Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5R49CE721682-05 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Automobile driving is a crucial aspect of everyday life, yet vehicular crashes represent a serious public health problem. Patients with epilepsy are at elevated risk for automobile crashes, causing great personal suffering and financial costs to society. Most collisions involving epileptic drivers are not seizure related but may instead result from cognitive effects upon driving performance of epilepsy and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Several million American drivers take AEDs for treatment of medical conditions besides epilepsy and may also be at risk for cognitive impairments that can reduce driving performance. Empirical evidence of the effects of AEDs on driving performance would enable development of driving guidelines that could lower the risk of injurious motor vehicle collisions; however, this evidence is currently lacking. The broad goal of our project is to determine the specific effects of the most commonly utilized AED, phenytoin, by assessing driving performance and cognitive abilities in neurologically normal volunteers taking phenytoin in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Our proposed experiments will assess: (1) cognitive functions using standardized neuropsychological tests (of attention, perception, memory, and executive functions), (2) driving performance during phenytoin and placebo administration, and (3) the effects of phenytoin-related cognitive performance upon driving performance. To measure driving performance, we will use a state-of-the-art fixed-base interactive driving simulator that allows us to observe driver errors in an environment that is challenging yet safe for the driver and tester, under conditions of optimal stimulus and response control. The results of this study of 30 drivers treated with phenytoin and placebo will increase the understanding of the role of AED-related cognitive impairment on driving safety errors. A better understanding of the impact of AEDs upon driving performance is necessary to rationally develop interventions that could help prevent crashes by drivers treated with AEDs.
Patients with epilepsy are at elevated risk for automobile crashes, causing great personal suffering and financial costs to society. Most collisions involving epileptic drivers are not seizure related but may instead result from cognitive effects upon driving performance of epilepsy and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Several million American drivers take AEDs for treatment of medical conditions besides epilepsy and may also be at risk for cognitive impairments that can reduce driving performance. Empirical evidence of the effects of AEDs on driving performance would enable development of driving guidelines that could lower the risk of injurious motor vehicle collisions; however, this evidence is currently lacking.
The broad goal of the current project is to determine the specific effects of AEDs on cognitive function and driving performance. To address this goal we will assess driving performance and cognitive abilities in neurologically normal volunteers taking phenytoin (Dilantin), the most commonly prescribed AED. Effects of phenytoin on driving performance and cognition will be addressed in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Driver cognition will be assessed using a battery of neuropsychological tests. Driving performance will be objectively assessed in all participants on standardized tasks enacted in a state-of-the-art driving simulator. Our 3 Specific Aims are:
Aim 1: To assess the effects of phenytoin on cognitive abilities that are crucial to the driving task, including perception, attention, memory, and executive function.
Hypothesis 1: A driver's cognitive abilities will decline during steady-state phenytoin administration compared to placebo. Drivers with higher blood levels of phenytoin will show greater decline.
Aim 2: To assess effects of phenytoin on driving performance and safety errors in a state-of-the-art driving simulator.
Hypothesis 2: Driving performance will decline and driver safety errors will increase during phenytoin administration compared to placebo. Drivers with higher blood levels of phenytoin will show greater impairments of driving.
Aim 3: To assess the effects of phenytoin-related cognitive impairments upon driving performance in a state-of-the-art driving simulator.
Hypothesis 3. Impairments of cognitive function affecting perception, attention, memory, executive function, and arousal will increase the likelihood of driver errors that may lead to a crash.
Our hypotheses would be supported if the drivers taking phenytoin, as opposed to placebo, demonstrate worse cognitive performance on neuropsychological tests, and more safety errors and crashes in the simulator. The hypotheses would also be supported if drivers with higher phenytoin levels show greater impairments of cognition and driving. Once the effects of phenytoin on driving performance are demonstrated in this project, we will have evidence to support more comprehensive research addressing specific dosing and serum levels and acute versus chronic administration.
There is currently no evidence concerning the effects of phenytoin on driving performance. Accurate driving performance data on patients receiving phenytoin would allow determination of fair and accurate criteria for making recommendations to drive or not to drive affecting millions of patients taking AEDS for epilepsy and other conditions. These data could also help reduce the risk of car crashes due to medication side effects.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Phenytoin administration |
|
| 2 | Placebo Comparator | Placebo |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phenytoin | Drug | Phenytoin will be dosed to a target dose of 5 mg/kg qhs for one month |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Subjects Who Had a Driving Simulator Crash Event | Number of subjects who had a crash event during the driving simulator test. | 1 month |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Erik K St. Louis, M.D. | University of Iowa | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics | Iowa City | Iowa | 52242 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | St. Louis EK, McEvoy S, Shi QC, Rizzo M. Useful Field of View impairment in partial epilepsy. Unpublished observations and submitted abstract to 3rd International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driving Asssessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, Rockport, Maine, June, 2005. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Phenytoin First, Then Placebo | Subjects first received Phenytoin target dose of 5 mg/kg qhs for one month. After a 14 day washout period, they received the placebo treatment for one month. |
| FG001 | Placebo First, Then Phentoin | Subjects first received Placebo for one month. After a 14 day washout period, they received Phenytoin target dose of 5 mg/kg qhs for one month. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Intervention (1 Month) |
| |||||||||||||
| Washout (14 Days) |
| |||||||||||||
| Second Intervention (1 Month) |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Cross-over Design | Subjects will be studied on two occasions, in random order. They will randomly be assigned to received either Phenytoin target dose of 5 mg/kg qhs for one month or placebo treatment for one month. After a 14 day washout period, they will receive the opposite treatment from the original. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Subjects Who Had a Driving Simulator Crash Event | Number of subjects who had a crash event during the driving simulator test. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 1 month |
|
|
Adverse Events were collected from baseline to end of study, approximately 2.5 months, for an overall duration of approximately three years.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Phenytoin | Phenytoin target dose of 5 mg/kg qhs | 0 |
Not provided
Not provided
The very small sample size of evaluable subjects prevents definitive conclusions on the safety hazards of phenytoin for driving performance.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erik St. Louis | University of Iowa | 507-266-7456 | StLouis.Erik@mayo.edu |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004827 | Epilepsy |
| D060825 | Cognitive Dysfunction |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D003072 | Cognition Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010672 | Phenytoin |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006827 | Hydantoins |
| D048289 | Imidazolidines |
| D007093 | Imidazoles |
| D001393 | Azoles |
| D006573 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo oral capsule | Drug | Placebo |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
| 0 |
| 20 |
| 0 |
| 20 |
| EG001 | Placebo | Placebo oral capsule | 0 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D019965 | Neurocognitive Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |