Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immunoenteral |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of the study was to assess the clinical effect of immunomodulating enteral nutrition in patients undergoing resection for gastrointestinal cancer. 196 subjects were randomly assigned into two study groups: standard and immunostimulating. The study failed to demonstrate any clear advantage of routine postoperative immunonutrition in patients undergoing elective upper gastrointestinal surgery
Background&Aim: The administration of immunomodulating enteral diets during postoperative period in patients after major gastrointestinal surgery is intended to reduce the number of postoperative complications and to shorten the hospital stay. The aim of the study was to assess the clinical effect of enteral immunostimulatory nutrition in surgical patients.
Material and Methods: 196 patients undergoing resection for pancreatic and gastric cancer were randomized in double-blind manner to receive early postoperative enteral nutrition with immunostimulating diet (IMEN group: formula supplemented with arginine, glutamine, omega-3 fatty acids) or oligopeptic control (SEN group) between June 2004 and September 2007. Enteral nutrition was started 6 hours after surgery and continued for 7 days, up to target volume of 100 ml/h. All malnourished patients requiring preoperative nutritional therapy were excluded for the study and treated preoperatively. Outcome measures were: number and type of complications, length of hospital stay, mortality, treatment tolerance, liver and kidney function.
Results: One hundred eighty-three patients (91 in SEN, 92 in IMEN group, 69 F, 114 M, mean age 61.2) of 196 initially enrolled were analyzed. There were 2 deaths in both groups. Median postoperative hospital stay was 12.4 days (SD 5.9) in SEN group and 12.9 days (SD 8.0) in IMEN group (p=0.42). Complications were observed in 21 patients (23.1%) in SEN and 23 (25.2%) in IMEN group (p>0.05). 4 (4.4%) patients in SEN group and 4 (4.4%) in IMEN had surgical complications (p>0.05). There were no differences in liver and kidney function, visceral protein concentration and treatment tolerance.
Conclusion: Clinical and laboratory parameters show no benefit of immunomodulating enteral nutrition over standard enteral nutrition in patients after major gastrointestinal surgery as far as complications, hospital stay, mortality and treatment tolerance and safety are considered.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| IMEN: 1 | Experimental | Enteral nutrition with immunostimulating diet (IMEN group: formula supplemented with arginine, glutamine, omega-3 fatty acids) |
|
| SEN | Active Comparator | postoperative enteral nutrition - standard oligopeptic diet |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reconvan | Drug | isocaloric, immunomodulating entral diet |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The ratio of postoperative complications (infectious and surgical) | Postoperative complications |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| length of hospital stay | length of hospital stay | |
| function of immune system | function of immune system | |
| assessment of liver and kidney function |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jan Kulig, MD, PhD | 1st Department of General Surgery | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Deparment of General Surgery | Krakow | Krkaow | 30-798 | Poland |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11822956 | Result | Braga M, Gianotti L, Nespoli L, Radaelli G, Di Carlo V. Nutritional approach in malnourished surgical patients: a prospective randomized study. Arch Surg. 2002 Feb;137(2):174-80. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.2.174. | |
| 24178185 | Derived | Klek S, Szybinski P, Szczepanek K. Perioperative immunonutrition in surgical cancer patients: a summary of a decade of research. World J Surg. 2014 Apr;38(4):803-12. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2323-z. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013274 | Stomach Neoplasms |
| D010190 | Pancreatic Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005770 | Gastrointestinal Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Peptisorb | Drug | isocaloric, isopeptic standard diet |
|
|
| assessment of liver and kidney function |
| determination of the treatment tolerance | determination of the treatment tolerance |
| assessment of visceral protein turnover | assessment of visceral protein turnover |
| 21074910 | Derived | Klek S, Sierzega M, Szybinski P, Szczepanek K, Scislo L, Walewska E, Kulig J. The immunomodulating enteral nutrition in malnourished surgical patients - a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Clin Nutr. 2011 Jun;30(3):282-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2010.10.001. Epub 2010 Nov 13. |
| 18571296 | Derived | Klek S, Kulig J, Sierzega M, Szczepanek K, Szybinski P, Scislo L, Walewska E, Kubisz A, Szczepanik AM. Standard and immunomodulating enteral nutrition in patients after extended gastrointestinal surgery--a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Nutr. 2008 Aug;27(4):504-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2008.04.010. Epub 2008 Jun 20. |
| D004066 |
| Digestive System Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D013272 | Stomach Diseases |
| D004701 | Endocrine Gland Neoplasms |
| D010182 | Pancreatic Diseases |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |