL for the 5 parameters. | ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF). Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. | Posted | Median | Full Range | percent change | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joints (DAS28) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using C-reactive Protein (CRP) as the Acute Phase Reactant (APR) | The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity (DA) that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of DA can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. APRs are a class of proteins that are useful markers for inflammation. | ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant | The DAS28 is a clinical index of RA disease activity that combines information from swollen joints, tender joints, the acute phase reactant, and general health (patient global assessment). Change from baseline in DAS28 is calculated as the Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 values minus the baseline value. | ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) as the Acute Phase Reactant | The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity (DA) that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of DA can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. APRs are a class of proteins that are useful markers for inflammation. | ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant | The DAS28 is a clinical index of RA disease activity that combines information from swollen joints, tender joints, the acute phase reactant, and general health (patient global assessment). Change from baseline in DAS28 is calculated as the Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 values minus the baseline value. | ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant | The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2 to >5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to <=1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2 to <=5.1); non-responders: change from baseline <=0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and <=1.2 with DAS28 >5.1. | ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. | Posted | Number | participants | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant | The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2 to >5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to <=1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2 to <=5.1); non-responders: change from baseline <=0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and <=1.2 with DAS28 >5.1. | ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. | Posted | Number | participants | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Classified as Responders at Week 24 According to the Self-Assessed Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) | The HAQ-DI is a 20-question instrument used to assess the degree of difficulty a participant had in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (FAs): dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and errands/chores. Responses for each FA were scored from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (inability to perform a task). The total score (range of 0-3) was calculated by adding the 8 individual FA scores, then dividing this sum by the total number of components answered. Responders were defined as participants achieving an improvement from baseline in the HAQ-DI score at Week 24 of >=0.22. | ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. | Posted | Number | participants | Week 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 24 | Participants achieving clinical remission were defined as those with a low disease activity, i.e., DAS28 score (using CRP) <2.6 at Week 24. | ITT Population | Posted | Number | participants | Week 24 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count at Week 24 | Change from baseline in tender joint count was calculated as the Week 24 count minus the baseline count. A total of 68 joints were assessed. Joints were classified as either tender or not tender by an independent assessor, who had documented experience in performing joint assessments. | ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. | Posted | Median | Full Range | number of tender joints | Baseline and Week 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Week 24 | Change from baseline in swollen joint count was calculated as the Week 24 count minus the baseline count. A total of 66 joints were assessed. Joints were classified as either swollen or not swollen by an independent assessor, who had documented experience in performing joint assessments. | ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. | Posted | Median | Full Range | number of swollen joints | Baseline and Week 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Participant-assessed Pain Score at Week 24 | A horizontal VAS of 100 mm was used to report the participant's level of joint pain. The scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (unbearable pain). Participants were instructed to draw a vertical line through the horizontal line to indicate how much joint pain they had. The distance from the "no pain" end to the vertical line drawn by the participant was the joint pain score. Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. | ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. | Posted | Median | Full Range | scores on a scale | Baseline and Week 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Participant-assessed Global Disease Score at Week 24 | The participant used a horizontal VAS of 100 mm for overall assessment of disease. The scale ranged from 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor). Participants were instructed to draw a vertical line through the horizontal line to indicate the state of the arthritis. The distance from the "very well" end to the vertical line drawn by the participant was the global disease assessment score. Change from baseline in participant-assessed global disease was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. | ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. | Posted | Median | Full Range | scores on a scale | Baseline and Week 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Physician-assessed Global Disease Score at Week 24 | The physician used a horizontal VAS of 100 mm for overall assessment of disease. The scale ranged from 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor). Physicians were instructed to draw a vertical line through the horizontal line to indicate the state of the arthritis. The distance from the "very well" end to the vertical line drawn by the participant was the global disease assessment score. Change from baseline in the physician-assessed global disease was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. | ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. | Posted | Median | Full Range | scores on a scale | Baseline and Week 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Week 24 | The self-assessed HAQ-DI is a 20-question instrument used to assess the degree of difficulty a participant had in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (FAs): dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and