Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| NIH/NCI 5 R44 CA082042-03 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| American Radiology Services, Inc | OTHER |
| Boca Raton community Hospital, FL | UNKNOWN |
| Diversified Specialty Institutes, Bensalem, PA | UNKNOWN |
| Advanced Breast Care Imaging |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this pilot clinical study is to test a methodology for using high-resolution Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging to guide vacuum-assisted core biopsy of breast abnormalities identified on PET. In order to implement the PET guidance, the study uses the Stereo Navigator accessory to the high-resolution organ-specific PET scanner (PEM Flex™ PET Scanner, Naviscan PET Systems, Inc., San Diego, CA). The Stereo Navigator is an investigational device intended for guiding biopsy needles toward lesions in breasts identified by a physician on a high resolution PET image. The study will evaluate the clinical utility of the Stereo Navigator in guiding the vacuum-assisted core biopsy of breast abnormalities, following the example of prior studies of breast biopsy guided by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
The study will invite participation from human subjects with newly diagnosed or suspected breast cancer who have one or more breast abnormalities moderately suspicious or highly suggestive of malignancy on breast imaging and requiring biopsy (the lesion(s) of interest). Prospective subjects will be asked to sign IRB-approved consent forms, explaining the use of PET imaging for guiding biopsy of suspicious lesion(s). Up to 30 patients will be recruited in the study. The study will be terminated after approximately 20 subjects undergo PET-guided interventional procedures. In the course of the study, a subject will be injected with 18F-FDG and imaged using the PEM Flex PET scanner. Once an abnormality requiring biopsy is identified on the PET scan, the physician conducting the procedure will use the PET image to plan the biopsy trajectory using the Stereo Navigator Software Module, and use the Stereo Navigator Needle Guide Holder to guide insertion of the introducing stylet toward the lesion. The sampling will be performed using commercially available core biopsy tools routinely used for MRI-guided biopsy.Immediately after the PET-guided biopsy, conventional biopsy markers will be inserted at the biopsy site(s) for correlation with other imaging modalities. Placement of the biopsy marker will be documented using mammography, as per standard clinical practice. Histopathologic results will be correlated with imaging findings. The procedure may be repeated for additional lesions identified on PET at the investigator's discretion.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| one arm | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stereo Navigator Accessory to PEM Flex PET Scanner | Device | For patients with suspicious breast abnormalities seen on high resolution PET image, the patients will be biopsied using commercial vacuum biopsy devices (pre-validated to work with Stereo Navigator) using Naviscan's Stereo Navigator (interventional device) for PET image guidance. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Lesions That Were Successfully Biopsied Using the PET-guided Biopsy Method. | Success in completion of the PET guided biopsy of a suspicious lesion was determined by
| within two days of obtaining histopathology of the lesion biopsied |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Who Reported Serious Adverse Events After the PET-Guided Biopsy | Serious Adverse Events are defined as events that
| Within one week of completing PET-guided biopsy |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Who Tolerated the PET-Guided Biopsy Procedure | Participants who could tolerate the procedure and complete it. This was ascertained by patient feedback questionnaire asking for overall discomfort rating from 0 to 5, where 0 is no discomfort and 5 was assigned to acute discomfort that prevented subject from completing the procedure. | Within one week of completing PET-guided biopsy |
Inclusion Criteria:
Individuals aged 25 years or older
Individuals who have at least one breast imaging finding requiring biopsy, specifically:
Individuals with suspected tumor size measuring one cm or less on mammography and/or ultrasound and/or MRI if the lesion is visible on any of these modalities, except that each site may enroll up to three patients each where the lesion of interest as measured on mammography (or ultrasound and/or MRI if not detectable on mammography) is more than 1 cm. (Note: The study will target patient enrollment such that at least 50% of the lesions to undergo biopsy across all sites will be less than 1 cm in diameter as measured on mammography, or as measured by other modalities, such as ultrasound, CT, or MRI, if the lesion is not detectable or measurable on mammography.)
Individuals who have agreed to participate in the study and who have signed study-specific informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Judith E Kalinyak, MD, Ph.D | Naviscan PET Systems, Inc | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boca Raton Community Hospital | Boca Raton | Florida | 33486 | United States | ||
| American Radiology Services, Greenspring |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21276128 | Derived | Kalinyak JE, Schilling K, Berg WA, Narayanan D, Mayberry JP, Rai R, Dupree EB, Shusterman DK, Gittleman MA, Luo W, Matthews CG. PET-guided breast biopsy. Breast J. 2011 Mar-Apr;17(2):143-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2010.01044.x. Epub 2011 Jan 31. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Website of Study sponsor : Naviscan PET Systems, Inc | View source |
Not provided
The first enrolled participant was excluded from the analysis, the subject signed the consent form prior to the trial being officially released.
Patients were recruited between January & July 2008 at the medical center where they underwent PEM imaging.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | PET Guided Biopsy | No comparison group. All enrolled participants were expected to undergo PET guided biopsy. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | PET Guided Biopsy | No comparison group. All enrolled participants were expected to undergo PET guided biopsy. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Lesions That Were Successfully Biopsied Using the PET-guided Biopsy Method. | Success in completion of the PET guided biopsy of a suspicious lesion was determined by
| All participants who completed the PET-guided biopsy for a suspicious lesions. 24 lesions were biopsied in 19 participants | Posted | Number | Number of lesions | within two days of obtaining histopathology of the lesion biopsied |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | PET Guided Biopsy | No comparison group. All enrolled participants were expected to undergo PET guided biopsy. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nausea | Investigations | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Judith E Kalinyak, MD, PhD, Medical Director | Naviscan Inc | 858-587-3641 | 108 | jkalinyak@naviscan.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| INDUSTRY |
| Epic Imaging | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Timonium |
| Maryland |
| 21093 |
| United States |
| Epic Imaging | Portland | Oregon | 97220 | United States |
| Advanced Breast Care Imaging | Allentown | Pennsylvania | 18104 | United States |
| Diversified Specialty Institutes | Bensalem | Pennsylvania | 37219 | United States |
| Participants |
|
| Age Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants Who Reported Serious Adverse Events After the PET-Guided Biopsy | Serious Adverse Events are defined as events that
| Posted | Number | Participants | Within one week of completing PET-guided biopsy |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Number of Participants Who Tolerated the PET-Guided Biopsy Procedure | Participants who could tolerate the procedure and complete it. This was ascertained by patient feedback questionnaire asking for overall discomfort rating from 0 to 5, where 0 is no discomfort and 5 was assigned to acute discomfort that prevented subject from completing the procedure. | Posted | Number | Participants | Within one week of completing PET-guided biopsy |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 2 |
| Bruising | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results pending FDA approval or clearance.
| D017437 |
| Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |