Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| GEN411 | Other Identifier | GENMAB |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Ofatumumab IV trials in RA were prematurely terminated because GSK refocused clinical development of autoimmune indications on the subcutaneous delivery.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a phase III, double-blind, randomized, multicenter, and parallel group trial with a duration of 24 weeks, followed by a 120 week Open-label Period. The primary purpose of the study is to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of ofatumumab in reducing clinical signs and symptoms in adult RA patients who had an inadequate response to TNF-α antagonist therapy.
This study consist of a double-blind, placebo controlled, and parallel group part with eligible patients enrolled into a 24 week Double-Blind Period, and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ofatumumab or placebo in addition to their background methotrexate treatment. Patients who complete the 24 week Double-blind Period without receiving rescue DMARD treatment will then be eligible to proceed into the 120 week Open-label Period to receive repeat treatment courses with ofatumumab. In the Open-label Period ofatumumab treatment courses will be given at individualized time intervals only if a clinical response has been achieved following the previous treatment course, and followed by a subsequent worsening in disease activity.
Patients who have completed the Open-label Period or have been withdrawn will then enter a maximum 2 year Follow-up Period, or until there B-cells return to normal or to baseline levels, whichever occurs earlier
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab | Experimental | 1000 mL dilution of 35ml of ofatumumab in sterile, pyrogen free 0.9% NaCl. Each treatment cycle consisting of two IV infusion taken 14 days apart. A total of 8 infusion cycles given over a 144 week period |
|
| 1000 ml Saline | Placebo Comparator | 1000 mL sterile, pyrogen free 0.9% NaCl. A treatment cycle consisting of two IV infusion taken 14 days apart. Only one placebo treatment cycle provided over a 24 week period |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab | Drug | 1000 mL dilution of 35ml of ofatumumab in sterile, pyrogen free 0.9% NaCl. Each treatment cycle consisting of two IV infusion taken 14 days apart. A total of 8 infusion cycles given over a 144 week period |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With a 20% Improvement From Baseline in Their American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20) at Week 24 | The ACR score was based on improvement from baseline in tender (TJC) and swollen joint counts (SJC). A participant had achieved ACR20 if he experienced >=20% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC and a >=20% improvement from baseline in 3 out of 5 of the following assessments: participant pain assessment on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS), participant global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, physician global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, participant self-assessed disability, and C-reactive protein. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With a 20% Improvement From Baseline in Their American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 | The ACR score was based on improvement from baseline in tender (TJC) and swollen joint counts (SJC). A participant had achieved ACR20 if he experienced >=20% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC and a >=20% improvement from baseline in 3 out of 5 of the following assessments: participant pain assessment on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS), participant global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, physician global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, participant self-assessed disability, and C-reactive protein. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Age ≥ 18 years;
Active disease at the time of screening as defined by:
≥ 8 swollen joints (of 66 joints assessed) and ≥ 8 tender joints (of 68 joints assessed), C-Reactive Protein (CRP) ≥ 1.0 mg/dL or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) ≥ 22 mm/hour, DAS28≥3.2 (based on ESR);
Inadequate response to previous or current TNF-alpha antagonist treatment;
Treatment with methotrexate (MTX), 7.5-25 mg/week, for at least 12 weeks and at a stable dose for at least 4 weeks.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| GSK Clinical Trials | GlaxoSmithKline | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Investigational Site | Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires | Buenos Aires | AAL1426 | Argentina | ||
| GSK Investigational Site |
Study OFA110634 is comprised of a 24-week Double-blind (DB) Period, followed by a 120-week Open-label (OL) Period. Participants who complete the OL Period, or who are withdrawn, enter a Follow-up (FU) period (anticipated to be approximately 2 years).
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo | Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5-25 milligrams [mg]/week [oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous] for 24 weeks) in the DB Period. |
| FG001 |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DB Treatment Period (24 Weeks) |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Drug | 1000 mL sterile, pyrogen free 0.9% NaCl. A treatment cycle consisting of two IV infusion taken 14 days apart. Only one placebo treatment cycle provided over a 24 week period |
|
| Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 |
| Number of Participants With a 50% Improvement From Baseline in Their ACR Score (ACR50) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The ACR score was based on improvement from baseline in tender (TJC) and swollen joint counts (SJC). A participant had achieved ACR50 if he experienced >=50% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC and a >=50% improvement from baseline in 3 out of 5 of the following assessments: participant pain assessment on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS), participant global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, physician global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, participant self-assessed disability, and C-reactive protein. | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| Number of Participants With a 70% Improvement From Baseline in Their ACR Score (ACR70) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The ACR score was based on improvement from baseline in tender (TJC) and swollen joint counts (SJC). A participant had achieved ACR70 if he experienced >=70% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC and a >=70% improvement from baseline in 3 out of 5 of the following assessments: participant pain assessment on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS), participant global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, physician global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, participant self-assessed disability, and C-reactive protein. | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| Mean Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joints (DAS28) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using C-reactive Protein (CRP) as the Acute Phase Reactant (APR) | The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity (DA) that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of DA can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. APRs are a class of proteins that are useful markers for inflammation. | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant | The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity (DA) that combines information from swollen and tender joints, the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The level of DA can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. APRs are a class of proteins that are useful markers for inflammation. Change from baseline in DAS28 is calculated as the Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 values minus the baseline value. | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| Mean DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) as the Acute Phase Reactant (ARP) | The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity (DA) that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of DA can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. APRs are a class of proteins that are useful markers for inflammation. | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant | The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity (DA) that combines information from swollen and tender joints, the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The level of DA can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. APRs are a class of proteins that are useful markers for inflammation. Change from baseline in DAS28 is calculated as the Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 values minus the baseline value. | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant | The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2 to >5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to <=1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2 to <=5.1); non-responders: change from baseline <=0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and <=1.2 with DAS28 >5.1. | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant | The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2 to >5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to <=1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2 to <=5.1); non-responders: change from baseline <=0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and <=1.2 with DAS28 >5.1. | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| Median of the Largest Integer n, for Which a Participant Met the ACR Criteria Requiring an Improvement of n% (ACRn) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | ACRn = the largest integer n for which a participant (par.) met the criteria requiring an improvement of n%. ACRn is a measure characterizing percentage (%) improvement from baseline (IFBL). A par. with an ACRn of X had an improvement of >=X% in tender/swollen joints (TJC/SJC), and an improvement of >=X% in 3 of the 5 parameters (patient [pt] pain assessment, pt global assessment [GA], physician GA, pt self-assessed disability, acute phase reactant). ACRn = min(TJC % IFBL, SJC % IFBL, composite measure % IFBL). Composite measure % IFBL is the 3rd highest value of % IFBL for the 5 parameters. | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The HAQ-DI is a 20-question instrument used to assess the degree of difficulty a participant had in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (FAs): dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and errands/chores. Responses for each FA were scored from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (inability to perform a task). The total score (range of 0-3) was calculated by adding the 8 individual FA scores, then dividing this sum by the total number of components answered. Responders were defined as participants achieving an improvement from baseline in the HAQ-DI score at Week 24 of >=0.22. | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count at Week 24 | Change from baseline in tender joint count was calculated as the Week 24 count minus the baseline count. A total of 68 joints were assessed. Joints were classified as either tender or not tender by an independent assessor, who had documented experience in performing joint assessments. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Week 24 | Change from baseline in swollen joint count was calculated as the Week 24 count minus the baseline count. A total of 66 joints were assessed. Joints were classified as either swollen or not swollen by an independent assessor, who had documented experience in performing joint assessments. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in CRP at Week 24 | Blood samples for the determination of CRP were taken at pre-specified visits and were sent to the central laboratory for analysis. Change from baseline in CRP was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. CRP is an acute-phase protein whose plasma concentration increases in response to inflammation. CRP is a useful marker of inflammation. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in ESR at Week 24 | ESR is measured by a blood test that shows the rate at which red blood cells sediment in a period of 1 hour. Blood samples for the determination of ESR were taken at pre-specified visits and were measured immediately at the trial site. Change from baseline in ESR was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in the Participant-assessed Pain Score Using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 24 | A horizontal VAS of 100 mm was used to report the participant's level of joint pain. The scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (unbearable pain). Participants were instructed to draw a vertical line through the horizontal line to indicate how much joint pain they had. The distance from the "no pain" end to the vertical line drawn by the participant was the joint pain score. Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in Participant-assessed Global Disease Score Using VAS at Week 24 | The participant used a horizontal VAS of 100 mm for overall assessment of disease. The scale ranged from 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor). Participants were instructed to draw a vertical line through the horizontal line to indicate the state of the arthritis. The distance from the "very well" end to the vertical line drawn by the participant was the global disease assessment score. Change from baseline in participant-assessed global disease was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in the Physician-assessed Global Disease Score Using VAS at Week 24 | The physician used a horizontal VAS of 100 mm for overall assessment of disease. The scale ranged from 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor). Physicians were instructed to draw a vertical line through the horizontal line to indicate the state of the arthritis. The distance from the "very well" end to the vertical line drawn by the participant was the global disease assessment score. Change from baseline in the physician-assessed global disease was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Questionnaire Score at Week 24 | The FACIT-F score has a valid range of values from 0 to 52, with a higher score indicating a lower burden of fatigue. The subset determining fatigue contains 13 questions. Responses to each question were scored from 0, indicating "Not at all fatigued," to 4, indicating "Very much fatigued." | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in the Short-Form 36 (SF-36v2) Norm-based Scores for Physical Component Summary and Physical Items at Week 24 | The SF-36v2 is a standardized questionnaire used to measure overall subjective health status by measuring 8 health-related parameters (each scored from 0 [poorer health] to 100 [better health]): body pain, general mental health (MH), perception of general health, physical functioning, role limitations (RL) caused by mental condition, RL caused by a physical condition, social functioning, and vitality. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores, as well as psychometrically based physical and MH summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in the SF-36v2 Norm-based Scores for Mental Component Summary and Mental Items at Week 24 | The SF-36v2 is a standardized questionnaire used to measure overall subjective health status by measuring 8 health-related parameters (each scored from 0 [poorer health] to 100 [better health]): body pain, general mental health (MH), perception of general health, physical functioning, role limitations (RL) caused by mental condition, RL caused by a physical condition, social functioning, and vitality. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically-based physical and MH summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Biomarker Levels for Anti-CCP, RF-IgA, RF-IgG, and RF-IgM at Baseline and Week 4 | The following biomarkers were assessed: Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide 3 antibody (Anti-CCP), Rheumatoid factor IgA (RF-IgA), RF IgG (RF-IgG), and RF IgM (RF-IgM). Measurements of RF were used to characterize participants' disease activity and immune status. Anti-CCP was used to characterize the disease type and the immune status of the participants. Assessments for which results were below the lower limit of quantification (LLQ) were reported using a value of LLQ/2. Assessments for which results were above the upper limit of quantification (ULQ) were reported using a value of ULQ. | Baseline and Week 4 |
| Number of Participants With Positive Human Anti-human Antibodies (HAHA) at Week 24 | Detection of human anti-human antibodies (HAHAs) against ofatumumab was to be performed by Electrochemiluminescent (ECL) Meso-Scale Discovery (MSD) immunoassay. Positive samples from the binding antibody test were also tested in a neutralizing antibody assay. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in Levels of IgA, IgG and IgM at Week 12 and Week 24 | The following immunoglobulins were assessed: IgA, IgG and IgM. Immunoglobulins, or antibodies, are large proteins used by the immune system to identify and neutralize foreign particles such as bacteria and viruses. Their normal blood levels indicate proper immune status. Low levels indicate immuno-suppression. | Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24 |
| Minimum DAS28-ESR Score During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of disease activity can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. The values summarized are the minimum DAS28 score (i.e. lowest level of disease activity) achieved by each participant within the first 24 weeks of each treatment course (TC), assessed using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR; rate at which red blood cells sediment in 1 hour). | First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144) |
| Minimum DAS28-CRP Score During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of disease activity can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. The values summarized are the minimum DAS28 score (i.e. lowest level of disease activity) achieved by each participant within the first 24 weeks of each treatment course, assessed using C-reactive Protein (CRP: used to monitor acute inflammatory phases of rheumatoid arthritis). | First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144) |
| Minimum Change From Baseline DAS28-ESR Score, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The level of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity based on the DAS28 score is defined as low if DAS28 <=3.2, moderate if 3.2< DAS28 <=5.1, or high if DAS28 > 5.1. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to clinical remission. The values summarized are the minimum change from baseline DAS28 score (i.e. greatest change in disease activity during the treatment course) achieved by each participant within the first 24 weeks of each treatment course, assessed by using ESR. Baseline score was determined at the start of each treatment course. For change from baseline, participants had to have both a baseline DAS28 value for the treatment course (i.e., the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the treatment course, providing it was done within a 14 day window prior to the date of infusion A) and a DAS28 value during the treatment course (i.e., during first 24 weeks of each treatment course). Change from baseline was calculated as the value during the treatment course minus the baseline value. | First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144) |