errands/chores. Responses for each FA were scored from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (inability to perform a task). The total score (range of 0-3) was calculated by adding the 8 individual FA scores, then dividing this sum by the total number of components answered. Change from baseline was calculated as the value at Week 24 minus the baseline value. | ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. | Posted | Median | Full Range | scores on a scale | Baseline and Week 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in CRP at Week 24 | Blood samples for the determination of CRP were taken at pre-specified visits and were sent to the central laboratory for analysis. Change from Baseline in CRP was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. CRP is an acute-phase protein whose plasma concentration increases in response to inflammation. CRP is a useful marker of inflammation. | ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. | Posted | Median | Full Range | milligrams per liter (mg/L) | Baseline and Week 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in ESR at Week 24 | ESR is measured by a blood test that shows the rate at which red blood cells sediment in a period of 1 hour. Blood samples for the determination of ESR were taken at pre-specified visits and were measured immediately at the trial site. Change from baseline in ESR was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. | ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. | Posted | Median | Full Range | millimeters per hour (mm/hr) | Baseline and Week 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Short-Form 36 (SF-36v2) Norm-based Scores for Physical Component Summary and Physical Items at Week 24 | The SF-36v2 is a standardized questionnaire used to measure overall subjective health status by measuring 8 health-related parameters (each scored from 0 [poorer health] to 100 [better health]): body pain, general mental health (MH), perception of general health, physical functioning, role limitations (RL) caused by mental condition, RL caused by a physical condition, social functioning, and vitality. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores, as well as psychometrically based physical and MH summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. | ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | scores on a scale | Baseline and Week 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the SF-36v2 Norm-based Scores for Mental Component Summary and Mental Items at Week 24 | The SF-36v2 is a standardized questionnaire used to measure overall subjective health status by measuring 8 health-related parameters (each scored from 0 [poorer health] to 100 [better health]): body pain, general mental health (MH), perception of general health, physical functioning, role limitations (RL) caused by mental condition, RL caused by a physical condition, social functioning, and vitality. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores, as well as psychometrically based physical and MH summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. | ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | scores on a scale | Baseline and Week 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Questionnaire Score at Week 24 | The FACIT-F score has a valid range of values from 0 to 52, with a higher score indicating a lower burden of fatigue. The subset determining fatigue contains 13 questions. Responses to each question were scored from 0, indicating "Not at all fatigued," to 4, indicating "Very much fatigued." | ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. | Posted | Median | Full Range | scores on a scale | Baseline and Week 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Levels of Anti-CCP, RF-IgA, RF-IgG, and RF-IgM at Week 24 | The following biomarkers were assessed: Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide 3 antibody (Anti-CCP), Rheumatoid factor IgA (RF-IgA), RF IgG (RF-IgG), and RF IgM (RF-IgM). Measurements of RF were used to characterize participants' disease activity and immune status. Anti-CCP was used to characterize the disease type and the immune status of the participants. Assessments for which results were below the lower limit of quantification (LLQ) were reported using a value of LLQ/2. Assessments for which results were above the upper limit of quantification (ULQ) were reported using a value of ULQ. | ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. | Posted | Median | Full Range | Units/Liter | Baseline and Week 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Levels of IL-6 and Serum Amyloid A at Week 24 | The following biomarkers were assessed: Interleukin 6 (IL-6) and Serum Amyloid A. These biomarkers were used to further characterize disease activity. | ITT Population. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Analysis included those participants in the ITT Population with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. | Posted | Median | Full Range | nanogram per liter (ng/l) | Baseline and Week 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Minimum DAS28-ESR Score During the Double-blind (DB) and Open-label (OL) Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of disease activity can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. The values summarized are the minimum DAS28 score (i.e. lowest level of disease activity) achieved by each participant within the first 24 weeks of each treatment course (TC), assessed using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR; rate at which red blood cells sediment in 1 hour). | As Treated (AT) Population: all participants who received at least one infusion of ofatumumab in the DB and/or OL Period. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Scores on a scale | First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Minimum DAS28-CRP Score During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of disease activity can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. The values summarized are the minimum DAS28 score (i.e. lowest level of disease activity) achieved by each participant within the first 24 weeks of each treatment course, assessed using C-reactive Protein (CRP: used to monitor acute inflammatory phases of rheumatoid arthritis). | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Minimum Change From Baseline in the DAS28-ESR Score, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The level of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity based on the DAS28 score is defined as low if DAS28 <=3.2, moderate if 3.2< DAS28 <=5.1, or high if DAS28 > 5.1. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to clinical remission. The values summarized are the minimum change from baseline DAS28 score (i.e. greatest change in disease activity during the treatment course) achieved by each participant within the first 24 weeks of each treatment course, assessed by using ESR. Baseline score was determined at the start of each treatment course. For change from baseline, participants had to have both a baseline DAS28 value for the treatment course (i.e., the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the treatment course, providing it was done within a 14 day window prior to the date of infusion A) and a DAS28 value during the treatment course (i.e., during first 24 weeks of each treatment course). Change from baseline was calculated as the value during the treatment course minus the baseline value. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Minimum Change From Baseline in the DAS28-CRP Score, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The level of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity based on the DAS28 score is defined as low if DAS28 <=3.2, moderate if 3.2< DAS28 <=5.1, or high if DAS28 > 5.1. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to clinical remission. The values summarized are the minimum change from baseline DAS28 score (i.e. greatest change in disease activity during the treatment course) achieved by each participant within the first 24 weeks of each treatment course, assessed by using CRP. Baseline score was determined at the start of each treatment course. For change from baseline, participants had to have both a baseline DAS28 value for the treatment course (i.e., the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the treatment course, providing it was done within a 14 day window prior to the date of infusion A) and a DAS28 value during the treatment course (i.e., during first 24 weeks of each treatment course). Change from baseline was calculated as the value during the treatment course minus the baseline value. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using ESR), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of disease activity can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6 at any time during the first 24 weeks of each treatment course. Low disease activity is defined as a DAS28 score >=2.6 and <3.2 at any time during the first 24 weeks of each treatment course. | AT Population | Posted | Number | participants | First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using CRP), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of disease activity can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6 at any time during the first 24 weeks of each treatment course. Low disease activity is defined as a DAS28 score >=2.6 and <3.2 at any time during the first 24 weeks of each treatment course. | AT Population | Posted | Number | participants | First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Time to Retreatment, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | Time to retreatment is defined as the time in days between infusion A of each treatment course and infusion A of the following treatment course. For participants randomized to ofatumumab in the Double-blind Period, Treatment Course 1 refers to the course of ofatumumab received in the Double-blind Period. The minimum period allowed per protocol before retreatment was 24 weeks (end of Double-blind Period). For participants randomized to placebo in the Double-blind Period, Treatment Course 1 refers to the first course of ofatumumab received in the Open-label Period. The minimum period allowed per protocol before retreatment during the Open-label Period was 16 weeks. | AT Population. Only those participants who were retreated from Week 24 were analyzed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Weeks | From Baseline up to Week 144 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Adverse Event or Serious Adverse Event, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in disability/incapacity; or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment should have been exercised in other situations. Refer to the general AE/SAE module for a list of AEs (occurring at a frequency threshold >=2%) and SAEs. | AT Population | Posted | Number | Participants | First treatment (Day 0) until the participant terminated the trial, assessed up to Week 144 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The number of participants with a CD19+ cell count greater than or equal to the lower limit of normal (LLN; reference range 0.11 to 0.66 giga [10^9] per liter) or the baseline value (whichever was lower) is presented. The baseline assessment is defined as the start of the Double-blind Period. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Participants | From baseline up to Week 144 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The number of participants with a CD3+ cell count greater than or equal to the lower limit of normal (LLN; reference range 0.11 to 0.66 giga [10^9] per liter) or the baseline value (whichever was lower) is presented. The baseline assessment is defined as the start of the Double-blind Period. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Participants | From baseline up to Week 144 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The number of participants with a CD4+ cell count greater than or equal to the lower limit of normal (LLN; reference range 0.11 to 0.66 giga [10^9] per liter) or the baseline value (whichever was lower) is presented. The baseline assessment is defined as the start of the Double-blind Period. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Participants | From baseline up to Week 144 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The number of participants with a CD8+ cell count greater than or equal to the lower limit of normal (LLN; reference range 0.11 to 0.66 giga [10^9] per liter) or the baseline value (whichever was lower) is presented. The baseline assessment is defined as the start of the Double-blind Period. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Participants | From baseline up to Week 144 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The baseline value for a treatment course is defined as the value before infusion A of each treatment course. The post-baseline visit is defined as any assessment during or after the start of infusion A during the specified treatment course. Pre-defined limits of potential clinical concern for vital signs (Low, High) are: Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (millimeters of mercury [mmHg]): 40, 110; Systolic blood pressure (SBP) (mmHg): 90, 170; Heart rate (beats per minute): 35, 120. LLN=lower limit of normal; ULN=upper limit of normal. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Participants | From baseline up to Week 144 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings, During the OL Period | The number of participants with normal, abnormal clinically significant (CS), and abnormal not clinically significant (NCS) ECG findings, as well as the number of participants with no results (NR), during the OL Period are presented. An overall interpretation of the ECG was made by the investigator, or the investigator could delegate this task to a cardiologist, if applicable. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Participants | From DB Period completion (Week 24) until the completion of the OL Period, assessed up to Week 144 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | Only those parameters for which at least one value of clinical concern (CC) was reported are summarized. Baseline (BL) value for a treatment course (TC) is defined as the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the TC. The post-baseline (PBL) visit is defined as any visit after the date of infusion A during the specified TC. Pre-defined limits of potential CC (CC Low [relative to the lower limit of normal], CC High [relative to the upper limit of normal]) are: Albumin: 0.9, 1.5; Alanine amino transferase (ALT): NA, 2; Alkaline phosphatase (ALP): NA, 1.5; Aspartate amino transferase (AST): NA, 2; Bilirubin total (TBIL): NA, 1.5; Calcium: 0.85, 1.08; CO2 content/bicarbonate (BCO): 0.85/0.75, 1.2/1.3, ; Chloride: 0.9, 1.1; Creatine kinase (CK): NA, 2; Creatinine: NA, 1.2; Gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT): NA, 2; Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH): NA, 2; Potassium: 0.9, 1.1; Sodium: 0.93, 1.07; Total protein: 0.8, 1.15; Urea/blood urea nitrogen (BUN): NA, 1.5; Uric acid: NA, 1.5. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Participants | From baseline up to Week 144 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | Only those parameters for which at least one value of clinical concern (CC) was reported are summarized. The baseline (BL) value for a treatment course (TC) is defined as the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the TC. The post-baseline (PBL) visit is defined as any visit after the date of infusion A during the specified TC. Pre-defined limits of potential clinical concern (CC Low [relative to lower limit of normal], CC High [relative to upper limit of normal]) are: Eosinophils: NA, 2; Hematocrit (HCT): 0.75, 1.2; Hemoglobin (Hb): 0.75, 1.2; Lymphocytes: 0.4, 2; Neutrophils total (TNUE): 0.8, 1.6; Platelet count (PC): 0.65, 1.5; Red blood cell count (RBC): 0.75, 2; White blood cell count (WBC): 0.7, 1.6. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Participants | From baseline up to Week 144 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC) | Only those parameters for a particular flag (<LLN or >ULN) are summarized if at least one value was outside the specified reference range. The Baseline (BL) value for a TC was defined as the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the TC. However to be evaluable as a baseline value, assessments must have been conducted within a 14 day window prior to the date of infusion A. The post-baseline (PBL) was any visit after the date of infusion A during the specified TC. The pre-defined LLN for biomarkers are: B-lymphocyte stimulator (B-ls):<486.5 nanograms per Liter (ng/L); Interleukin-6 (IL-6):<0.31ng/L and Serum amyloid A: <1951 ng/mL. LLN was not defined for Rheumatoid factor (RF)-IgA, RF-IgG, RF-IgM or anti- cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody and RF. The pre- defined ULN range for biomarkers (RF)-IgA: >6 units; RF-IgG:>6 units; RF-IgM:>6 units; Anti-CCP:>19.9999 units; B-ls:>1343.3 ng/L; IL-6: >5 ng/L; RF:>11.9999 kilounits (KU)/L; Serum amyloid A:>82432 ng/mL. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Participants | From baseline up to Week 144 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Any Serious Adverse Event During the Follow-up Period | A serious adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in disability/incapacity; or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment should have been exercised in other situations. Refer to the general SAE module for a list of SAEs. | Safety Follow-up Population: all participants who withdrew from the Double-blind Period and had evidence of contact with the site after the end of the Double-blind Period and all participants who withdrew or completed the Open-label Period and had evidence of contact with the site after their end of Open-label date. | Posted | Number | Participants | From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (or maximum of 2 years from Last Subject Last Visit [LSLV]) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Immunoglobulin Values Outside the Reference Range During the Follow-up Period | The reference ranges for immunoglobulins (LLN, ULN) are defined as: IgA (grams/Liter): 0.81, 4.63; IgG (grams/Liter): 6.94, 16.18; IgM (grams/Liter): 0.48, 2.71. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Participants | From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (or maximum of 2 years from LSLV) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Time to First CD19+ B-cell Repopulation Relative to the First Dose and Last Dose of Ofatumumab | Time to first CD19+ B-cell repopulation (return to normal or baseline level) relative to the first dose was assessed only for those participants whose B-cells repopulated after receiving ofatumumab. Time to first CD19+ B-cell repopulation relative to the last dose of ofatumumab was assessed only for those participants whose B-cells repopulated during their last ofatumumab treatment course or follow-up. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Median | Full Range | Months | From the first dose of ofatumumab until the last Follow-up Period visit (up to Week 248) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With a Positive JC Virus Test Result During the Follow-up Period | Blood samples were collected for analysis of plasma/white blood cell JC Virus (JCV) using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. A positive JC Virus test result indicated the presence of JC Virus. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Participants | From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (or maximum of 2 years from LSLV) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern During the Follow-up Period | Only those parameters for which at least one value of clinical concern (CC) was reported are summarized. Pre-defined limits of potential clinical concern (CC Low [relative to the lower limit of normal], CC High [relative to the upper limit of normal]) are: ALT: NA, 2; ALP: NA, 1.5; Creatinine: N/A, 1.2; CO2/BCO: 0.85/0.75, 1.2/1.3; CK: NA, 2; GGT: NA, 2; Urea/BUN: NA, 1.5. | AT Population. Only participants who withdrew from the DB Period and had evidence of contact with the site after the end of the DB Period and all participants who withdrew or completed the OL Period and had evidence of contact with the site after their end of OL date were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Participants | From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (maximum of 2 years) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern During the Follow-up Period | Only those parameters for which at least one value of clinical concern (CC) was reported are summarized. Pre-defined limits of potential clinical concern (CC Low [relative to lower limit of normal], CC High [relative to upper limit of normal]) are: Eosinophils: NA, 2; Total neutrophils: 0.8, 1.6; Platelet count: 0.65, 1.5. | AT Population. Only participants who withdrew from the DB Period and had evidence of contact with the site after the end of the DB Period and all participants who withdrew or completed the OL Period and had evidence of contact with the site after their end of OL date were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Participants | From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (maximum of 2 years) |
|
Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo: DB Period | Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs are reported for participants receiving placebo in the DB Period. Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams [mg]/week [oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous] for 24 weeks) in the DB Period. | 4 | 130 | 46 | 130 | ||
| EG001 | Ofatumumab 700 mg: DB and OL Periods | SAEs and non-serious AEs are reported for participants receiving ofatumumab 700 mg in either the DB or OL Period. Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week [oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous] for 24 weeks) in the DB Period. Participants completing the 24-week DB Period without receiving rescue disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment were eligible to proceed into the 120-week OL Period to receive repeat ofatumumab treatment courses (at individualized time intervals if a clinical response had been achieved after the previous treatment course). | 44 | 243 | 226 | 243 | ||
| EG002 | Placebo or Ofatumumab 700 mg: Follow-up Period | SAEs and non-serious AEs are reported for participants receiving either placebo or ofatumumab 700 mg in the Follow-up Period. Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period. | 13 | 224 | 0 | 224 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis bacterial | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Interstitial lung disease | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary embolism | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pericardial effusion | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Synovitis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ischaemic stroke | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Angina unstable | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Foot deformity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute coronary syndrome | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Angioedema | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arrhythmia supraventricular | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Axillary vein thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| B-cell lymphoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bile duct stone | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blepharospasm | Eye disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bunion | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac aneurysm | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebrovascular accident | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colonic polyp | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colonic stenosis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diabetes mellitus | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diverticulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diplopia | Eye disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Electrocardiogram T wave inversion | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Endometritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gingival cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatitis B | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Incisional hernia | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Inguinal hernia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Jaundice | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lower respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Metrorrhagia | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myasthenia gravis | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oedema peripheral | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Osteoarthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ovarian cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pertusis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Polyneuropathy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Post cholecystectomy syndrome | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyelonephritis acute | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Radius fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thoracic vertebral fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tooth infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Toxicity to various agents | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Troponin T increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ulna fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Umbilical hernia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Varicose vein | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vertebrobasilar insufficiency | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vertigo | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abortion spontaneous | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ankle fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebrovascular disorder | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Empyema | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Overdose | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pancreatic necrosis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal colic | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Subcutaneous haematoma | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Supraventricular tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urticaria | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Throat irritation | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypersensitivity | Immune system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bacteriuria | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Leukocyturia | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dermatitis allergic | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haematuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alanine aminotransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Erythema | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rheumatoid arthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rhinitis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Leukopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oropharyngeal pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vertigo | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood pressure increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bone pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Conjunctiviitis | Eye disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspepsia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Flushing | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lymphocyte count decreased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Mouth ulceration | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oedema peripheral | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory disorder | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Drug intolerance | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysphagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Odynophagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Osteoarthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash generalised | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sciatica | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Response Center | GlaxoSmithKline | 866-435-7343 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001172 | Arthritis, Rheumatoid |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
