Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a multicenter Phase III study to demonstrate the diagnostic utility of 124I-cG250 PET/CT pre-surgical imaging in patients with operable renal masses.
A preoperative 124I-cG250 PET scan may distinguish between clear cell and non-clear cell renal carcinoma in patients with renal masses. Studies of imaging characteristics of 124I by a variety of PET cameras, quantification of tumor uptake of 124I-labeled antibody and correlation with biopsy measurement of tumor and normal tissue have met with encouraging results. As clear cell renal cancers are associated with an aggressive phenotype their a priori determination may help guide appropriate surgical/therapeutic management.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 124-Iodine-cG250 (124I-cG250) | Other | Single arm study, comparing 124I cG250 PET/CT and CT. Each patient underwent a PET/CT and CT scan days (+/-2days) after receipt of 124I cG250. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 124-Iodine-cG250 (124I-cG250) | Drug | i.v. and PET/CT scan 4+/-2 days after administration |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity and Specificity of 124I-cG250 PET/CT Versus Diagnostic CT. | Average estimate of three independent, blinded central readers per imaging modality on the proportion of participants that were correctly identified on the 124I-cG250 PET/CT Images of having (sensitivity) or not having (specificity) clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC) compared to CT images. Histopathology provided the standard-of-truth because it is the only definitive method for accurately identifying ccRCC. | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy of 124I-cG250 PET/CT Imaging Versus Diagnostic CT Imaging | The Accuracy is the proportion of participants with correct determinations of 124I-cG250 PET/CT imaging compared to diagnostic CT Imaging in the detection of ccRCC as confirmed by histopathology diagnoses. The numbers represent the average estimate of three independent, blinded central readers per imaging modality. For the secondary efficacy variables no 95% CIs for differences of averages were calculated. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Subject is over 18 years of age.
Presence of a renal mass.
Scheduled for surgical resection of renal mass (partial or total nephrectomy, open or laparoscopic technique).
Expected survival of at least 3 months.
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status < 2.
The following laboratory results should be within the following limits within the last 2 weeks prior to study day 1:
Negative serum pregnancy test; to be performed on female patients of childbearing potential within 24 hours prior to receiving investigational product. All females of childbearing potential must indicate intent to avoid pregnancy and must use an accepted, effective method of contraception for the duration of the study.
Recovered from toxicity of any prior therapy.
Able and willing to give valid written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Chaitanya Divgi, MD | University of Pennsylvania | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA | Los Angeles | California | 90095-1721 | United States | ||
| Stanford University Medical Center |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17395103 | Background | Divgi CR, Pandit-Taskar N, Jungbluth AA, Reuter VE, Gonen M, Ruan S, Pierre C, Nagel A, Pryma DA, Humm J, Larson SM, Old LJ, Russo P. Preoperative characterisation of clear-cell renal carcinoma using iodine-124-labelled antibody chimeric G250 (124I-cG250) and PET in patients with renal masses: a phase I trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007 Apr;8(4):304-10. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70044-X. | |
| 23213092 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
226 subjects were enrolled at 14 study sites in the USA.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | PET/CT Versus CT | PET/CT and CT scans for all study subjects 4 days (+/- 2 days) after 124I cG250 administration. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| CT | Procedure | contrast enhanced CT scan |
|
| 6 months |
| Positive Predictive Value (PPV) | The Positive Predictive Value (PPV) reflects the Proportion of positive results that are true positive. The PPV of 124I-cG250 PET/CT imaging compared to diagnostic CT Imaging in the detection of ccRCC as confirmed by histopathology diagnoses. The numbers represent the average estimate of three independent, blinded central readers per imaging modality. For the secondary efficacy variables no 95% CIs for differences of averages were calculated. | 6 months |
| Negative Predictive Value (NPV) | Negative Predictive Value (NPV) reflects the proportion of negative results that are true negatives. The NPV of 124I-cG250 PET/CT imaging compared to diagnostic CT Imaging in the detection of ccRCC as confirmed by histopathology diagnoses. The numbers represent the average estimate of three independent, blinded central readers per imaging modality. For the secondary efficacy variables no 95% CIs for differences of averages were calculated. | 6 months |
| Stanford |
| California |
| 94305 |
| United States |
| H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Center | Tampa | Florida | 33612 | United States |
| Lahey Clinic | Burlington | Massachusetts | 01805 | United States |
| University of Michigan | Ann Arbor | Michigan | 48109-0330 | United States |
| Nevada Cancer Institute | Las Vegas | Nevada | 89135 | United States |
| Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center | New York | New York | 10021 | United States |
| UNC School of Medicine-Chapel Hill | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | 27599 | United States |
| Duke University Medical Center | Durham | North Carolina | 27711 | United States |
| Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Cleveland | Ohio | 44195 | United States |
| Ohio State University | Columbus | Ohio | 43210 | United States |
| Fox Chase Cancer Center | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104-4283 | United States |
| Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104-4283 | United States |
| MD Anderson | Houston | Texas | 77030-4009 | United States |
| Derived |
