Thalidomide Versus Bortezomib in Melphalan Refractory Myeloma
Thalidomide Versus Bortezomib in Melphalan Refractory Myeloma
The purpose of the study is to compare thalidomide + dexamethasone with bortezomib + dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma refractory to melphalan therapy. The main goal is to find out which of these two 2:nd line regimens that offers the patients the best chance for a response with as long duration and as good quality of life as possible.
The study is an open randomized multicentre study in which patients with multiple myeloma refractory to melphalan therapy are randomized between bortezomib and thalidomide therapy, in both arms with the addition of dexamethasone. In case of failure to the initially given treatment the patient will be crossed over to the alternative treatment.
The number of patients needed is calculated to 300, based upon the hypothesis of a 50% difference in progression free survival, a significance level of 95% and a power of 80%. With 12 patients being recruited each month during 25 months and a 4 months follow-up after the last included patient, the total study time will be 29 months.
The dose regimens for bortezomib and thalidomide follow general clinical praxis as regards recommendations for optimal dosing in the Nordic countries.
Evaluation of response and toxicity is performed every 3 weeks for at least 12 weeks, thereafter every 6 weeks. Evaluation of efficacy is done according to The International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria. Evaluation of toxicity is done by CTCAE grading. Evaluation of quality of life is done by the EORTC QLQ30 questionnaires with the addition of the myeloma specific MY-24 module which are mailed to the patients at predetermined intervals during the study.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: