Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| UL1RR024150 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Discontinuation due to the high response rate at the 1st stage and slow accrual.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Genentech, Inc. | INDUSTRY |
| Biogen | INDUSTRY |
| National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study was done to find out if the investigational medication, rituximab, could help relieve the symptoms of peripheral neuropathy (such as numbness [abnormal protein in the blood] and weakness of the lower and upper extremities) in people who have monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and people with a symptomatic or smoldering Waldestrom macroglobulinemia.
Rituximab is an antibody which attacks a particular type of white blood cell (B Cell). By targeting the B-cells which make the abnormal protein which is involved in causing the nerve trouble, it is hoped that damage to nerve fibers will be stopped and improvement will be allowed to proceed.
This was a Phase II single arm trial evaluating the use of Rituximab administered at standard dose and schedule as an initial cycle of therapy, followed by a re-evaluation at 6 months.
If progression in neuropathy (as indicated by an increase in the Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) of greater than or equal to 10 or a modified Rankin Score increase of > 1 grade) the patient was off study. In addition, if the subject elected to pursue other active treatment including but not limited to plasmapheresis, high-dose intravenous immuneglobulin (IVIG), chemotherapeutic agents, or high dose corticosteroids, or if conditions in the exclusion criteria develop subsequent to enrollment, the subject was off study.
If the neuropathy is stable or responding (NIS of < 10 or a modified Rankin Score increase of < 1 grade) the patient would have received Cycle 2 of rituximab followed by a reevaluation at 12 months.
The study had a Simon Optimal two-stage Phase II design (α 5%, β 10%, π0 5%, π1 20%). The minimum clinically important response rate was 20%. The first stage was to include 21 patients and the second stage a total of 41 patients. The treatment would be rejected if there were fewer than 2 responders at the first stage or fewer than 5 responders at the second stage. The treatment would be accepted for further study if there were at least 5 responders out of 41 patients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rituximab | Experimental | Subjects will receive rituximab administered at the standard dose and schedule as an initial cycle of therapy, followed by a re-evaluation at 6 months. If the neuropathy is stable or responding at 6 months, the subject will receive Cycle 2 of rituximab, followed by a re-evaluation at 12 months. Rituximab will be given as a 375 mg/m^2 intravenous infusion once weekly for four doses (days 1, 8, 15, and 22). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rituximab | Biological | Rituximab will be given as a 375 mg/m^2 intravenous infusion once weekly for four doses (days 1, 8, 15, and 22). |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Subjects With at Least 10 Points Improvement in the Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) for Either Side of the Body at 6 Months | The Neuropathy Impairment Score [previously called the Neurologic Disability Score (NDS)] is derived from a neurologic examination obtained in a standard way by a specially trained neurologist. Decisions are based on the neurologist's judgment of what is normal considering site, age, sex, weight, height, and physical fitness. The instrument has 35 items, each ranked for left and right sides of the body; weakness is scored 0=normal, 1=25% disability, 2=50% disability, 3=75% disability and 4=100% disability. NIS total score was calculated as the sum of the 35 items, ranging from 0 to 140, with higher score indicating greater disability or impairment. The neurologist measured the NIS score on both sides of the body, but recorded worst score and reported as 1 for each individual subject (i.e., each subject had only 1 reported score.) Improvement was defined as at least 10 points improvement in NIS total score, that is, reduction in the number of points on the scale. | baseline, 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Subjects Whose Disease Has Stabilized or Responded, for Either Side of the Body, as Measured by NIS at 6 Months | The Neuropathy Impairment Score (previously called the Neurologic Disability Score [NDS]) is derived from a neurologic examination obtained in a standard way by a specially trained neurologist. Decisions are based on the neurologist's judgment of what is normal considering site, age, sex, weight, height, and physical fitness. The instrument has 35 items, each ranked for left and right sides of the body; weakness is scored 0=normal, 1=25% disability, 2=50% disability, 3=75% disability and 4=100% disability. NIS total score was calculated as the sum of the 35 items, ranging from 0 to 140, with higher score indicating greater disability or impairment. The NIS score was measured on both sides of the body, the worst score recorded reported as 1 for each individual subject. Stability was defined as change of less than 10 points in the NIS total score. Improvement was defined as at least 10 points improvement in NIS total score, that is, reduction in the number of points on the scale. |
Not provided
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
Diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), as evidenced by 1 of the following criteria:
Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) ≥ 25
Stable or progressive neuropathy (i.e., not currently improving), as judged by NIS values that have not fallen ≥ 10 (between enrollment and the last documented value), at least 1 month but not greater than 3 months prior to enrollment
No evidence of amyloidosis or overt lymphoma, overt myeloma, or Waldenström macroglobulinemia with end organ damage
No evidence of multiple myeloma, Amyloid Light-chain (AL)-amyloidosis
No evidence of Polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal gammopathy, and skin changes (POEMS) syndrome, diabetes mellitus, alcohol induced neuropathy, untreated hypothyroidism, vitamin B12 deficiency, Sjögren syndrome, and other causes of neuropathy
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Inclusion Criteria:
Not pregnant
Negative serum pregnancy test
Fertile patients must use an acceptable method of birth control during treatment and for 6 months after completion of treatment
Adequate bone marrow function as indicated by sufficient precursors of all three cell lines and cellularity of at least 20% on bone marrow biopsy within 6 months
Platelets > 100,000/mm^3
Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 1,000/mm^3
Hemoglobin > 7 g/dL
Serum creatinine < 3.0 mg/dL
Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) < 2 times upper limit of normal
No history of psychiatric disorder requiring hospitalization, psychiatric consultation, or psychotropic medications within the last year
Patients with controlled depression are eligible, as defined by the following:
Exclusion criteria:
History of HIV infection or seropositivity
History or serological profile suggesting prior hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (i.e., HbsAg or anti-HBs with anti-HBc)
HBV infection or non-vaccination-related HBV seropositivity
Active infection
New York Heart Association class III or IV heart disease
History or baseline ECG tracing demonstrating severe recurrent or severe recent (within 3 months) cardiac dysrhythmia (e.g., ventricular tachycardia, torsades de pointes ("Twisting of the Points," a rapid polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia), or other serious ventricular dysrhythmias) requiring implanted defibrillator treatment
Confirmed diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)
Concomitant malignancies or previous malignancies within the last five years, with the exception of adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
Malignancy associated with a paraneoplastic neuropathy
A history of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to humanized or murine monoclonal antibodies
A history of known severe primary or secondary immunodeficiency (e.g., common variable immunodeficiency)
Significant other uncontrolled medical illnesses that may interfere with drug delivery or interpretation of results
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Benn E. Smith, MD | Mayo Clinic | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayo Clinic Scottsdale | Scottsdale | Arizona | 85259-5499 | United States | ||
| Mayo Clinic - Jacksonville |
Not provided
Subjects were enroll from January 2005 to June 2008 at the Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Rituximab | Subjects will receive rituximab administered at the standard dose and schedule as an initial cycle of therapy, followed by a re-evaluation at 6 months. If the neuropathy is stable or responding at 6 months, the subject will receive Cycle 2 of rituximab, followed by a re-evaluation at 12 months. Rituximab will be given as a 375 mg/m^2 intravenous infusion once weekly for four doses (days 1, 8, 15, and 22). |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Rituximab | Subjects will receive rituximab administered at the standard dose and schedule as an initial cycle of therapy, followed by a re-evaluation at 6 months. If the neuropathy is stable or responding at 6 months, the subject will receive Cycle 2 of rituximab, followed by a re-evaluation at 12 months. Rituximab will be given as a 375 mg/m^2 intravenous infusion once weekly for four doses (days 1, 8, 15, and 22). |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 10 Points Improvement in the Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) for Either Side of the Body at 6 Months | The Neuropathy Impairment Score [previously called the Neurologic Disability Score (NDS)] is derived from a neurologic examination obtained in a standard way by a specially trained neurologist. Decisions are based on the neurologist's judgment of what is normal considering site, age, sex, weight, height, and physical fitness. The instrument has 35 items, each ranked for left and right sides of the body; weakness is scored 0=normal, 1=25% disability, 2=50% disability, 3=75% disability and 4=100% disability. NIS total score was calculated as the sum of the 35 items, ranging from 0 to 140, with higher score indicating greater disability or impairment. The neurologist measured the NIS score on both sides of the body, but recorded worst score and reported as 1 for each individual subject (i.e., each subject had only 1 reported score.) Improvement was defined as at least 10 points improvement in NIS total score, that is, reduction in the number of points on the scale. | A dichotomous measure was used so that subjects who discontinued participation prematurely could be included as non-responders. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of subjects | baseline, 6 months |
Subjects were monitored for adverse events weekly per cycle ( Day 1, 8, 15, and 22); each subject could receive up to 2 cycles (4 infusions each.) Adverse event monitoring continued for at least 12 months following the subject's last Rituximab infusion.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Rituximab | Subjects will receive rituximab administered at the standard dose and schedule as an initial cycle of therapy, followed by a re-evaluation at 6 months. If the neuropathy is stable or responding at 6 months, the subject will receive Cycle 2 of rituximab, followed by a re-evaluation at 12 months. Rituximab will be given as a 375 mg/m^2 intravenous infusion once weekly for four doses (days 1, 8, 15, and 22). |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
The study was discontinued at the first stage to the high response rate and slow accrual.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Benn E. Smith | Mayo Clinic | 480-301-6711 | bsmith@mayo.edu |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011230 | Precancerous Conditions |
| D008998 | Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D006942 | Hypergammaglobulinemia |
| D001796 | Blood Protein Disorders |
| D006402 | Hematologic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000069283 | Rituximab |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D058846 | Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived |
| D000911 | Antibodies, Monoclonal |
| D000906 | Antibodies |
| D007136 | Immunoglobulins |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| baseline, 6 months |
| Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 Grade Improvement in the Modified Rankin Score at 6 Months | The Modified Rankin Scale was used to determine functional disability as follows: 0 = asymptomatic; 1 = symptoms not interfering with manual activities/walking normally; 2 = minor difficulties in manual activities/walking independently without support; 3 = unable to perform some manual activities/walking independently with support; 4 = unable to eat, dress or wash independently/needing assistance to walk; 5 = no useful tasks performed with upper limbs/confined to wheelchair. Therefore, scores could range from 0 to 5, with higher values indicating greater disability. | baseline, 6 months |
| Percentage of Patients Having Improvement in the Hand Grip Strength Ergometry Value for Either Hand at 6 Months | Grip strength was measured by a dynamometer in both hands at baseline and every three months until the final study visit. Response criteria was defined as achieving improvement in hand grip strength dynamometry values (>10% better relative to baseline at the 6 month visit on either side). | baseline, 6 months |
| Percentage of Subjects Having One or More Stable Hand Grip Strength Ergometry Values for Either Hand at 6 Months | Grip strength was measured by a dynamometer in both hands at baseline and every three months until the final study visit. Response criteria was defined as achieving stable hand grip strength dynamometry values (no more than 10% better or worse relative to baseline at the 6 month visit on either side). | baseline, 6 months |
| Percentage of Subjects With > 50% Reduction of Monoclonal Protein Titer at 6 Months | Monoclonal immunoglobulins measured included Immunoglobulin G (IgG), Immunoglobulin A (IgA), and Immunoglobulin M (IgM). | baseline, 6 months |
| Jacksonville |
| Florida |
| 32224 |
| United States |
| Mayo Clinic Cancer Center | Rochester | Minnesota | 55905 | United States |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OG000 | Rituximab | Subjects will receive rituximab administered at the standard dose and schedule as an initial cycle of therapy, followed by a re-evaluation at 6 months. If the neuropathy is stable or responding at 6 months, the subject will receive Cycle 2 of rituximab, followed by a re-evaluation at 12 months. Rituximab will be given as a 375 mg/m^2 intravenous infusion once weekly for four doses (days 1, 8, 15, and 22). |
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects Whose Disease Has Stabilized or Responded, for Either Side of the Body, as Measured by NIS at 6 Months | The Neuropathy Impairment Score (previously called the Neurologic Disability Score [NDS]) is derived from a neurologic examination obtained in a standard way by a specially trained neurologist. Decisions are based on the neurologist's judgment of what is normal considering site, age, sex, weight, height, and physical fitness. The instrument has 35 items, each ranked for left and right sides of the body; weakness is scored 0=normal, 1=25% disability, 2=50% disability, 3=75% disability and 4=100% disability. NIS total score was calculated as the sum of the 35 items, ranging from 0 to 140, with higher score indicating greater disability or impairment. The NIS score was measured on both sides of the body, the worst score recorded reported as 1 for each individual subject. Stability was defined as change of less than 10 points in the NIS total score. Improvement was defined as at least 10 points improvement in NIS total score, that is, reduction in the number of points on the scale. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of subjects | baseline, 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 Grade Improvement in the Modified Rankin Score at 6 Months | The Modified Rankin Scale was used to determine functional disability as follows: 0 = asymptomatic; 1 = symptoms not interfering with manual activities/walking normally; 2 = minor difficulties in manual activities/walking independently without support; 3 = unable to perform some manual activities/walking independently with support; 4 = unable to eat, dress or wash independently/needing assistance to walk; 5 = no useful tasks performed with upper limbs/confined to wheelchair. Therefore, scores could range from 0 to 5, with higher values indicating greater disability. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of subjects | baseline, 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients Having Improvement in the Hand Grip Strength Ergometry Value for Either Hand at 6 Months | Grip strength was measured by a dynamometer in both hands at baseline and every three months until the final study visit. Response criteria was defined as achieving improvement in hand grip strength dynamometry values (>10% better relative to baseline at the 6 month visit on either side). | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of subjects | baseline, 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects Having One or More Stable Hand Grip Strength Ergometry Values for Either Hand at 6 Months | Grip strength was measured by a dynamometer in both hands at baseline and every three months until the final study visit. Response criteria was defined as achieving stable hand grip strength dynamometry values (no more than 10% better or worse relative to baseline at the 6 month visit on either side). | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of subjects | baseline, 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With > 50% Reduction of Monoclonal Protein Titer at 6 Months | Monoclonal immunoglobulins measured included Immunoglobulin G (IgG), Immunoglobulin A (IgA), and Immunoglobulin M (IgM). | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of subjects | baseline, 6 months |
|
|
|
| 1 |
| 21 |
| 0 |
| 21 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D006425 |
| Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
| D010265 | Paraproteinemias |
| D007160 | Immunoproliferative Disorders |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
| D007162 | Immunoproteins |
| D001798 | Blood Proteins |
| D011506 | Proteins |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D012712 | Serum Globulins |
| D005916 | Globulins |
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|