| Minimum Change From Baseline DAS28-CRP Score, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The level of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity based on the DAS28 score is defined as low if DAS28 <=3.2, moderate if 3.2< DAS28 <=5.1, or high if DAS28 > 5.1. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to clinical remission. The values summarized are the minimum change from baseline DAS28 score (i.e. greatest change in disease activity during the treatment course) achieved by each participant within the first 24 weeks of each treatment course, assessed by using CRP. Baseline score was determined at the start of each treatment course. For change from baseline, participants had to have both a baseline DAS28 value for the treatment course (i.e., the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the treatment course, providing it was done within a 14 day window prior to the date of infusion A) and a DAS28 value during the treatment course (i.e., during first 24 weeks of each treatment course). Change from baseline was calculated as the value during the treatment course minus the baseline value. | First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144) |
| Time to Retreatment, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | Time to retreatment is defined as the time in days between infusion A of each treatment course and infusion A of the following treatment course. For participants randomized to ofatumumab in the Double-blind Period, Treatment Course 1 refers to the course of ofatumumab received in the Double-blind Period. The minimum period allowed per protocol before retreatment was 24 weeks (end of Double-blind Period). For participants randomized to placebo in the Double-blind Period, Treatment Course 1 refers to the first course of ofatumumab received in the Open-label Period. The minimum period allowed per protocol before retreatment during the Open-label Period was 16 weeks. | From Baseline up to Week 144 |
| Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using ESR), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of disease activity can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6 at any time during the first 24 weeks of each treatment course. Low disease activity is defined as a DAS28 score >=2.6 and <3.2 at any time during the first 24 weeks of each treatment course. | First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144) |
| Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using CRP), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of disease activity can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6 at any time during the first 24 weeks of each treatment course. Low disease activity is defined as a DAS28 score >=2.6 and <3.2 at any time during the first 24 weeks of each treatment course. | First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144) |
| Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Adverse Event or Serious Adverse Event, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in disability/incapacity; or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment should have been exercised in other situations. Refer to the general AE/SAE module for a list of AEs (occurring at a frequency threshold >=2%) and SAEs. | First treatment (Day 0) until the participant terminated the trial, assessed up to Week 144 |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings, During the OL Period | The number of participants with normal, abnormal clinically significant (CS), and abnormal not clinically significant (NCS) ECG findings, as well as the number of participants with no results (NR), during the OL Period are presented. An overall interpretation of the ECG was made by the investigator, or the investigator could delegate this task to a cardiologist, if applicable. | From DB Period completion (Week 24) until the completion of the OL Period, assessed up to Week 144 |
| Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at Indicated the Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The number of participants with a CD19+ cell count greater than or equal to the lower limit of normal (LLN; reference range 0.11 to 0.66 giga [10^9] per liter) or the baseline value (whichever was lower) is presented. The baseline assessment is defined as the start of the Double-blind Period. | From baseline up to Week 144 |
| Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The number of participants with a CD3+ cell count greater than or equal to the lower limit of normal (LLN; reference range 0.11 to 0.66 gill per liter) or the baseline value (whichever was lower) is presented. The baseline assessment is defined as the start of the Double-blind Period. | From baseline up to Week 144 |
| Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point , During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The number of participants with a CD4+ cell count greater than or equal to the lower limit of normal (LLN; reference range 0.11 to 0.66 gill per liter) or the baseline value (whichever was lower) is presented. The baseline assessment is defined as the start of the Double-blind Period. | From baseline up to Week 144 |
| Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point , During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The number of participants with a CD8+ cell count greater than or equal to the lower limit of normal (LLN; reference range 0.11 to 0.66 gill per liter) or the baseline value (whichever was lower) is presented. The baseline assessment is defined as the start of the Double-blind Period. | From baseline up to Week 144 |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | Only those parameters for which at least one value of clinical concern (CC) was reported are summarized. The baseline (BL) value for a treatment course is defined as the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the treatment course. The post-baseline (PBL) visit is defined as any visit after the date of infusion A during the specified treatment course. Pre-defined limits of potential clinical concern (CC Low [relative to the lower limit of normal], CC High [relative to the upper limit of normal]) are: Albumin: 0.9, 1.5; Alanine amino transferase (ALT): NA, 2; Alkaline phosphatase (ALP): NA, 1.5; Aspartate amino transferase (AST): NA, 2; Bilirubin total (TBIL): NA, 1.5; Calcium: 0.85, 1.08; CO2 content/bicarbonate (BCO): 0.85, 1.2; Creatine kinase (CK): NA, 2; Creatinine: NA, 1.2; Gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT): NA, 2; Potassium: 0.9, 1.1; Urea/blood urea nitrogen (BUN): NA, 1.5; Uric acid: NA, 1.5. | From baseline up to Week 144 |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | Only those parameters for which at least one value of clinical concern (CC) was reported are summarized. The baseline (BL) value for a treatment course is defined as the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the treatment course. The post-baseline (PBL) visit is defined as any visit after the date of infusion A during the specified treatment course. Pre-defined limits of potential clinical concern (CC Low [relative to lower limit of normal], CC High [relative to upper limit of normal]) are: Eosinophils: NA, 2; Hematocrit (HCT): 0.75, 1.2; Hemoglobin (Hb): 0.75, 1.2; Monocytes: 0.2, 5 2; Neutrophils total (TNUE): 0.8, 1.6; Platelet count (PC): 0.65, 1.5; Red blood cell count (RBC): 0.7, 5 2; White blood cell count (WBC): 0.7, 1.6. | From baseline up to Week 144 |
| Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The baseline value for a treatment course is defined as the value before infusion A of each treatment course. The post-baseline visit is defined as any assessment during or after the start of infusion A during the specified treatment course. Pre-defined limits of potential clinical concern for vital signs (Low, High) are: Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (millimeters of mercury [mmHg]): 40, 110; Systolic blood pressure (SBP) (mmHg): 90, 170; Heart rate (beats per minute): 35, 120. LLN=lower limit of normal; ULN=upper limit of normal. | From baseline up to Week 144 |
| Number of Participants With Immunoglobulin Values Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The baseline value for a treatment course is defined as the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the treatment course. The post-baseline visit is defined as any visit after the date of infusion A during the specified treatment course. Reference ranges (LLN, ULN) used for immunoglobulins are: immunoglobulin A (IgA) (grams/Liter): 0.81, 4.63; immunoglobulin G (IgG) (grams/Liter): 6.94, 16.18; immunoglobulin M (IgM) (grams/Liter): 0.48, 2.71. | From baseline up to Week 144 |
| Number of Participants With Positive John Cunningham (JC) Virus Test Results at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline During the DB and OL Periods | Blood samples were collected for analysis of plasma/white blood cell JC Virus (JCV) using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. A positive JC Virus test result indicates the presence of JC Virus. | From basline up to Week 144 |
| Number of Participants With Any Serious Adverse Event During the Follow-up Period | A serious adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in disability/incapacity; or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment should have been exercised in other situations. Refer to the general SAE module for a list of SAEs. | From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (or maximum of 2 years from Last Subject Last Visit [LSLV]) |
| Number of Participants With Immunoglobulin Values Outside the Reference Range During the Follow-up Period | The reference ranges for immunoglobulins (LLN, ULN) are defined as: IgA (grams/Liter): 0.81, 4.63; IgG (grams/Liter): 6.94, 16.18; IgM (grams/Liter): 0.48, 2.71. | From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (or maximum of 2 years from LSLV) |
| Time to First CD19+ B-cell Repopulation Relative to the First Dose and Last Dose of Ofatumumab | Time to first CD19+ B-cell repopulation (return to normal or baseline level) relative to the first dose was assessed only for those participants whose B-cells repopulated after receiving ofatumumab. Time to first CD19+ B-cell repopulation relative to the last dose of ofatumumab was assessed only for those participants whose B-cells repopulated during their last ofatumumab treatment course or follow-up. | From the first dose of ofatumumab until the last Follow-up Period visit (up to Week 248) |
| Number of Participants With a Positive JC Virus Test Result During the Follow-up Period | Blood samples were collected for analysis of plasma/white blood cell JC Virus (JCV) using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. Positive JC Virus test result indicated presence of JC Virus. | From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (or maximum of 2 years from LSLV) |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern During the Follow-up Period | Only those parameters for which at least one value of clinical concern (CC) was reported are summarized. Pre-defined limits of potential clinical concern (CC Low [relative to the lower limit of normal], CC High [relative to the upper limit of normal]) are: ALT: NA, 2; ALP: NA, 1.5; TBIL: NA, 1.5; CO2/BCO: 0.85, 1.2; CK: NA, 2; GGT: NA, 2; Urea/BUN: NA, 1.5. | From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (maximum of 2 years) |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern During the Follow-up Period | Only those parameters for which at least one value of clinical concern (CC) was reported are summarized. Pre-defined limits of potential clinical concern (CC Low [relative to lower limit of normal], CC High [relative to upper limit of normal]) are: Eosinophils: NA, 2; Total neutrophils: 0.8, 1.6; Platelet count: 0.65, 1.5. | From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (maximum of 2 years) |
| Rosario |
| Santa Fe Province |
| 2000 |
| Argentina |
| GSK Investigational Site | Córdoba | 5000 | Argentina |
| GSK Investigational Site | San Miguel de Tucumán | 4000 | Argentina |
| GSK Investigational Site | Herlev | 2730 | Denmark |
| GSK Investigational Site | Silkeborg | 8600 | Denmark |
| GSK Investigational Site | Amiens | Picardie | 80054 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Cahors | 46005 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Corbeil-Essonnes | 91106 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Échirolles | 38434 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Strasbourg | 67098 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Toulouse | 31059 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Heidelberg | Baden-Wurttemberg | 69120 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Erlangen | Bavaria | 91054 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Potsdam | Brandenburg | 14467 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hamburg | Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg | 22081 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hamburg | Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg | 22415 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hanover | Lower Saxony | 30625 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Osnabrück | Lower Saxony | 49074 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Leipzg | Saxony | 04109 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Magdeburg | Saxony-Anhalt | 39112 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Berlin | State of Berlin | 10559 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Berlin | State of Berlin | 14129 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Naples | Campania | 80131 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Telese Terme (BN) | Campania | 82100 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Rome | Lazio | 00161 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Genoa | Liguria | 16132 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Milan | Lombardy | 20132 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Milan | Lombardy | 20157 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Milan | Lombardy | 20162 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Varese | Lombardy | 21100 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Prato | Tuscany | 59100 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Padova | Veneto | 35121 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Amsterdam | 1056 AB | Netherlands |
| GSK Investigational Site | Enschede | 7511JX | Netherlands |
| GSK Investigational Site | Zwolle | 8011 JW | Netherlands |
| GSK Investigational Site | Haugesund | N-5528 | Norway |
| GSK Investigational Site | Levanger | 7600 | Norway |
| GSK Investigational Site | Lillehammer | 2609 | Norway |
| GSK Investigational Site | Trondheim | 7006 | Norway |
| GSK Investigational Site | Lima | Lima Province | Lima 27 | Peru |
| GSK Investigational Site | Incheon | 400-711 | South Korea |
| GSK Investigational Site | Seoul | 110-744 | South Korea |
| GSK Investigational Site | Seoul | 120-752 | South Korea |
| GSK Investigational Site | Seoul | 133-792 | South Korea |
| GSK Investigational Site | Seoul | 137-701 | South Korea |
| GSK Investigational Site | Getafe/Madrid | 28905 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Madrid | 28007 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Madrid | 28046 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Mérida (Badajoz) | 06800 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Santander | 39008 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Seville | 41071 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Valencia | 46017 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Oskarström | SE-313 92 | Sweden |
| GSK Investigational Site | Stockholm | SE-171 76 | Sweden |
| GSK Investigational Site | Wishaw | Lanarkshire | ML2 0DP | United Kingdom |
| GSK Investigational Site | Newcastle | Northumberland | NE1 4LP | United Kingdom |
| GSK Investigational Site | Cannock | WS11 5XY | United Kingdom |
| GSK Investigational Site | Dundee | DD1 9SY | United Kingdom |
| GSK Investigational Site | Leytonstone, London | E11 1NR | United Kingdom |
| Ofatumumab |
Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week [oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous] for 24 weeks) in the DB Period. Participants completing the 24-week DB Period without receiving rescue disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment were eligible to proceed into the 120-week OL Period to receive repeat ofatumumab treatment courses (at individualized time intervals if a clinical response had been achieved after the previous treatment course). |
| FG002 | Placebo or OFA 700 mg: FU Period | Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| OL Treatment Period (120 Weeks) |
|
|
| Follow-up Period (Approximately 2 Years) |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo | Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams [mg]/week [oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous] for 24 weeks). |
| BG001 | Ofatumumab 700 mg | Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week [oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous] for 24 weeks). |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With a 20% Improvement From Baseline in Their American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20) at Week 24 | The ACR score was based on improvement from baseline in tender (TJC) and swollen joint counts (SJC). A participant had achieved ACR20 if he experienced >=20% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC and a >=20% improvement from baseline in 3 out of 5 of the following assessments: participant pain assessment on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS), participant global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, physician global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, participant self-assessed disability, and C-reactive protein. | Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants who were exposed to investigational product irrespective of their compliance to the planned course of treatment. Participants were analyzed according to their randomized treatment. | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline and Week 24 |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With a 20% Improvement From Baseline in Their American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 | The ACR score was based on improvement from baseline in tender (TJC) and swollen joint counts (SJC). A participant had achieved ACR20 if he experienced >=20% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC and a >=20% improvement from baseline in 3 out of 5 of the following assessments: participant pain assessment on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS), participant global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, physician global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, participant self-assessed disability, and C-reactive protein. | ITT Population | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With a 50% Improvement From Baseline in Their ACR Score (ACR50) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The ACR score was based on improvement from baseline in tender (TJC) and swollen joint counts (SJC). A participant had achieved ACR50 if he experienced >=50% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC and a >=50% improvement from baseline in 3 out of 5 of the following assessments: participant pain assessment on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS), participant global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, physician global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, participant self-assessed disability, and C-reactive protein. | ITT Population | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With