Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To compare the 30-day safety and efficacy of the GORE Flow Reversal System when used with approved carotid stents to an Objective Performance Criterion derived from distal embolic protection studies.
The GORE Flow Reversal System, manufactured by W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc., was developed as a proximal occlusion device to reverse the flow of blood in the carotid artery. It is designed to achieve embolic protection prior to crossing the lesion in the majority of cases in order to minimize the possibility of an adverse event occurrence.
The objective of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the GORE Flow Reversal System when used to provide embolic protection during Carotid Artery Stent (CAS) procedures. Subjects diagnosed with carotid stenosis requiring revascularization and are at high risk for adverse events from CEA are eligible to participate.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| GFRS Pivotal Subjects | Experimental | All non-training subjects using the GORE Flow Reversal System for embolic protection during carotid artery stenting (all subjects other than first two subjects accounted for in Training Cases). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GORE Flow Reversal System (GFRS) | Device | Carotid artery angioplasty and stenting with embolic protection |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Composite Major Adverse Event (MAE) Rate | Number of participants with one or more Major Adverse Event (death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and/or transient ischemic attack (TIA)) through the 30-day follow-up (non-hierarchical; MAE adjudicated by independent Clinical Events Committee) | Treatment through 30-day visit window |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Flow Reversal System Technical Success | Number of participants with Technical Success using the GORE Flow Reversal System (system deployed and utilized during stenting procedure) | Procedure |
| Flow Reversal System Success |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Angiographic Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Daniel Clair, M.D. | The Cleveland Clinic | Principal Investigator |
| L. N. Hopkins, M.D. | Millard Fillmore Gates/Univ. of Buffalo | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millard Fillmore Gates/Univ. of Buffalo | Buffalo | New York | 14209 | United States | ||
| Cleveland Clinic Foundation |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15943521 | Background | Parodi JC. Re: is flow reversal the best method of protection during carotid stenting? J Endovasc Ther. 2005 Jun;12(3):414-5. doi: 10.1583/05-1610L.1. No abstract available. | |
| 17410059 | Background | Parodi JC, Schonholz C, Parodi FE, Sicard G, Ferreira LM. Initial 200 cases of carotid artery stenting using a reversal-of-flow cerebral protection device. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2007 Apr;48(2):117-24. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study was approved to enroll subjects from a maximum of 40 medical institutions in the United States (including public and academic research center hospitals and private practices).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | GFRS Pivotal Subjects | All non-training subjects using the GORE Flow Reversal System for embolic protection during carotid artery stenting (all subjects other than first two subjects accounted for in Training Cases). |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procedure |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Follow-up Through 30 Days Post Procedure |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | GFRS Pivotal Subjects | All non-training subjects using the GORE Flow Reversal System for embolic protection during carotid artery stenting (all subjects other than first two subjects accounted for in Training Cases). |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Composite Major Adverse Event (MAE) Rate | Number of participants with one or more Major Adverse Event (death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and/or transient ischemic attack (TIA)) through the 30-day follow-up (non-hierarchical; MAE adjudicated by independent Clinical Events Committee) | All primary endpoint evaluable subjects | Posted | Feb 2009 | Number | participants | Treatment through 30-day visit window |
|
30 days postprocedure (0-40 days given 10-day late follow-up window)
AEs reported by investigative sites via Adverse Event Case Report Form (CRF), using study-specific coding. Site-reported adverse events that were potential Major Adverse Events (stroke or TIA) were adjudicated by the independent Clinical Events Committee.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | GFRS Pivotal Subjects | All non-training subjects using the GORE Flow Reversal System for embolic protection during carotid artery stenting (all subjects other than first two subjects accounted for in Training Cases). |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypotension | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arrhythmia | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew Garcia | W. L. Gore & Associates | (800) 437-8181 | AGarcia@WLGore.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016893 | Carotid Stenosis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002340 | Carotid Artery Diseases |
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Number of participants where the GORE Flow Reversal System was delivered, placed, reverse flow was established, and the balloon sheath and wire retrieved as outlined in the Instructions for Use without causing any adverse events during the procedure.