| Divgi CR, Uzzo RG, Gatsonis C, Bartz R, Treutner S, Yu JQ, Chen D, Carrasquillo JA, Larson S, Bevan P, Russo P. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography identification of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: results from the REDECT trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jan 10;31(2):187-94. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.41.2445. Epub 2012 Dec 3. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | PET/CT Versus CT | All subjects were scheduled to receive a PET/CT and a diagnostic CT |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Sensitivity and Specificity of 124I-cG250 PET/CT Versus Diagnostic CT. | Average estimate of three independent, blinded central readers per imaging modality on the proportion of participants that were correctly identified on the 124I-cG250 PET/CT Images of having (sensitivity) or not having (specificity) clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC) compared to CT images. Histopathology provided the standard-of-truth because it is the only definitive method for accurately identifying ccRCC. | ITD (Intend-to-Diagnose) observed case: All subjects who were enrolled and infused with the investigational product and who had a "standard-of-truth" (histopathology) result and images evaluated as readable by the blinded readers | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Proportion of participants | 6 months |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Accuracy of 124I-cG250 PET/CT Imaging Versus Diagnostic CT Imaging | The Accuracy is the proportion of participants with correct determinations of 124I-cG250 PET/CT imaging compared to diagnostic CT Imaging in the detection of ccRCC as confirmed by histopathology diagnoses. The numbers represent the average estimate of three independent, blinded central readers per imaging modality. For the secondary efficacy variables no 95% CIs for differences of averages were calculated. | ITD (Intend-to-Diagnose) observed case: All subjects who were enrolled and infused with the investigational product and who had a "standard-of-truth" (histopathology) result and images evaluated as readable by the blinded readers | Posted | Number | Proportion of participants | 6 months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Positive Predictive Value (PPV) | The Positive Predictive Value (PPV) reflects the Proportion of positive results that are true positive. The PPV of 124I-cG250 PET/CT imaging compared to diagnostic CT Imaging in the detection of ccRCC as confirmed by histopathology diagnoses. The numbers represent the average estimate of three independent, blinded central readers per imaging modality. For the secondary efficacy variables no 95% CIs for differences of averages were calculated. | ITD (Intend-to-Diagnose) observed case: All subjects who were enrolled and infused with the investigational product and who had a "standard-of-truth" (histopathology) result and images evaluated as readable by the blinded readers | Posted | Number | Protportion of participants | 6 months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Negative Predictive Value (NPV) | Negative Predictive Value (NPV) reflects the proportion of negative results that are true negatives. The NPV of 124I-cG250 PET/CT imaging compared to diagnostic CT Imaging in the detection of ccRCC as confirmed by histopathology diagnoses. The numbers represent the average estimate of three independent, blinded central readers per imaging modality. For the secondary efficacy variables no 95% CIs for differences of averages were calculated. | ITD (Intend-to-Diagnose) observed case: All subjects who were enrolled and infused with the investigational product and who had a "standard-of-truth" (histopathology) result and images evaluated as readable by the blinded readers | Posted | Number | Proportion of participants | 6 months |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | PET/CT Versus CT | All subjects were scheduled to receive a PET/CT and a diagnostic CT | 33 | 226 | 191 | 226 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Colitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Gastrointestinal haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Intestinal perforation | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Retroperitoneal haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cerebral infarction | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Disease Progression | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urinary anastomotic leak | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pleural effusion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pulmonary embolism | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Flank pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Clostridial infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pyelonephritis | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Sepsis | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hepatic enzyme increased | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Haematuria | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Extravasation of urine | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Nephrolithiasis | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Renal haemorrhage | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Renal infarct | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urinary tract obstruction | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urinoma | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hypotension | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Haematoma | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Deep vein thrombosis | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cardiac Arrest | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cardiac failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Glioma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Respiratory failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procedural pain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Fatigue | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Incision site pain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Anxiety | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vomitting | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dysgeusia | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head of R&D | Heidelberg Pharma AG (former Wilex AG) | info@hdpharma.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002292 | Carcinoma, Renal Cell |
| D007680 | Kidney Neoplasms |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000230 | Adenocarcinoma |
| D002277 | Carcinoma |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D014571 | Urologic Neoplasms |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D007674 | Kidney Diseases |
| D014570 | Urologic Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| Superiority |
|
|
|