| D003240 | Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C527517 | ofatumumab |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Protocol Violation |
|
| Protocol-defined Stopping Criteria Met |
|
| Study Closed/Terminated |
|
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| Physician Decision |
|
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| Protocol Violation |
|
| Protocol-defined Stopping Criteria Met |
|
| Study Closed/Terminated |
|
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic/Latino |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ofatumumab 700 mg |
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week [oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous] for 24 weeks) in the DB Period. Participants completing the 24-week DB Period without receiving rescue disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment were eligible to proceed into the 120-week OL Period to receive repeat ofatumumab treatment courses (at individualized time intervals if a clinical response had been achieved after the previous treatment course). |
| OG002 | Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period | Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period. |
|
|
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week [oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous] for 24 weeks) in the DB Period. Participants completing the 24-week DB Period without receiving rescue disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment were eligible to proceed into the 120-week OL Period to receive repeat ofatumumab treatment courses (at individualized time intervals if a clinical response had been achieved after the previous treatment course).
| OG002 | Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period | Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period. |
|
|
| OG001 | Ofatumumab 700 mg | Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week [oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous] for 24 weeks) in the DB Period. Participants completing the 24-week DB Period without receiving rescue disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment were eligible to proceed into the 120-week OL Period to receive repeat ofatumumab treatment courses (at individualized time intervals if a clinical response had been achieved after the previous treatment course). |
| OG002 | Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period | Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period. |
|
|
| OG001 | Ofatumumab 700 mg | Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week [oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous] for 24 weeks) in the DB Period. Participants completing the 24-week DB Period without receiving rescue disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment were eligible to proceed into the 120-week OL Period to receive repeat ofatumumab treatment courses (at individualized time intervals if a clinical response had been achieved after the previous treatment course). |
| OG002 | Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period | Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period. |
|
|
| OG002 | Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period | Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period. |
|
|
| OG002 | Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period | Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period. |
|
|
| OG002 | Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period | Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period. |
|
|
| OG002 | Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period | Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period. |
|
|
| OG002 | Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period | Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period. |
|
|
| OG002 | Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period | Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period. |
|
|
| OG002 | Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period | Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period. |
|
|
| OG002 | Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period | Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period. |
|
|
| OG002 | Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period | Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period. |
|
|
| OG002 | Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period | Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period. |
|
|
| OG001 | Ofatumumab 700 mg | Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week [oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous] for 24 weeks) in the DB Period. Participants completing the 24-week DB Period without receiving rescue disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment were eligible to proceed into the 120-week OL Period to receive repeat ofatumumab treatment courses (at individualized time intervals if a clinical response had been achieved after the previous treatment course). |
| OG002 | Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period | Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period. |
|
|
| OG002 | Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period | Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period. |
|
|
| OG001 | Ofatumumab 700 mg | Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week [oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous] for 24 weeks) in the DB Period. Participants completing the 24-week DB Period without receiving rescue disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment were eligible to proceed into the 120-week OL Period to receive repeat ofatumumab treatment courses (at individualized time intervals if a clinical response had been achieved after the previous treatment course). |
| OG002 | Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period | Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period. |
|
|
| OG002 | Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period | Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period. |
|
|
| OG002 | Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period | Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period. |
|
|
| OG002 | Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period | Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period. |
|
|
| OG002 | Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period | Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period. |
|
|
| OG002 | Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period | Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period. |
|
|
| OG002 | Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period | Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period. |
|
|