a 70% Improvement From Baseline in Their ACR Score (ACR70) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The ACR score was based on improvement from baseline in tender (TJC) and swollen joint counts (SJC). A participant had achieved ACR70 if he experienced >=70% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC and a >=70% improvement from baseline in 3 out of 5 of the following assessments: participant pain assessment on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS), participant global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, physician global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, participant self-assessed disability, and C-reactive protein. | ITT Population | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joints (DAS28) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using C-reactive Protein (CRP) as the Acute Phase Reactant (APR) | The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity (DA) that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of DA can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. APRs are a class of proteins that are useful markers for inflammation. | ITT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the relevant visit were analyzed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant | The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity (DA) that combines information from swollen and tender joints, the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The level of DA can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. APRs are a class of proteins that are useful markers for inflammation. Change from baseline in DAS28 is calculated as the Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 values minus the baseline value. | ITT Population. Only those participants contributing values at baseline and the relevant visit were analyzed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) as the Acute Phase Reactant (ARP) | The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity (DA) that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of DA can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. APRs are a class of proteins that are useful markers for inflammation. | ITT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the relevant visit were analyzed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant | The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity (DA) that combines information from swollen and tender joints, the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The level of DA can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. APRs are a class of proteins that are useful markers for inflammation. Change from baseline in DAS28 is calculated as the Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 values minus the baseline value. | ITT Population. Only those participants contributing values at baseline and the relevant visit were analyzed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant | The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2 to >5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to <=1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2 to <=5.1); non-responders: change from baseline <=0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and <=1.2 with DAS28 >5.1. | ITT Population | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant | The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2 to >5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to <=1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2 to <=5.1); non-responders: change from baseline <=0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and <=1.2 with DAS28 >5.1. | ITT Population | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Median of the Largest Integer n, for Which a Participant Met the ACR Criteria Requiring an Improvement of n% (ACRn) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | ACRn = the largest integer n for which a participant (par.) met the criteria requiring an improvement of n%. ACRn is a measure characterizing percentage (%) improvement from baseline (IFBL). A par. with an ACRn of X had an improvement of >=X% in tender/swollen joints (TJC/SJC), and an improvement of >=X% in 3 of the 5 parameters (patient [pt] pain assessment, pt global assessment [GA], physician GA, pt self-assessed disability, acute phase reactant). ACRn = min(TJC % IFBL, SJC % IFBL, composite measure % IFBL). Composite measure % IFBL is the 3rd highest value of % IFBL for the 5 parameters. | ITT Population. This trial was terminated prematurely due to the Sponsor's decision to not pursue clinical development of the IV formulation of ofatumumab in an autoimmune indication; thus, no participants were analyzed for this endpoint. | Posted | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The HAQ-DI is a 20-question instrument used to assess the degree of difficulty a participant had in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (FAs): dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and errands/chores. Responses for each FA were scored from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (inability to perform a task). The total score (range of 0-3) was calculated by adding the 8 individual FA scores, then dividing this sum by the total number of components answered. Responders were defined as participants achieving an improvement from baseline in the HAQ-DI score at Week 24 of >=0.22. | ITT Population. Only those participants contributing values at baseline and the relevant visit were analyzed. | Posted | Median | Full Range | scores on a scale | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count at Week 24 | Change from baseline in tender joint count was calculated as the Week 24 count minus the baseline count. A total of 68 joints were assessed. Joints were classified as either tender or not tender by an independent assessor, who had documented experience in performing joint assessments. | ITT Population. Only those participants contributing values at baseline and the relevant visit were analyzed. | Posted | Median | Full Range | tender joints | Baseline and Week 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Week 24 | Change from baseline in swollen joint count was calculated as the Week 24 count minus the baseline count. A total of 66 joints were assessed. Joints were classified as either swollen or not swollen by an independent assessor, who had documented experience in performing joint assessments. | ITT Population. Only those participants contributing values at baseline and the relevant visit were analyzed. | Posted | Median | Full Range | swollen joints | Baseline and Week 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in CRP at Week 24 | Blood samples for the determination of CRP were taken at pre-specified visits and were sent to the central laboratory for analysis. Change from baseline in CRP was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. CRP is an acute-phase protein whose plasma concentration increases in response to inflammation. CRP is a useful marker of inflammation. | ITT Population. Only those participants contributing values at baseline and the relevant visit were analyzed. | Posted | Median | Full Range | milligrams per liter (mg/L) | Baseline and Week 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in ESR at Week 24 | ESR is measured by a blood test that shows the rate at which red blood cells sediment in a period of 1 hour. Blood samples for the determination of ESR were taken at pre-specified visits and were measured immediately at the trial site. Change from baseline in ESR was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. | ITT Population. Only those participants contributing values at baseline and the relevant visit were analyzed. | Posted | Median | Full Range | millimeters per hour (mm/hr) | Baseline and Week 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Participant-assessed Pain Score Using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 24 | A horizontal VAS of 100 mm was used to report the participant's level of joint pain. The scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (unbearable pain). Participants were instructed to draw a vertical line through the horizontal line to indicate how much joint pain they had. The distance from the "no pain" end to the vertical line drawn by the participant was the joint pain score. Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. | ITT Population. This trial was terminated prematurely due to the Sponsor's decision to not pursue clinical development of the IV formulation of ofatumumab in an autoimmune indication; thus, no participants were analyzed for this endpoint. | Posted | Baseline and Week 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Participant-assessed Global Disease Score Using VAS at Week 24 | The participant used a horizontal VAS of 100 mm for overall assessment of disease. The scale ranged from 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor). Participants were instructed to draw a vertical line through the horizontal line to indicate the state of the arthritis. The distance from the "very well" end to the vertical line drawn by the participant was the global disease assessment score. Change from baseline in participant-assessed global disease was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. | ITT Population. This trial was terminated prematurely due to the Sponsor's decision to not pursue clinical development of the IV formulation of ofatumumab in an autoimmune indication; thus, no participants were analyzed for this endpoint. | Posted | Baseline and Week 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Physician-assessed Global Disease Score Using VAS at Week 24 | The physician used a horizontal VAS of 100 mm for overall assessment of disease. The scale ranged from 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor). Physicians were instructed to draw a vertical line through the horizontal line to indicate the state of the arthritis. The distance from the "very well" end to the vertical line drawn by the participant was the global disease assessment score. Change from baseline in the physician-assessed global disease was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. | ITT Population. This trial was terminated prematurely due to the Sponsor's decision to not pursue clinical development of the IV formulation of ofatumumab in an autoimmune indication; thus, no participants were analyzed for this endpoint. | Posted | Baseline and Week 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Questionnaire Score at Week 24 | The FACIT-F score has a valid range of values from 0 to 52, with a higher score indicating a lower burden of fatigue. The subset determining fatigue contains 13 questions. Responses to each question were scored from 0, indicating "Not at all fatigued," to 4, indicating "Very much fatigued." | ITT Population. This trial was terminated prematurely due to the Sponsor's decision to not pursue clinical development of the IV formulation of ofatumumab in an autoimmune indication; thus, no participants were analyzed for this endpoint. | Posted | Baseline and Week 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Short-Form 36 (SF-36v2) Norm-based Scores for Physical Component Summary and Physical Items at Week 24 | The SF-36v2 is a standardized questionnaire used to measure overall subjective health status by measuring 8 health-related parameters (each scored from 0 [poorer health] to 100 [better health]): body pain, general mental health (MH), perception of general health, physical functioning, role limitations (RL) caused by mental condition, RL caused by a physical condition, social functioning, and vitality. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores, as well as psychometrically based physical and MH summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. | ITT Population. This trial was terminated prematurely due to the Sponsor's decision to not pursue clinical development of the IV formulation of ofatumumab in an autoimmune indication; thus, no participants were analyzed for this endpoint. | Posted | Baseline and Week 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the SF-36v2 Norm-based Scores for Mental Component Summary and Mental Items at Week 24 | The SF-36v2 is a standardized questionnaire used to measure overall subjective health status by measuring 8 health-related parameters (each scored from 0 [poorer health] to 100 [better health]): body pain, general mental health (MH), perception of general health, physical functioning, role limitations (RL) caused by mental condition, RL caused by a physical condition, social functioning, and vitality. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically-based physical and MH summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. | ITT Population. This trial was terminated prematurely due to the Sponsor's decision to not pursue clinical development of the IV formulation of ofatumumab in an autoimmune indication; thus, no participants were analyzed for this endpoint. | Posted | Baseline and Week 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Biomarker Levels for Anti-CCP, RF-IgA, RF-IgG, and RF-IgM at Baseline and Week 4 | The following biomarkers were assessed: Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide 3 antibody (Anti-CCP), Rheumatoid factor IgA (RF-IgA), RF IgG (RF-IgG), and RF IgM (RF-IgM). Measurements of RF were used to characterize participants' disease activity and immune status. Anti-CCP was used to characterize the disease type and the immune status of the participants. Assessments for which results were below the lower limit of quantification (LLQ) were reported using a value of LLQ/2. Assessments for which results were above the upper limit of quantification (ULQ) were reported using a value of ULQ. | ITT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the relevant visit were analyzed. | Posted | Median | Full Range | Units/Liter | Baseline and Week 4 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Positive Human Anti-human Antibodies (HAHA) at Week 24 | Detection of human anti-human antibodies (HAHAs) against ofatumumab was to be performed by Electrochemiluminescent (ECL) Meso-Scale Discovery (MSD) immunoassay. Positive samples from the binding antibody test were also tested in a neutralizing antibody assay. | ITT Population. This trial was terminated prematurely due to the Sponsor's decision to not pursue clinical development of the IV formulation of ofatumumab in an autoimmune indication; thus, no participants were analyzed for this endpoint. | Posted | Baseline and Week 24 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Levels of IgA, IgG and IgM at Week 12 and Week 24 | The following immunoglobulins were assessed: IgA, IgG and IgM. Immunoglobulins, or antibodies, are large proteins used by the immune system to identify and neutralize foreign particles such as bacteria and viruses. Their normal blood levels indicate proper immune status. Low levels indicate immuno-suppression. | Safety Population: identical to the ITT population except that participants were analyzed according to their actual treatment when this differed from their randomized treatment. Only those participants contributing values at baseline and the relevant visit were analzyed. | Posted | Median | Full Range | grams per Liter (g/L) | Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Minimum DAS28-ESR Score During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of disease activity can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. The values summarized are the minimum DAS28 score (i.e. lowest level of disease activity) achieved by each participant within the first 24 weeks of each treatment course (TC), assessed using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR; rate at which red blood cells sediment in 1 hour). | As Treated (AT) Population: all participants who received at least one infusion of ofatumumab in the DB and/or OL Period | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Scores on a scale | First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Minimum DAS28-CRP Score During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of disease activity can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. The values summarized are the minimum DAS28 score (i.e. lowest level of disease activity) achieved by each participant within the first 24 weeks of each treatment course, assessed using C-reactive Protein (CRP: used to monitor acute inflammatory phases of rheumatoid arthritis). | AT Population | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Minimum Change From Baseline DAS28-ESR Score, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The level of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity based on the DAS28 score is defined as low if DAS28 <=3.2, moderate if 3.2< DAS28 <=5.1, or high if DAS28 > 5.1. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to clinical remission. The values summarized are the minimum change from baseline DAS28 score (i.e. greatest change in disease activity during the treatment course) achieved by each participant within the first 24 weeks of each treatment course, assessed by using ESR. Baseline score was determined at the start of each treatment course. For change from baseline, participants had to have both a baseline DAS28 value for the treatment course (i.e., the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the treatment course, providing it was done within a 14 day window prior to the date of infusion A) and a DAS28 value during the treatment course (i.e., during first 24 weeks of each treatment course). Change from baseline was calculated as the value during the treatment course minus the baseline value. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Minimum Change From Baseline DAS28-CRP Score, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The level of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity based on the DAS28 score is defined as low if DAS28 <=3.2, moderate if 3.2< DAS28 <=5.1, or high if DAS28 > 5.1. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to clinical remission. The values summarized are the minimum change from baseline DAS28 score (i.e. greatest change in disease activity during the treatment course) achieved by each participant within the first 24 weeks of each treatment course, assessed by using CRP. Baseline score was determined at the start of each treatment course. For change from baseline, participants had to have both a baseline DAS28 value for the treatment course (i.e., the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the treatment course, providing it was done within a 14 day window prior to the date of infusion A) and a DAS28 value during the treatment course (i.e., during first 24 weeks of each treatment course). Change from baseline was calculated as the value during the treatment course minus the baseline value. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Time to Retreatment, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | Time to retreatment is defined as the time in days between infusion A of each treatment course and infusion A of the following treatment course. For participants randomized to ofatumumab in the Double-blind Period, Treatment Course 1 refers to the course of ofatumumab received in the Double-blind Period. The minimum period allowed per protocol before retreatment was 24 weeks (end of Double-blind Period). For participants randomized to placebo in the Double-blind Period, Treatment Course 1 refers to the first course of ofatumumab received in the Open-label Period. The minimum period allowed per protocol before retreatment during the Open-label Period was 16 weeks. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Days | From Baseline up to Week 144 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using ESR), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of disease activity can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6 at any time during the first 24 weeks of each treatment course. Low disease activity is defined as a DAS28 score >=2.6 and <3.2 at any time during the first 24 weeks of each treatment course. | AT Population | Posted | Number | participants | First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using CRP), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of disease activity can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6 at any time during the first 24 weeks of each treatment course. Low disease activity is defined as a DAS28 score >=2.6 and <3.2 at any time during the first 24 weeks of each treatment course. | AT Population | Posted | Number | participants | First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Adverse Event or Serious Adverse Event, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in disability/incapacity; or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment should have been exercised in other situations. Refer to the general AE/SAE module for a list of AEs (occurring at a frequency threshold >=2%) and SAEs. | AT Population | Posted | Number | Participants | First treatment (Day 0) until the participant terminated the trial, assessed up to Week 144 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings, During the OL Period | The number of participants with normal, abnormal clinically significant (CS), and abnormal not clinically significant (NCS) ECG findings, as well as the number of participants with no results (NR), during the OL Period are presented. An overall interpretation of the ECG was made by the investigator, or the investigator could delegate this task to a cardiologist, if applicable. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Participants | From DB Period completion (Week 24) until the completion of the OL Period, assessed up to Week 144 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at Indicated the Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The number of participants with a CD19+ cell count greater than or equal to the lower limit of normal (LLN; reference range 0.11 to 0.66 giga [10^9] per liter) or the baseline value (whichever was lower) is presented. The baseline assessment is defined as the start of the Double-blind Period. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Participants | From baseline up to Week 144 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The number of participants with a CD3+ cell count greater than or equal to the lower limit of normal (LLN; reference range 0.11 to 0.66 gill per liter) or the baseline value (whichever was lower) is presented. The baseline assessment is defined as the start of the Double-blind Period. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Participants | From baseline up to Week 144 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point , During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The number of participants with a CD4+ cell count greater than or equal to the lower limit of normal (LLN; reference range 0.11 to 0.66 gill per liter) or the baseline value (whichever was lower) is presented. The baseline assessment is defined as the start of the Double-blind Period. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Participants | From baseline up to Week 144 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point , During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The number of participants with a CD8+ cell count greater than or equal to the lower limit of normal (LLN; reference range 0.11 to 0.66 gill per liter) or the baseline value (whichever was lower) is presented. The baseline assessment is defined as the start of the Double-blind Period. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Participants | From baseline up to Week 144 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | Only those parameters for which at least one value of clinical concern (CC) was reported are summarized. The baseline (BL) value for a treatment course is defined as the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the treatment course. The post-baseline (PBL) visit is defined as any visit after the date of infusion A during the specified treatment course. Pre-defined limits of potential clinical concern (CC Low [relative to the lower limit of normal], CC High [relative to the upper limit of normal]) are: Albumin: 0.9, 1.5; Alanine amino transferase (ALT): NA, 2; Alkaline phosphatase (ALP): NA, 1.5; Aspartate amino transferase (AST): NA, 2; Bilirubin total (TBIL): NA, 1.5; Calcium: 0.85, 1.08; CO2 content/bicarbonate (BCO): 0.85, 1.2; Creatine kinase (CK): NA, 2; Creatinine: NA, 1.2; Gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT): NA, 2; Potassium: 0.9, 1.1; Urea/blood urea nitrogen (BUN): NA, 1.5; Uric acid: NA, 1.5. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Participants | From baseline up to Week 144 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | Only those parameters for which at least one value of clinical concern (CC) was reported are summarized. The baseline (BL) value for a treatment course is defined as the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the treatment course. The post-baseline (PBL) visit is defined as any visit after the date of infusion A during the specified treatment course. Pre-defined limits of potential clinical concern (CC Low [relative to lower limit of normal], CC High [relative to upper limit of normal]) are: Eosinophils: NA, 2; Hematocrit (HCT): 0.75, 1.2; Hemoglobin (Hb): 0.75, 1.2; Monocytes: 0.2, 5 2; Neutrophils total (TNUE): 0.8, 1.6; Platelet count (PC): 0.65, 1.5; Red blood cell count (RBC): 0.7, 5 2; White blood cell count (WBC): 0.7, 1.6. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Participants | From baseline up to Week 144 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The baseline value for a treatment course is defined as the value before infusion A of each treatment course. The post-baseline visit is defined as any assessment during or after the start of infusion A during the specified treatment course. Pre-defined limits of potential clinical concern for vital signs (Low, High) are: Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (millimeters of mercury [mmHg]): 40, 110; Systolic blood pressure (SBP) (mmHg): 90, 170; Heart rate (beats per minute): 35, 120. LLN=lower limit of normal; ULN=upper limit of normal. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Participants | From baseline up to Week 144 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Immunoglobulin Values Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course | The baseline value for a treatment course is defined as the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the treatment course. The post-baseline visit is defined as any visit after the date of infusion A during the specified treatment course. Reference ranges (LLN, ULN) used for immunoglobulins are: immunoglobulin A (IgA) (grams/Liter): 0.81, 4.63; immunoglobulin G (IgG) (grams/Liter): 6.94, 16.18; immunoglobulin M (IgM) (grams/Liter): 0.48, 2.71. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Participants | From baseline up to Week 144 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Positive John Cunningham (JC) Virus Test Results at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline During the DB and OL Periods | Blood samples were collected for analysis of plasma/white blood cell JC Virus (JCV) using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. A positive JC Virus test result indicates the presence of JC Virus. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Participants | From basline up to Week 144 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Any Serious Adverse Event During the Follow-up Period | A serious adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in disability/incapacity; or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment should have been exercised in other situations. Refer to the general SAE module for a list of SAEs. | Safety Follow-up Population: all participants who withdrew from the Double-blind Period and had evidence of contact with the site after the end of the Double-blind Period and all participants who withdrew or completed the Open-label Period and had evidence of contact with the site after their end of Open-label date. | Posted | Number | Participants | From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (or maximum of 2 years from Last Subject Last Visit [LSLV]) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Immunoglobulin Values Outside the Reference Range During the Follow-up Period | The reference ranges for immunoglobulins (LLN, ULN) are defined as: IgA (grams/Liter): 0.81, 4.63; IgG (grams/Liter): 6.94, 16.18; IgM (grams/Liter): 0.48, 2.71. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Participants | From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (or maximum of 2 years from LSLV) |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Time to First CD19+ B-cell Repopulation Relative to the First Dose and Last Dose of Ofatumumab | Time to first CD19+ B-cell repopulation (return to normal or baseline level) relative to the first dose was assessed only for those participants whose B-cells repopulated after receiving ofatumumab. Time to first CD19+ B-cell repopulation relative to the last dose of ofatumumab was assessed only for those participants whose B-cells repopulated during their last ofatumumab treatment course or follow-up. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Median | Full Range | Months | From the first dose of ofatumumab until the last Follow-up Period visit (up to Week 248) |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With a Positive JC Virus Test Result During the Follow-up Period | Blood samples were collected for analysis of plasma/white blood cell JC Virus (JCV) using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. Positive JC Virus test result indicated presence of JC Virus. | AT Population. Only those participants contributing values at the indicated time point were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Participants | From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (or maximum of 2 years from LSLV) |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern During the Follow-up Period | Only those parameters for which at least one value of clinical concern (CC) was reported are summarized. Pre-defined limits of potential clinical concern (CC Low [relative to the lower limit of normal], CC High [relative to the upper limit of normal]) are: ALT: NA, 2; ALP: NA, 1.5; TBIL: NA, 1.5; CO2/BCO: 0.85, 1.2; CK: NA, 2; GGT: NA, 2; Urea/BUN: NA, 1.5. | AT Population. Only participants who withdrew from the DB Period and had evidence of contact with the site after the end of the DB Period and all participants who withdrew or completed the OL Period and had evidence of contact with the site after their end of OL date were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Participants | From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (maximum of 2 years) |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern During the Follow-up Period | Only those parameters for which at least one value of clinical concern (CC) was reported are summarized. Pre-defined limits of potential clinical concern (CC Low [relative to lower limit of normal], CC High [relative to upper limit of normal]) are: Eosinophils: NA, 2; Total neutrophils: 0.8, 1.6; Platelet count: 0.65, 1.5. | AT Population. Only participants who withdrew from the DB Period and had evidence of contact with the site after the end of the DB Period and all participants who withdrew or completed the OL Period and had evidence of contact with the site after their end of OL date were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Participants | From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (maximum of 2 years) |
|
|
Because no investigational product was administered during the Follow-up Period, per protocol, only serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported for this period.
SAEs/AEs were collected in members of the Safety Population (SP), which is identical to the ITT Population, except that participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment received rather than to the treatment randomized to (one participant was randomized to placebo but received study drug).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo: DB Period | Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs are reported for participants receiving placebo in the DB Period. Placebo was administered as two 1000 milliliter (ml) intravenous (IV) infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background methotrexate (MTX) treatment (7.5 to 25 milligrams [mg]/week [oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous] for 24 weeks) in the DB Period. | 6 | 83 | 36 | 83 | ||
| EG001 | Ofatumumab 700 mg: DB and OL Periods | SAEs and non-serious AEs are reported for participants receiving ofatumumab 700 mg in either the DB or OL Period. Ofatumumab 700 mg (35 ml) was administered as two 1000 ml IV infusions, one at Day 0 and the other at Day 14, in addition to background MTX treatment (7.5 to 25 mg/week [oral, intramuscular, or subcutaneous] for 24 weeks) in the DB Period. Participants completing the 24-week DB Period without receiving rescue disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment were eligible to proceed into the 120-week OL Period to receive repeat ofatumumab treatment courses (at individualized time intervals if a clinical response had been achieved after the previous treatment course). | 30 | 148 | 133 | 148 | ||
| EG002 | Placebo or Ofatumumab 700 mg: Follow-up Period | SAEs and non-serious AEs are reported for participants receiving either placebo or ofatumumab 700 mg in the Follow-up Period. Participants randomized to DB treatment who completed the OL Period, who did not enter the OL Period, who did not qualify for retreatment, or who were withdrawn were to be followed until the number of B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal (according to the central laboratory) or Baseline levels or for a maximum of 2 years from the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Periods, whichever occurred earlier. No investigational product was administered in the Follow-up Period. | 17 | 132 | 0 | 132 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaphylactic reaction | Immune system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypersensitivity | Immune system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaphylactic shock | Immune system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alanine aminotransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| John Cunningham (JC) virus test positive | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cervical myelopathy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebrovascular accident | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Foot deformity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Retinal detachment | Eye disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Meningitis viral | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Post procedural complication | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diabetes mellitus inadequate control | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pleurisy | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cataract | Eye disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bile duct stone | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Herpes oesophagitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Implant site reaction | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lipoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oesophageal candidiasis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oral candidiasis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rheumatoid arthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Spinal compression fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urosepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Transaminases increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Osteoarthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Deep vein thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haemophilus infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hip fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intervertebral disc protrusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Musculoskeletal pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nephrolithiasis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Osteoporotic fracture | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ovarian cyst ruptured | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pancytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peripheral ischaemia | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyelonephritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Septic shock | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ulna fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vaginal prolapse | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Infusion related reaction | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urticaria | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Throat irritation | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Erythema | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rhinitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaphylactic reaction | Immune system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood pressure increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypersensitivity | Immune system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oropharyngeal pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alanine aminotransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cervicitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dry eye | Eye disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysphonia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Flushing | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Herpes zoster | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypotension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Onychomycosis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oropharyngeal discomfort | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sensation of foreign body | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Infusion related reaction | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Throat tightness | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anxiety | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cataract | Eye disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest discomfort | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Spinal osteoarthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Erysipelas | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Post herpetic neuralgia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash pruritic | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sciatica | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Response Center | GlaxoSmithKline | 866-435-7343 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001172 | Arthritis, Rheumatoid |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
| D003240 | Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C527517 | ofatumumab |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Protocol Violation |
|
| Protocol-defined Stopping Criteria Met |
|
| Study Closed/Terminated |
|
| Physician Decision |
|
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic/Latino |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Participants |
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|