| Procedure |
| Stent Success | Number of participants where the FDA-approved stent was successfully delivered, deployed,and delivery system removed with an attainment of < 50% residual stenosis following stent placement, as assessed by the angiographic core laboratory. | Procedure |
| Clinical Success | Number of participants with Flow Reversal System and Stent Success in the absence of death, emergency endarterectomy, repeat percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA)/thrombolysis of the target vessel, stroke, or myocardial infarction (MI), as determined by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC). | 24-48 Hours Post-Procedure |
| Patency at 30 Days | Number of participants with less than 50% restenosis as determined by carotid duplex ultrasound core laboratory at 30 days post-procedure. | Treatment through 30-day visit window |
| Cleveland |
| Ohio |
| 44195 |
| United States |
| 11958320 | Background | Parodi JC, Schonholz C, Ferreira LM, Mendaro E, Ohki T. "Seat belt and air bag" technique for cerebral protection during carotid stenting. J Endovasc Ther. 2002 Feb;9(1):20-4. doi: 10.1177/152660280200900104. |
|
| years |
|
| Age, Continuous | Median | Full Range | years |
|
| Age, Customized | Number | participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| History of Diabetes | Patient has a history of Diabetes prior to enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| History of Hypertension | Patient has history of hypertension prior to study enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| History of Ischemic Stroke | Number of prior ischemic strokes prior to enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Previous Endarterectomy | Timing of previous endarterectomy (CEA) | Number | participants |
|
| Symptomatic | Presence of baseline neurological symptoms within 6 months prior to study enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Flow Reversal System Technical Success | Number of participants with Technical Success using the GORE Flow Reversal System (system deployed and utilized during stenting procedure) | All enrolled subjects | Posted | Number | participants | Procedure |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Flow Reversal System Success | Number of participants where the GORE Flow Reversal System was delivered, placed, reverse flow was established, and the balloon sheath and wire retrieved as outlined in the Instructions for Use without causing any adverse events during the procedure. | Posted | Number | participants | Procedure |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Stent Success | Number of participants where the FDA-approved stent was successfully delivered, deployed,and delivery system removed with an attainment of < 50% residual stenosis following stent placement, as assessed by the angiographic core laboratory. | All enrolled subjects with post procedure angiographic assessment of lesion stenosis | Posted | Feb 2009 | Number | participants | Procedure |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Clinical Success | Number of participants with Flow Reversal System and Stent Success in the absence of death, emergency endarterectomy, repeat percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA)/thrombolysis of the target vessel, stroke, or myocardial infarction (MI), as determined by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC). | All enrolled subjects with post procedure angiographic assessment of lesion stenosis | Posted | Number | participants | 24-48 Hours Post-Procedure |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Patency at 30 Days | Number of participants with less than 50% restenosis as determined by carotid duplex ultrasound core laboratory at 30 days post-procedure. | Subjects with successful stent placement and ultrasound evaluation at 30-day follow-up evaluation. | Posted | Feb 2009 | Number | participants | Treatment through 30-day visit window |
|
|
|
| 40 |
| 245 |
| 62 |
| 245 |
| Groin Hematoma (w/wo Surgical Repair) | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Other (Bleeding) | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Anemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Angina/Coronary Ischemia | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Arrhythmia | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Myocardial Infarction (MI) | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Stroke/Cerebrovascular accident (CVA) | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cerebral ischemia/Transient ischemic attack (TIA) | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Other (Cardiac) | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Renal Failure/Insufficiency | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Other (Infectious/Inflammatory) | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Other (Neurologic) | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hyperperfusion Syndrome | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain (Head, Neck) | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Other (Surgical Procedure) | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pseudoaneurysm (Femoral) | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Other (Wound) | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Other (Other) | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cerebral Hemorrhage | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypotension | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypertension | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Other (Neurologic) | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain (Head, Neck) | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Other (Other) | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
|
Gore has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 90 days. Each investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of multi-center data, less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites.
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D001157 | Arterial Occlusive Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |